Explore the recycling of bioleaching functional bacteria and sulfur substrate using the sulfur-covered biochar particles

Bioleaching has been attracting attention recent years as an emerging sediment heavy metal pollution remediation technology. However, the use of sulfur powder as sulfur substrate causes the problem of “post-acidification”, and the free bioleaching functional bacteria which are susceptible to environmental impact during reactor operation cannot be used efficiently for multiple rounds. These problems can be solved if the sulfur substrate and the bioleaching functional bacteria can be recycled simultaneously after bioleaching. A new kind of sulfur substrate, the laboratory-made sulfur-covered biochar particles, were used in the bioleaching experiment, compared with sulfur powder and sulfur powder mixed with the surfactant rhamnolipid. The sulfur-covered biochar particles exhibited superior bioleaching performance, including faster acidification rate, SO 4 2- production rate and heavy metal bioleaching rate, and higher heavy metal solubilization percentage (Ni 33.76%; Cu 66.16%; Zn 65.494%), which was resulted from the acceleration of bioleaching reaction by the bioleaching functional bacteria immobilized on the biochar surface. Otherwise, the sulfur-covered biochar particles could be reused in the second round, and the heavy metal solubilization percentage (Ni32.84%, Cu69.93%, Zn67.17%) was comparable with that of the first round. Nevertheless, the sulfur content became the main limiting factor causing poor bioleaching performance during the third round. The sulfur mixed with the surfactant rhamnolipid did not show significant effect in promoting acidification and heavy metal solubilization due to high levels of organic matter and the impact of the low pH value.

. This problem can be solved utilizing microorganisms immobilization technology. The technology immobilized specific microorganisms on a carrier, restricting or positioning them in a certain area, so the microorganisms can maintain a high density and high biological activity, and can proliferate quickly [14]. This technology has the advantages of less microorganisms loss, strong toxicity resistance, and reusable microorganisms [15,16]. The choice of the carrier material is crucial to this technology. A proper carrier can not only increase the number and the activity of the microorganisms, but also achieve efficient recycle of the microorganisms.
These two problems can be solved at the same time if a proper carrier can be utilized to immobilize sulfur substrate and bioleaching functional bacteria, because the residual sulfur substrate and the active bioleaching bacteria can be reused for multiple times by recycling the carrier.
In order to overcome the "post-acidification" problem and simplify the steps of the repetitive addition of bioleaching inoculum during the operation of the bioleaching sequencing batch reactor, the research selected bamboo biochar as the carrier to produce the recyclable sulfur-covered biochar particles by solidifying melted elemental sulfur on the surface of the bamboo biochar. The research investigated the bioleaching effect of the sulfur-covered biochar particles compared with the sulfur powder and the sulfur powder mixed with the surfactant rhamnolipid. The research also explored the potential and the mechanism of the immobilization of the bioleaching functional bacteria on the sulfur-covered biochar particles and their recycling use. The research also explored the change in the structure of microflora during the bioleaching process using the integrated high-throughput absolute abundance quantification (iHAAQ) technology [17].

Materials And Methods
concentrations of various heavy metals were as follows: Ni 84 mg/kg, Cu 284 mg/kg, Zn 394 mg/kg.
The heavy metal concentrations of the sediment were analyzed using the method mentioned in Analysis of heavy metal contents after the acid digestion of the sediment.

Properties of sulfur substrate
The sulfur substrate used in the research included sulfur-covered biochar particles, sulfur powder and sulfur powder mixed with surfactant rhamnolipid (see Table 1 for details). The sulfur-covered biochar particles were prepared by the laboratory: The bamboo biochar was purchased from Lin'an Yaoshi Biochar Industry Co., Ltd. Bamboo sawdust was anaerobic-burned at 500 °C for 8h, and the bamboo biochar particles were sieved with a mortar mill to obtain the particle size required for the research.
After that, the bamboo biochar particles were washed three times with distilled water, and dried at 105 °C for 6h. The surface area of the prepared bamboo biochar particles was 332.10 m 2 ·g -1 . The and Na (0.01 %).
And the sulfur-covered biochar particles were produced by solidifying melted elemental sulfur on the surface of the bamboo biochar at 120 °C. After cooling down, the weight of the attached melted sulfur on the bamboo biochar particles was measured in order to control the same sulfur content in each experiment group. Table 1 The properties of the different sulfur substrates

Preparation of the sludge-enriched inoculum
The inoculum used in this experiment was obtained from the acclimation of the sludge indigenous bacterium in Hangzhou Qige Wastewater Treatment Plant. And the preparation methods were consistent with the previous research [18].

Bioleaching experiment
Three experiment groups were set up according to the sulfur substrate added: sulfur powder group (experimental code: S-A), sulfur-covered biochar particles group (experimental code: SC-A), sulfur powder mixed with rhamnolipid (experimental code: R-A). The bioleaching experiments were conducted in a 250 mL conical flask containing 2.5 g dry weight of sediment, 150 mL of distilled water (the sediment concentration was decided by pre-experiment), 3 g/L of sulfur substrate (calculated by sulfur content) and 3 mL of sludge-enriched inoculum (-A represented the addition of the inoculum).
Control groups without sulfur substrate and sterilization groups without sulfur substrate but with 200 mg/L NaN 3 were set at the same time (the experimental code: C/N).
The conical flasks were placed in a shaking incubator at 28 °C and 180 r/min. Each treatment consisted of nine parallel groups, three of which were used to measure pH, concentration of SO 4 2and heavy metal on a daily basis. Distilled water was added daily to compensate for the loss of vaporization. The supernatant was withdrawn daily and the concentration of SO 4 2and heavy metals was analyzed. The other six parallel groups were tested for microbiological analysis on Day 4 and Day 9, respectively.
When it came to Day 9, the Tessier sequential extraction method was employed to determine the content of different heavy metal forms in the solid phase after bioleaching [19]. The forms of heavy metals were represented as follows in Fig. 2 After the first round, the sulfur-covered biochar particles of the SC-A group were recovered by filtration and washed with sterile physiological saline 3 times before being used for the second round of bioleaching. The experimental conditions of the second round were the same as those of the first round, but no bioleaching functional bacteria or sulfur substrate were added in all experimental groups. The third round of bioleaching experiment was carried out by the same experimental method.
The pH value, concentration of SO 4 2and heavy metals of the samples were measured every day to investigate the bioleaching effect of the sulfur-covered biochar particles in the multiple recycling rounds.

Analysis method
The pH value was measured using pH meter (PB-10) using the National Standard Method HJ 962-2018.
The concentration of SO 4 2was detected by ion chromatography (ICS-1100); total nitrogen, total carbon, and total phosphorus of the sediment sample were determined using an elemental analyzer (Elementar vario MAX CNS). The specific surface area of the biochar samples were measured using the American Tristar III3020 automatic specific surface area. The BET (Brunauer-Emmerr-Teller) equation was used to calculate the surface area of the bamboo biochar particles [20]. The EA110 elemental analyzer was utilized to determine the percentages of elements C, H, and N in the biochar samples [21]. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FEI SIRION-100) was utilized to observe the surface structure and the colonization of the microorganisms on the sulfur-covered biochar particles.

Analysis of heavy metal content
The heavy metal concentration of the sample was detected by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (PQMS 10-5000S-AR091). The limit of detection (LOD) of the ICP-MS is 1ppb, the accuracy was < 5%, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) was < 5%. To control the analytical quality of the analytical procedure, a certified reference material (GBW-07405) was applied and analyzed following the same procedure. The recoveries of Ni, Cu and Zn were in the range of 74.3%~113.3% (n=3). The recoveries of heavy metals during the sequential extraction process were in the ranges of 79.08~117.92%, 76.16~107.94% and 74.93~113.62%, respectively. The method to calculate the recoveries of heavy metal during the sequential extraction process was written in the Supplementary Material. These results indicated that our methods were reliable and precise enough for the purposes of this study.

Microbiological analysis
Using the iHAAQ methodology proposed by Lou et al., the qPCR analyses were performed to quantify the specific genes of the extracted DNA with three replicates using a StepOnePlus TM Real-Time PCR System instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The high-throughput sequencing was performed by using Illumina Miseq platform following standard protocols. The quality control of raw sequencing reads was performed using QIIME software (version 1.7.0). The absolute abundance of each genus level of the top 30 most abundant microorganisms in the sediment was calculated by multiplying the total abundance of bacteria (the copy number of the 16S rRNA gene in the V4 region measured by qPCR) and the corresponding relative abundance obtained by high-throughput sequencing [17].

Data analysis
The mathematical calculations involved in the study were done using Matlab 2017 software. The chart making and function curve fitting involved in the research were completed using Origin 8.0 software.
The correlation analysis was performed using SPSS V22.0 software.
Heavy metal bioleaching curves were fitted using logistic equations [22]: (see Equation 1 in the In the formula, M is the concentration of heavy metal (mg/kg) in the liquid phase; M limit is the upper limit bioleaching concentration of heavy metal (mg/kg); t is the bioleaching time; x, B, and p are constants.
We assumed that when M = 95%M limit , the bioleaching is finished. Then based on equation (1), T 95% could be calculated using equation (2): (see Equation 2 in the Supplementary Files) Using equation (1) to further determine the derivative of the time t and the bioleaching time T Vmax (day), at which the maximum bioleaching rate V max (mg·kg -1 ·day -1 ) is reached, can be obtained.

Bioleaching performance of sulfur-covered biochar particles
There was no significant difference in acidification rate within the experiment groups after the addition of the sludge-enriched inoculum. The SC-A group achieved the fastest acidification rate (pH reached 2.35 on the Day 5) and the lowest pH value (pH reached 1.80 on the Day 9) (Fig. 1). Although the specific surface area of the sulfur powder was much larger than that of the sulfur-covered biochar particles, the acidification rate of the S-A group was slightly slower than that in the SC-A group (pH reached 2.44 on the Day 6). In the R-A group, rhamnolipid was added as a surfactant to make the sulfur powder more easily dispersed in the liquid phase, but its acidification rate was the slowest (pH reached 2.36 on the Day 8). In order to investigate the acidification performance of the indigenous microorganisms in the sediment, the C group and the N group were set. When no sulfur substrate was added (the C group), the presence of indigenous microorganisms in the sediment also kept the system acidic (pH was about 5.5), while the pH of the N group remained at around 7.
The shorter the time bioleaching finished, the faster the total bioleaching rate. The SC-A group with the fastest acidification rate and the shortest the bioleaching time had the fastest total bioleaching rate ( Table 2), and it also reached the highest heavy metal solubilization (Ni 33.76%; Cu 66.16%; Zn 65.49%). While the total bioleaching rate of the R-A group was slower than those of the S-A group and the SC-A group, these experiment groups with inoculum added all reached almost the same heavy metal solubilization at the end of the bioleaching experiment (Fig.2). For the three heavy metals studied, the heavy metal solubilization percentage was in decreasing order: Cu>Zn>Ni (Fig. S1), Zn and Cu were likely to be leached while Ni was least likely to be leached, which was similar to previous studies [23,24].
The logistic formula (1) can fit the heavy metal bioleaching curve very well (see Table 2 for detail parameters of curve fitting). Formula (2) can be used to calculate the time required for each sulfur substrate to reach the bioleaching end point. Formula (1) can be used to obtain V max (mg·kg -1 ·day -1 ) and the time it appears T Vmax (day).
According to Table 2, the V max was related to the heavy metal leached. The V max of the three heavy metals in the increasing order was Zn>Cu>Ni. Chen et al. (2004) found that the higher the initial heavy metals contend in the sediment, the faster the V max , which was consistent with our result.
The SC-A group had the fastest acidification rate, SO 4 2production rate, total bioleaching rate, the largest V max and the corresponding shortest T Vmax , and it also reached the highest heavy metal solubilization. In addition, the sulfur substrate could be reused when the sulfur-covered biochar particles were recycled. All of these indicated that sulfur-covered biochar particles had superior bioleaching ability and the potential for recycling.

Bioleaching functional bacteria immobilization effect of sulfur-covered biochar particles
In order to test the bioleaching functional bacteria immobilization effect of sulfur-covered biochar particles, samples were collected for microbiological analysis in the middle of the experiment (Day 4) and the end of the experiment (Day 9). The integrated high-throughput absolute abundance quantification (iHAAQ) technology were used to investigate the changes in the flora structure and abundance during bioleaching (Fig.3). The result showed that the absolute abundance of Top 30 microorganisms in the SC-A group was less than the S-A group in the middle of the experiment.

Among the dominant microorganisms associated with bioleaching, only Acidithiobacillus and
Sulfuritalea were more abundant in the SC-A group. However, the situation reversed at the end of the experiment, the sulfur-covered biochar particles of the SC-A group enriched higher abundance of the Top 30 microorganisms, regardless of whether they were related to bioleaching.
At the same time, we performed scanning electron microscope observations of the sulfur-covered biochar particles recycled from the first round of bioleaching. The observation showed that large amount of rod shaped microorganisms was immobilized on the surface of the sulfur-covered biochar particles, and the sulfur layer on the surface became rough and complicated due to metabolism of the bioleaching bacteria (Fig.4).

Reuse of recoverable sulfur-covered biochar particles in bioleaching
In order to investigate the feasibility of reusing the sulfur-covered biochar particles in multiple bioleaching rounds, the sulfur-covered biochar particles used in the first bioleaching round were recycled to be reused in the second and the third round of bioleaching, meanwhile no more sulfur substrate and sludge-enriched inoculum were added. The results showed that both the first round and the second round could reach pH 2.5 when it came to Day 9, but the pH value of the third bioleaching round only reached 3.5 when the experiment came to an end. Although the final pH values of the first round and the second round were very close, the SO 4 2production of the second round was much lower than the first round, and the SO 4 2production rate of the third round stayed flat. At the end of the second bioleaching round, the heavy metals solubilization was Ni 32.84%, Cu 69.93% and Zn 67.17%, while only Ni 20.09%, Cu 10.28% and Zn 37.20% in the third round. Therefore, the recycled sulfur-covered biochar particles could support the second round of bioleaching, and the heavy metals solubilization was satisfied. When it came to an end of the third bioleaching round, only 20.25% elemental sulfur still remained on the biochar particles.

Acidification and oxidation of sulfur
It is generally accepted that the solubilization of the acid-soluble metal sulphides is caused by the attack of the proton (the "polysulfide pathway") [25,26], while the acid-insoluble metal sulphides are dissolved by the combination of oxidative attack and proton attack (the "thiosulfate pathway") [27].
Therefore, we can investigate the acidification rate and the production of SO 4 2to judge the bioleaching of heavy metals from the side, and the result showed that the faster the pH declined, the faster the SO 4 2was produced, indicating that the acidification of the system was caused by the sulfur oxidation to produce H 2 SO 4 .
Sulfur powder is highly hydrophobic and difficult to disperse in the liquid phase, but it has a large specific surface area, so it is more prone to adsorb microorganisms and promote their growth, and its production rate of SO 4 2tends to be fast [9]. However, the acidification rate and SO 4 2production rate of the S-A group were slower than the SC-A group. Many studies have reported that the biochar is redox-active due to its quinone group and aromatic structure [28][29][30]. We performed Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy on the biochar particles used in the experiment. The results showed that the infrared absorption peak appeared at 1610 cm -1 , indicating the existence of quinone structure (Fig S2). The electron transfer in the process of microbial oxidation of elemental sulfur could be enhanced, resulting from the transformation of the oxidation and reduction states of quinone structure. Therefore, the comparable acidification rate of sulfur-covered biochar particles and sulfur powder may result from the acceleration of sulfur oxidation rate, especially when microbial oxidation was happening at the same time.
Rhamnolipid is a biological surfactant commonly produced by strains of the genus Pseudomonas. The release of this biological surfactant promotes emulsification of the hydrocarbon phase, rendering such lipophilic molecules available to the metabolic pathways of microorganisms [31]. However, the R-A group did not show a significant effect in promoting the bioleaching acidification. This could be caused by the organic matters the rhamnolipid contained, which inhibit the autotrophic metabolism of indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. The growth of bioleaching functional strains could be inhibited by organic compounds such as pyruvic acid, citric acid, oxaloacetic acid, and glucose [32][33][34][35].

Heavy metal bioleaching performance
A large proportion of Cu in the sediment sample existed in the organic state (49.14%), and Zn mostly existed in exchangeable, carbonate-bound, and iron-manganese oxidation states (57.30%). In this case, Zn and Cu had high bioleaching levels in the experiment. The research found that the residual state was the most difficult form to be leached [36,37], this is because that heavy metals in the residual form bound to a resistant crystal structure rarely contact sulfuric acid [38]. Therefore, the amount of the residual form determined the upper limit of the bioleaching of heavy metals and Ni mostly existing in the residual form was the most difficult metal to be leached.
The kind of sulfur substrate affected the acidification rate, which in turn affected the total bioleaching rate, and the distribution of the initial form of the heavy metal determined the level of heavy metal solubilization in bioleaching. This explained why three experiment groups had different total bioleaching rate, but they all reached similar heavy metal solubilization and the distribution of heavy metal form in the sediment after bioleaching.
Extraction of metals by anionic surfactant rhamnolipid through solubilization has been known and previously applied with effective results [39][40][41]. However, the R-A group did not show significant effect in promoting heavy metal solubilization in the research. This may be because that as the pH in the bioleaching system declined, the water solubility, surface tension and the number of heavy metal binding sites of the rhamnolipid continued to decrease [40,42]. Otherwise, the complicated competitive ions and ligands in the sediment system were important factors affecting the adsorption and solubilization of heavy metals by rhamnolipid.

Immobilization function of biochar
The microbiological analysis and the scanning electron microscope result proved that the sulfur-covered biochar particles could enrich and immobilize bioleaching functional bacteria from the sediment.
The reason why sulfur-covered biochar particles could immobilize large amount of bacteria may be related to its carrier bamboo biochar. Biochar contains a series of nutrients (such as K + , Mg 2+ , Na + , N, P, etc.), and because of its negative surface charge, it can also absorb salt ions in the surrounding environment to provide nutrients for microorganisms [43]. The adsorption of heavy metals leached during the bioleaching process on the biochar could reduce heavy metals bioavailability, which alleviated their toxicity to the microorganisms [44,45]. Besides, the large specific surface area and the high pore volume of the biochar can provide safe and suitable microenvironment for microorganisms to grow [46]. Otherwise, the sulfur melted on the surface of the bamboo biochar particles provided the elemental sulfur as sulfur substrate while also expanding the reaction area to a certain extent. Therefore, compared with sulfur powder, the addition of sulfur-covered biochar particles had a stronger promotion effect on the growth of sulfur-oxidizing autotrophs.

Potential reuse of sulfur-covered biochar particles
The recycled sulfur-covered biochar particles had satisfied bioleaching performance in the second round of bioleaching, but their sulfur content became the main limiting factor in the third or more rounds. Similar conclusion could also be obtained by combining the distribution figure of the elemental sulfur in different rounds (Fig. 5). In addition, we found that there was still much elemental sulfur that was not converted to SO 4 2but was wasted or converted to other sulfur compounds remained in the sediment, which indicated the complexity of the sulfur oxidizing bacteria metabolism during bioleaching process in the sediment.
The sulfur residue remained on the biochar particles was different from sulfur powder, it was immobilized on the biochar particles and could be recycled efficiently, which avoided the problem of "post-acidification" and secondary pollution. No inoculum addition during the second bioleaching round indicated that the use of the sulfur-covered biochar particles could also simplify the operational step of the inoculum addition. Nevertheless, the sulfur-covered biochar particles could only maintain two rounds of bioleaching, and the third and more rounds of bioleaching were limited due to insufficient sulfur substrate. In the future research, it is considered to supplement a small amount of sulfur powder or new sulfur-covered biochar particles to provide an additional sulfur source in the third or more rounds of bioleaching, so as to maintain the reuse of the sulfur-covered biochar particles. In the current chemical fertilizer industrial production, the production operation of sulfurcovered urea particles is realized, which manifested that the industrial production of the sulfurcovered biochar particles is also practicable.

Conclusion
The result showed that the sulfur-covered biochar particles had the fastest acidification rate, SO 4 2production rate and heavy metal bioleaching rate, and the highest heavy metal solubilization, which was resulted from the acceleration of bioleaching reaction by the bioleaching functional bacteria immobilized on the biochar surface. Meanwhile, the dual immobilization of the bioleaching functional bacteria and the sulfur layer on the sulfur-covered biochar particles realized their recycling and their reuse in the second bioleaching round. In the future research, a small amount of sulfur powder or new sulfur-covered biochar particles will be supplemented to achieve more rounds of recycling of the sulfur-covered biochar particles, so as to maintain the reuse of the sulfur-covered biochar particles, so as to overcome the "post-acidification" problem and simplify the steps of the repetitive addition of bioleaching inoculum during the operation of the bioleaching sequencing batch reactor.

List Of Abbreviations
S-A: the sulfur powder groups with inoculum added; SC-A: the sulfur-covered biochar particles groups with inoculum added; R-A: the sulfur powder mixed with rhamnolipid groups with inoculum added; C: the control groups; C-A: the control groups with inoculum added; N: the NaN 3 groups Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding
The study was supported financially by the National Science and Technology Major Project     The scanning electron microscope result of the SC-A group on the Day 9. The magnifications of (a) and (b) were (1000×) and (5000×), respectively.