Multi-drug-resistant diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes in pediatric patients with gastroenteritis from central Iran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19830/v1

Abstract

Background Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) is a significant cause of gastroenteritis and a major public health problem. This study investigates the prevalence and the antibiotic resistance patterns of DEC that were isolated from infectious diarrhea samples of pediatric patients from central Iran.

Methods Pediatric diarrhea samples were collected from 230 pediatric patients visiting the hospital. E. coli pathotypes were diagnosed by using conventional culture methods and PCR. Antibiotic resistance profiles, the frequency of multi-drug resistance (MDR), and the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of extended spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL), AmpC and integron-associated genes were analyzed.

Results Of the 230 samples of infectious diarrhea, 91 (39.5%) produced E. coli isolates. Of these, 32 cases (35.1%) were identified as DEC by culture and PCR. The frequency of the E. coli pathotypes obtained was as follows: EAEC 11/32 (34.3%), EPEC 9/32 (28.1%), ETEC 6/32 (18.7%), EIEC 3/32 (9.3%), and EHEC 3/32 (9.3%). The antibiotic resistance rates were greater for nalidixic acid (30/32; 93.7%), ampicillin (29/32; 90.6%), and tetracycline (25/32; 78.1%) than for any of the other tested antibiotics. High levels of MDR (25/32; 78.1%) and the presence of ESBL (18/32; 56.2%) and AmpC (9/32; 28.1%) were observed in the DEC isolates. The isolates showed a higher frequency of the ESBL genes [ bla TEM (18/18; 100%), bla CTX-M15 (17/18; 94.4%)], and AmpC [ bla CIT (4/9; 44.4%) and bla DHA (4/9; 44.4%)] than of the other ESBL and AmpC genes.

Conclusion DEC appeared to be the second-most abundant agent of diarrhea in pediatric patients after Campylobacter jejuni , with frequent MDR and ESBL presence.

Background

Gastroenteritis causes 525,000 deaths per year worldwide, especially in children younger than five years old (1). It can cause serious growth retardation and malnutrition (2). Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) is one of the most abundant agents in pediatric gastroenteritis, particularly in developing countries (3). DEC can be divided into various pathogroups: enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), entero-invasive E. coli (EIEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) (4). Among these pathotypes, EAEC, EPEC and ETEC are the most significant enteric pathogens and cause 30–40% of the acute pediatric diarrhea cases in developing and developed countries (5). The emergence of multi-drug-resistant (exhibiting resistance against two or more antibiotics, MDR) E. coli strains is a public health concern and is complicating the treatment of various serious infections, particularly in pediatrics (6). Lately, worldwide diffusion of extended spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli has been most remarkable (7). Hence, the analysis of the frequency of diarrheagenic E. coli pathotypes to the total burden of diarrheal disease and the antimicrobial resistance pattern of these pathotypes is necessary for developing useful interventions that can effectively reduce the mortality and morbidity related to diarrhea.

The number of outbreaks of diarrhea and dysentery in central Iran, especially in the summer, is very high in pediatrics (8), but the prevalence of DEC and antibiotic resistance in this region is unknown. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the abundance, the phenotypic antimicrobial resistance levels and the resistance gene content of the region’s DEC by examining diarrhea samples from pediatric patients.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

For this cross-sectional, descriptive study, 230 samples of diarrhea were collected from children who were referred to the Amirkabir Educational-Referral Center from the beginning of May 2015 to the end of February 2016. Consent and questionnaire forms were supplied to the parents or guardians of each patient. The inclusion criteria of the study were 1- providing a signed consent form and completed questionnaire, either by the patient or the patient’s parents or caregivers, 2- providing a stool sample containing more than five white blood cells per high-power field (HPF) (8). 3- not having received antibiotics by the patient for at least a week before consultation at the hospital. This research obtained approval from the ethics committee of the Arak University of Medical Sciences (ARAKMU.REC. 93-176-30 and 1395.83).

Phenotypic investigation: To identify E. coli strains and EHEC, diarrheal stool samples were cultured directly on MacConkey and Sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) agar media (Merck, Hamburg, Germany), respectively. Next, colonies that grew on these media were identified by biochemical tests. API 20E test strips (bioMerieux, France) were used for final identification. Then, O157: H7 serological testing (SSI, Copenhagen, Denmark) of isolated colorless colonies (due to lack of sorbitol fermentation) was done. Positive controls of different E. coli pathotypes were obtained from the microbiology department of the Arak University of Medical Sciences.

Antibiotic resistance determination

According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2017 guidelines (9), a disk diffusion assay was performed on the isolated E. coli colonies. The antibiotic discs contained nalidixic acid (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefixime (5 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftizoxime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), azithromycin (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and imipenem (10 µg) (Mast Diagnostics, United Kingdom).

Detection of ESBL and AmpC by phenotypic methods

To identify ESBL-positive isolates, the samples were subjected to combination disk diffusion, and double-disk synergy testing methods, and to identify AmpC-positive isolates, disk testing and phenol boronic acid methods according to the 2017 CLSI guidelines were used (9).

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted directly from the fecal samples and the reference E. coli. isolates using the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount and purity of the extracted DNA were measured with a NanoDrop apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham. Massachusetts, United States).

Genotypic identification

PCR of the uldA gene was performed to confirm E. coli at the genus level (10). PCR was performed on the pCVD432 gene for EAEC (11), eae gene for EPEC (12), elt, est genes for ETEC (13), ial gene for EIEC (4), and stx gene for EHEC (12). The ESBL genes (blaTEM, blaCTX−M−1, 2, 8, 14, 15, and blaSHV) and AmpC genes (blaCMY−2, blaCIT, blaACC, blaFOX, blaMOX and blaDHA) were identified by PCR as well (8). PCR of the qnr determinant genes qnrS, qnrA, and qnrB was performed to amplify the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) targets. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes of the quinolone-resistant E. col isolates were identified using DNA sequencing (8). Quaternary ammonium compounds (qac) resistance genes were investigated using PCR (8).

Integron detection

To investigate the presence of class 1, 2 and 3 integrons, PCR was performed as previously described (8).

Results and Discussion

Of the 230 analyzed samples, 91 (39.5%) produced E. coli isolates and 32 (35.1%) were identified as DEC, based on a combination of culture and PCR. All the culture-positive samples were confirmed as positive by PCR. The female-to-male DEC infection ratio was 1.1:1 (Table 1).

Table 1. Total number, sex, and age characteristics of the patients with E. coli pathotypes

We showed that DEC (n=32, 13.9%) was second only to Campylobacter jejuni (n=45, 19.5%; p = 0.003) as the most abundant agent of diarrhea in pediatric patients, whereas in Shiraz (Iran) and India, DEC was the most common agent found (14-16). Pediatricians should therefore request standard microbiological methods for determination of the pathogens involved and for designing subsequent therapy.

Phenotypic and genotypic investigation: The isolates showed a greater frequency of the EAEC (11/32; 34.3%) and EPEC (9/32; 28.1%) pathotypes than of the other E. coli pathotypes. (Table 1). The PCR results were consistently in accordance with those obtained from culture. Table 5 shows the abundance of DEC and E. coli pathotypes in the present study and the pathotypes reported in previous studies. The differences in the frequencies of DEC and E. coli pathotypes may be related to a variety of factors, including differences in climate and other environmental conditions, the level of economic development, individual hygiene practices, lack of/improper medical health care, poor quality medical care, and contamination of food or of food manufacturing or processing facilities (17).

The patients showed a greater frequency of mucus in the stool (28/32; 87.5%), abdominal pain (24/32; 75%), and vomiting (19/32; 59.3%) than of other clinical symptoms (Table 2). Table 5 shows the numerous clinical symptoms identified in this study and in other published papers. Our analysis showed differences in the clinical symptoms between various bacterial infections, but many overlaps were also evident. Hence, a laboratory-based identification of DEC is still required for etiological verification of this diarrheal disease. Nevertheless, pediatricians should seriously consider EHEC as an etiological agent of diarrhea when blood is found in stool specimens.

Table 2: Frequency of clinical symptoms in pediatric patients with E. coli pathotypes

Phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic resistance determination: The CLSI 2017 guidelines indicated greater antibiotic resistance rates for nalidixic acid (30/32; 93.7%), ampicillin (29/32; 90.6%), and tetracycline (25/32; 78.1%) than for any of the other antibiotics. All DEC isolates were susceptible to gentamicin and imipenem. DEC is a common agent in developing countries and is spread by contaminated water and food; therefore, its frequency and antimicrobial resistance are public health concerns (17). Full descriptions of the antibiotic resistance of DEC and E. coli pathotypes, from this study and others, are provided in Table 5. These results strongly suggest that nalidixic acid, ampicillin, tetracycline, and cotrimoxazole can no longer be empirically prescribed for the treatment of severe diarrhea and dysentery in central Iran. Since 1960, cotrimoxazole has been one of the World Health Organization’s essential medicines, as it is widely available and easily affordable and shows a broad spectrum of activity against an extensive range of infections, including diarrhea.

High levels of MDR (25/32; 78.1%), ESBL (18/32; 56.2%), and AmpC (9/32; 28.1%) gene expression were observed for the DEC isolates (Table 3). The most extensive MDR strains for our collection of DEC showed combined resistance to nalidixic acid, ampicillin, tetracycline, and third-generation cephalosporins. The frequency of ESBL positivity was higher in the EAEC pathotype (81.8%) than in the other ESBL-positive E. coli pathotypes.

Table 3. Phenotypic antibiotic resistance rates in E. coli pathotypes

MDR DEC has quickly spread worldwide and represents a serious menace to the proper management of diarrhea and dysentery in developing countries (19). The frequencies of MDR DEC in the present study and in others are summarized in Table 5. The high rate of MDR-resistant isolates in pediatric patients with diarrhea can lead to more frequent treatment failures. In addition, resistant isolates demand the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics for the empiric treatment of infections, adding tremendous costs to treatment of these infections (20).

The isolates showed a higher frequency of the ESBL genes blaTEM (18/18; 100%), blaCTX-M15 (17/18; 94.4%), and AmpC [blaCIT (4/9; 44.4%) and blaDHA (4/9; 44.4%)] than of the other ESBL and AmpC genes (Table 4). Table 5 shows the frequency of ESBL and its encoding genes in DEC and the other E. coli pathotype isolates. The differences in the frequencies of MDR, ESBL, and related genes across various regions may reflect different antibiotic usage patterns and different DEC community compositions (21).

Table 4. Frequency of antibiotic resistance genes among E. coli pathotypes

Among the PMQR determinants, qnrS, and qnrA were positive in 18/30 (60%) and 2/30 (6.6%) in nalidixic acid-resistant DEC strains, respectively and no case of qnrB was found. 20/30 (66.6%) isolates carrying PMQR contain similar mutations in gyrA at amino acid 83 (replacement of serine with leucine) and 18/30 (60%) parC at amino acid 80 (replacement of serine with isoleucine; GenBank accession no. HM068910). Although quinolones/fluoroquinolones are intended to be appropriate drugs against resistant isolates, the enhancement in antimicrobial resistance is a burden in controlling infections caused by DEC (22). In India, qnrS, qnrB, and qnrA were found at 46.6%, 40%, and 0% in the DEC strains, respectively (18). In Tehran (Iran), qnr was found at 72% in the DEC strains (23). These studies indicate that diffusion of qnr resistance genes among these DEC isolates is variable.

Class 1 and 2 integrons were observed in a total of 19/32 (59.3%) and 13/32 (40.6%) DEC strains: were observed. No Class 3 integrons were found (Table 4). Of the three categories of integrons pertinent to antimicrobial resistance, the class I integron is the one most frequently obtained from Gram-negative bacteria (24). The prevalence of integrons in the enterobacteriacae family has been shown to vary and has played a significant role in the spread of drug-resistance (25). In India Int1 had a prevalence of 41.6%, and no cases of Int2 or Int3 were found from DEC isolates (18). The class 1 integron is overcoming in outspreading the MDR genes among these DEC isolates despite the advent of class 2 and 3 integrons. In this study, 16/25 (64%) and 36% of MDR isolates of DEC contained Int1 and Int2 genes, respectively. In Iran (Southwest) MDR in intestinal pathogenic bacteria such as DEC is known to be related with presence (21).

Table 5. Comparison of the frequency, clinical symptoms, and antibiotic resistance of DEC and E. coli pathotypes in this study and in other studies

Conclusion

DEC is second only to Campylobacter jejuni in frequency when compared with other enteropathogens in pediatric patients with diarrhea from central Iran, and the abundance is greater for EAEC than for any other pathotype (15). Thus, pediatricians and, even more importantly, experts in laboratory diagnostics should pay special attention to the identification of these E. coli pathotypes. Pediatricians should keep these resistant bacteria in mind when treating pediatric patients with infectious diarrhea, and empiric antibiotic therapy should be adapted appropriately. Necessary measures must be taken to control the drug resistance of these bacteria.

Abbreviations

DEC: Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, MDR: multi-drug resistance, ESBL: extended spectrum-β-lactamase, EAEC: enteroaggregative E. coli, EPEC: enteropathogenic E. coli, ETEC: enterotoxigenic E. coli, EIEC: entero-invasive E. coli, EHEC: enterohemorrhagic E. coli, PCR: polymerase chain reaction, DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid, HPF: high-power field, SMAC: Sorbitol MacConkey, CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, PMQR: plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance, qac: Quaternary ammonium compounds, BLAST: basic local alignment search tool.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical approval from the Arak University of Medical Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or guardian for participants under 16 years old. There was no access to any information that enabled authors to identify individual patient.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data pertaining to this study are within the manuscript. The datasets analyzed and/or used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors stipulate that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Arak University of Medical Sciences (Numbers: ARAKMU.REC. 93-176-30 and 1395.83)

Authors’ contributions

EGR conceptualized and designed the study. EA were involved in the data collection, generation, and performed data analysis, MM supervised the lab works and wrote the first draft, AvB performed data analysis and writing of the paper. All authors have read and approved this version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the educational assistance of Arak University of Medical Sciences due to its financial contributions to and support of this study.

Disclosure

AvB is an employee of bioMerieux, a company designing, developing and selling infectious disease tests. The company had no influence on the design and execution, either of the study or in the writing of the manuscript. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  1. Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J, Okoi C, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291-301.
  2. Troeger C, Colombara DV, Rao PC, Khalil IA, Brown A, Brewer TG, et al. Global disability-adjusted life-year estimates of long-term health burden and undernutrition attributable to diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(3):e255-e69.
  3. Canizalez-Roman A, Flores-Villaseñor HM, Gonzalez-Nuñez E, Velazquez-Roman J, Vidal JE, Muro-Amador S, et al. Surveillance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from diarrhea cases from children, adults and elderly at Northwest of Mexico. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016;7:1924.
  4. Lee GY, Jang HI, Hwang IG, Rhee MS. Prevalence and classification of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from fresh beef, poultry, and pork in Korea. International journal of food microbiology. 2009;134(3):196-200.
  5. Ifeanyi CIC, Ikeneche NF, Bassey BE, Al-Gallas N, Aissa RB, Boudabous A. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli pathotypes isolated from children with diarrhea in the Federal Capital Territory Abuja, Nigeria. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2015;9(02):165-74.
  6. Mansour Amin MS, Javaherizadeh H, Motamedifar M, Saki M, Veisi H, Ebrahimi S, et al. Antibiotic resistance pattern and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolates in children from southwest Iran. Infection and drug resistance. 2018;11:1097.
  7. Chong Y, Shimoda S, Shimono N. Current epidemiology, genetic evolution and clinical impact of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2018;61:185-8.
  8. Abbasi E, Abtahi H, van Belkum A, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Multidrug-resistant Shigella infection in pediatric patients with diarrhea from central Iran. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2019;12:1535.
  9. Patel J, Weinstein M, Eliopoulos G, Jenkins S, Lewis J, Limbago B. M100 Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. United State: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017:240.
  10. Mohammadzadeh M, Goudarzi H, Dabiri H, Fallah F. Characterization of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Associated with Diarrhea Among Iranian Infants. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2017;5(1).
  11. Jafari F, Garcia-Gil L, Salmanzadeh-Ahrabi S, Shokrzadeh L, Aslani M, Pourhoseingholi M, et al. Diagnosis and prevalence of enteropathogenic bacteria in children less than 5 years of age with acute diarrhea in Tehran children's hospitals. Journal of infection. 2009;58(1):21-7.
  12. Ndlovu T, Le Roux M, Khan W, Khan S. Co-detection of virulent Escherichia coli genes in surface water sources. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116808.
  13. Xia X, Meng J, McDermott PF, Ayers S, Blickenstaff K, Tran T-T, et al. Presence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and other potentially diarrheagenic E. coli strains in retail meats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(6):1709-17.
  14. Shrivastava AK, Kumar S, Mohakud NK, Suar M, Sahu PS. Multiple etiologies of infectious diarrhea and concurrent infections in a pediatric outpatient-based screening study in Odisha, India. Gut pathogens. 2017;9(1):16.
  15. Abbasi E, Belkum Av, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Quinolone and Macrolide-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni in Pediatric Gastroenteritis Patients from Central Iran. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2019.
  16. Aminshahidi M, Arastehfar A, Pouladfar G, Arman E, Fani F. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella with high rate of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase production: two predominant etiological agents of acute diarrhea in Shiraz, Iran. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2017;23(8):1037-44.
  17. Gomes TA, Elias WP, Scaletsky IC, Guth BE, Rodrigues JF, Piazza RM, et al. Diarrheagenic escherichia coli. brazilian journal of microbiology. 2016;47:3-30.
  18. Natarajan M, Kumar D, Mandal J, Biswal N, Stephen S. A study of virulence and antimicrobial resistance pattern in diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolated from diarrhoeal stool specimens from children and adults in a tertiary hospital, Puducherry, India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2018;37(1):17.
  19. Zeighami H, Haghi F, Hajiahmadi F, Kashefiyeh M, Memariani M. Multi-drug-resistant enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli isolated from children with diarrhea. Journal of Chemotherapy. 2015;27(3):152-5.
  20. Van Duin D, Paterson DL. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in the community: trends and lessons learned. Infectious Disease Clinics. 2016;30(2):377-90.
  21. Kargar M, Mohammadalipour Z, Doosti A, Lorzadeh S, Japoni-Nejad A. High prevalence of class 1 to 3 integrons among multidrug-resistant diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in southwest of Iran. Osong public health and research perspectives. 2014;5(4):193-8.
  22. Namboodiri SS, Opintan JA, Lijek RS, Newman MJ, Okeke IN. Quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli from Accra, Ghana. BMC microbiology. 2011;11(1):44.
  23. Heidary M, Momtaz H, Madani M. Characterization of diarrheagenic antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli isolated from pediatric patients in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2014;16(4).
  24. Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY, Tae SH, Choi CH, Moon DC, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Korea. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2005;55(5):639-44.
  25. Deng Y, Bao X, Ji L, Chen L, Liu J, Miao J, et al. Resistance integrons: class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2015;14(1):45.
  26. Yu J, Jing H, Lai S, Xu W, Li M, Wu J, et al. Etiology of diarrhea among children under the age five in China: Results from a five-year surveillance. Journal of Infection. 2015;71(1):19-27.
  27. Saeed A, Abd H, Sandstrom G. Microbial aetiology of acute diarrhoea in children under five years of age in Khartoum, Sudan. Journal of medical microbiology. 2015;64(Pt 4):432.
  28. Miri ST, Dashti A, Mostaan S, Kazemi F, Bouzari S. Identification of different Escherichia coli pathotypes in north and north-west provinces of Iran. Iranian journal of microbiology. 2017;9(1):33.
  29. Chen Y, Chen X, Zheng S, Yu F, Kong H, Yang Q, et al. Serotypes, genotypes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of human diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli isolates circulating in southeastern China. Clinical microbiology and infection. 2014;20(1):52-8.

Tables

Table 1. Total number, sex, and age characteristics of the patients with E. coli pathotypes

E. coli pathotypes

DEC

EACE

EPEC

ETEC

EIEC

Stx negative EHEC O157:H7

LT

ST

Total number (%)

32/91 (35.1%)

11/32 (34.3%)

9/32 (28.1%)

6/32 (18.7%)

3/32 (9.3%)

3/32 (9.3%)

4/6 (66.6%)

2/6 (33.3%)

Male

15/32 (46.8%)

4/11 (36.3%)

5/9 (55.5%)

4/6 (66.6%)

1/3 (33.3%)

1/3 (33.3%)

3/4 (75%)

1/2 (50%)

Female

17/32 (53.1%)

7/11 (63.6%)

4/9 (44.4%)

2/6(33.3%)

2/3 (66.6%)

2/3 (66.6%)

1/4 (25%)

1/2 (50%)

Average age

4 years and 6 months

 

3 years and 1 month

 

2 years and 9 months

 

4 years and 6 months

5 years and 8 months

4 years and 1 month

3 years and 8 months

 

6 years

Youngest patient's age

5 months

5 months

8 months

9 months

3 years and 5 months

1 year

9 months

3 years

Oldest patient's age

10 years

10 years

10 years

9 years

9 years

6 years

9 years

9 years

 

 

Table 2: Frequency of clinical symptoms in pediatric patients with E. coli pathotypes

E. coli pathotypes

Mucus in the stool

Abdominal pain

Vomiting

Fever

Blood in the stool

DEC

28/32 (87.5%)

24/32 (75%)

19/32 (59.3%)

17/32 (53.1%)

10/32 (31.2%)

EAEC

10/11 (90.9%)

9/11 (81.8%)

8/11 (72.7%)

7/11 (63.6%)

4/11 (36.3%)

EPEC

9/9 (100%)

4/9 (44.4%)

5/9 (55.5%)

4/9 (44.4%)

1/9 (11.1%)

 

ETEC

LT

 

5/6 (83.3%)

3/4 (75%)

 

5/6 (83.3%)

3/4 (75%)

 

2/6 (33.3%)

1/4 (25%)

 

2/6 (33.3%)

1/4 (25%)

 

0%

0%

ST

2/2 (100%)

2/2 (100%)

1/2 (50%)

1/2 (50%)

0%

EIEC

3/3 (100%)

3/3 (100%)

3/3 (100%)

3/3 (100%)

2/3 (66.6%)

Stx negative EHEC O157:H7

1/3 (33.3%)

3/3 (100%)

1/3 (33.3%)

1/3 (33.3%)

3/3 (100%)

 

 

Table 3. Phenotypic antibiotic resistance rates in E. coli pathotypes

Antibiotic

DEC

n:32

EAEC

n:11

EPEC

n:9

ETEC

n:6

EIEC

n:3

Stx negative EHEC O157:H7

n:3

Nalidixic acid

Ampicillin

30 (93.7%)

29 (90.6%)

11 (100%)

11 (100%)

8 (88.8%)

8 (88.8%)

5 (83.3%)

5 (83.3%)

3 (100%)

3 (100%)

3 (100%)

2 (66.6%)

Tetracycline

25 (78.1%)

10 (90.9%)

5 (55.5%)

5 (83.3%)

3 (100%)

2 (66.6%)

Cotrimoxazole

23 (71.8%)

10 (90.9%)

5 (55.5%)

3 (50%)

2 (66.6%)

3 (100%)

Chloramphenicol

18 (56.2%)

7 (63.6%)

4 (44.4%)

4(66.6%)

2 (66.6%)

1 (33.3%)

Ceftriaxone

18 (56.2%)

9 (81.8%)

5 (55.5%)

2 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

Cefixime

18 (56.2%)

9 (81.8%)

5 (55.5%)

2 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

Cefotaxime

18(56.2%)

9 (81.8%)

5 (55.5%)

2 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

Ceftizoxime

12 (37.5%)

6 (54.5%)

4 (44.4%)

2 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Cefoxitin

9 (28.1%)

6 (54.5%)

2 (22.2%)

1 (16.6%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Ceftazidime

9 (28.1%)

5 (45.4%)

4 (44.4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Azithromycin

8 (25%)

4 (36.3%)

4 (44.4%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (33.3%)

Ciprofloxacin

5 (15.6%)

2 (18.1%)

3 (33.3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (33.3%)

Gentamicin

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

Imipenem

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

MDR

25 (78.1%)

9 (81.8%)

6 (66.6%)

4 (66.6%)

3 (100%)

3 (100%)

ESBL+

18 (56.2%)

9 (81.8%)

5 (55.5%)

2 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

AmpC+

9 (28.1%)

6 (54.5%)

2 (22.2%)

1 (16.6%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

 

Table 4. Frequency of antibiotic resistance genes among E. coli pathotypes

Resistance

 

Target gene

DEC

 

EAEC

 

EPEC

 

ETEC

 

EIEC

Stx negative EHEC O157:H7

 

 

 

Sulfonamide

 

Sul2

18/23 (78.2%)

9/10 (90%)

5/5 (100%)

2/3 (66.6%)

1/2 (50%)

1/3 (33.3%)

 

Sul1

 

14/23(60.8%)

 

6/10 (60%)

 

4/5 (80%)

 

1/3 (33.3%)

 

1/2 (50%)

 

2/3 (66.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ESBL+

 

 

blaTEM

18/18 (100%)

9/9 (100%)

5/5 (100%)

2/2 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

blaCTX-M-15

17/18 (94.4%)

8/9 (88.8%)

5/5 (100%)

2/2 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

blaCTX-M-1

12/18 (66.6%)

6/9 (66.6%)

4/5 (80%)

1/2 (50%)

1/1 (100%)

0%

blaCTX-M-14

12/18 (66.6%)

7/9 (77.7%)

4/5 (80%)

1/2 (50%)

0%

0%

blaSHV

6/18 (33.3%)

3/9 (33.3%)

3/5 (60%)

0%

0%

1/1 (100%)

blaCTX-M-2

6/18 (33.3%)

3/9 (33.3%)

2/5 (40%)

1/2 (50%)

0%

0%

blaCTX-M-8

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AmpC+

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

blaCIT

4/9 (44.4%)

2/6 (33.3%)

1/2 (50%)

1/1 (100%)

-

-

blaDHA

4/9 (44.4%)

2/6 (33.3%)

1/2 (50%)

1/1 (100%)

-

-

blaCMY-2

3/9 (44.4%)

1/6 (100%)

1/2 (100%)

1/1 (100%)

-

-

blaACC

1/9 (11.1%)

1/6 (16.6%)

0%

0%

-

-

blaFOX

0%

0%

0%

0%

-

-

blaMOX

0%

0%

0%

0%

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fluoroquinolone

 

gyrA

20/30 (66.6%)

8/11 (72.7%)

7/8 (87.5%)

2/5 (40%)

1/3 (33.3%)

2/3 (66.6%)

parC

18/30 (60%)

7/11 (63.6%)

7/8 (87.5%)

2/5 (40%)

1/3 (33.3%)

1/3 (33.3%)

qnrS

18/30 (60%)

7/11 (63.6%)

6/8 (75%)

2/5 (40%)

1/3 (33.3%)

2/3 (66.6%)

qnrA

2/30 (6.6%)

1/11 (9%)

1/8 (12.5%)

0%

0%

0%

qnrB

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Integrase

 

Int1

19/32 (59.3%)

6/11 (54.5%)

6/9 (66.6%)

4/6 (66.6%)

2/3 (66.6%)

1/3 (33.3%)

Int2

13/32 (40.6%)

4/11 (36.3%)

7/9 (77.7%)

1/6 (16.6%)

0%

1/3 (33.3%)

Int3

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

 

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds

 

 

qac

 

23/32 (71.8%)

 

8/11 (72.7%)

 

8/9 (88.8%)

 

 

3/6 (50%)

 

 

2/3 (66.6%)

 

 

2/3 (66.6%)

 

 

 

Table 5. Comparison of the frequency, clinical symptoms, and antibiotic resistance of DEC and E. coli pathotypes in this study and in other studies

E. coli pathotypes

In this study

Shiraz (Iran)

India

China

(Throughout

the country)

Tehran (Iran)

Sudan

Iran’s north and northwest provinces

China

(Southeastern)

DEC

35.1%

43.6%

30.7%

5%

58.9%

48 %

27%

14.1%

EAEC

34.3%

23.6%

6.9%

1.6%

16.6%

43 %

0%

62.5%

EPEC

28.1%

10.9%

21.5%

1.6%

12.6%

29 %

10.5%

15%

ETEC

18.7%

3.6%

10.7%

1%

10.8%

18 %

5.8%

17.9%

EIEC

9.3%

5.5%

-

0.5%

-

9 %

0%

0.3%

EHEC

9.3%

0%

4.6%

0.3%

18.9%

-

3.5%

4%

The most abundant E. coli pathotype

EAEC 81.8%

EAEC 84.6%

EPEC 21.5%

EAEC and EPEC 1.6%

EHEC 18.9%

EAEC 43 %

EPEC 10.5%

EAEC 62.5%

 

Clinical symptoms in patients with DEC

Mucus in the stool

87.5%

-

-

65%

51.5%

-

-

-

Abdominal pain

75%

-

-

3.4%

-

-

-

-

Vomiting

59.3%

-

-

5.1%

52.6%

-

-

-

 

 

Antibiotic resistance in patients with DEC

Nalidixic acid

93.7%

-

-

-

-

34%

-

-

Ampicillin

90.6%

93.8%

-

-

-

47%

-

91.8%

Tetracycline

78.1%

-

-

-

-

24%

-

57%

Cotrimoxazole

71.8%

77.1%

-

-

-

-

-

52.3%

Cefotaxime

56.2%

66.7%

-

-

-

-

-

35.7%

Ceftriaxone

56.2%

66.7%

-

-

-

-

-

-

ESBL in DEC isolates

56.2%

66.7%

-

-

-

-

-

34.5%

The most abundant ESBL genes

blaTEM 100% and blaCTX-M15 94.4%

-

-

-

-

-

-

blaCTX-M 94.2%

References

-

(16)

(14)

(26)

(11)

(27)

(28)

(29)

-: Not reviewed