DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1110968/v1
Background: Computed tomography Hounsfield unit (HU) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score are both alternative tool to the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry(DEXA) scan T-score to quantify the bone quality. However, it is not known which method more accurately reflects vertebral bone mineral density.
Purpose: To evaluate the best method for evaluating vertebral bone mineral density in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Methods: Eighty-five patients who had at most two vertebrae with severe degeneration at L1–L4 were retrospectively reviewed.HU value was measured by axial CT image, VBQ score was calculated by T1-weighted lumbar MRI image, and L1-L4 T-score and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured by DEXA.The correlation of the vertebral HU value and VBQ score to the T-score was analyzed.
Results: There were 52 female and 33 male patients. The average age was 57.18±9.65 years . HU values had a positive correlation with BMD and T-score. The correlation coefficients between HU and T-score was 0.751(<0.001) for L1; 0.699(<0.001) for L2; 0.618(<0.001) for L3; 0.543(<0.001) for L4; and 0.677(<0.001) for L1-4.However,VBQ score had a negative correlation with BMD and T-score. The correlation coefficients between VBQ score and T-score was -0.231(<0.05) for L1; -0.246(<0.05) for L2; -0.268(<0.05) for L3; -0.252(<0.05) for L4; and -0.346(<0.01) for L1-4. The correlation coefficients of HU value at L1–L4 were higher than the correlation coefficients of VBQ score .
Conclusions: HU value was a better predictor of vertebral bone mineral density than VBQ score in patients with lumbar degenerative disease.
Osteoporosis is defined as low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue with consequent increases in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture[1].As the population ages, osteoporosis has become a common disease worldwide.In spinal surgery, the evaluation of bone mineral density is very important. Osteoporosis is one of the main causes of complications such as fixation failure bone non-union and adjacent horizontal fracture after spinal surgery[2–3].
DEXA is presently used as the gold standard method for assessing BMD[4].However, the BMD measurements from lumbar DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases are increased because of scoliosis, degenerative arthritis, osteophyte formation, bone sclerosis[5–7].Therefore, an approach to assess bone mineral density using HU values of CT images has been extensively studied [8–10].In addition,another novel technique for assessing bone quality is the VBQ score, which uses noncontrast, T1-weighted lumbar spine MRI and was moderately correlated with femoral neck and overall lowest T-score[11].Another common benefit of both approaches is the use of available or opportunistic imaging to provide meaningful data about the patient's bone quality.
However, no study assessed the association between VBQ score and vertebral T-score.We studied the correlation of the vertebral HU value and VBQ score to the T-score, and evaluated the similarity and difference between them.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital.Because it was a retrospective study, informed consent was waived.We reviewed patients who underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar diseases at the spinal Department of our hospital from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2021.Inclusion criteria: patients who received lumbar CT, MRI and DEXA scan within 1 month before surgery in our hospital.The exclusion criteria were :(1) at least 3 osteophytes with severe hyperplasia between L1 and L4 according to the four-level classification system of osteophytes [12];(2) According to UCLA grading standards, at least 3 intervertebral disc degeneration between L1 and L4 reached grade 4 [13];(3) Narrowing of at least 3 adjacent facet joints between L1 and L4 (< 1 mm) accompanied by large osteophytes [14].(4) A history of lumbar surgery;(5) spinal infection, tumor or metabolic disease;(6) Anatomical identification is difficult to identify for radiometry. Finally,85 patients were selected for this study.
BMD and T-score of each patient's lumbar spine (L1-L4) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA, Discover A densitometers, Hologic Inc, Bedford, MA, USA).WHO’s criteria were applied [4]: osteoporosis (T≤−2.5), osteopenia (−2.5 < T <−1) and normal BMD (T≥−1).
AS previous protocol[9], PACS was used to calculate HU value. Briefly, HU values were measured by placing the elliptic region of interest (ROI) in an axial mid-body image through L1-L4(Figure 1). Include as many trabeculae as possible in ROI and avoid cortical bone and heterogeneous areas such as posterior venous plexus, bone islands, and compressed bone. The mean HU value represents the bone mineral density of vertebral trabecular bone.
As previously described [11],VBQ score was assessed using lumbar non-contrast, T1-weighted MRI.First, the ROI was placed in a mid-sagittal section to measure the signal intensity (SI) of l1-L4 vertebral body bone trabeculae(Figure 2). In patients with mid-sagittal abnormalities (eg, hemangioma, venous plexus, scoliosis changes), parasagittal slices were used to reflect bone quality. If the entire vertebral body is abnormal, the vertebral body is excluded.The SI of L1-L4 was then divided by the SI of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the L3 level to obtain VBQ score(Figure 2, Formula 1).If the CSF of L3 space is completely blocked, the ROI of CSF is placed at the L2 level.All HU values and VBQ scores were measured by two independent observers and averaged for statistical analysis.
SPSS 25 (SPSS, USA) software was used for statistical analysis.Interobserver reliability calculations was performed by the interclass correlation coefficient(0 represents no agreement and 1 represents perfect agreement).The correlations between HU value and BMD,VBQ score and BMD,HU value and T-score,VBQ score and T-score were evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient and binary linear regression.For the correlation coefficient (r), r≤0.3 represents poor correlation, 0.3<r≤0.6 represents moderate correlation, 0.6 < r≤0.8 represents high correlation, and r> 0.8 represents high correlation.
85 patients were included in this study, including 33 males and 55 females, with an average age of 57.18±9.65 years and BMI of 25.96±3.60 kg/m2.normal BMD was detected in 23 patients, osteopenia was detected in 37 patients,osteoporosis was detected in 25 patients. .Interobserver reliability calculations was well in measuring HU value and VBQ score, with ICCs of 0.995 and 0.971, respectively.The characteristics of these patients were summarized in Table 1.
Characteristics |
All (n = 85) |
---|---|
Age (years) |
57.18±9.65 |
Gender ratio (male: female) |
33:52 |
BMI (kg/m2) |
25.96±3.60 |
L1 BMD (g/cm2) |
0.855±0.130 |
L2 BMD (g/cm2) |
0.906±0.145 |
L3 BMD (g/cm2) |
0.954±0.151 |
L4 BMD (g/cm2) |
1.007±0.176 |
Average BMD of L1-L4(g/cm2) |
0.931±0.142 |
L1 T-score |
-1.53±1.15 |
L2 T-score |
-1.33±1.30 |
L3 T-score |
-1.25±1.37 |
L4 T-score |
-0.60±1.59 |
Average T-score of L1-L4 |
-1.18±1.28 |
L1 HU value |
136.05±43.87 |
L2 HU value |
128.99±43.67 |
L3 HU value |
121.92±44.98 |
L4 HU value |
126.19±47.09 |
Average HU value of L1-L4 |
128.29±43.80 |
L1 VBQ score |
3.22±0.71 |
L2 VBQ score |
3.27±0.79 |
L3 VBQ score |
3.30±0.81 |
L4 VBQ score |
3.21±0.87 |
Average VBQ score of L1-L4 |
3.25±0.77 |
The correlations between HU value and BMD,VBQ score and BMD,HU value and T-score,VBQ score and T-score were summarized in Table 2.The correlation coefficients between HU value and BMD for L1-L4 were 0.752(<0.001),0.696(<0.001),0.615(<0.001),0.547(<0.001) and 0.677(<0.001) for the average of L1-L4; the correlation coefficients between HU value and T-score for L1-L4 were 0.751(<0.001),0.699(<0.001),0.618(<0.001),0.543(<0.001) and 0.677(<0.001) for the average of L1-L4;the correlation coefficients between VBQ score and BMD for L1-L4 were -0.302(<0.01),-0.291(<0.01),-0.279(<0.01),-0.270(<0.05) and -0.309(<0.01) for the average of L1-L4; the correlation coefficients between VBQ score and T-score for L1-L4 were -0.231(<0.05),-0.246(<0.05),-0.268(<0.05),-0.252(<0.05) and -0.346(<0.01) for the average of L1-L4.There was a moderate or high positive correlation between HU value and BMD,HU value and T-score, while there was a negative correlation between VBQ score and BMD,VBQ score and T-score, but the correlation was poor.In addition,scatter plots showing the relationship between average HU value and average T-score, average VBQ score and average T-score are also shown in Figure3.
Correlation coefficients |
||
---|---|---|
BMD |
T-score |
|
L1 HU value |
0.752** |
0.751** |
L2 HU value |
0.696** |
0.699** |
L3 HU value |
0.615** |
0.618** |
L4 HU value |
0.547** |
0.543** |
Average HU value of L1-L4 |
0.677** |
0.677** |
L1 VBQ score |
-0.302** |
-0.231* |
L2 VBQ score |
-0.291** |
-0.246* |
L3 VBQ score |
-0.279** |
-0.268* |
L4 VBQ score |
-0.270* |
-0.252* |
Average VBQ score of L1-L4 |
-0.309** |
-0.346** |
*P value < 0.05;**P value < 0.01. |
mineral density is critical to the strength of the motor system. Osteoporosis, which is prone to fracture, can be quantified in advance with a DEXA scan.In the United States, the estimated prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in the population is 43.9% and 10.3% respectively[15].Osteoporosis is an important risk factor for many complications of spine surgery, such as screw loosening, adjacent segment disease, interbody cage subsidence and fractures[2-3,16-17]. Since DEXA can include all calcified tissue, such as calcified aorta or osteophytes in degenerative spine, and may overestimate bone mass, several alternative measurements have been developed[5-7].
HU represents the density of human tissue. The corresponding HU value of a volume element is: HU value =1000×(μx-μwater) /μwater, whereμwater andμx represent the attenuation coefficient of distilled water and a volume element on X ray respectively. The bone density is high, usually 300~3000HU[18]. Many studies have shown a good correlation between HU value and T score [8-10,18-20].Similarly, the M-score was the first MRI-based observation to use adipose tissue with high T1 signal and to assess fat infiltration in cancellous bone by measuring T1 signal in the vertebral body[21].Other study has confirmed this approach and provided evidence for the use of m-scores to assess bone quality[22].However, M-Score is of limited utility because it requires measurements to be taken using the same MRI machine.Using the principle of M-score and avoiding its defects, VBQ score was developed [11]. VBQ score was standardized with L3 space CSF SI as a reference value and could be compared between patients with different MRI machines. VBQ score has been shown to be correlated with BMD score of DXA scan [11]. MRI and CT of lumbar are routine examinations for patients undergoing lumbar surgery.Therefore,for a more accurate measurement of BMD in patients undergoing lumbar surgery, it is worth considering which measurement is more relevant to the patient's BMD.
In our study, HU values of L1-L4 were positively correlated with BMD and T-score of corresponding vertebral bodies (P <0.001). Similarly, we demonstrated that the VBQ scores of L1-L4 were negatively correlated with BMD and T-scores(P <0.05). However, the HU value of L1-L4 was more correlated with vertebral BMD and T-score, which may be because HU value can directly measure BMD, while VBQ score indirectly reflects BMD by measuring the signal of fat.However, neither HU value nor VBQ score had a higher correlation with BMD than previous studies[9,11], which may be due to the limited sample size of our study.
Limitations
Our study has limitations.First, no matter HU value or VBQ score, the selection of the region of interest is artificial and local, which may bring errors to the measurement results. Second, although we selected patients with mild degeneration, some degeneration of these patients, such as vascular calcification and ligament ossification, would also result in a higher BMD measurement value. Thirdly, due to the retrospective study of 2-year patients, the insufficient sample size of the study may lead to bias in the experimental results.
HU value and VBQ scores of vertebral bodies both can be used as complementary measures to assess BMD in patients with lumbar degeneration.In addition,HU value was a better predictor of vertebral bone mineral density than VBQ score in patients with lumbar degenerative disease.
CT Computed tomography
HU Hounsfield unit
VBQ Vertebral bone quality
MRI Magnetic resonance imaging
DEXA Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
BMD Bone mineral density
ROI Regions of interest
SI Signal intensity
CSF Cerebrospinal fluid
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the ethical committee of Third Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University.
Informed consent: As a retrospective analysis, the need for individual consent was waived.
Consent for publication: As a retrospective analysis, the need for individual consent was waived.
Author contributions: Wenshuai Li and Houze Zhu equally participated in the design of the study, statistical analysis and article writing. Tong Tong participated in data collection. Zijian Hua participated in data collection. Xuan Zhao participated in language editing. Yong Shen participated in the design of the study. Linfeng Wang participated in the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approve the final version of the manuscript.
Funding: None of the authors received funding from other individuals or institutions.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability: Data were not stored in a repository.