See the published version of this preprint at 3D Printing in Medicine.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Chase Tenewitz
Mercer University School of Medicine
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-0536
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objectives: The purpose of this review was to assess the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in interventional radiology (IR) simulation experiences.
Materials and Methods: A literature query was conducted in April 2020 for articles discussing 3D printing for simulations in numerous library databases using various search terms.
Results: While trainee feedback is generally supportive of 3D printing within the field of IR, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education.
Conclusions: Presently available literature endorses the use of 3D printing within IR. 3D printing has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized.
Keywords
three-dimensional printing, simulation training, high fidelity training, interventional radiology
Figure 1
Figure 2
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at 3D Printing in Medicine.
Version 1
Posted 20 Nov, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 27 Dec, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 15 Dec, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 12 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 21 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 15 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Nov, 2020
First submitted
On 09 Nov, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at 3D Printing in Medicine.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Chase Tenewitz
Mercer University School of Medicine
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1895-0536
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at 3D Printing in Medicine.
Version 1
Posted 20 Nov, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 27 Dec, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 15 Dec, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 12 Dec, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 21 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 15 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 15 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 15 Nov, 2020
First submitted
On 09 Nov, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at 3D Printing in Medicine.
Objectives: The purpose of this review was to assess the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing in interventional radiology (IR) simulation experiences.
Materials and Methods: A literature query was conducted in April 2020 for articles discussing 3D printing for simulations in numerous library databases using various search terms.
Results: While trainee feedback is generally supportive of 3D printing within the field of IR, current applications utilizing 3D printed models are heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of best practices standards in the realm of medical education.
Conclusions: Presently available literature endorses the use of 3D printing within IR. 3D printing has the potential to expand within the field, as it offers a straightforward, sustainable, and reproducible means for hands-on training that ought to be standardized.
Figure 1
Figure 2
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...