Formation of IL-6-treated platelet-ULVWF strings and clearance by ADAMTS13
IL-6, a representative inflammatory mediator, promotes hemostasis through several pathways including platelet aggregation [26, 27]. IL-6-treated platelets are thrombosis-prone in that they are primed for activation by several platelet agonists at subthreshold concentrations [28–30]. We modified the flow-chamber experiments to a miniaturized microfluidic system to perform the experiments with a small volume of blood [25]. We examined IL-6-treated platelets for their influence on the formation of platelet-bearing ULVWF strings on activated ECs under flow conditions, as compared to mock-treated platelets. As shown in Figure 1A and B, more platelet-bearing ULVWF strings were detected when IL-6-treated platelets were perfused than perfusing untreated platelets (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 21.6±10.6 versus 16.2±6.5; 1.30±0.16-fold increase; P < 0.01).
(A) HUVECs cultured in a microfluidic channel were stimulated with histamine, and then perfused with platelets untreated (left panel; control) or treated with IL-6 (right panel). ULVWF-platelet formed the beads-on-string appearance (arrow heads) the endothelial surface (original magnification 200x). (B) Data summary from multiple experiments shows fold increase in the number of ULVWF strings, as compared to control (data presented as SEM, n=5, Student’s t test, *P < 0.01).
We further determined whether IL-6-treated platelets influence the cleavage of ULVWF strings, as previously reported [4]. The perfusion of plasma from healthy subjects (as the source of ADAMTS13 shortened the length of preformed ULVWF strings with adherent IL-6-treated platelets or untreated platelets. However, 38.2±16.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.1-52.3; P < 0.01) of ULVWF strings bearing IL-6-treated platelets remained on the endothelial surface after 3 minutes of perfusion, compared with 11.0±5.7% (95% CI 6.0-15.9) of those bearing untreated platelets (Fig. 2).
(A) ULVWF–platelet strings formed during the perfusion of IL-6-treated or untreated platelets were cleaved by ADAMTS13 in plasma and washed away from the endothelial surface (▶ ULVWF-platelet strings initially formed, ▶ Strings showing decrease in length, ▷ Strings eliminated from endothelial surface). (B) Data summary from multiple experiments (Mean±SEM, n=5, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to the untreated control).
The platelet IL-6 signaling pathway in clearance of platelet-bearing ULVWF by ADAMTS13
The results demonstrated that IL-6 primed platelets affect the formation and clearance of ULVWF-platelet strings. To explain this phenomenon, we hypothesized that there exists a pathway between the point of the IL-6 signal and VWF-GPIbα binding. It has been shown that the PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signal pathways play a role in VWF-GPIb-IX-dependent platelet aggregation [31–33]. Here, we investigated whether IL-6 activates the PI3K/Akt or MEK/ERK pathway in platelets [34, 35] by examining the phosphorylation of Akt or ERK1/2. The IL-6 treatment induced a 1.54-fold (95% CI 1.48-1.60) and 1.63-fold (95% CI 1.25-2.01) increases in the phosphorylation of Akt and ERK, respectively, as compared to the mock treatment (Fig. 3).
Western blot analysis was performed to evaluate Akt and ERK1/2 phosphorylation after the treatment of platelets with 100 ng/mL IL-6 for 30 minutes. β-actin was used as a loading control. Histograms show quantitative analysis of pAkt normalized to total AKT and pERK1/2 normalized to total ERK1/2. Graphs represent the mean±SEM of three separate experiments performed in triplicate, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to the untreated group (C).
When platelets treated with IL-6 and the MEK inhibitor U0126 were perfused, the formation of ULVWF strings was reduced by 58.9±9.4% (95% CI 48.2-69.5), as compared to the perfusion of platelets treated with IL-6 alone (Fig. 4). The reduction was 42.9±30.9% (mean±SD, 95% CI 7.9-77.8) with the PI3K inhibitor LY294002, but the difference did not research statistical significance (Fig. 4).
IL-6-treated or resting platelets were treated with or without LY294002 or U0126 and then perfused through activated ECs in the channel. Summarized data presented the related ratio of formed strings. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P < 0.05 compared to the control group, #P < 0.05 compared to the IL-6-treated group.
In contrast, no difference in ULVWF-platelet string formation was observed when untreated platelets were perfused together with either LY294002 or U0126. When plasma was perfused, 84.2±15.2% (95% CI 66.9-100.0) of ULVWF strings bearing untreated platelets were removed within 3 minutes, whereas 52.3±17.5% (95% CI 32.5-72.2) of ULVWF-strings bearing IL-6-treated platelets were eliminated. The reduced cleavage of ULVWF strings bearing IL-6-treated platelet was reversed back to 82.2±16.8% (95% CI 63.3-100.0) by LY294002 (Fig. 5A, 5C). U0126 also increased the cleavage of UVWF strings bearing IL-6-treated platelet from 67.7±7.1% (95% CI 59.7-75.7) to 83.3±5.8% (95% CI 76.8-89.9), comparable to perfusion of mock-treated platelets (81.3±7.0%, 95% CI 73.3-89.3) (Fig. 5B, 5D).
IL-6-treated or untreated platelets were perfused into the channel after treatment with or without LY294002 (A, C) or U0126 (B, D). ULVWF–platelet strings were cleaved by ADAMTS13 contained in plasma and washed away from the endothelial surface. ▶ ULVWF-platelet strings initially formed, ▶ Strings showing decrease in length, ▷ Strings eliminated from the endothelial surface. Summarized data show the clearance rate of ULVWF-platelet strings by ADAMTS13. Mean±SEM, n=3, *P < 0.05 versus the IL-6 only-treated group.
In contrast, inhibitors of JAK or STAT3 did not significant affect the cleavage of ULVWF strings bearing IL-6-treated platelets (data not shown). Together, these results suggest that IL activated PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signaling pathways regulated the formation and clearance of VWF-platelet strings formed on activated ECs.
14-3-3ζ regulated the cleavage of ULVWF-platelet strings under flow conditions
14-3-3ζ is a GPIb-IX-associated adaptor protein that interacts with several phosphoserine-dependent binding sites of GPIb-IX [9, 36]. It regulates VWF-GPIbα binding, VWF-induced GP Ib clustering and mechanosignal transduction leading to platelet activation [9, 37, 38]. Several proinflammatory cytokines were reproted to induce 14-3-3ζ to undergo phosphorylation [10, 11, 36]. We examined whether 14-3-3ζ mediates the effects of IL-6 on ULVWF-platelet string formation and cleavage. Platelets treated with 100 ng/ml IL-6 for 30 minutes had 1.47-fold increase in 14-3-3ζ phosphorylation (95% CI 1.24-1.71) from untreated platelets (Fig. 6).
Western blot analysis was performed to evaluate phosphorylation and protein levels of 14-3-3ζ after treatment of platelets with 100 ng/mL IL-6 for 30 minutes. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Histograms show quantitative analysis of p14-3-3ζ normalized to β-actin, 14-3-3ζ normalized to β-actin, and p14-3-3ζ normalized to total 14-3-3ζ. Graphs represent the mean±SEM of three separate experiments performed in triplicate, *P < 0.05 compared to the untreated group (C).
When perfusion over activated ECs, the 14-3-3 antagonist R18 did not change the number of ULVWF strings bearing either IL-6-treated or resting platelets (Fig. 7).
IL-6-treated or untreated platelets were perfused into the channel after treatment with or without R18. Many ULVWF-platelet strings were present on the endothelial surface. Summarized data were mean±SEM, n=4, *P < 0.05 compared to control.
However, R18 increased the rate of cleaving ULVWF strings bearing IL-6-treated platelets from 57.4±16.4% (95% CI 41.3-73.4) to 84.9±7.4% (95% CI 77.6-92.1, Fig. 8). These results indicate that 14-3-3ζ regulated the cleavage of ULVWF strings with adherent IL-6-treated platelets. The phosphorylation of 14-3-3 may play an important role in the regulation of protein complex formation and therefore in signal transduction [39, 40].
(A) IL-6-treated or untreated platelets were perfused into the channel after treatment with or without R18. ULVWF–platelet strings were cleaved by ADAMTS13 contained in plasma and washed away from the endothelial surface. ▶ ULVWF-platelet strings initially formed, ▶ Strings showing decrease in length, ▷ Strings eliminated from the endothelial surface. (B) Summarized data showed the clearance rate of ULVWF-platelet strings by ADAMTS13. Mean±SEM, n=4, *P < 0.05 compared to the control group, #P < 0.05 compared to IL-6 alone-treated group.