Reagents and materials
Dimethyl 5-aminoisophthalate, 1,3,5-tris (bromomethyl) benzene, phenol, sodium acetate anhydrous, sodium nitrite, sodium hydroxide, N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol anhydrous, methanol, magnesium sulfate anhydrous, potassium carbonate, sodium chloride, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, pH 4.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M), pH 7.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M), pH 8.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M), pH 9.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M), sodium dihydrogen phosphate anhydrous, sodium phosphate dibasic, potassium bromide, deuterated chloroform, octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica (C18) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) and were of analytical grade. pH 6.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M) was purchased from Beijing Lanyi chemical products Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and were of analytical grade. Quinine sulfate fluorescent standard substance (98.6%) and abamectin B1 were purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Demonized water (18 MΩ cm) was produced by using a water purification system (Water Purification System, Casccada 1, Pall, Beijing, China).
General instrumentation
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was recorded on a Thermo 330 spectrometer at 500-4000 cm-1 wavelengths and a resolution of 3 cm-1 over 32 scans. The ultraviolet-visible absorption spectrometry (UV-Vis) was measured with a TECHCOMP UV2600 Spectrometer (TECHCOMP, Shanghai, China) at 200-800 cm-1 wavelengths. 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum was recorded on a JNM-ECA 600 MHz-NMR using tetramethylsilane (TMS) (JEOL, Japan). Electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) data of TPB and the product were obtained by using a Bruker New ultrafleXtreme MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer at NL: 7,990,000, RT: 4.58-4.66, AV: 34, T: FTMS-p ESI and NL: 41,300, RT: 2.13-2.22, AV: 36, T: FTMS-p ESI. Fluorescent spectrum was performed using a Hitachi F-7000 spectrometer at Sampling Interval: 5 nm, Scan speed: 12000 nm min-1, EX Slit: 5 nm, EM Slit: 5 nm, PMT Voltage: 700V, Contour interval: 10 nm, Temperature: room temperature.
Preparation of probe TPB
TPB was synthesized by the scheme showed in Figure. S1 based on a previously reported method20, which was confirmed by FT-IR, UV-Vis, 1H NMR and ESI-MS. FT-IR: characteristic absorption peaks at 3432 cm-1 (C-H of aryl), 1699 cm-1 (C=O of carboxyl), 1597 cm-1 (N=N), 1499 cm-1 (aryl), 1253 cm-1 (aryl-N). UV-Vis: λmax 355 nm (azobenzene). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm): 8.71 (s, 3 H), 8.65-8.68 (s, 6 H), 7.94-7.95 (d, 6 H), 7.25 (s, 3 H), 7.0-7.1 (d, 6 H), 5.22 (s, 6 H). HRMS (m/z, ESI): [M]− calcd. Found 971.2133 (TPB), 703.1660 (TPB-C14N2O4H8), 485.1024 (TPB-C22N4O9H22). All supplementary data used for confirmation can be found in Figures S2-S5.
General procedure for fluorescent spectra measurement
Tetrahydrofuran, as a solvent, was used to prepare the probe TPB solution (0.06 mmol L-1) and abamectin B1 solution (1.0 mg L-1). 0.5832 g TPB was added to a volumetric flask and mixed with tetrahydrofuran solution to 10 mL to get probe TPB solution (0.06 mmol L-1). 1.0 mg abamectin B1 was added to a volumetric flask and mixed with tetrahydrofuran solution to 1 L to get abamectin B1 solution (1.0 mg L-1).
Fluorescent spectra of probe TPB were analyzed before and after adding abamectin B1 to ascertain the appropriate excitation wavelength and emission wavelength. One 10 mL colorimetric tube was filled with probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1) and avermectin B1 (0.2 mL, 1.0 mg L-1). The other was only filled with probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1). Then, they all fixed with tetrahydrofuran to 10 mL. For each sample in colorimetric tubes, test condition of the fluorescence intensity was as follows: Sample mixed time: 10 s, Sampling interval: 5 nm, Scan speed: 12000 nm min-1, EX Slit: 5 nm, EM Slit: 5 nm, PMT Voltage: 700V, Contour interval: 10 nm, Temperature: room temperature, EX WL: 200-600 nm, EM WL: 200-600 nm.
Establishment and validation of the analysis method
To obtain the ideal pH condition of test, considering the emergence of esterification at pH below 5.0 and salt forming at pH above 5.0 for avermectin B1, the effect of pH 5.0-9.0 on the analysis result was investigated. Five 10 mL colorimetric tubes were filled with probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1) and avermectin B1 (0.2 mL, 1.0 mg L-1), and fixed to 10 mL with pH 5.0-9.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M) at room temperature, respectively. For each sample in colorimetric tubes, test condition of the fluorescence intensity was same as that of probe TPB, except EX WL: 360 nm and EM WL: 420 nm. pH 6.0 phosphate buffer (0.2 M) was found as an ideal pH condition and used in following tests.
To obtain the ideal mount of phosphate buffer, the effect of 0.2-1.2 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0) was investigated. Six 10 mL colorimetric tubes were filled with probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1) and avermectin B1 (0.2 mL, 1.0 mg L-1), and fixed with 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0) at room temperature, respectively. For each sample in colorimetric tubes, test condition of the fluorescence intensity was same as that of probe TPB, except EX WL: 360 nm and EM WL: 420 nm. 0.8 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0) was found as an ideal mount and further applied in followed tests.
To establish the relationship between probe TPB and abamectin B1, at room temperature, 0.0 mL, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mL abamectin B1 (1.0 mg L-1) were added to probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1), mixed with 0.8 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0) and fixed with tetrahydrofuran to 10 mL, respectively. For each sample, test condition of the fluorescence intensity was same as that of part 2.4, except EX WL: 360 nm, EM WL: 200-700 nm.
To validate the method under analytical control, the limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision and linear range were implemented according to the previous methods21,22. A 10 mL colorimetric tubes was mixed with abamectin B1 (0.20 mL, 1.0 mg L-1) and probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1), mixed with 0.8 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0 ), fixed with tetrahydrofuran to 10 mL and fluorescently detected according to that of probe TPB, except EX WL: 360 nm and EM WL: 420 nm. Eleven groups of parallel experiments were conducted. LOD and LOQ were calculated using the formulas shown in Eq. (1-2). Precision was evaluated using relative standard deviation (RSD). The linear range was from LOQ to the maximum measured value.
LOD = 3 δ/k (1)
(δ: standard deviation of the experiments, k: slope for the range of the linearity)
LOQ = 10×δ (2)
(δ: standard deviation of the experiments)
Preparation and analysis of apple samples
Malus pumila mill, Qinguan and Huangxiangjiao were purchased from local Xingfu Supermarket (Beijing, China) and analyzed. Apple samples were prepared according to a published method23. Each sample (20.0 g) was respectively added with acetonitrile (10.0 mL) and vigorously shaken for 2.0 min by a vortex mixer. Next, each mixture was mixed with 4.0 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate anhydrous and 1.0 g sodium chloride and shook for another 1.0 min. Following centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5.0 min, 2.0 mL of the upper layer was transferred to a 20 mL volumetric flask and filled with tetrahydrofuran to obtain tested Malus pumila mill, Qinguan and Huangxiangjiao samples. These samples were fluorescently detected according to that of probe TPB, except EX WL: 360 nm and EM WL: 420 nm, respectively. Value of abamectin B1 was calculated according to the linear regression equation of this work.
To perform the recovery rate, two 10 mL colorimetric tubes were mixed with 2.0 mL apple sample and probe TPB (1.0 mL, 0.06 mmol L-1), mixed with 0.8 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.0 ), fixed with tetrahydrofuran to 10 mL and marked as A and B, respectively. Afterwards, A was filled by the standard abamectin B1 (0.05 mL, 1.0 mg L-1). They all were fluorescently detected according to that of probe TPB, except EX WL: 360 nm and EM WL: 420 nm. Level of abamectin B1 was calculated according to the linear regression equation of this work. And the recovery rate was calculated using the formulas shown in Eq. (3).
Recovery rate (%) = 100 × (CA - CB)/CS (3)
(CA: level of abamectin B1 of A filled by the standard abamectin B1, CB: level of abamectin B1 of B, CS: level of added standard abamectin B1)