1. Parajuli, N. et al. Real-time EMG based pattern recognition control for hand prostheses: A review on existing methods, challenges and future implementation. Sensors 19, 4596 (2019).
2. Herr, H. M. et al. Reinventing Extremity Amputation in the Era of Functional Limb Restoration. Ann. Surg. 273, (2021).
3. Hargrove, L. J., Miller, L. A., Turner, K. & Kuiken, T. A. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Sci. Rep. 7, 13840 (2017).
4. Ortiz-Catalan, M. Engineering and surgical advancements enable more cognitively integrated bionic arms. Sci. Robot. 6, eabk3123 (2021).
5. Finley, F. R. & Wirta, R. W. Myocoder-computer study of electromyographic patterns. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 48, 20–24 (1967).
6. Fougner, A., Stavdahl, Ø., Kyberd, P. J., Losier, Y. G. & Parker, P. A. Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 20, 663–677 (2012).
7. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Håkansson, B. & Brånemark, R. Real-time and simultaneous control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 756–764 (2014).
8. Yatsenko, D., McDonnall, D. & Guillory, K. S. Simultaneous, proportional, multi-axis prosthesis control using multichannel surface EMG. in EMBS 29th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 6134–6137 (2007).
9. Kuiken, T. A. et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. JAMA - J. Am. Med. Assoc. 301, 619–628 (2009).
10. Vu, P. P. et al. A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, 1–12 (2020).
11. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Brånemark, R., Håkansson, B. & Delbeke, J. On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion. Biomed. Eng. Online 11, 33 (2012).
12. De Luca, C. J. et al. Long-Term Neuroelectric Signal Recording from Severed Nerves. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-29, 393–403 (1982).
13. Dhillon, G. S., Lawrence, S. M., Hutchinson, D. T. & Horch, K. W. Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: Implications for neural control of artificial limbs. J. Hand Surg. Am. 29, 605–615 (2004).
14. Jia, X. et al. Residual Motor Signal in Long-Term Human Severed Peripheral Nerves and Feasibility of Neural Signal-Controlled Artificial Limb. J. Hand Surg. Am. 32, 657–666 (2007).
15. George, J. A., Davis, T. S., Brinton, M. R. & Clark, G. A. Intuitive neuromyoelectric control of a dexterous bionic arm using a modified Kalman filter. J. Neurosci. Methods 330, 108462 (2020).
16. Rossini, P. M. et al. Clinical Neurophysiology Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 777–783 (2010).
17. Cracchiolo, M. et al. Decoding of grasping tasks from intraneural recordings in trans-radial amputee. J. Neural Eng. 17, 26–34 (2020).
18. Davis, T. S. et al. Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves. J. Neural Eng. 13, 036001 (2016).
19. Wendelken, S. et al. Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 121 (2017).
20. Page, D. M. et al. Motor Control and Sensory Feedback Enhance Prosthesis Embodiment and Reduce Phantom Pain After Long-Term Hand Amputation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 1–16 (2018).
21. George, J. A. et al. Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax2352 (2019).
22. Micera, S. et al. Decoding information from neural signals recorded using intraneural electrodes: Toward the development of a neurocontrolled hand prosthesis. Proc. IEEE 98, 407–417 (2010).
23. Christie, B. P. et al. Long-term stability of stimulating spiral nerve cuff electrodes on human peripheral nerves. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 14, 70 (2017).
24. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O. & Brånemark, R. Self-Contained Neuromusculoskeletal Arm Prostheses. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1732–1738 (2020).
25. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Branemark, R. & Hakansson, B. Evaluation of classifier topologies for the real-time classification of simultaneous limb motions. in Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2013, 6651–6654 (2013).
26. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Håkansson, B. & Brånemark, R. An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 257re6 (2014).
27. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Rouhani, F., Branemark, R. & Hakansson, B. Offline accuracy: A potentially misleading metric in myoelectric pattern recognition for prosthetic control. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. EMBS 2015-Novem, 1140–1143 (2015).
28. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Brånemark, R. & Håkansson, B. BioPatRec: A modular research platform for the control of artificial limbs based on pattern recognition algorithms. Source Code Biol. Med. 8, 11 (2013).
29. de Montalivet, E. et al. Guiding the Training of Users With a Pattern Similarity Biofeedback to Improve the Performance of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 28, 1731–1741 (2020).
30. Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O. & Brånemark, R. Self-Contained Neuromusculoskeletal Arm Prostheses. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1732–1738 (2020).
31. Englehart, K. & Hudgins, B. A Robust, Real-Time Control Scheme for Multifunction Myoelectric Control. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50, 848–854 (2003).
32. Hudgins, B., Parker, P. & Scott, R. N. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 40, 82–94 (1993).