3.1. Extraction and analysis of sericin protein. Sericin was extracted from silk cocoons for further usage in Ag-Ser NP synthesis. Sericin protein can be extracted by heat, acids, and bases. The biological and physical properties of sericin can be affected by different extraction method[24]. In this work, sericin has extracted by autoclaving for 60 min at 0.1 MPa with a degumming rate of %18-25 of total cocoon mass. This process is selected among others due to its simplicity and not contain any further purification steps [25].
Sericin molecules show characteristic amide (I-II-III) peaks in the IR spectrum. Amide I peak generally corresponds 1630-1650 cm-1 due to C=O stretching vibration whereas, N-H bending and C-N stretching vibration at 1520-1540 cm-1 for amide II and C-N stretching vibration together with N-H in-plane bending at 1270-1230 cm-1 for amide III [20], [26]. From FTIR measurements, (Figure 1.) amide (I-II-III) peaks were detected at 1652.8, 1530.7, and 1249.4 cm-1 respectively. It is worth to mention that the amide I and amide II presents the major peaks in the spectra corresponding to C=O stretching. Thus, relative intensity of C=O peaks indicates extracted sericin structure abundantly contains highly hydrophilic carboxylate groups.[20] Moreover, absorptions at 1050 and 1391 cm-1 arise from C-H and O-H bending vibration and C-OH stretching vibration also indicates structure rich in hydroxyl chains [26].
Furthermore, Amide bonds are the backbone of polypeptide chains thus, their absorptions in IR spectra could indicate molecular conformations and secondary structures of the proteins [26]. In a previous study, random coil structures were assigned to 1650 cm-1 for amide I, 1540 cm-1 for amide II and 1230 cm-1 for amide III [20]. As mentioned before, peaks that found at 1652.8, 1530.7 and 1249.4 cm-1 may show, sericin protein consist of a high degree of random coils [27]. This molecular conformation may suggest that the sericin molecules have denatured and degraded due to high temperature-high pressure extraction method. Thus, abundance of highly electronegative functional groups appeared on IR spectra, may produce an electrostatic barrier while, complex polymer structure provides a physical barrier to particle aggregation. Therefore, denatured sericin may be a promising stabilizing agent for nanoparticle synthesis.
3.2. (Ag-Ser) nanoparticle preparation and evaluation of synthesis parameters. Silver nanoparticle synthesis by Tollens process involves three reactions; formation of silver oxide by dissolution of AgNO3 with presence of NaOH (Eq. 1), alteration of silver oxide to silver amine complex (Eq. 2) and reduction of silver amine complex cation in alkaline media by a reducing sugar (in this case maltose) (Eq. 3).
2AgNO3 + 2NaOH → Ag2O + 2NaNO3 + H2O (Eq. 1)
Ag2O + 4NH4OH→2[Ag(NH3)2]+ + 3H2O (Eq. 2)
R-CHO +2[Ag(NH3)2]+ → 2Ag + 4NH3 + 2H2O + R-COONa (Eq. 3)
In nanoparticle synthesis, size distribution, morphology and stability are dependent on concentration of reaction components, type of reducing and stabilizing agents [28]. During the reduction of silver complex, ammonium concentration was remain same in all experiments since, excess NH3 ions in solution surround the amine complexes thus, fewer silver nuclei can be formed due to slower reaction kinetics. Consequently, the particle size prone to be larger [29].
Table 1
Average particle sizes of synthesized Ag-Ser NPs at different pH conditions.
pHa | 11.5 | 11.8 | 12 |
Average particle sizeb (nm) | 20.23 ±6.25 | 38.7 ±14.5 | 51.8 ±23.01 |
a pH of solutions was measured before addition of maltose solution. |
b Concentration of sericin was kept same in all pH experiments (20µg/mL). |
In addition to ammonium concentration, pH value of the solution is also a crucial parameter for the Tollens process. As the pH of the reaction environment increased above 12, thick silver layer forms on the glass surface. (see appendix.) Consequently, particle production yield decreases. This phenomenon was also reported by S. Sangsuk [30]. In their work, sonication was applied in reaction system to avoid mirror formation. On the other hand, at pH values lower than 11.5 prolong reaction time from minutes to hours. Therefore, optimum pH values were determined between 11.5 and 12.
Particle size measurement results (Table 1.) show that size distribution of Ag-Ser NPs was increased from 20.23 ±6.25 nm to 51.8 ±23.01 nm from pH 11.5 to pH 12. Results are consistent with a previous studies, in which at pH of 11.5, both mean particle size and distribution become narrower [29]. Remarkably, adjusting pH of synthesis media to 11.5, provide both smaller average particle size and narrower standard deviation.
Table 2
Reaction time and particle distribution on different sericin concentrations
Sericin conc. (µg/ml) | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |
Average particle sizea (nm) | 30.86 ±7.8 nm | 28.9 ±7.41 nm | 20.23 ±6.25 nm | 18.04 ±6.03 nm |
apH of the solution were kept at 11.5 for all experiments. |
As for the sericin concentration (Table 2.), The lowest particle size value (18.04 ±6.03) were enabled via 25 µg/mL sericin concentration. Results suggest that reaction time can be affected by stabilizer concentration together with pH of the solution. Moreover, controlling both parameters has a crucial role in synthesizing nanoparticles with optimum anti-bacterial activity since silver nanoparticles' anti-bacterial efficiency depends on their size [31].
3.3. TEM Results and estimation of sericin coating on Ag-Ser NPs. According to our TEM results (Figure 2.A-B), Ag-Ser NPs were consisted spherical particles with no indication of aggregation. Each equiaxed spherical shaped particles have nearly same diameters. Due to mono peak size distribution between 14 nm to 19 nm, the ripening process cannot be observable from particle distribution (Figure 2.D). However, on a single nanoparticle (Figure 2.B) grain boundaries are present in a multigrain structure. Therefore, results may direct the coalescence of first formed particles by the ripening process after the nucleation stage [32]. HRTEM image (Figure 2.C) presents Ag-Ser NPs have periodic lattice spacing of 0.23 nm, which consistent with the characteristic plane of (111) for face-centered cubic (FCC) structure [32], [33].
SAED patterns (Figure 3A,B) present a ring and spot diffraction pattern which also indicates polycrystalline nature of Ag-Ser NPs [34]. However, we detected some highly crystalline particles which further prove the ripening of particles at the growth stage. Interplanar distances (dcalculated) of patterns were found to be 2.33, 1.95, 1.37, 1.08, 0.85 and 1.04 Å which corresponds to (111), (200), (220), (222), (422) and (400) planes of face centered cubic structure (FCC) which is specific for Ag crystal structure [35], [36].
To investigate that the extracted sericin can encapsulate synthesized particles and stabilize the growth stage, both particle size measurements and TEM analyses were used. It is worth to mention that DLS measures particle diameters through fluctuations in light intensity [4]. Hence, recorded particle diameters with DLS also contain sericin coating, but TEM only provides particle images without the organic component due to the proteins' electron transparency. Consequently, the thickness of the sericin coating equals the difference between the two diameters. From TEM images of Ag-Ser particles, the mean particle diameter calculated from the size distribution histogram (Figure 2.D) is 16.03 ±2.3 nm. On the other hand, as shown in (Table 2.) size distribution, determined by particle size measurements analysis, was found to be 18.04 ±6.03 nm at same sericin concentration. In conclusion, the particle diameter difference between measurements indicates sericin successfully coated nanoparticle surface.
3.4. Zeta potential measurements of Ag-Ser nanoparticles. Zeta potential is a quantitative parameter, which shows the charge difference between the nanoparticle surface and the surrounding medium [4]. When the surface charge of particles is strong enough, Brownian diffusion processes will be the dominant force in the system and overcome attraction forces (in this case, Van der Waals forces) [37]. Therefore, evaluating the surface potential could be a useful tool to understand the electrostatic stability of Ag-Ser NPs.
When synthesized nanoparticles have considerable positive or negative zeta potential value (> ±30 mV), repulsion forces between particles are supposed to be high. Thus, particles will not intent to be agglomerated [38]. In the nanoparticle–sericin system, charge difference emerges from negative –oxo, -hydroxo, sulfide, and carbonyl groups from sericin coating or free OH- ions in the solution environment [37]. Therefore, a decrease in pH can reduce the electrostatic stability of nanoparticles.
Table 3
Zeta potential values of Ag-Ser NPs at different pHs varied from 4.5 to 10.
pH | 4.5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
ζ values (mV) | -15.3 | -21.3 | -24.5 | -27.7 | -26.9 | -28 | -29.8 |
σ | ±0.3 | ±0.2 | ±1 | ±0.5 | ±0.3 | ±0.8 | ±1.5 |
At the start, synthesized particles have a zeta potential value of -29.8 mV at a pH of 10 (Table 3.) Besides, at a pH of 7, ζ-value was -27.7 mV. Therefore, such a high potential value at a pH of 7 indicates that the sericin alone can provide a negative charged electrostatic barrier to nanoparticles. Although no significant change was observed at alkaline conditions, ζ-values were decreased at acidic pHs, from -27.7 to -15.3 mV, approached zero. This situation can be explained by the isoelectronic point of sericin, which is approximately 4 [39].
Agglomeration is a reversible process, which can be defined as the formation of bigger precipitates by weak physical interactions [40]. In this case, agglomeration occurs rather than aggregation because sericin coating acts as a physical barrier even though the protective potential layer was decreased. Therefore, in alkaline pH values, when enough concentration of hydroxyl ion is present in the solution, particles can re-disperse (Figure 4.). These phenomena also could be seen when a complex polymer with electronegativity such as casein [41] is used in nanoparticle synthesis.
pH 4.5 (ζ value= -15.3) is determined as a critical limit for the overwhelming electrostatic forces between particles by attraction forces.
As for the comparison, synthesized NPs have higher surface potential than citrate stabilized nanoparticles (-21.17 mV at pH=7) [42]. Besides, sodium dodecyl sulfate [43] (SDS) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [44] (CTAB) coated NPs have the zeta potential of -40 mV and +34 mV, respectively. However, their active stabilization mechanism is only limited by electrostatic repulsion forces due to their amphiphilic structure. Results demonstrate that the Ag-Ser NPs have electrostatic stability between pH range between 5 to 9 with having ζ-value of -27.7 mV at pH=7. Furthermore, Ag-Ser NPs are sterically protected since particles are agglomerated at a pH of 4.5 rather than aggregated.