Dysphagia is not a uncommon postoperative complication of anterior cervical surgery in the treatment of cervical diseases. Bazaz [6] performed a prospective study including 249 patients and reported the rate of postoperative dysphagia were 50.2%, 32.2%, 17.8%, and 12.5% at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. A growing number of studies paid attention on risk factors of postoperative dysphagia and demonstrated that age, female patients, smoking, multilevel fused level, rhBMP use, perative time, type of surgical procedure, and surgical level, revision surgery, comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, and severe neck pain were related with increased risk of postoperative dysphagia [4, 5]. Although many scholars focused on postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery, the risk factors associated with postoperative dysphagia are controversial. To our knowledge, few studies have investigated the risk factors of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery treating multilevel cervical disorder with kyphosis according to follow-up time.
Our findings showed that a history of smoking, lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score, post-operative Cobb angle of C2-7 and change of Cobb angle of C2-7 were associated with dysphagia within 3-month after surgery. Furthermore, a history of smoking, lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score, and post-operative Cobb angle of C2-7 were linked with dysphagia within 6-month after surgery. However, a history of smoking and lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score were found to be risk factors related with dysphagia at at any follow-up.
Thus, we perform a retrospective study to evaluate the risk factors associated with postoperative dysphagia based on subgroup of follow-up time. In the present study, 67.9%, 44.4%, 34.6%,25.9% and 14.8% at the time of 1 week, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 1 -year after surgery, respectively. As Fig. 2 shown, within 1-year follow-up, the number of patients with postoperative dysphagia significantly decrease along with time but the descent gradually slowed down. Nevertheless, we did not observe a obviously stable tendency within 1-year follow-up due to our relatively short follow-up. We need a longer follow-up to assess when patients who have multilevel cervical disorder with kyphosis suffering from postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical would significantly relieve.
In term of cervical sagittal parameters, Okano I [8] collected retrospectively data of 291 patients to identify the perioperative risk factors for dysphagia and dysphonia and suggested that preoperative C2−7 angle was not related with high morbidity, which was consistent with our result. However, Okano I did not studied on effect of postoperative C2−7 or correction of C2−7 on postoperative dysphagia. Tian [9] considered cervical sagittal parameters as factors and concluded that change of C2−7 angle played an important role in development of dysphagia in patient with or without kyphosis. Furthermore, Tian [9] demonstrated that once the dC2–C7 angle is greater than 5°, the chance of developing postoperative dysphagia is significantly greater. Chen [10] also evaluated risk factors of the development of dysphagia following same-day combined anterior-posterior cervical spine surgeries and indicated in increment surgical correction of C2–7 with increasing rate of postoperative dysphagia. Actually, we partially agreed with previous conclusions [9, 10] due to the difference in character of the study population, which may lead to slight discrepancy. In the present study, we only focused on patients with multilevel cervical disorder with kyphosis and proved that postoperative and change of C2−7 angle significantly impact dysphagia within 6 months, but not at 1-year follow-up. We definitely believed that postoperative and change of C2−7 angle were the leading driver in development of postoperative dysphagia in special patient with kyphosis at short-term follow-up. Surely, patients was not being adapted to status that against esophagus caused by cervical lordosis and plate after anterior cervical surgery. Whereas, patients gradually adjust to the status that against esophagus. Mention above may perfectly account for our results. Park [11] believed that most patients were able to tolerate this increase in C2–7 SVA. While we also partial agree with Park’ consequence. In our study, change of C2 SVA was discovered to be related with postoperative dysphagia with 1-month. After 1 month after surgery, patients may adapt to the correction of C2 SVA.
The SWAL-QOL questionnaire with lower scores indicating more frequent symptoms of dysphagia is a widely used to measure degree of dysphagia [12, 13]. Because some questions are less suitable for spinal surgical study [8]. Therefore, we adopted a 14-item questionnaire to assess symptoms frequently associated with dysphagia [14]. Vaishnav [15] firstly evaluated relation between SWAL-QOL score and dysphagia and suggested that preoperative SWAL-QOL score was a predictive factor of dysphagia in single level ACDF. Park [11] also found preoperative dysphagia associated with poor postoperative functional swallow outcome by FOSS score. We obtained similar results with previous study [11, 15]. Our findings demonstrated that lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score implying was an independent risk of postoperative dysphagia at any follow-up in univariate and multivariate analysis, which was particularly relevant clinically because it was beneficial for spine surgeon to preoperatively distinguish those who were susceptible to postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, we are able to offer adequate preoperative preparation to minimize the degree of postoperative dysphagia.
A number of studies have shown detrimental effects of smoking on clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for spinal disorders. Riley [4] found that smoking was an independent predictor of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery. Joaquim [5] had a similar result. In this study, the data indicated that no matter which follow-up, a history of smoking was positively related with postoperative dysphagia after anterior surgery. One plausible explanation for this result is the deleterious effects of smoking on delaying the detumescence of surrounding tissues.
There were several limitations in this study. First, this is a retrospective study from single-center. We will conduct a prospective multi-center study in the future. Second, the small sample size of patients with postoperative dysphagia, especially at final follow-up, may induce potential biases. A larger number of patients with postoperative dysphagia were included in the further study.Third, 1-year follow-up time is relatively short, a longer follow-up may be more significant. Fourth, we did not analyzed the degree of postoperative dysphagia based on Bazaz dysphagia score [6] because of small sample.
In conclusion, many factors including patients with a history of smoking, lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score, postoperative Cobb angle of C2-7 and change of Cobb angle of C2-7 and C2-7 SVA were related with postoperative dysphagia during 3-month after surgery. Furthermore, patients with a history of smoking and lower preoperative SWAL-QOL score were found to be risk factors of postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery at any follow-up. According to present study, we can clearly see which kind of people with kyphotic curvature and multilevel diseases more likely had postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery. We hope this article can provide a reference for spinal surgeons when facing multilevel cervical degenerative diseases. Meanwhile it is helpful for the future study on postoperative dysphagia. Further large-scale, well-designed studies are urgently needed.