See the published version of this preprint at Scientific Reports.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research Article
Anthony Garza
Syracuse University
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Bacterial-derived polyketide and non-ribosomal peptide natural products are crucial sources of therapeutic agents and yet little is known about the conditions that favor activation of natural product genes or the regulatory machinery that controls their transcription. Recent findings suggest that the σ54 system, which includes σ54-loaded RNA polymerase and transcriptional activators called enhancer binding proteins (EBPs), might be a common regulator of natural product genes. Here, we explore this idea by analyzing four putative σ54 promoters identified in the sequences of Myxococcus xanthus natural product gene clusters. We show that mutations in the putative σ54-RNA polymerase binding regions reduce in vivo promoter activities during growth and development. We also show that the EBP Nla28 is important for the in vivo activities of three natural product promoters, that Nla28 binds to wild-type fragments of these promoters in vitro, and that in vitro binding is lost when the putative Nla28 binding sites are mutated. These results indicate that the natural product promoters are bona fide σ54 promoter elements and three are direct targets of Nla28. Interestingly, the vast majority of experimentally confirmed and putative σ54 promoters in M. xanthus natural product clusters are located within genes and not in intergenic sequences.
Keywords
enhancer binding proteins (EBPs), Myxococcus, Nla28, σ54
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Scientific Reports.
Version 1
Posted 24 Nov, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 31 Dec, 2020
Reviewers agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviews received
Received 01 Dec, 2020
Reviewers agreed
On 20 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 20 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 20 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 20 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 20 Nov, 2020
First submitted
On 17 Nov, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at Scientific Reports.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Anthony Garza
Syracuse University
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Scientific Reports.
Version 1
Posted 24 Nov, 2020
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 31 Dec, 2020
Reviewers agreed
On 02 Dec, 2020
Reviews received
Received 01 Dec, 2020
Reviewers agreed
On 20 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 20 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned
On 20 Nov, 2020
Editor invited
On 20 Nov, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 20 Nov, 2020
First submitted
On 17 Nov, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Scientific Reports.
Bacterial-derived polyketide and non-ribosomal peptide natural products are crucial sources of therapeutic agents and yet little is known about the conditions that favor activation of natural product genes or the regulatory machinery that controls their transcription. Recent findings suggest that the σ54 system, which includes σ54-loaded RNA polymerase and transcriptional activators called enhancer binding proteins (EBPs), might be a common regulator of natural product genes. Here, we explore this idea by analyzing four putative σ54 promoters identified in the sequences of Myxococcus xanthus natural product gene clusters. We show that mutations in the putative σ54-RNA polymerase binding regions reduce in vivo promoter activities during growth and development. We also show that the EBP Nla28 is important for the in vivo activities of three natural product promoters, that Nla28 binds to wild-type fragments of these promoters in vitro, and that in vitro binding is lost when the putative Nla28 binding sites are mutated. These results indicate that the natural product promoters are bona fide σ54 promoter elements and three are direct targets of Nla28. Interestingly, the vast majority of experimentally confirmed and putative σ54 promoters in M. xanthus natural product clusters are located within genes and not in intergenic sequences.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
The full text of this article is available to read as a PDF.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...