Background
Plastics now pollute marine environments across the globe. On entering these environments, plastics are rapidly colonised by a diverse community of microorganisms termed the Plastisphere. Members of the Plastisphere have a myriad of diverse functions typically found in any biofilm but, additionally, a number of marine Plastisphere studies have claimed the presence of plastic-biodegrading organisms, although with little mechanistic verification. Here we obtained a microbial community from marine plastic debris and analysed the community succession across six weeks of incubation with different polyethylene terephthalate (PET) products as the sole carbon source, and further characterised the mechanisms involved in PET degradation by two bacterial isolates from the Plastisphere.
Results
We found that all communities differed significantly from the inoculum and were dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, i.e. Alteromonadaceae and Thalassospiraceae at early time points, Alcanivoraceae at later time points and Vibrionaceae throughout. The large number of encoded enzymes involved in PET degradation found in predicted metagenomes and the observation of polymer oxidation by FTIR analyses both suggested PET degradation was occurring. However, we were unable to detect intermediates of PET hydrolysis with metabolomic analyses, which may be attributed to their rapid depletion by the complex community. To further confirm the PET biodegrading potential within the Plastisphere of marine plastic debris, we used a combined proteogenomic and metabolomic approach to characterise amorphous PET degradation by two novel marine isolates, Thioclava sp. BHET1 and Bacillus sp. BHET2. The identification of PET hydrolytic intermediates by metabolomics confirmed that both isolates were able to degrade PET. High-throughput proteomics revealed that while Thioclava sp. BHET1 used the degradation pathway identified in terrestrial environment counterparts, these were absent in Bacillus sp. BHET2, indicating that either the enzymes used by this bacterium share little homology with those characterised previously, or that this bacterium uses a novel pathway for PET degradation.
Conclusions
Overall, the results of our multi-OMIC characterisation of PET degradation provide a significant step forwards in our understanding of marine plastic degradation by bacterial isolates and communities and evidences the biodegrading potential extant in the Plastisphere of marine plastic debris.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4
Figure 5
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Posted 13 Nov, 2020
Received 03 Feb, 2021
On 02 Feb, 2021
Received 26 Dec, 2020
On 24 Nov, 2020
On 22 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 17 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 27 Oct, 2020
Posted 13 Nov, 2020
Received 03 Feb, 2021
On 02 Feb, 2021
Received 26 Dec, 2020
On 24 Nov, 2020
On 22 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 17 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 02 Nov, 2020
On 27 Oct, 2020
Background
Plastics now pollute marine environments across the globe. On entering these environments, plastics are rapidly colonised by a diverse community of microorganisms termed the Plastisphere. Members of the Plastisphere have a myriad of diverse functions typically found in any biofilm but, additionally, a number of marine Plastisphere studies have claimed the presence of plastic-biodegrading organisms, although with little mechanistic verification. Here we obtained a microbial community from marine plastic debris and analysed the community succession across six weeks of incubation with different polyethylene terephthalate (PET) products as the sole carbon source, and further characterised the mechanisms involved in PET degradation by two bacterial isolates from the Plastisphere.
Results
We found that all communities differed significantly from the inoculum and were dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, i.e. Alteromonadaceae and Thalassospiraceae at early time points, Alcanivoraceae at later time points and Vibrionaceae throughout. The large number of encoded enzymes involved in PET degradation found in predicted metagenomes and the observation of polymer oxidation by FTIR analyses both suggested PET degradation was occurring. However, we were unable to detect intermediates of PET hydrolysis with metabolomic analyses, which may be attributed to their rapid depletion by the complex community. To further confirm the PET biodegrading potential within the Plastisphere of marine plastic debris, we used a combined proteogenomic and metabolomic approach to characterise amorphous PET degradation by two novel marine isolates, Thioclava sp. BHET1 and Bacillus sp. BHET2. The identification of PET hydrolytic intermediates by metabolomics confirmed that both isolates were able to degrade PET. High-throughput proteomics revealed that while Thioclava sp. BHET1 used the degradation pathway identified in terrestrial environment counterparts, these were absent in Bacillus sp. BHET2, indicating that either the enzymes used by this bacterium share little homology with those characterised previously, or that this bacterium uses a novel pathway for PET degradation.
Conclusions
Overall, the results of our multi-OMIC characterisation of PET degradation provide a significant step forwards in our understanding of marine plastic degradation by bacterial isolates and communities and evidences the biodegrading potential extant in the Plastisphere of marine plastic debris.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4
Figure 5
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...