1. Evers, L.H., D. Bhavsar, and P. Mailander, The biology of burn injury. Experimental Dermatology, 2010. 19(9): p. 777-783.
2. Auxenfans, C., et al., Cultured allogenic keratinocytes for extensive burns: A retrospective study over 15 years. Burns, 2014. 40(1): p. 82-88.
3. Rowan, M.P., et al., Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements. Critical Care, 2015. 19.
4. Varkey, M., J. Ding, and E.E. Tredget, Advances in Skin Substitutes-Potential of Tissue Engineered Skin for Facilitating Anti-Fibrotic Healing. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 2015. 6(3): p. 547-563.
5. Ehrenreich, M. and Z. Ruszczak, Tissue-engineered temporary wound coverings. Important options for the clinician. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat, 2006. 15(1): p. 5-13.
6. Marquette, C.A., L. Pourchet, and A. Thépot, Skin substitute production process through additive manufacturing. Application N° 15 63461 (30/12/2015).
7. Pourchet, L., et al., Large 3D bioprinted tissue: Heterogeneous perfusion and vascularization. Bioprinting, 2019. 13: p. e00039.
8. Zhu, W.H., et al., The mouse aorta model: Influence of genetic background and aging on bFGF- and VEGF-induced angiogenic sprouting. Angiogenesis, 2003. 6(3): p. 193-199.
9. Nehls, V., K. Denzer, and D. Drenckhahn, Pericyte involvement in capillary sprouting during angiogenesis in situ. Cell and Tissue Research, 1992. 270(3): p. 469-474.
10. Nakatsu, M.N., et al., Angiogenic sprouting and capillary lumen formation modeled by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in fibrin gels: The role of fibroblasts and Angiopoietin-1. Microvascular Research, 2003. 66(2): p. 102-112.
11. Velazquez, O.C., et al., Fibroblast-dependent differentiation of human microvascular endothelial cells into capillary-like 3-dimensional networks. The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2002. 16(10): p. 1316-1318.
12. Chen, X., et al., Prevascularization of a fibrin-based tissue construct accelerates the formation of functional anastomosis with host vasculature. Tissue Engineering - Part A, 2009. 15(6): p. 1363-1371.
13. Wu, Y., D.J. Ravnic, and I.T. Ozbolat, Intraoperative Bioprinting: Repairing Tissues and Organs in a Surgical Setting. Trends in Biotechnology, 2020.
14. Pourchet, L.J., et al., Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold-Free Approach. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2017. 6(4): p. 1601101.
15. Pourchet, L.J., et al., Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold-Free Approach. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2017. 6(4).
16. 3d.FAB. FLOWTIPS®. 2018; Available from: http://fabric-advanced-biology.univ-lyon1.fr/flowtips/.
17. Blaeser, A., et al., Controlling Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance Printing Resolution and Stem Cell Integrity. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2016. 5(3): p. 326-333.
18. Courtial, E.J., et al., Silicone rheological behavior modification for 3D printing: Evaluation of yield stress impact on printed object properties. Additive Manufacturing, 2019. 28: p. 50-57.
19. Auxenfans, C., et al., Use of allogenic epidermal sheets for difficult wound healing: selection and testing of relevant growth factors. Biomed Mater Eng, 2006. 16(4 Suppl): p. S73-83.
20. Gauglitz, G.G., et al., Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med, 2011. 17(1-2): p. 113-25.
21. Hinz, B., The role of myofibroblasts in wound healing. Curr Res Transl Med, 2016. 64(4): p. 171-177.
22. DiPietro, L.A., Angiogenesis and wound repair: when enough is enough. J Leukoc Biol, 2016. 100(5): p. 979-984.
23. Busuioc, C.J., et al., Phases of the cutaneous angiogenesis process in experimental third-degree skin burns: histological and immunohistochemical study. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2013. 54(1): p. 163-71.