1. Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SGB, Hadden J, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): Research and development. Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172(1):11–8.
2. Wing J, Curtis RH, Beevor A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Glossary for HoNOS score sheet. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 1999 May;174:432–4.
3. Eagar K, Gaines P, Burgess P, Green J, Bower A, Buckingham B, et al. Developing a New Zealand casemix classification for mental health services. World Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;3(3):172–7.
4. Tulloch AD, Khondoker MR, Thornicroft G, David AS. Home treatment teams and facilitated discharge from psychiatric hospital. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Oct;24(5):402–14.
5. Tulloch AD, David AS, Thornicroft G. Exploring the predictors of early readmission to psychiatric hospital. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Apr;25(2):181–93.
6. Trauer T. The subscale structure of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). J Ment Health. 1999;8(5):499–509.
7. Lauzon S, Corbière M, Bonin JP, Bonsack C, Lesage AD, Ricard N. [Validation of the French version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS-F)]. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr. 2001 Nov;46(9):841–6.
8. Speak B, Muncer S. The structure and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Australas Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 1;23(1):66–8.
9. Lovaglio PG, Monzani E. Validation aspects of the health of the nation outcome scales. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Sep 6;5(1):20.
10. Lovaglio PG, Monzani E. Health of the nation outcome scales evaluation in a community setting population. Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov 1;21(9):1643–53.
11. Jacobs R. Investigating Patient Outcome Measures in Mental Health [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Feb 26]. Available from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/139380/
12. Bebbington P, Brugha T, Hill T, Marsden L, Window S. Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci. 1999 May;174:389–94.
13. Bender KG. The meagre outcomes of HoNOS. Australas Psychiatry. 2020;28(2):206–9.
14. James M, Painter J, Buckingham B, Stewart MW. A review and update of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). BJPsych Bull. 2018;42(2):63–8.
15. Pirkis JE, Burgess PM, Kirk PK, Dodson S, Coombs TJ, Williamson MK. A review of the psychometric properties of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) family of measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Nov 28;3(1):76.
16. Semahegn A, Torpey K, Manu A, Assefa N, Tesfaye G, Ankomah A. Psychotropic medication non-adherence and associated factors among adult patients with major psychiatric disorders: a protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;7(1):10.
17. Bonsack C, Borgeat F, Lesage A. Mesurer la sévérité des problèmes des patients et leur évolution dans un secteur psychiatrique : une étude sur le terrain du Health of Nation Outcome Scales en français (HoNOS-F). Ann Méd-Psychol Rev Psychiatr. 2002 Sep 1;160(7):483–8.
18. Andreas S, Harries-Hedder K, Schwenk W, Hausberg M, Koch U, Schulz H. Is the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales appropriate for the assessment of symptom severity in patients with substance-related disorders? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Jul 1;39(1):32–40.
19. Golay P, Basterrechea L, Conus P, Bonsack C. Internal and Predictive Validity of the French Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: Need for Future Directions. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016 Aug 2 [cited 2019 Oct 21];11(8). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970811/
20. De Ayala RJ. Methodology in the social sciences. The theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Press. https://doi. org/10.3102/10769986030003295; 2009.
21. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. MESA Press, 5835 S; 1993.
22. Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychom Monogr Suppl 17. 1969;
23. Bock RD. A Brief History of Item Theory Response. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 1997;16(4):21–33.
24. Reeve BB, Fayers P. Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. Assess Qual Life Clin Trials Methods Pract. 2005;2:55–73.
25. Baker F. The Basics of Item Response Theory [Internet]. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation; 2001. Available from: http://www.edres.org/irt/baker/final.pdf
26. Immekus JC, Snyder KE, Ralston PA. Multidimensional item response theory for factor structure assessment in educational psychology research. In: Frontiers in Education. Frontiers; 2019. p. 45.
27. Chalmers RP. mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(6):1–29.
28. R Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2018.
29. An X, Yung Y-F. Item response theory: What it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. SAS Inst Inc SAS364-2014. 2014;10(4).
30. Lipscomb J, Gotay C, Snyder C, editors. Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods and applications. [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2004 [cited 2020 Feb 26]. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Lipscomb+J%2C+Gotay+C%2C+Snyder+C.+Outcomes+Asjsessment+in+Cancer%3A+Measures%2C
+Methods+and+Applications.+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%3B+2005.&btnG=
31. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6(1):53–60.
32. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.
33. Forero CG, Maydeu-Olivares A. Estimation of IRT graded response models: Limited versus full information methods. Psychol Methods. 2009;14(3):275.
34. Depaoli S, Tiemensma J, Felt JM. Assessment of health surveys: fitting a multidimensional graded response model. Psychol Health Med. 2018;23(sup1):1299–317.
35. Jiang S, Wang C, Weiss DJ. Sample size requirements for estimation of item parameters in the multidimensional graded response model. Front Psychol. 2016;7:109.
36. StataCorp. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 141. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2016.
37. Kraus L, Baumeister SE, Pabst A, Orth B. Association of Average Daily Alcohol Consumption, Binge Drinking and Alcohol-Related Social Problems: Results from the German Epidemiological Surveys of Substance Abuse. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009 May 1;44(3):314–20.
38. Andreas S, Harfst T, Dirmaier J, Kawski S, Koch U, Schulz H. A psychometric evaluation of the German version of the ‘health of the nation outcome scales, HoNOS-D’: on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders. Psychopathology. 2007;40(2):116–25.
39. Turton R. An exploratory factor analysis of HONOS-LD scales. Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2020;
40. Pennou A, Lecomte T, Potvin S, Khazaal Y. Mobile Intervention for Individuals With Psychosis, Dual Disorders, and Their Common Comorbidities: A Literature Review. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:302.
41. Han BH, Termine DJ, Moore AA, Sherman SE, Palamar JJ. Medical multimorbidity and drug use among adults in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Dec;12:214–9.
42. Wu L-T, Zhu H, Ghitza UE. Multicomorbidity of chronic diseases and substance use disorders and their association with hospitalization: Results from electronic health records data. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 01;192:316–23.
43. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):23–74.
44. Khan S. Concurrent mental and substance use disorders in Canada. Health Rep. 2017 Aug 16;28(8):3–8.
45. Moulin A, Evans E, Xing G, Melnikow J. Substance Use, Homelessness, Mental Illness and Medicaid Coverage: A Set-up for High Emergency Department Utilization. West J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 18;19(6):902–6.
46. Cerdá M, Moffitt TE, Meier MH, Harrington H, Houts R, Ramrakha S, et al. Persistent cannabis dependence and alcohol dependence represent risks for midlife economic and social problems: A longitudinal cohort study. Clin Psychol Sci. 2016;4(6):1028–46.
47. Rhemtulla M, Fried EI, Aggen SH, Tuerlinckx F, Kendler KS, Borsboom D. Network analysis of substance abuse and dependence symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;161:230–7.
48. Penzenstadler L, Gentil L, Huỳnh C, Grenier G, Fleury M-J. Variables associated with low, moderate and high emergency department use among patients with substance-related disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;207:107817.
49. Penzenstadler L, Machado A, Thorens G, Zullino D, Khazaal Y. Effect of Case Management Interventions for Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:51.
50. Penzenstadler L, Soares C, Anci E, Molodynski A, Khazaal Y. Effect of Assertive Community Treatment for Patients with Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review. Eur Addict Res. 2019;25(2):56–67.
51. Pennou A, Lecomte T, Khazaal Y, Potvin S, Vézina C, Bouchard M. Does theory of mind predict specific domains of social functioning in individuals following a first episode psychosis? Psychiatry Res. 2021;113933.
52. Oexle N, Müller M, Kawohl W, Xu Z, Viering S, Wyss C, et al. Self-stigma as a barrier to recovery: a longitudinal study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;268(2):209–12.