4.1. Prediction of meteorological drought risk
(1) Selection of the optimal marginal distribution
Drought duration and severity are the main features characterizing drought events, and they are extracted form SPI based on the run theory. To obtain the suitable marginal distribution function for drought, distribution functions, such as exponential distribution, lognormal distribution and gamma distribution, were employed to fit drought duration and severity in both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Finally, the marginal distributions with the goodness of fit (GOF) were selected based on the minimum AIC and BIC, and the results are shown in Table 3. The four fitting functions for the duration of meteorological drought under PJB4.5, PJB4.5, PJB8.5 and PJJ8.5 scenarios were generalized extreme value, inverse gaussian, inverse gaussian, and generalized pareto, respectively, while the fitting functions for drought severity were all exponential, and the parameters of each distribution function can be observed in Table 3. Besides, the Kendall's rank correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were also adopted to test the correlation between drought duration and severity before establishing the joint distribution function. As shown in Table 3, the Kendall's rank correlation coefficients were all above 0.68, while the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were all greater than 0.8. The correlation coefficients all passed the significance test of α = 0.05, suggesting that drought duration and severity were highly correlated. Consequently, the copula function can be employed to determine the joint distribution function of drought duration and severity in the WRB.
Table 2
Summary of selected copula families and their mathematical description
Name
|
Mathematical description
|
Parameter range
|
Normal-copula
|
\(\int_{{ - \infty }}^{{{\emptyset ^{ - 1}}(\mu )}} {\int_{{ - \infty }}^{{{\emptyset ^{ - 1}}(\nu )}} {\frac{1}{{2\pi \sqrt {1 - {\theta ^2}} }}} } \exp \left( {\frac{{2\theta xy - {x^2} - {y^2}}}{{2(1 - {\theta ^2})}}} \right)dxd{y^b}\)
|
\(\theta \in [ - 1,1]\)
|
t-copula
|
\(\int_{{ - \infty }}^{{{\text{t}}_{{{\theta _2}}}^{{ - 1}}(\mu )}} {\int_{{ - \infty }}^{{{\text{t}}_{{{\theta _2}}}^{{ - 1}}(\nu )}} {\frac{{\Gamma ((\theta +2)/2)}}{{\Gamma ({\theta _2}/2)\pi {\theta _2}\sqrt {1 - {\theta _1}^{2}} }}{{(1+\frac{{{x^2} - 2{\theta _1}xy+{y^2}}}{{{\theta _2}}})}^{({\theta _2}+2)/2}}} } dxd{y^c}\)
|
\({\theta _1} \in [ - 1,1],{\theta _2} \in (0,\infty )\)
|
Clayton-copula
|
\(\hbox{max} {({\mu ^{ - \theta }}+{\nu ^{ - \theta }} - 1,0)^{ - 1/\theta }}\)
|
\(\theta \in ({\text{-1}},0) \cup (0,\infty )\)
|
Frank-copula
|
\(- \frac{1}{\theta }\ln \left[ {1+\frac{{(exp( - \theta \mu ) - 1)(exp( - \theta \nu ) - 1)}}{{\exp ( - \theta ) - 1}}} \right]\)
|
\(\theta \in ({\text{-}}\infty ,0) \cup (0,\infty )\)
|
Gumbel-copula
|
\(\exp \left\{ { - {{\left[ {{{\left( { - \ln (\mu )} \right)}^\theta }+{{( - ln(\nu ))}^\theta }} \right]}^{1/\theta }}} \right\}\)
|
\(\theta \in [1,\infty ]\)
|
(2) Selection of the optimal copula functions
Through the analysis of marginal distribution functions, the copula functions could be used to determine the joint distribution of meteorological drought duration and severity in the basin. Therefore, five copula functions were selected to determine the joint distribution functions of meteorological drought duration and severity. The results are presented in Table 4. Although all copula functions showed good agreement in the formulation of the joint distribution, the optimal copula functions for meteorological drought duration and drought severity were selected based on the GOF, and the optimal copula for each scenario using bolded font. For the drought duration and severity in the WRB, Gumbel-copula dominated in the selected optimal joint combinations, among which, the optimal joint distribution functions of PJB4.5, PJB8.5, and PJJ8.5 scenarios are all Gumbel-copula, and the PJJ4.5 scenario is t-copula. The parameter estimates of the copula function are shown in Table 4.
Based on the copula selected from the GOF, the probabilities calculated based on the fitted distribution function were used to plot the scatter plots of drought duration and drought severity in Figure 4. It can be seen from the figure that the high probability part of drought duration and drought severity is well fitted, and the joint probability distribution values of the two go up with increasing drought duration and drought severity. This also confirms that the high probability of drought duration and that of drought severity move in the same direction, while the low probability part is poorly fitted. There are two reasons behind this conclusion: 1) Limited time series and insufficient drought events; 2) The SPI index is calculated for monthly precipitation data and the calculated drought durations are discrete in nature. Therefore, based on the above description, the best copula function based on each scenario is used for meteorological drought risk probability prediction.
Table 3
Fit error of marginal distribution of meteorological drought duration and severity.
Scenario
|
drought
|
Optimal distribution
|
Parameter
|
AIC
|
BIC
|
Kendall
|
Spearman rank
|
rank
|
PJB4.5
|
duration
|
generalized extreme value
|
κ=4.46, σ=0.16,μ=1.04
|
46.79
|
52.07
|
0.68**
|
0.81**
|
severity
|
exponential
|
μ=1.66
|
131.41
|
133.17
|
PJJ4.5
|
duration
|
inverse gaussian
|
μ=2.67, λ=4.38
|
154.91
|
158.43
|
0.75**
|
0.88**
|
severity
|
exponential
|
μ=1.66
|
131.62
|
133.38
|
PJB8.5
|
duration
|
inverse gaussian
|
μ=2.21, λ=4.72
|
148.53
|
152.27
|
0.7**
|
0.82**
|
severity
|
exponential
|
μ=1.48
|
135.55
|
137.43
|
PJJ8.5
|
duration
|
generalized pareto
|
κ=22.17, σ=0.001,θ=1.00
|
103.51
|
107.71
|
0.68**
|
0.8**
|
severity
|
exponential
|
μ= 1.49
|
108.01
|
110.81
|
Note: Regarding the meaning of letters in PJB4.5 and SJJ8.5, P and S stand for precipitation and streamflow, respectively; JJ and JB stand for Jiaji Station and Jiabao Station, respectively; 4.5 and 8.5 stand for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. "**" indicates that the correlation coefficient passed the test of α=0.05.
Table 4
Fit errors of copula functions for meteorological drought duration and severity
Scenario
|
Copula
|
RMSE
|
AIC
|
BIC
|
θ
|
PJB4.5
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.19
|
-304.17
|
-302.4
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.15
|
-322.4
|
-320.63
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.12
|
-341.49
|
-339.73
|
2.73
|
Normal-copula
|
0.12
|
-339.54
|
-337.78
|
|
t-copula
|
0.12
|
-340.57
|
-337.05
|
|
PJJ4.5
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.13
|
-336.43
|
-334.67
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.11
|
-347.43
|
-345.67
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.1
|
-359.75
|
-357.98
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.09
|
-363.5
|
-361.74
|
|
t-copula
|
0.09
|
-365.42
|
-361.9
|
θ1=0.90, θ2=9.98
|
PJB8.5
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.13
|
-380.8
|
-378.93
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.1
|
-403.05
|
-401.18
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.09
|
-414.27
|
-412.39
|
2.21
|
Normal-copula
|
0.09
|
-411.51
|
-409.64
|
|
t-copula
|
0.09
|
-414.6
|
-410.85
|
|
PJJ8.5
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.2
|
-337.02
|
-335.15
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.15
|
-367.76
|
-365.89
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.09
|
-418.47
|
-416.6
|
2.38
|
Normal-copula
|
0.12
|
-387.57
|
-385.7
|
|
t-copula
|
0.11
|
-395.06
|
-391.32
|
|
Figure 4 is here
(3) Prediction of meteorological drought risk probability
After the marginal distribution function and the copula function were determined, the drought risk assessment model was used to predict the intra- and inter-seasonal meteorological drought risk probabilities for the next 30 years (2021-2050). The drought risk probabilities for the two greenhouse gas (GHG) emission models can be seen in Table 5. For meteorological drought risk, the probability of intra-seasonal drought occurrence under the three scenarios of PJB4.5, PJJ4.5 and PJB8.5 was 60%-70%, which indicates that intra-seasonal meteorological droughts are prone to occur in the WRB in the next 30 years. However, the risk of intra-seasonal drought for the PJJ8.5 scenario is relatively small at 42.6%. By contrast, the risk of inter-seasonal droughts under the four scenarios is relatively low, with a probability is about 30%, the PJB8.5 scenario with even small probability risk of 16.76%. Therefore, the probability of intra-seasonal droughts in the WRB in the next 30 years is high, indicating that meteorological droughts are mostly short-term droughts. This is mainly determined by the climate of the basin, which is in a tropical monsoon climate with uneven distribution of precipitation within the year, with the rainy season (May-November) accounting for approximately 80% of the annual precipitation, so the main types of drought in the WRB were short-term droughts such as winter droughts and winter-spring droughts (Zhao et al., 2019). To better understand why short-term droughts are prone to occur in the WRB, six statistical coefficients were used for analysis herein, including nonuniformity coefficient (Cn), complete accommodation coefficient (Cc), concentration degree (Cd), concentration period (Cp), relative variation range (Cr), and absolute variation range (Ca). Please refer to (Lin et al., 2017) for detailed calculation steps about six statistical coefficients,. As shown in Table 6, the results of the uneven intra-annual distribution of precipitation are consistent with the risk of intra-seasonal meteorological drought, demonstrating that short-term droughts tend to hit the WRB.
Table 5
Probabilistic prediction of intra-seasonal and inter-seasonal meteorological drought risk
Scenario
|
PJB4.5
|
PJJ4.5
|
PJB8.5
|
PJJ8.5
|
Intra-seasonal
|
62.85
|
65.54
|
66.78
|
42.62
|
Inter-seasonal
|
27.25
|
27.56
|
16.76
|
32.78
|
Table 6
Intra-annual variation of precipitation in WRB
Scenario
|
Cn
|
Cc
|
Cp
|
Cd
|
Cr
|
Ca
|
PJB45
|
0.72
|
0.32
|
0.37
|
0.49
|
15.06
|
359.72
|
PJJ45
|
0.70
|
0.31
|
0.30
|
0.48
|
14.71
|
345.04
|
PJB85
|
0.66
|
0.30
|
0.41
|
0.46
|
13.83
|
316.22
|
PJJ85
|
0.65
|
0.29
|
0.33
|
0.45
|
13.11
|
289.87
|
4.2. Hydrological drought risk prediction
4.2.1. Prediction of LULC in the WRB
In this paper, we used the CA-Markov module in IDRISI software to simulate and predict the LULC following the principle of equal time interval, and simulated the LULC maps of 2000 to simulate those 1980 and 1990 to simulate. By taking 1990 as the base year and according to the land use transition matrix and land use suitability maps of 1980-1990 (similar to the land use over the past decade), we used the CA-Markov module to simulate the LULC maps of 2000, and compared and analyzed the similarity between the measured and simulated land use maps of the WRB in 2000 with the Crosstab module in IDRISI. The Kappa coefficient was 0.9. Similarly, the LULC maps of 1990 and 2000 were used to predict those of 2010 whose validated Kappa coefficient was 0.91. The results demonstrate that the Kappa coefficients of the predicted and measured maps for both periods are greater than 0.8. Additionally, the simulation results are presented in Figure 5, suggesting that the simulation results are highly reliable, so the CA- Markov model can be adopted for prediction and simulation of land use in the WRB.
Therefore, by using the above validated CA-Markov prediction and simulation program and regarding 2015 as the start year, the land use transition matrix and suitability map was calculated in light of the historical land use maps of 1980, 1990 and 2000, respectively. Meanwhile, 15, 25 and 35 CA iterations were selected accordingly to predict the projected land use maps for 2030, 2040 and 2050 (shown in Figure 6). The overall spatial distribution of land use in 2030, 2040 and 2050 is basically the same as that in 2015, but there are clear changes in each land use type within them.
Figure 5 is here
Figure 6 is here
4.2.2. Calibration and validation of the SWAT model
In order to improve the accuracy of the model simulation for better understanding of the hydrological processes in the WRB, two major hydrological stations were selected for calibration and validation. The monthly streamflow of the basin from 2000 to 2010 were simulated with monthly scale as the time step, and the year 2000 was regarded as the model warm-up period to minimize experimental errors. Beyond that, to create initial conditions for model simulation, the years 2001-2005 were regarded as the model calibration period and 2006-2010 as the model validation period. The sensitivity analysis of the SWAT model parameters is presented in Table 7. The simulation and observation results of the SWAT model are shown in Figure 7. The measured streamflow, simulated streamflow and precipitation process of each month in the calibration and validation periods are relatively consistent, and the simulation results of the two hydrological stations have achieved satisfactory results. The R2 values of Jiabao Station were 0.79 and 0.94 for the calibration and validation periods, respectively (Table 8), and the Ens coefficients were 0.67 and 0.81, respectively. Regarding Jiaji Station, the R2 values and Ens coefficients were 0.83 and 0.60 for the calibration period, and 0.93 and 0.86 for the validation period, respectively. In general, the streamflow from the two hydrological stations met the requirements during the calibration and validation periods. In addition, the SWAT model can better simulate the hydrological processes affected by climate and land use changes in the WRB, and can be used to simulate and analyze the hydrological drought conditions in the WRB.
Table 7
Sensitivity parameters of the SWAT model
Parameter Name
|
Parameter definition
|
Calibrate method
|
Calibrate value
|
Order
|
CN2
|
The SCS curve number
|
R
|
-0.4817
|
1
|
ALPHA_BF
|
Base flow alpha factor (days)
|
V
|
1.4089
|
2
|
ESCO
|
Soil evaporation compensation factor
|
V
|
11.7706
|
3
|
GW_DELAY
|
Groundwater delay (days)
|
V
|
0.1927
|
4
|
GWQMN
|
Threshold depth of water in shallow aquifer required for return flow to occur (mm)
|
V
|
0.1276
|
5
|
SOL_AWC
|
Available water capacity of the soil
|
V
|
0.8681
|
6
|
GW_REVAP
|
Groundwater re-evaporation coefficient
|
R
|
-0.0527
|
7
|
Table 8
Calibration and validation results of streamflow simulation using the SWAT model
Station
|
Calibration
|
Validation
|
R2
|
Ens
|
R2
|
Ens
|
Jiabao station
|
0.79
|
0.67
|
0.94
|
0.81
|
Jiaji station
|
0.83
|
0.60
|
0.93
|
0.86
|
Figure 7 is here
4.2.3. Prediction of hydrological drought risk
(1) Selection of marginal distribution function
To obtain suitable marginal distribution of hydrological droughts characteristics, the SWAT model parameters obtained from the calibration and validation periods were used to predict future streamflow under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. In the next step, the hydrological drought index was calculated; the hydrological drought duration and drought severity were extracted by the run theory; and distribution functions (eg. exponential, lognormal, and gamma distributions) were used to fit the hydrological drought duration and drought severity. Marginal distribution with GOF was selected based on the minimum AIC and BIC, and the results are shown in Table 9. The fitting functions of hydrological drought duration and drought severity distribution under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios are also presented in Table 9.
Table 9
Fit error of marginal distribution of hydrological drought duration and severity.
Scenario
|
drought
|
Optimal distribution
|
Parameter
|
AIC
|
BIC
|
Kendall rank
|
Spearman
rank
|
SJB45
|
duration
|
generalized extreme value
|
κ=-0.22, σ=3.36, θ=1.00
|
137.51
|
142
|
0.78**
|
0.92**
|
severity
|
lognormal
|
μ=-0.01, σ=1.34
|
115.19
|
118.18
|
SJJ45
|
duration
|
generalized extreme value
|
κ=5.23, σ=2.25, μ=1.43
|
103.51
|
107.71
|
0.8**
|
0.92**
|
severity
|
birnbaum saunders
|
β=1.00, α=1.64
|
108.01
|
110.81
|
SJB85
|
duration
|
generalized pareto
|
κ=0.11, σ=3.24, θ=1.00
|
115.67
|
119.2
|
0.82**
|
0.93**
|
severity
|
exponential
|
μ=2.88
|
100.73
|
101.9
|
SJJ85
|
duration
|
generalized pareto
|
κ=24.23, σ=0.001, θ=1.00
|
36.2
|
40.08
|
0.82**
|
0.95**
|
severity
|
generalized pareto
|
κ=1.96, σ=0.27,θ=0.001
|
95.61
|
99.5
|
Note: "**" indicates that the correlation coefficient passed the test of α=0.05
(2) Selection of the optimal copula functions
The analysis of marginal distribution functions demonstrated that the copula functions could be used to determine the joint distribution of hydrological drought duration and severity in the basin, and the results are presented in Table 10. The optimal copula functions selected by GOF of each scenario were used to predict the probability of drought risk, and the probability distribution between hydrological drought duration and drought severity in WRB was plotted in Figure 8. It can be observed from the figure that the high probability part of hydrological drought duration and drought severity is well fitted, and the joint probability distribution values also show an increasing trend as drought duration and drought severity increase. By contrast, the low probability part is poorly fitted, resulting from the limited time series and the discrete durations of drought. A number of studies have also stressed the importance of joint probability, because joint probability is an important guide for the assessment of water resources systems and offers great values for drought risk assessment (Ayantobo et al., 2021; Shiau, 2006).
Table 10
Fit errors of copula functions for drought duration and severity
Scenario
|
Copula
|
RMSE
|
AIC
|
BIC
|
θ
|
SJB45
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.09
|
-273.97
|
-272.47
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.06
|
-303.19
|
-301.69
|
12.83
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-297.97
|
-296.48
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-296.74
|
-295.24
|
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-294.66
|
-291.67
|
|
SJJ45
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.19
|
-304.17
|
-302.4
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.15
|
-322.4
|
-320.63
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.12
|
-341.49
|
-339.73
|
3.36
|
Normal-copula
|
0.12
|
-339.54
|
-337.78
|
|
t-copula
|
0.12
|
-340.57
|
-337.05
|
|
SJB85
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.09
|
-191.74
|
-190.56
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.07
|
-199.45
|
-198.27
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-205.56
|
-204.38
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-205.66
|
-204.48
|
0.92
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-203.6
|
-201.24
|
|
SJJ85
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.06
|
-242.75
|
-241.45
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.06
|
-243.31
|
-242.01
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-238.51
|
-237.21
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-243.39
|
-242.09
|
0.9
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-241.35
|
-238.76
|
|
Figure 8 is here
(3) Prediction of hydrological drought risk probability
After the marginal distribution function and copula function were determined, the drought risk assessment model was employed to project the probabilities of intra-seasonal and inter-seasonal drought risk for the next 30 years (2021-2050). Table 11 demonstrates the probabilities of drought risk for the two GHG emission models. For hydrological drought, the probability of intra-seasonal hydrological drought risk is 35%-60%, and that of inter-seasonal hydrological drought risk is 30%-50%. As a whole, the probability of intra-seasonal drought in the WRB is high in the coming 30 years, but the risk of inter-seasonal drought is greater for hydrologic drought than for meteorological drought. Among them, except for the inter-seasonal RCP 4.5 scenario, the probability of hydrological drought in the upstream is greater than that of hydrological drought in the downstream, indicating that the upstream basin is more susceptible to hydrological drought. Interestingly, the probability of intra-seasonal meteorological droughts is greater than that of intra-seasonal hydrological droughts, while that of inter-seasonal droughts is smaller than inter-seasonal hydrological droughts (except for the SJB85 scenario). This indicates that meteorological droughts tend to be intra-seasonal, while hydrological droughts tend to be inter-seasonal in the WRB in the next three decades. In other words, meteorological droughts are mostly short-term droughts, while hydrological droughts are likely to be both short-term and long-term droughts.
Table 11
Probabilistic prediction of intra-seasonal and inter-seasonal hydrological drought risk
Scenario
|
Copula
|
RMSE
|
AIC
|
BIC
|
θ
|
SJB45
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.09
|
-273.97
|
-272.47
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.06
|
-303.19
|
-301.69
|
12.83
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-297.97
|
-296.48
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-296.74
|
-295.24
|
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-294.66
|
-291.67
|
|
SJJ45
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.19
|
-304.17
|
-302.4
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.15
|
-322.4
|
-320.63
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.12
|
-341.49
|
-339.73
|
3.36
|
Normal-copula
|
0.12
|
-339.54
|
-337.78
|
|
t-copula
|
0.12
|
-340.57
|
-337.05
|
|
SJB85
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.09
|
-191.74
|
-190.56
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.07
|
-199.45
|
-198.27
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-205.56
|
-204.38
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-205.66
|
-204.48
|
0.92
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-203.6
|
-201.24
|
|
SJJ85
|
Clayton-copula
|
0.06
|
-242.75
|
-241.45
|
|
Frank-copula
|
0.06
|
-243.31
|
-242.01
|
|
Gumbel-copula
|
0.06
|
-238.51
|
-237.21
|
|
Normal-copula
|
0.06
|
-243.39
|
-242.09
|
0.9
|
t-copula
|
0.06
|
-241.35
|
-238.76
|
|
In general, precipitation, as a basic meteorological variable of the water circulation and hydrological processes, may lead to water shortages in rivers, lakes and reservoirs, and consequently to hydrological droughts. In addition to climatic factors, the impact of human activities, which change the underlying surface, on hydrological processes cannot be overlooked. Land use changes directly reflect the impact of human activities on hydrological processes, and indirectly affect the occurrence of droughts. The analysis hydrological droughts risk shows that hydrological droughts occur more frequently in the upstream than in the downstream. Besides, the influence of underlying surface on hydrological droughts cannot be ignored, despite the extremely heavy influence of meteorological droughts on hydrological droughts. The slope may affect the propagation of drought (Xu et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2017). The upstream area is at high altitudes and mostly located at the slope of mountainous and hilly areas. Under the same circumstances, the greater the slope, the faster the flow rate, and the uneven distribution within the year in this area easily causes seasonal droughts. Additionally, the land use map of Figure 5 and Figure 6 shows that the underlying surface of the upstream area is mainly covered with woodlands and orchard. For one thing, the woodlands in the upstream basin include tropical rainforests, rubber plantations and other commercial forests. These vegetations are broad-leaved forests, which also makes the study area unique in respect of geographical and ecological vulnerability. The evapotranspiration of broad-leaved forests is higher owing to the homogeneous structure of rubber plantations as well as the large space and strong winds between trees. The literature also indicates that the evapotranspiration of forests is higher than that of grassland and cropland (Sterling et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2019). In the meantime, forest land can alter local microtopography and change the infiltration rate of water flowing into the soil and slow down or maintain streamflow, thereby increasing droughts (Chang et al., 2015). For another, fruits and cash crops grown in orchard, which are the main economic income of the region, and these tropical cash crops require sufficient water for irrigation. Further, agricultural activities need lots of water from rivers, and thus lead to drought. Following the principle of water balance, drought also occurs in case of constant precipitation and greater evaporation (Barker et al., 2016). Therefore, the probability of hydrological drought is greater in the upstream than in the downstream.