1.Boos N, Webb JK. Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 1997;6(1):2–18.
2.Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 12: pedicle screw fixation as an adjunct to posterolateral fusion for low-back pain. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2005;2(6):700–6.
3.Sansur CA, Caffes NM, Ibrahimi DM, Pratt NL, Lewis EM, Murgatroyd AA, et al. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2016;25(4):467–76.
4.Wray S, Mimran R, Vadapalli S, Shetye SS, McGilvray KC, Puttlitz CM. Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2015;22(5):503–10.
5.Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2009;9(5):366–73.
6.Matsukawa K, Kato T, Yato Y, Sasao H, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique. Spine. 2016;41(14):E851–6.
7.Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Hynes RA, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Yoshihara Y, et al. Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Among Different Transpedicular Trajectories: A Finite Element Study. Clinical spine surgery. 2017;30(7):301–7.
8.Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Abe Y, Asazuma T, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? Acta neurochirurgica. 2016;158(3):465–71.
9.Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, Nemoto K. Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. Journal of neurosurgery Spine. 2015;23(4):471–8.
10.Hung CW, Wu MF, Hong RT, Weng MJ, Yu GF, Kao CH. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2016;145:41–5.
11.Phan K, Hogan J, Maharaj M, Mobbs RJ. Cortical Bone Trajectory for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement: A Review of Published Reports. Orthopaedic surgery. 2015;7(3):213–21.
12.Chen YR, Deb S, Pham L, Singh H. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Cortical Bone Trajectory - A Prospective Cohort Study on Postoperative Pain Outcomes. Cureus. 2016;8(7):e714.
13.Chin KR, Pencle FJR, Coombs AV, Elsharkawy M, Packer CF, Hothem EA, et al. Clinical Outcomes With Midline Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws Versus Traditional Pedicle Screws in Moving Lumbar Fusions From Hospitals to Outpatient Surgery Centers. Clinical spine surgery. 2017;30(6):E791-e7.
14.Lee GW, Ahn MW. Comparative Study of Cortical Bone Trajectory-Pedicle Screw (Cortical Screw) Versus Conventional Pedicle Screw in Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 2-Year Post Hoc Analysis from Prospectively Randomized Data. World neurosurgery. 2018;109:e194-e202.
15.Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2002;11 Suppl 2:S170–8.
16.Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C. The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine. 2005;30(5):E109–14.
17.Bordes-Monmeneu M, Bordes-Garcia V, Rodrigo-Baeza F, Saez D. [System of dynamic neutralization in the lumbar spine: experience on 94 cases]. Neurocirugia (Asturias, Spain). 2005;16(6):499–506.
18.Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine. 2005;30(3):324–31.
19.Wurgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M, Landolt H, Fandino J. Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine. 2008;33(3):E66–72.
20.Anand N, Baron EM. Role of dynesys as pedicle-based nonfusion stabilization for degenerative disc disorders. Advances in orthopedics. 2012;2012:218385.
21.Matsukawa K, Taguchi E, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Hosogane N, Asazuma T, et al. Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation? Spine. 2015;40(15):E873–8.
22.Chuang WH, Lin SC, Chen SH, Wang CW, Tsai WC, Chen YJ, et al. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection. Spine. 2012;37(24):E1488–97.
23.Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T. Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine. 1989;14(11):1256–60.
24.Chen CS, Chen WJ, Cheng CK, Jao SH, Chueh SC, Wang CC. Failure analysis of broken pedicle screws on spinal instrumentation. Medical engineering & physics. 2005;27(6):487–96.