Materials and equipments.
For preparing the electrospun microribbon nets, nylon 6/6 (pellets, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; CAS number 32131-17-2) and formic acid (ACS reagent, ≥88.0%, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; CAS number 64-18-6) were used. Further, the conducting polymer was synthesized using lithium perchlorate (LiClO4, battery grade, dry, 99.99% metals basis, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; CAS number 7791-03-9), pyrrole (for synthesis, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; CAS number 109-97-7), and acetonitrile (for HPLC, gradient grade, ≥ 99.9%, Honeywell, Charlotte, NC, USA; CAS number 75-05-8) as solvent. A gold target (99.99% purity, Kurt J. Lesker) and Ar (99.9999% purity, Linde) were employed for the metallization process. All solutions were prepared by using ultrapure water generated in a Milli-Q equipment (18.2 MΩ cm).
The procedure to cover the metalized microribbons with PPy, involved the use a Parstat 2273 Princeton Applied Research for electropolymerizing the monomer. The metalized microribbons attached on stainless steel frames were used as working electrode (WE), a platinum mesh as counter electrode (CE) and a commercial saturated calomel electrode as reference electrode (RE). For the electrochemical characterization, a MultiAutolab M101 potentiostat/galvanostat equipped with NOVA 2.1.4 software was used. The electrochemical cell was based on strips taken from the PPy coated microribbon net and used as WE, a platimum plate used as CE and a commercial Ag/AgCl electrode as RE. For the metallization process, a Torr DC sputtering equipment was employed.
Preparation of PPy based fibrillary artificial muscle.
The PPy based fibrillary artificial muscles were prepared according to a procedure described in a previous work25. At first, nylon 6/6 microribbons were prepared from a precursor solution by electrospinning in controlled environmental conditions and collecting on copper frames. In a second step, the electrospun ribbons were covered with a thin layer of gold by sputtering and later submerged into a monomeric solution, consisting in 0.2 M pyrrole and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile and 2% water. Then, the metalized nets were used as working electrodes in the setup for potentiostatic electropolymerization of pyrrole, by applying a constant potential of 0.872 V for 120 s.
Characterization.
After preparation, the PPy coated microribbon webs were cut in rectangular strips of 1 x 2 cm width x length and submerged in a 0.1 M LiClO4 aqueous solution. Then, using the microribbon strips as electrodes cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments were performed using -0.60 and +0.60 V as potential limits and a scan rate of 100 mVs-1. Several cycles were performed allowing the system to remove a possible previous material memory and promoting the exchange of chloride from the electrolyte35-37. When a stationary response is obtained, the material’s electroactivity data is stored as a reference before the experimental series. The actuation performances of the artificial muscle were tested through cyclic voltammetry experiments considering the same parameters as those mentioned above. In a further step the sensing properties of the artificial muscle were investigated by recording consecutive CVs while sweeping the potential between -0.60 and +0.60 V at a scan rate of 100 mVs-1, while various weights were clung to the fibrillary strip (as can be seen in Figure 6). Likewise, an anodic and a cathodic chronoamperometric response were obtained when the artificial muscle was subjected to successive square current waves by applying a constant current of ± 0.5 mA for 3 s each. The square current pulses were repeatedly applied while attaching the masses to the microribbon strip. Corresponding results were acquired by recording the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) plots, EIS being a suitable technique for describing the ionic diffusion processes, when different loads were hung on the artificial muscle. The ionic diffusion behavior was investigated by applying a polarization potential of -0.20 V, in the 0.1-100000 Hz frequency range, at 10 points per decade and an AC voltage amplitude of 10 mV. The experimental data were interpreted by using a ZView 2 (Scribner Assoc.) fitting program, considering an electrical equivalent circuit (Figure 5c) which was also employed to estimate the electrode parameters. The weights used during the experiment were prepared by cutting a copper wire and bending it in a S-shape in order to be attached to the artificial muscle. Since every cut wire had a weight of 6 mg, up to four masses were consecutively hanged leading to masses of 6, 12, 18 and 24 mg respectively. The first mass was attached to the microribbons by using a piece of adhesive tape, Figure 6 showing the experimental design used during experiments.