Figure1 shows that the colloidal AuNPs are close to spherical Au nanoparticles with citrate stabilized. After assembly of AuNPs monolayer on the substrate, annealing at temperatures close to Tg (the glass transition temperature (Tg) is the temperature at which the molecular structure shows molecular mobility) of the AuNPs thin films (557°C) results in significant enhancement of the adhesion between the AuNPs and the substrate. Therefore, LSPR sensor chips were annealed at 550°C at a rate of 5°C/min and stayed at this temperature for 4 h. The FESEM image illustrates the size distribution of 10-15 nm nanoparticles (Fig. 2). After self-assembly of AuNPs on a substrate and then annealing, the AuNPs were deposited most uniformly and densely because of aggregation of nanoparticles, the size distribution increased to about 15-20 nm.
Optical Properties and Characterization of GNPs
Figure 3 reveals the XRD pattern of metallic Au nanoparticles on the glass substrate. All diffraction peaks corresponding to face-cantered cubic (fcc) (111), (200), (220), and (311) crystalline planes were well-matched with the JCPDS No. 03-065-8601 of Au. The XRD pattern of Au with the background of glass pattern confirm the distance between Au nanoparticles on the surface. The extinction spectrum of LSPR sensor chips before and after annealing was characterized by UV-Vis spectroscopy and shown in Fig. 4. The UV–Vis spectrum of colloidal AuNPs exhibits a plasmon resonance peak at 522 nm. Annealing of AuNPs thin films leads to an enhancement in the extinction intensity and 10 nm LSPR red-shift. As the nanoparticle size increases, not only does the adsorption rate increase but also the position and width of the LSPR shift.
LSPR sensor chips were performed to optimize the immobilization of amine functional groups on the glass substrate with different concentrations of APTES, which attends as a linking molecule between the glass and the AuNPs. The self-assembly takes place through electrostatic interaction between the positively charged amine group and negatively charged AuNPs.
Figures 5 and 6 depict the surface plasmon peak changes of the LSPR sensor chip to determine the optimal APTES concentration and optimal immersion time in colloidal AuNPs. As shown in Fig. 5, increasing the APTES concentration not only enhances the extinction intensity of the LSPR sensor chip but also an LSPR red-shift exists. However, this treatment has not been followed in Fig. 6. Based on the results shown in Table 1, conditions of 0.5% APTES and 12 h immersion in AuNPs were selected as the optimal condition for the LSPR sensor chip. Because this chip demonstrates the highest extinction intensity and sharp plasmon peak, these features make the sensor chip highly sensitive.
Table 1
The extinction wavelength and intensity of LSPR sensor chip (according to Figs. 5 and 6)
|
1 h immersion in colloidal AuNPs
|
12 h immersion in colloidal AuNPs
|
APTES (1 h)
|
0.1%
|
0.5%
|
1%
|
2%
|
5%
|
0.1%
|
0.5%
|
1%
|
2%
|
5%
|
Wavelength (nm)
|
530
|
535
|
534
|
533
|
543
|
533
|
537
|
534
|
537
|
539
|
Intensity of Extinction (a.b.)
|
0.175
|
0.226
|
0.216
|
0.199
|
0.25
|
0.241
|
0.295
|
0.261
|
0.262
|
0.271
|
Due to the synergistic effects, metal/graphene nanostructure hybrids exhibit advanced performance compared to NPs and graphene derivatives taken independently. Hence, attempts have been focused on the decoration of GO/rGO surfaces with AuNPs, which have applications in various fields such as sensors, catalysts, and SERS.
Figure 7 shows the FTIR spectra of GO and rGO in which the GO spectrum contains the absorption bands corresponding to –OH stretch at 3428 cm−1, the C=O carbonyl stretching vibrations at 1602 cm−1, the C-OH stretching at 1384 cm−1, and the epoxy C–O stretching at 1014 cm−1. The spectrum of rGO shows peaks at 3428 cm−1, corresponding to –OH stretch, while the bands of carboxyl, epoxy, and carbonyl were removed after the reduction [35, 36].
Based on the results, the AuNPs thin film for depositing GO and rGO was selected with 0.5% APTES and 12 h immersion in colloidal AuNPs as the optimal condition for the LSPR sensor chip. The GO and rGO layers were used due to their inherent properties of binding the biomolecules and increasing the interaction light with structure [37, 38]. The morphology of LSPR chips of AuNPs/GO and AuNPs/rGO was observed using SEM. As shown in Fig. 8, the GO sheets were recognized in the SEM image. Similarly, the SEM images of AuNPs/GO and AuNPs/rGO are presented in which the uniform distribution of paper-like GO and rGO sheets on AuNPs thin film is visible.
According to Fig. 9, all absorption peaks associated with the GO and rGO sheets are in the visible rang of 400-900 nm, which is the wavelength range of AuNPs LSPR [39]. Detection of the local index of refraction using UV-Visible spectrum corresponding to sharp plasmon peaks for high sensitivity. In this case, LSPR sensor chip of AuNPs/rGO have sharp plasmon peaks rather than other chips, and redshift confirms the binding of AuNPs and rGO.
Figure 10 shows the Raman spectra of the AuNPs/GO and the AuNPs/rGO films displaying the G band (1593 cm-1) for vibration mode in-plane of sp2 carbon domains and D band (1347 cm-1) associated with structural defects indicating the reduction in the size of sp2 domains and increasing of out-plane of sp3 domains. The ID/IG ratio can be described as the number of defects of GO and rGO in the LSPR sensor chip. For the sensor chip of AuNPs/GO, the value of ID/IG is equal to 0.78, while for AuNPs/rGO it increases to 0.81. An increase in ID/IG shows that partial reduction has increased structural defects in the GO carbon plane [40]. Significant differences in intensity peak intensities can confirm the widespread coupling of AuNPs with rGO, which increases the light interaction in the advanced surface Raman spectroscopy (SERS) configuration. As a short conclusion, Glass/AuNPs/rGO chip will be suitable for sensory applications compared to Glass/AuNPs/GO chip.