[1] Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. European urology. 2019 May: 75:799-810
[2] Westerman ME, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Low Grade Cystic Renal Epithelial Neoplasms. Urology. 2019 Nov: 133:145-50
[3] Capitanio U, Terrone C, Antonelli A, et al. Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function. European urology. 2015 Apr: 67:683-9
[4] Chiruvella M, Ghouse SM, Tamhankar AS. "Polar flip" technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy - Evolution of a novel technique for posterior hilar tumors. Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. 2019 Jul-Sep: 35:230-1
[5] Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. The Journal of urology. 2009 Sep: 182:844-53
[6] Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. European urology. 2009 Nov: 56:786-93
[7] Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, Park CH, Gill IS. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. The Journal of urology. 2010 May: 183:1708-13
[8] Hakky TS, Baumgarten AS, Allen B, et al. Zonal NePhRO Scoring System: A Superior Renal Tumor Complexity Classification Model. Clin Genitourin Canc. 2014 Feb: 12:E13-E8
[9] Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992 May: 111:518-26
[10] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery. 2004 Aug: 240:205-13
[11] Davidiuk AJ, Parker AS, Thomas CS, et al. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score: An Accurate Image-based Scoring System to Predict Adherent Perinephric Fat in Partial Nephrectomy. European urology. 2014 Dec: 66:1165-71
[12] Yanishi M, Kinoshita H, Koito Y, et al. Adherent Perinephric Fat Is a Surgical Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis Using Mayo Adhesive Probability Score. Transplantation proceedings. 2020 Jan - Feb: 52:84-8
[13] Xia L, Wang X, Xu T, Guzzo TJ. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy. Journal of endourology. 2017 Sep: 31:893-909
[14] Chang KD, Abdel Raheem A, Kim KH, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up. BJU international. 2018 Oct: 122:618-26
[15] Garisto J, Bertolo R, Dagenais J, et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes. Urologic oncology. 2018 Oct: 36:471 e1- e9
[16] Jung S, Min GE, Chung BI, Jeon SH. Risk factors for postoperative hemorrhage after partial nephrectomy. Korean journal of urology. 2014 Jan: 55:17-22
[17] Baumann C, Westphalen K, Fuchs H, Oesterwitz H, Hierholzer J. Interventional management of renal bleeding after partial nephrectomy. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2007 Sep-Oct: 30:828-32