Study design
We have chosen to undertake a systematic scoping review to explore the breadth or depth of the literature, map and summarize the evidence and identify or address knowledge gaps in relation to the impact of COVID-19 on individual oral health [36, 37]. The proposed systematic scoping review will be undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews [36]. The review question collectively developed by the research team (including oral health and public health researchers and clinicians) is defined as: ‘What is known about the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral health at individual level?’.
Eligibility criteria
Population/ studies
Studies that explore impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the oral health of all individuals will be included. The impacts on oral health at individual level could be explored from the perspectives of clients or their health service providers. Health service providers refer to dental, medical, nursing and allied health staff involved in providing or monitoring oral healthcare.
Concept
Inclusion and exclusion criteria are as follows:
Table 1: Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Criterion
|
Inclusion
|
Exclusion
|
Population
|
All individuals including children, adults, vulnerable populations and people with special needs
|
N/A
|
Setting
|
Any
|
N/A
|
Interventions
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Study designs
|
All study designs
|
N/A
|
Publication type
|
Peer review of original research (including reviews)
|
Opinion pieces, editorials, magazine articles
|
Outcomes
|
Articles that explore the self-perceived oral health impacts of COVID-19 pandemic
Articles related to accessing and utilisation of dental services during the COVID-19 pandemic
Articles that explore the barriers and enablers of achieving optimal oral health during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
Articles that explore the transmission of COVID-19 in oral healthcare settings
Articles that focus on prevention of COVID-19 at oral healthcare settings
Articles that explore the perspectives, experiences and attitudes of oral health service providers on COVID-19 pandemic
Articles that focus on challenges or enablers experienced by oral health service providers during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
Language
|
Articles written in English
|
Articles in language other than English
|
Availability
|
Full text available
|
Not full text available
|
Date
|
All articles from January 2020 onwards
|
Anything outside of this range
|
Search strategy
The study team will develop a search strategy as recommended by the 2020 Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews in consultation with a specialist health librarian and peer reviewed by using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) checklist [38]. A draft search strategy for MEDLINE is provided (see Additional file 1). The search strategy will then be refined and altered for use in each of the following databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, OVID, Proquest, Embase, Dentistry and Oral Health Sciences Source (DOSS) and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Additional studies of relevance will be identified by hand-searching the reference lists of all the included studies.
A combination of terms related to two themes of ‘COVID-19 pandemic’ and ‘oral health’ will be searched across all databases and other searches. Boolean operators will be used to conduct the search. The search terms will be searched as both, keywords and subject headings (e.g., MeSH) in the titles and abstracts. Search limits will be applied to language preference of English only. Search results will be saved and exported into EndNote, a bibliographic software program, to store, organize, and manage all results.
Data extraction
Once all searches have been undertaken the results will be imported into Covidence – Cochrane’s systematic review management software [39]. Duplicates will be removed once importation is complete, and screening undertaken against the eligibility criteria. A sample of 25 articles will be assessed by all reviewers to ensure reliability in the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1). Team discussion will be used to ensure consistent application. The Covidence software supports blind reviewing with two reviewers required at each screening phase. Conflicts are flagged within the software which allows the team to discuss those that have disagreements until consensus can be reached. The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist will guide the reporting of the review [40] (see Additional file 2) and all stages will be documented using the PRISMA-ScR flow chart [40].
A preliminary protocol for this review has been published in the Open Science Framework (OSF-https://osf.io/7t9bq/) preregistrations to enhance transparency and replicability and to reduce any publication or reporting biases.
Data management
A data charting instrument will be created in Covidence to extract study characteristics and to confirm the study relevance. The characteristics to be extracted will include, but not limited to the publication month and year, type of publication (e.g., original research, type of study design, country where the study was conducted, population characteristics (e.g., children, elderly), the domain of oral health (e.g., oral health status, oral health behaviours such as oral hygiene maintenance or utilisation of oral healthcare services) and information relevant to inclusion criteria. Data extraction function of Covidence will be used to extract these study characteristics.
Presentation of the results/ data mapping
Data will be extracted relating to the impact of COVID-19 on individual oral health and will be summarised in tabular format. The format of these tables will be developed and refined throughout the data extraction. Narrative summaries that describe how the extracted data relates to the aim of the review will also be developed based on the data extraction criteria.