3.1 Crosslinked structure fabricated on tissue paper
Figure 1(a) describes the procedure of nano-SiO2 hybrid crosslinked coating layer constructed on tissue paper. Firstly, polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP), hyperbranched polyethyleneimine (PEI) and nanoparticle SiO2 were well mixed in solvent with a series of different ratios at room temperature, meanwhile pre-crosslinking structure would be produced. Then, a certain size tissue paper was dipped into the pre-crosslinking coating solution. The final composite separators with different crosslinking ratios were obtained after experienced vacuum drying at 60 oC. It should be pointed out that crosslinking reactions were occurred between -NH2 groups in PEI and VDF segments in PVDF-HFP. As reported in previous literatures (Taguet, Ameduri, & Dufresne, 2006; R. Zhou et al., 2014; R. Zhou et al., 2015), VDF segments could take off HF molecules through autocatalytic effect of basic amines to form -CF=CH- bonds. Afterwards, due to electron withdrawing effect of F atoms in -CF=CH- groups and nucleophilicity of amines, michael addition reactions would take place between them to create new bonds. This structure would continue to suffer from rearrangement, finally leading to the formation of C=N bonds. ATR-FTIR spectra were carried out to detect this generation and shown in Figure 1(b). Though similar absorption peaks appear in the two composite separators whether crosslinked or not, there is still a characteristic absorption peak at 1642cm−1 distinguished for separator CS(10:1), corresponding to C=N stretching vibration and indicating the successful occurrence of crosslinking reactions between PEI and PVDF-HFP. In addition, another two different bands centered at 1565cm−1 and 1476cm−1 can be discovered in CS(10:1) curve, which are respectively assigned to the N–H bending vibration of unreacted primary amine groups and the N–H deformative vibration of secondary amine groups in PEI (Chen, Chen, Liu, Zhao, & Wang, 2019; Chuang, Lin, Wang, & Hong, 2021). The existence of crosslinked network will produce a steady reticular structure to endure external force. As displayed in subsequent results (Fig. 3(d)), significant enhancement of tensile strength can be observed after PEI added into the composite separator, which further provides supporting evidence for the occurrence of crosslinking reactions in this system (Shin et al., 2021).
3.2 Morphology and pore structure
The separator sandwiched between two electrodes not only plays an important role in physical isolation, but also requires appropriate pores to allow rapid transmission of lithium ions in the battery (Yang, Shi, Chu, Shao, & Wang, 2021). SEM is usually employed to detect information about surface morphology and pore structure. As seen in Fig. 1(c) and 1(d), tissue paper is made from a disorderly stack of fibers, which results in apertures ranging from a few microns to dozens of microns and distributed non-uniformly. To avoid short-circuit phenomenon and heterogeneous lithium deposition, it is imperative to give a modification for tissue paper. Accordingly, nano-SiO2 hybrid crosslinked polymer coating was introduced on the surface of tissue substrate and the final thickness of CS(10:1) separator was about 56 µm, as shown in cross section SEM (Fig. S1). Compared with CS(1:0) separator only using nano-SiO2 hybrid PVDF-HFP as coating layer (Fig. 1(e-f)), CS(10:1) separator was observed from Fig. 1(g-h) gives more highly interconnected three-dimensional hole structures, which will provide unobstructed access for lithium ion transmission (Yang et al., 2021). Notably, these structures also present with differently size, among which the larger pores can be benefit to contain a large number of electrolytes and the smaller pores can be advantage to prevent the penetration of lithium dendrite (Lopez, Mackanic, Cui, & Bao, 2019). The quantitative data of pore size distribution of separators were measured and shown in Fig. 1(i). We can find that the pore size of CS(1:0) separator is basically concentrated at about 1 µm, while three interval distributions are presented for CS(10:1) separator using crosslinked system as coating layer and respectively placed at 1.2, 0.9 and 0.5 µm. This result is consistent with pore structure observed from SEM images. Because of smaller size as dominant, the even pore size of CS(10:1) separator is about 0.65 µm, lower than that of CS(1:0) separator. These results can be attributed to the introduction of hyperbranched PEI and the formation of crosslinked structure between PEI and PVDF-HFP, which can decrease crystallinity of polymer matrix, change distances between polymer chains and further realize the regulation of pore size (L. Liu et al., 2021).
The capacity of separator to accommodate electrolyte has a close relationship with porosity (W. Zhang et al., 2018). As shown in Table 1, with the increase of crosslinking agent PEI, the porosity of crosslinked composite separator gradually decreases, but much higher than that of Celgard 2400 (30%). When fixing the ratio of PVDF-HFP and PEI at 20:1 or 10:1, the porosity of about 70% can be obtained, which is basically similar with that of traditional composite separator CS(1:0). This demonstrates higher porosity and smaller pore size can simultaneously achieve through controlling the crosslinking ratio, which are the prerequisite for absorbing more electrolytes and preventing the penetration of lithium dendrite (Guan et al., 2020).
Table 1
Basic properties of Celgard 2400 and composite separators.
Separator
|
Porosity
(%)
|
Electrolyte uptake (%)
|
Ion conductivity (mS/cm)
|
Celgard 2400
|
30
|
70
|
0.19
|
CS(1:0)
|
77
|
227
|
0.57
|
CS(20:1)
|
73
|
248
|
0.65
|
CS(10:1)
|
71
|
254
|
0.69
|
CS(5:1)
|
66
|
236
|
0.51
|
CS(5:2)
|
58
|
229
|
0.43
|
3.3 Wettability and electrolyte uptake
Wettability can reflect adsorption and expansion rate of electrolyte on separator (Lv et al., 2021). Fig. 2(a) gives immersion-height photograph at the time of separator immersed in liquid electrolyte 120 min. It was found that with the increase of hyperbranched PEI content, electrolyte immersion-height for the crosslinked composite separator raised firstly and then reduced. When the crosslinking ratio of PVDF-HFP and PEI was set at 10:1, highest immersion-height achieved with the value of 3.2 cm. As a comparison, only 0.3 cm and 2.2 cm immersion-height were respectively obtained for Celgard 2400 and the control CS(1:0) separator. This behavior demonstrates superior wettability of CS(10:1) separator. Moreover, contact angles of electrolyte on separators were measured and shown in Fig. 2(b). Compared with Celgard 2400 and CS(1:0) separator, the lowest contact angle was obtained for CS(10:1) separator no matter at initial contact or after 20 S. As the crosslinking degree increased, there were complete opposite trends observed between contact angle and immersion-height, indicating coincident wettability results. These results can be attributed to hydrophilicity of tissue paper substrate and strong polarity provided by abundant amines in hyperbranched PEI, which can improve electrolyte affinity with separator and be helpful for electrolyte adsorption (Sheng et al., 2021). On the other hand, the incorporation of crosslinking agent at an appropriate content can regulate the formation of interconnected pore structure but produce negligible effect on porosity, which can make the adsorbed electrolyte infiltrate and diffuse in separator quickly (Sheng et al., 2021). However, deeply crosslinking can hinder the penetration of electrolyte and result in attenuation of wettability, which is mainly related to the reduction of porosity as displayed in Table 1. Good wettability of CS(10:1) separator will be beneficial to lithium ion migration between electrodes especially for high power LIB and reduce standing time after cell assembly (Sheng et al., 2021).
Separator serves as electrolyte reservoir to ensure number of lithium ions transferred during battery operation, thus electrolyte uptake is an important parameter to decide electrochemical performance (Z. Zhang, Zhou, Yu, Cai, & Yang, 2020). According to data from Table 1, compared with Celgard 2400, the control composite separator CS(1:0) can accommodate more electrolyte. This behavior has a close relationship with its higher porosity and better hydrophilicity to electrolyte caused by the employment of polar coating layer (PVDF-HFP and SiO2) and substrate (Yuan et al., 2021). With the addition of crosslinking agent PEI, the capacity to absorb electrolyte begins to increase gradually. Specially, the crosslinked composite separator CS(10:1) gives the highest electrolyte uptake with the value of 254%. This cannot separate from good affinity between strong polarity PEI and electrolyte. In addition, the application of hyperbranched PEI forming crosslinking structure can reduce the crystallinity of polymer coating PVDF-HFP, which will be advantageous to liquid electrolyte swell into coating layer (R. Zhou et al., 2015). These two factors and basically unchanged porosity endow CS(10:1) separator with promoted electrolyte uptake. As PEI content continued to increase, the electrolyte uptake of the crosslinked composite separator begins to decrease mainly due to reduced porosity displayed in Table 1. Higher electrolyte uptake of CS(10:1) separator will accommodate more Li+ to participate in charge transfer, thus producing lower internal impedance (Yuan et al., 2021).
3.4 Thermal analysis, flame retarding property and mechanical behavior
To cope with heat generated during the operation of high power LIB, separator must have sufficient thermal stability and flame retardancy, so that providing superior safety when battery working in a variety of possible normal cases, or not causing more serious explosions when sudden short-circuit reaction occurred (Babiker et al., 2021). Fig. 3(a) gives photographs of separators experienced heat treatment at different temperatures. We can find that Celgard 2400 separator is suffered from significant dimensional shrinkage above 200°C until completely fusion. However, the original size can be kept unchanged for the prepared tissue-based composite separator in the whole temperature range. This is mainly related to cellulose, a main component of tissue paper, and nanoparticle SiO2, which own excellent thermal stability and can afford stable supporting skeleton for composite separators (Z. Wang et al., 2018). Compared with PVDF-HFP as binder in coating layer, the introduction of crosslinked structure will also contribute to the sufficient thermal stability of composite separators, which cannot be intuitively reflected from dimensional stability. From DSC curves displayed in Fig. 3(c), we can find there is a melting peak of PVDF-HFP at about 150 oC for the control CS(1:0) membrane (X. Zhang et al., 2021), while no melting signal is distinguished for CS(10:1) separator with crosslinked structure. This demonstrates that the construction of crosslinked network can restrict the melting of PVDF-HFP, thus boosting heat resistance of the overall structure again (Y. Zhu, Cao, Chen, Yu, & Li, 2019). However, the color is observed to get darker gradually for the crosslinked composite separator with the increase of PEI content and heating temperature from Fig. 3(a). This phenomenon can be explained as further deepened crosslinking reactions and oxidation of unreacted amine groups in PEI (Y.-H. Zhao et al., 2009). TGA curves were also measured and shown in Fig. S2 Compared with separator CS(1:0) without SiO2, the incorporation of crosslinked network is observed to give composite separator with higher solid residue when temperature increased above to 600 oC. Especially, the addition of SiO2 further raises this value and offers CS(10:1) separator with best thermal stability. By comparison, Celgard 2400 separator leaves no solid basically when temperature rising to 500 oC. Flame retardancy was tested by combustion experiment and given in Fig. 3(b). A huge difference phenomenon can be discovered when separators are approached to fire. Celgard 2400 burned and shrunk rapidly resulted from inherent thermal sensitivity and inflammability nature of polyolefin, pure tissue paper also gives a violent combustion, while the composite separator whether crosslinked or not shows self-extinguishing phenomenon. Limiting oxygen index (LOI) dates were tested and shown in Fig. S3, LOI value is observed to increase in the order of Tissue paper < CS(1:0) without SiO2 < CS(10:1) without SiO2 < CS(10:1). This demonstrates the addition of nano-SiO2, the existence of fluorine element in coating layer and the fabrication of crosslinked network have synergetic effect in improving flame retardancy of CS(10:1) separator (X. Zhang et al., 2021). These behaviors will be helpful for the improvement of battery safety.
Separator should achieve certain mechanical property to meet winding operation in the production process and resist the growth of lithium dendrite during battery cycling (Wu, Ning, Jiang, Shi, & Huang, 2019). The stress-strain curves were carried out and displayed in Fig. 3(d). It can be found that pure tissue paper has a very low tensile strength of 2.9 MPa. After PVDF-HFP and SiO2 coated on tissue paper, enhanced tensile strength (7.5 MPa) is obtained for CS(1:0) separator. Especially, when PEI also introduced in coating layer, tensile strength is increased substantially and CS(10:1) separator displays the maximum value of about 9.9 MPa. This can be ascribed to the formation of 3D crosslinked network between PVDF-HFP and PEI, which is hard to deform when suffered from external force (Chuang et al., 2021). However, with the continuous increase of crosslinking degree, tensile strength begins to reduce for CS(5:1) and CS(5:2) separator. This demonstrates that excessive crosslinked structure is too firm to absorb more external energy, thus leading to the occurrence of breakage prematurely. Clearly, tensile strength can reach the maximum improvement when coating layer incorporated with a suitable crosslinking ratio. This is a very satisfactory result when compared with other coating layers reported in previous literatures (J. Zhang et al., 2020), but still lower than that of Celgard 2400 due to its special uniaxial tension process during fabrication (E. Wang et al., 2020).
3.5 Electrochemical performance
Internal resistance can determine ohmic polarization degree in battery (Hasanpoor et al., 2021). Bulk resistance of separator together with interfacial resistance between separator and electrode restrict internal impedance in this system. As shown in Fig. 4(a), the interception of Nyquist plots on X-axis increases in the order of CS(10:1)(3.5Ω) < CS(20:1)(4.2Ω) < Celgard2400(4.6Ω) < CS(1:0)(5.2Ω) < CS(5:1)(6.2Ω) < CS(5:2)(6.9Ω), demonstrating the lowest bulk resistance for CS(10:1) separator. The ionic conductivities of separators were calculated according to Eq. 3 and decreased in the sequence of CS(10:1) > CS(20:1) > CS(1:0) > CS(5:1) > CS(5:2) > Celgard2400, which was consistent with the result of contact angles. Electrolyte uptake and penetration in separator are two important factors to determine ionic conductivity, which can ensure the number and mobility of Li+ during battery operation (Kim et al., 2020). CS(10:1) own the highest electrolyte uptake and basically unaffected infiltration at this crosslinking ratio, thus providing outstanding ionic conductivity. As crosslinking degree deepened, the infiltration of electrolyte in separator would be suffered from reduced aperture, thus appearing the attenuation phenomenon in conductivity. Compared with Celgard 2400, all composite separators have higher ionic conductivities but bigger thicknesses. Only for CS(10:1) and CS(20:1) separator, ionic conductivity can offset negative effect by thickness, thus giving lower bulk impedance.
Interfacial compatibility between separator and electrode is another parameter to influence ohmic polarization degree and Li+ storage capacity (H. Zhao et al., 2020). Fig. 4(b) gives interfacial impedances of simulate batteries based on Celgard 2400 or a series of composite separators. The distance between intercepts of Nyquist plots on the real axis is considered as interfacial resistance, which includes solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film impedance located at high frequency region and charger transfer impedance placed in medium or low frequency region (Xu et al., 2015). It can be found the distance between semicircle intercepts increase stepwise with a sequence of CS(10:1) < CS(20:1) < CS(5:1) < CS(5:2) < CS(1:0) < Celgard2400, indicating better interfacial compatibility existed between crosslinked composite separator and electrode. Especially when crosslinking ratio regulated at 10:1, most favorable interfacial compatibility is reached. This can be ascribed to strong binding force produced by crosslinked network to liquid electrolyte, which will reduce free electrolyte and minimize its side reactions occurred on lithium electrode, thus cutting down SEI film impedance (Lv et al., 2021). For CS(10:1) separator, more electrolyte are entrapped by crosslinked network so that thinner SEI film and lower impedance obtained. On the other hand, superior electrolyte absorption behavior of CS(10:1) separator can facilitate to form a gel layer with adhesive property at the separator/electrode interface, thus leading to closer interfacial contact and faster Li+ transfer (H. Zhao et al., 2020). These two factors together bring about the interfacial optimization between CS(10:1) separator and electrode.
Separator after absorbing electrolyte should maintain stability within a wide voltage range to offer a higher operating potential for LIB or withstand overcharge/overdischarge (Kim et al., 2020). Electrochemical window based on SS/separator/Li cell was detected by Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) method and the corresponding result was depicted in Fig. 4(c). It can be found that there is a sudden current increase in LSV curve when voltage increased to a certain value, which declares the occurrence of oxidation decomposition reaction in this system (Kim et al., 2020). Accordingly, initial decomposition voltages can be observed to increase in the order of Celgard2400 < CS(5:2) < CS(5:1) < CS(1:0) < CS(20:1) < CS(10:1), indicating better anodic stability for CS(10:1) separator. This behavior can be attributed to improved electrolyte storage capability and enhanced binding force between composite separator and carbonate electrolyte by the construction of crosslinked network, which can alleviate the decomposition of free solvent molecules on the anode, thus being inclined to provide broader electrochemical window for LIB (Liang, Liang, Cao, & Wu, 2021). While crosslinking degree increased, electrolyte storage capability begins to get weaker, thus resulting to the existence of more free electrolyte in cell and the earlier appearance of oxide decomposition.
Lithium ion transference number is an important parameter in investigating concentration polarization phenomenon (Zahn, Lagadec, Hess, & Wood, 2016). In this study, Li+ transference numbers (tLi+) were estimated by the combination of chronoamperometry and EIS of Li/separator/Li cells as shown in Fig. 4(d-i) and calculated by Eq. 4. We can find that tLi+ presents an increasing trend in the order of Celgard2400 < CS(5:2) < CS(5:1) < CS(1:0) < CS(20:1) < CS(10:1), indicating that appropriate crosslinking degree can improve lithium ion transference number. This is mainly related to physical binding produced by crosslinked network to larger ions PF6−, which will restrict mobility of anion and give lithium ions more chance to take part in charge transfer (Suriyakumar & Stephan, 2020). Meanwhile, nano-SiO2 in the coating layer of composite separator can also serve as Lewis acid centers to trap electrolyte anions (K. Liu et al., 2017; D. Zhou et al., 2016). These two factors finally give a superior tLi+ for CS(10:1) separator compared with Celgard 2400 and traditional composite separator. However, as crosslinking degree continues to increase, there is an obvious decline observed for tLi+. This can be interpreted as the loss of effective fixing to electrolyte due to the shrinkage of pore structures as discussed above, which will directly result in free movement of PF6− and cut down charge transfer duty of Li+. The higher tLi+ for CS(10:1) separator will provide timely replenishment of Li+ during electrode reaction and be benefit to weaken concentration polarization degree (Xia et al., 2021). According to detailed investigation and analysis, in the following study we will choose CS(10:1) separator to fabricate battery due to its outstanding physical properties and electrochemical performance.
3.6 Cell performance
Lithium ion batteries assembling with Celgard 2400, CS(1:0) or CS(10:1) separator were respectively charged at a constant current rate 0.2 C and discharged at different current rates ranging from 0.2 C to 2 C and then back to 0.2 C. As shown in Fig. 5(a-c), discharge capacities of the three systems decrease gradually with the increase of discharge C rate. This can be attributed to aggravated polarization phenomenon at a higher current density including ohmic, concentration and electrochemical polarization, which will cause the reduction of discharge voltage and shorten discharge time to less than theoretical value, thus leading to attenuated discharge capacity (Yan et al., 2020). When discharge rate varied from 2 C back to 0.2 C, compared with other two systems, the battery using CS(10:1) separator presents higher coincidence whether in discharge voltage or capacity, indicating its better reversibility in cell performance. Fig. 5(d) summarizes rate capabilities of the three systems. Superior discharge capacities are observed for CS(10:1) sample in all of the C-rate. Especially, when current rate increased to 2 C, there are substantial increase discovered in the capacity divergence between them. As discussed above, CS(10:1) separator own superior ionic conductivity, excellent interface compatibility between electrode and separator as well as higher Li+ transference number, which will lead to lower ohmic resistance and concentration polarization existed in battery, thus giving enhanced discharge performance. The influence resulted from internal polarization will be amplified as discharge rate increased, thus the capacity difference between them becoming more pronounced (Valverde et al., 2020). This outstanding cell performance at elevated rate will provide possibility for the application of CS(10:1) separator in high power LIB.
The battery must maintain a high discharge capacity after multiple cycles, which is a premise of application (Xia et al., 2021). As shown in Fig. 5(e), 100 charge/discharge cycles were carried out at 0.5 C/0.5 C rate to evaluate cycling performance. We can find all the three systems show almost 100% coulombic efficiency. Moreover, in the initial cycles, system CS(10:1) reveals slight higher discharge capacities (about 153 mAh g−1) than system CS(1:0) (about 149 mAh g−1), but there is a larger capacity divergency appeared between system Celgard 2400 (about 138 mAh g−1) and CS(10:1). This phenomenon is consistent with rate capabilities mentioned above. As cycling tests going on, CS(1:0) system gives a stepwise decrease phenomenon in discharge capacity. Especially a sudden drop is observed from the battery based on CS(1:0) separator with discharge capacity decreasing to 90 mAh g−1 when cycle number surpassed 65. Finally, LIB using CS(10:1) separator gives a discharge capacity retention about 98% after 100 cycles, much higher than that of Celgard 2400 (about 84%) and CS(1:0) system (about 64%). This can be attributed to 3D crosslinked coating layer constructed on tissue paper through hyperbranched PEI and polymer matrix PVDF-HFP, which can not only fix electrolyte firmly in separator but also provide a steady coating structure to endure long term swelling of electrolyte. These behaviors will not only ensure sufficient electrolyte for lithium ion transport but also maintain efficient physical isolation existed between electrodes during the whole cycling, thus bringing about stable cycling performance for system CS(10:1) (Xia et al., 2021). On the contrary, separator CS(1:0) only employs polymer PVDF-HFP as binder, which is easy to loss overall structure and shed from substrate after swollen by electrolyte, thus resulting in micro-short circuit occurred in the last stage and the attenuation of capacity (Jia et al., 2020).