1. Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014; 15:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.
2. Walsh M, Sackett D, Deveraux PJ. When RCT participants are lost to follow up. Why even a few can matter. Clin Trials. 2015; 12:537–9.
3. Gillies, K., Bower, P., Elliott, J., MacLennan, G., Newlands, RSN., Ogden, M., Treweek, SP., Wells, M., Witham, MD., Young, B. & Francis, JJ. 2018. 'Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol'. Trials, vol. 19, 197.
4. Brueton VC, Tierney J, Stenning S, Harding S, Meredith S, Nazareth I, Rait G. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 12:MR000032. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000032. pub2.
5. Brueton VC, Stevenson F, Vale C, Tierney J, Meredith S, Harding S, Stenning S, Nazareth I, Rait G. (2014) Use of strategies to improve retention in primary care randomised trials: a qualitative study with in-depth interviews. BMJ Open 2014;4:1 e003835.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003835. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/1/e003835.full
6. Brueton V. Stenning S. Stevenson S. Tierney j. Rait G. Best practice guidance for the use of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials developed from two consensus workshops. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88 (2017) 122-132.
7. Kearney A, Daykin A, Shaw AR, Lane AJ, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gamble C. Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials. Trials. 2017 Dec;18(1):406.
8. NIHR CRN Annual Performance Report 2014/2015.
9. Chalmers I, Bracken M, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu M, Howells D, Ioannidis J, Oliver S. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 2014; 383: 156–65.
10. Standard Protocol Items: Recommendation For Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) http://www.spirit-statement.org/. Accessed 13 June 2017.
11. Healy, P., Galvin, S., Williamson, P., Treweek, S., Whiting, C., Maeso, B., Bray, C., Brocklehurst, P., Moloney, M., Douiri, A., Gamble, C., Gardner, H., Mitchell, D., Stewart, D., Jordan, J., O’Donnell, M., Clarke, M., Pavitt, S., Guegan, E., Blatch-Jones, A., Smith, V., Reay, H. and Devane, D. Identifying trial recruitment uncertainties using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership – the PRioRiTy (Prioritising Recruitment in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2018; 19(1).
12. Duley L, Uhm S, Oliver S. Top 15 UK research priorities for preterm birth. Lancet 2014; 383: 2041–2042.
13. Batchelor JM, Ridd MJ, Clarke T, Ahmed A, Cox M, Crowe S, Howard M, Lawton S, McPhee M, Rani A, Ravenscroft JC, Roberts A, Thomas KS. The Eczema Priority Setting Partnership: a collaboration between patients, carers, clinicians and researchers to identify and prioritize important research indicative questions for the treatment of eczema. British Journal of Dermatology 2013; 168: 577–582.
14. Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A. and Liao, T. “Constant Comparison” in The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. 2004.
15. Skea, Z, Newlands, R, Gillies, K. What influences non-retention in clinical trials? A meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for drop out. PLoS Med. 2017.
16. El Feky, A., Gillies, K., Gardner, H., Fraser, C. and Treweek, S. A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials. Systematic Reviews. 2018; 7(1).
17. JLA: James Lind Alliance. The James Lind Alliance Guidebook. Version 6. 2016. Available at www.jla.nihr.ac.uk. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
18. Buck D, Gamble C, Dudley L, et al. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open. 2014; 4:e006400.
19. Evans B, Bedson E, Bell P, et al. Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure. Trials. 2013; 14:1.
20. Pollard K, Donskoy AL, Moule P, Donald C, Lima M, Rice C. Developing and evaluating guidelines for patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015; 28(2):141–55.
21. Williamson P, Altman D, Bagley H, Barnes K, Blazeby J, Brookes S, et al. The Comet Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017; 18(Suppl 3): p. 280.