Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Enterococcus Isolates Using MALDI-TOF MS, VITEK 2, and 16S rRNA Sequencing

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-101404/v1

Download PDF

Original article

Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Enterococcus Isolates Using MALDI-TOF MS, VITEK 2, and 16S rRNA Sequencing

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-101404/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

The bacterial genus Enterococcus encompasses 38 species. Two of the most common species are E. faecalis and E. faecium. Recently, however, there has been an increase in clinical reports concerning less prevalent Enterococcus species, such as E. durans, E. hirae, and E. gallinarum. Rapid and accurate laboratory methods are needed to facilitate the identification of all these bacterial species. In the present study, we compared the relative accuracy of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), VITEK 2, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing using 39 enterococci isolates from dairy samples, and compared the resultant phylogenetic trees. We found that MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified all isolates at the species level except for one, whereas the VITEK 2 system, which is an automated identification system using biochemical characteristics of species, misidentified ten isolates. However, phylogenetic trees constructed from both methods showed all isolates in similar positions. Our results clearly showed that MALDI-TOF MS is a reliable and rapid tool for identifying Enterococcus species with greater discriminatory power than the biochemical assay method of VITEK 2.

Nutrition & Dietetics

Enterococcus

identification

VITEK 2

MALDI-TOF MS

16S rRNA

Although certain Enterococcus genus are used as starter cultures in many food products, this bacterial group is considered a human and animal pathogen which can cause nosocomical infections and urinary tract infections, and contribute to food spoilage
Accurate and reliable identification of Enterococcus genus present in food is of great importance for predicting shelf life and for managing and reducing microbiological food hazar
Phylogenetic trees obtained from MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK2 analyses were compared to evaluate the discriminative resolution of these two systems.

Genus Enterococcus is composed of 38 bacterial species, many of which can be isolated from various habitats, such as the feces of hospitalized patients, animals, animal-derived foods, and environments such as soil and water (Abriouel et al. 2008; Vu and Carvalho 2011; Quintela-Baluja et al. 2013; Lebreton et al. 2014). Although certain enterococcal strains are used as starter cultures in many food products, this bacterial group is considered a human and animal pathogen which can cause nosocomical infections and urinary tract infections, and contribute to food spoilage (Vu and Carvalho 2011; Quintela‐Baluja et al. 2013; Lebreton et al. 2014). Along with their complicated virulence factors, enterococci have drawn renewed interest due to their ability to transfer antibiotic resistance genes to other pathogenic bacteria, which poses a great public health concern (Vu and Carvalho 2011; Lebreton et al. 2014). Further, the Enterococcus genus is not attributed the “generally recognized as safe” status, and is not included on the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) list from the European Food Safety Authority (Hanchi et al. 2018).

Fast and reliable identification of bacterial species present in food is of great importance for predicting shelf life and for managing and reducing microbiological food hazards (Quintela-Baluja et al. 2013). Many laboratories employ various diagnostic techniques to identify Enterococcus spp., including biochemical methods such as Analytical Profile Index (API) strips and the automated VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, France), and molecular approaches such as PCR-based 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing (Fang et al. 2012). Although phenotypic methods are regarded by food and clinical authorities in many countries as a gold standard by which to identify Enterococcus strains, these procedures are time-consuming and labor-intensive (Cheng et al. 1997). Further, species identification of enterococci using phenotypic methods is challenging due to the similar biochemical traits among species; therefore only a limited number of species can be identified (Quintela‐Baluja et al. 2013). Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has gained popularity as an alternative identification method based on its rapid, cost-effective, and accurate ability to identify many pathogenic bacteria. However, this method has not been thoroughly tested in unusual Enterococcus species (Seng et al. 2009; Quintela‐Baluja et al. 2013). To the best of our knowledge, the applicability of MALDI-TOF MS to discriminating enterococci species from dairy sources has not been assessed, nor has a phylogenetic comparison of MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 analyses been conducted. To conduct such an evaluation, we identified species of enterococci isolates from dairy samples using VITEK 2, MALDI-TOF MS, and 16S rRNA sequencing, and compared their discriminatory power at the species level. In addtion, phylogenetic trees obtained from MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 analyses were compared to evaluate the discriminative resolution of these two systems.

Bacterial strains

A total of 39 Enterococcus strains were recovered from dairy samples. The cells were stored at -72°C with 50% glycerol until ready for use. Bacteria were cultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) at 37°C for 24 h prior to analysis. The strains E. faecalis KCTC 3206 and KCTC 3511, distributed by KCTC in South Korea, were used as controls.

Biochemical phenotyping using VITEK 2 system

Biochemical reactions of the isolates were tested using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, pure colonies of each strain were cultured in TSA and suspended in sterile saline (0.45% NaCl) to a turbidity of McFarland 0.5 – 0.63. Bacteria were then injected into gram-positive (GP) cards, (bioMérieux) in order to conduct 42 biochemical tests using the following copmpounds: (AGAL = alpha-galactosidase; ADH1 = arginine dihydrolase; ADH2S = arginine dihydrolase; AGAL = alpha-galactosidase; AGLU = alpha-glucosidase; ALAA = alanine arylamidase; AMAN = alpha-mannosidase; AMY = amygdalin; APPA = ala-phe-pro arylamidase; ASPA = L-aspartic acid arylamidase; BACI = bacitracin resistance; BGAL = beta-galactosidase; BGUR = beta-glucorinidase; BGURR = beta glucorinidase; CDEX = alpha-cyclodextrin; DGAL = galactose; DMAL = maltose; DMAN = mannitol; DMNE = mannose; DRAF = raffinose; DRIB = ribose; DSOR = sorbitol; DTRE = trehalose; DXYL = xylose; LAC = lactose; LEUA = L-leucine arylamidase; LLATK = lactate; MBDG = methyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside; NAG = N-acetyl-glucosamine; NC6.5 = growth in 6.5 NaCl; NOVO = novobiocin resistance; O129R = O/129 resistance; OPTO = optochin resistance; PHOS = alkaline phosphatase; PIPLC = phosphatidylinositol-phospholipase C; POLYB = polymyxin B; PROA = pro arylamidase beta-glucuronidase; PUL = pullulan; PYRA = L-pyroglutamic acid arylamidase; SAC = sucrose; SAL = salicin; TYRA = tyrosine arylamidase; URE = urease). Results of this identification procedure were used to generate a phylogenetic tree using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) on the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis X (MEGA X) software (version 10.0.5).

MALDI-TOF MS analysis

The isolates were prepared for MALDI-TOF MS analysis using the direct colony method as previously described (Fang et al. 2012; Deng et al. 2014), with modifications. In brief, each individual colony was incubated on TSA at 37°C for 24 h, then transferred onto a MSP 96 target polished steel BC (Bruker Daltonik) using a toothpick. To crystalize bacterial components, 1 μl of saturated α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid matrix solution in 50% acetonitrile-2.5% trifluoroacetic acid (Bruker Daltonik) was overlaid on each well and air-dried at room temperature (25°C). Main spectrum profiles (MSP) of isolates were obtained using the microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) with default MSP identification standard settings (linear positive mode, 2,000 to 20,000 Da). Bacteria were identified, and a phylogenetic tree was generated by analyzing MS spectra using MALDI Biotyper software (version 3.1) and flexControl software (version 3.4.127.0).

16S rRNA gene sequencing

The bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using NucliSENS EasyMag (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolates were generated by Bionics (Seoul, South Korea) using universial primers (27F, 5’-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3’, and 1492R, 5’-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3’). Each of the raw 16S rRNA gene sequencing datasets was aligned using MEGA X software (version 10.0.5); species were identified using the NCBI BLASTn program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The results from 16S rRNA gene sequencs were used as the standard for interpreting the results from VITEK 2 and MALDI-TOF MS analyses.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad InStat 3 software (San Diego, CA) and data were analyzed using the two-sided Fisher’s exact test.

In this study, 16S rRNA sequencing revealed that the 39 enterococci isolates comprised 9 isolates of E. faecalis, 5 of E. faecium, 6 of E. durans, 18 of E. hirae, and 1 of E. gallinarum. We compared sequencing results with those from MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2. In brief, a single E. durans isolate was misidentified as E. faecium by MALDI-TOF MS, whereas ten isolates were mismatched by VITEK 2 (Table 1). The species misidentified by VITEK 2 were as follows: two out of five E. durans isolates were misidentified as E. gallinarum and E. faecium, and two out of the eighteen E. hirae isolates were misidentified as E. durans and one as E. gallinarum. These results demonstrate that the discriminative capability of MALDI-TOF MS is superior to that of VITEK 2 (p < 0.05). However, E. faecalis and E. gallinarum were correctly identified in both methods.

Table 1. Comparison of correct identification rates of Enterococcus isolates from MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 at species level.

16S rRNA species	Number (%) of correct identifications ^a
“Gold standard”	MALDI-TOF MS	VITEK 2
Enterococcus faecalis (n = 9)	9	9
Enterococcus faecium (n = 5)	5	0
Enterococcus durans (n = 6)	5	4
Enterococcus hirae (n = 18)	18	15
Enterococcus gallinarum (n = 1)	1	1
Total (n = 39)	38 (97.4) A	29 (74.4) B

^a Different letters (A, B) within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.01)

Phylogenetic trees generated from MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 analyses are shown in Fig. 1. The isolates were grouped into four clusters by MALDI-TOF MS, which revealed that each cluster was composed of specific species except for a single E. gallinarum isolate in Cluster I. In contrast, the isolates were clustered into the total of seven groups by VITEK 2 based on the biochemical patterns by which it designates species. The phylogenetic tree based on the latter system showed isolates in the same species adjacent to each other; however, they were classified as different species. For example, 11 isolates which were identified as E. durans were not clustered in the same group.

Enterococci are ubiquitous in the environment; they can grow in the intestinal tracts of humans and animals. They cause numerous infections, including urinary tract infections and endocarditis, as well as various nosocomial infections. In order to curb the spread of such diseases, it is important to identify enterococci at the species level in diagnostic laboratories (Vu; Kirschner). Further, with the recent increase of clinical cases in which less common species, such as E. durans, E. hirae, E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus, are implicated, rapid and accurate identification at the species or subspecies level is necessary for the control of infections and the study of epidemiology (Willey et al. 1999; Kirschner et al. 2001).

Similar results were observed in previous studies, in which MALDI-TOF MS correctly identified all clinical isolates tested, including E. faecalis, E. faecium, E. casselifalvus, and E. gallinarum. In contrast, VITEK 2 misidentified 10 of 131 isolates (Fang et al.2012). Such misidentification may reflect unreliable identification of uncommon Enterococcus species, or the occurance of atypical phenotypic properties (Singer et al. 1996; Tsakris et al. 1998). This suggests that the VITEK 2 database needs further improvement to increase accuracy of Enterococcus species identification. Quintela-Baluja et al. (2013) revealed that enterococci can have different mass spectral profiles, depending on whether they originate from dairy or meat (Quintela‐Baluja et al. 2013). Therefore, to ensure accurate species identification, enterococci originating from animal-derived sources should be evaluated by MALDI-TOF MS. This study is the first to assess the discriminative power of MALDI-TOF MS in relation to common and uncommon Enterococcus species from dairy samples, including E. durans, E. hirae, and E. gallinarum. Although the source of the isolates in our study was dairy samples, our results indicate that MALDI-TOF MS could be a useful alternative diagnostic tool for screening enterococci species not only from foods, but also in etiological clinical applications which require fast and reliable species- or strain-level identification.

Although each method differentiates based on different characteristics (i.e., protein spectrum versus biochemical patterns) (Sala-Comorera et al. 2016), the phylogenetic trees obtained from the two systems placed the isolates in identical positions (Fig. 1). In accordance with our results, Sala-Comorer et al. (2016) demonstrated that dendrograms obtained from MALDI-TOF MS showed taxonomic resolution similar to that of the PhenePlate™ system, a biochemical phenotyping method (Sala-Comorer et al. 2016). These results suggest that although both methods display similar levels of resolution in discriminating the isolates, MALDI-TOF MS is a much more accurate method of species identification than VITEK 2.

In the present study, we compared two bacterial diagnostic techniques which are currently used in laboratories, VITEK 2 and MALDI-TOF MS. The latter has been used as an alternative tool for identification and phylogenic study of enterococci. Our evaluation of the accuracy of each system in identifying species among Enterococcus isolates showed MALDI-TOF MS to be more accurate than VITEK 2. Whereas MALDI-TOF MS misidentified only a single E. durans isolate, VITEK 2 showed less discriminative capability regarding both common (E. faecium) and uncommon species (E. durans and E. hirae). These results imply that MALDI-TOF MS can be used as fast and reliable tool for bacterial identification, and for analyzing phylogenetic relationships within genera.

In addition to its high level of accuracy, MALDI-TOF MS was the most time- and cost-effective method among various other automated biochemical identification methods, such as API and the VITEK system (Seng et al. 2009). A previous study similarly showed that MALDI-TOF MS is more efficient than VITEK 2 in identifying Enterococcus species other than faecalis and faecium (Fang et al. 2012). Because the results of MALDI-TOF MS are based on a software-installed database of mass spectral profiles, this method requires more extensive spectrum data than other systems. However, its reliability is superior; 38 out of 39 Enterococcus isolates in this study were accurately identified.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that MALDI-TOF MS can be used for routine identification of both usual and unusual enterococci from dairy products, as it shows greater species-level discriminatory power than VITEK 2. Further, MALDI-TOF MS is cost-effective and requires less time to identify the bacteria, making it a useful technique for diagnostic laboratories which need rapid identification of bacterial species. However, one limitation to this study is that we only tested for species in the Enterococcus genus, and have not tested the sensitivity of MALDI-TOF MS to species of other genera. Further study is needed which incorporates numerous species from various genera in order to further evaluate the discriminative capacity of MALDI-TOF MS.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and material

The raw sequencing data in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SUB8439660.

Competing interests

We certify that there are no conflicts of interest with any financial organization regarding the materials discussed in the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported by Konkuk University Researcher Fund, 2020.

Authors' contributions

SH and JW designed the research and conducted the experiments and analyses. HW, KY, DH and DB contributed new reagents or analytical tools. HW, KY and HK analyzed data, SH and JW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. KY, DH, DB, HK and KH critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Industry-University Cooperation of Konkuk University, the technical support of all members of KU Center for Food Safety & Dept. of Public Health, and Sensorgen, too.

Abriouel H, Omar NB, Molinos AC, López RL, Grande MJ, Martínez-Viedma P, Ortega E, Cañamero MM, Galvez A. (2008) Comparative analysis of genetic diversity and incidence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance among enterococcal populations from raw fruit and vegetable foods, water and soil, and clinical samples. Int J Food Microbiol 123:38-49.
Cheng S, Mccleskey FK, Gress MJ, Petroziello JM, Liu R, Namdari H, Beninga K, A Salmen A, DelVecchio VG. (1997) A PCR assay for identification of Enterococcus faecium. J Clin Microbiol 35:1248-1250.
Deng J, Fu L, Wang R, Yu N, Ding X, Jiang L, Fand Y, Jiang C, Lin L. Wang Y, Che X. (2014) Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS, gene sequencing and the Vitek 2 for identification of seventy-three clinical isolates of enteropathogens. J Thorac Dis 6:539.
Fang H, Ohlsson AK, Ullberg M, Özenci V. (2012) Evaluation of species-specific PCR, Bruker MS, VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 system for the identification of clinical Enterococcus isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:3073–3077.
Hanchi H, Mottawea W, Sebei K, Hammami R (2018) The Genus Enterococcus: Between Probiotic Potential and Safety Concerns—An Update. Front Microbiol 9:1791.
Kirschner C, Maquelin K, Pina P, Thi NN, Choo-Smith LP, Sockalingum GD, Sandt C, Ami D, Orsini F, Doglia SM, Allouch P. Mainfait M, Puppels GJ, Naumann D. (2001) Classification and identification of enterococci: a comparative phenotypic, genotypic, and vibrational spectroscopic study. J Clin Microbiol 39:1763-1770.
Lebreton F, Willems RJL, Gilmore MS. (ed) (2014) Enterococcus diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization. In Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N (ed), Enterococci: from commensals to leading causes of drug resistant infection. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA.
Quintela‐Baluja M, Böhme K, Fernández‐No IC, Morandi S, Alnakip ME, Caamaño‐Antelo S, ... Calo‐Mata P. (2013) Characterization of different food‐isolated Enterococcus strains by MALDI‐TOF mass fingerprinting. Electrophoresis 34:2240-2250.
Sala-Comorera L, Vilaró C, Galofré B, Blanch AR, García-Aljaro C. (2016) Use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry for bacterial monitoring in routine analysis at a drinking water treatment plant. Int J Hyg Environ Health 219:577-584.
Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. (2009) Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 49:543–551.
Singer DA, Jochimsen EM, Gielerak P, Jarvis WR (1996) Pseudooutbreak of Enterococcus durans infections and colonization associated with introduction of an automated identification system software update. J Clin Microbiol 34:2685–2687
Tsakris A, Woodford N, Pournaras S, Kaufmann M, Douboyas J. (1998) Apparent increased prevalence of high-level aminoglycoside resistant Enterococcus durans resulting from false identification by a semiautomated software system. J Clin Microbiol 36:1419–1421
Vu J, Carvalho J. (2011) Enterococcus: review of its physiology, pathogenesis, diseases and the challenges it poses for clinical microbiology. Front Biol 6:357.
Willey BM, Jones RN, McGeer A, Witte W, French G, Roberts RB, Jenkins SG, Nadler H, Low DE. (1999) Practical approach to the identification of clinically relevant Enterococcus species. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 34:165-171.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Enterococcus Isolates Using MALDI-TOF MS, VITEK 2, and 16S rRNA Sequencing

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Key Points

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1