3.1. Characterization of catalyst
The successful synthesis of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 was affirmed using different techniques like FT-IR, FE-SEM, EDX, elemental mapping, XRD, ICP-OES, and TGA.
FT-IR technique has been used to identify various functional groups of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 and its stepwise building. Fig. 1 illustrates the FT-IR spectra of a) Hal-Cl, b) g-C3N4, c) Balsalazide, and d) Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4. In Fig. 1a, the absorption bands at around 539, 1631, and 3620–3698 cm−1 are related to the stretching vibrations of Si–O–Al, Si–O, and inner -OH groups, respectively [58]. In Fig. 1b, as expected, the strong absorption at 807 cm−1 is due to the special bending vibration of triazine moiety [59]. The FT-IR spectrum of BS is in good accordance with the reported data [60] and exhibited some characteristic bands at 3371, 3039 cm−1, (OH, NH stretching), 1699, 1631 cm−1 (acid and amide carbonyl stretching), 1579 cm−1 (C=C stretching), 1219 cm−1 (C-N stretching) and 1073 cm−1 (C-O stretching) (Fig. 1c). The FT-IR spectrum of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 is presented in Fig. 1d. All the expected absorption peaks of Hal-Cl, BS and g-C3N4 can be detected in this spectrum, which indicates the successful trapping of BS complex in Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4.
The structural morphologies, particle size and shape of the Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 were determined using FE-SEM analysis. The corresponding image (Fig. 2) displays a tubular morphology indicating that Hal structure remained unchanged even after successful surface coating with BS and incorporation of Dy NPs (Fig. 2).
The elemental composition and their corresponding weight% was ascertained by EDX analysis (Fig. 3). The existence of Al, Si, and O elements are ascribed to the Hal structure in Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4. In addition, the presence of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen elements confirm the attachment of balsalazide molecule in the targeted structure. The occurrence of Dy element peak in the EDX spectrum clearly indicates the loading of Dy on the Hal-BS-g-C3N4.
The elemental analysis study was further extended via elemental mapping of the Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 (Fig. 4). The outcome clearly confirms the presence of the mentioned elements in the catalyst with a suitable dispersity. The uniform distribution of active sites over the catalyst surface is very significant in its catalytic activity. The obtained result from elemental mapping analysis therefore agreed well with EDX data (Fig. 4).
The crystalline phase structure of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 nanocomposite was examined by XRD analysis. As shown in Fig. 5, the Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 exhibits seven sharp and strong diffraction peaks at 2θ = 8°, 12°, 22.6°, 28.2°, 31.5°, 57°, and 68° which are in good agreement with XRD pattern of tubular Hal (JCPDS card no. 29-1487) [61, 62]. The g-C3N4 phase is represented by a peak at 2θ = 28° (JCPDS card no. 87-1526). These results certainly validates that the tubular structure of Hal is not destroyed during the functionalization and stabilization of Dy complex. The diffraction peaks of Dy nanoparticles were not observed in the XRD pattern due to the high dispersion and low loading (1.9 wt% as determined by ICP-OES) and strong attachment onto the support [63].
Thermal stability and the quantitative estimation of the trapped organic groups were investigated by TGA analysis of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 over the temperature range of 25-800°C (Fig. 6). The thermograph displays three decomposition breaks and confirms the structure of Dy complex trapped between Hal and g-C3N4 with various layers. As can be seen, the first weight loss of the catalyst (~4%) occurred at about 50–120°C, related to the removal of the adsorbed water or surface hydroxyl groups. The second weight loss occurred nearly between 330–410°C (~10%), which can be assigned to the destruction of the chloropropyl groups coated on the Hal support. Again, the third and major weight loss (~50%) occurred at 450-675°C, attributed to the removal of the chemisorbed water and BS molecule. Finally, at the end of decomposition till 700°C, the total loss in weight was about 64.23. These results show good thermal stability of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4.
3.2. Catalytic study
After the detailed structural characterization of the nanocomposite material (Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4), its catalytic activity was investigated in the synthesis of 4H-benzo[g]chromenes. However, prior to generalizations, optimization of reaction conditions appeared very important and thus the reaction of 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (1.0 mmol), benzaldehyde (1.0 mmol) and malononitrile (1.5 mmol) was selected as model. Subsequently, the influence of various reaction parameters including solvent, reaction temperature and catalyst loading were examined (Table 1). It's worthy to mention that the reaction failed in the absence of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 catalyst. After optimizing the catalyst loading, the effect of a number of solvents and temperature were explored. The results indicated that the presence of solvent and catalyst were very important to succeed the reaction. After comprehensive experiments, 10 mol% of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 catalyst in refluxing water was considered as the optimal reaction conditions (Table 1).
Table 1
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of 4H-benzo[g]chromene derivatives.
Entry
|
Reaction condition
|
Catalyst (mol%)
|
Time (min)
|
Yield (%)
|
1
|
H2O/ r.t.
|
10
|
60
|
85
|
2
|
H2O/ 50°C
|
10
|
40
|
90
|
3
|
H2O/ 80°C
|
10
|
20
|
96
|
4
|
H2O/ reflux
|
10
|
14
|
98
|
5
|
H2O/ reflux
|
--
|
60
|
10
|
6
|
EtOH, r.t
|
10
|
65
|
80
|
7
|
EtOH, reflux
|
10
|
35
|
90
|
8
|
CH3CN, reflux
|
10
|
40
|
87
|
9
|
CHCl3, reflux
|
10
|
75
|
80
|
10
|
Toluene, 80°C
|
10
|
20
|
87
|
11
|
H2O/ 80°C
|
15
|
14
|
98
|
12
|
H2O/ 80°C
|
5
|
25
|
88
|
Reaction conditions: Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 as catalyst, Solvent (5 ml)
|
After optimization the reaction parameters, immediately we had to investigate the scope and generality of those conditions by involving diverse substrates in the reaction. Thus, we examined various electron-withdrawing and electron-releasing benzaldehydes in the Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 catalyzed multicomponent cyclocondensation reaction for the preparation of 4H-benzo[g]chromene derivatives. The results have been documented in Table 2. It is evident from the results that the different aldehydes are very much compatible under the reaction conditions, providing excellent yields irrespective of the functional character and geometry in positions in aromatic ring (o, m, p). Evidently, our catalytic system is very suitable in terms of the efficiency of reactions, reaction time and yields. All the derivatives were obtained in excellent yields (90-98%) and short reaction times (10-30 min). Noticebaly, the substrates with electron-withdrawing groups (NO2, Cl, Br and F) reacted faster than that with electron-donating substrates (Me, OMe, OH and NMe2). In addition to malononitrile, ethyl cyanoacetate was also employed in the reaction, showing comparable efficacy. After isolating the pure products, they were dried and the melting pints were recorded to compare with authentic samples.
Table 2
One pot, three-component synthesis of 4H-chromenes using Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 as the catalyst.

Entry
|
R
|
R´
|
Time (min)
|
Yield (%)
|
M.P.
Obs. Lit. [52, 64, 65]
|
1
|
C6H5
|
CN
|
14
|
98
|
262-263
|
260-262
|
2
|
4-FC6H4
|
CN
|
11
|
96
|
242-245
|
244–246
|
3
|
4-ClC6H4
|
CN
|
14
|
97
|
231-233
|
230-232
|
4
|
4-BrC6H4
|
CN
|
15
|
95
|
248-250
|
249-251
|
5
|
4-NO2C6H4
|
CN
|
22
|
96
|
232-234
|
230-232
|
6
|
4-CH3C6H4
|
CN
|
25
|
95
|
241-245
|
240-242
|
7
|
4-OCH3C6H4
|
CN
|
20
|
95
|
244-245
|
244-246
|
8
|
4-OHC6H4
|
CN
|
30
|
90
|
257-260
|
258-260
|
9
|
4-NMe2C6H4
|
CN
|
32
|
91
|
249-252
|
250-252
|
10
|
2-ClC6H4
|
CN
|
25
|
95
|
248-250
|
248-250
|
11
|
2,4-Cl2-C6H3
|
CN
|
30
|
94
|
281-283
|
280-282
|
12
|
C6H5
|
CO2Et
|
20
|
95
|
185-188
|
185-187
|
13
|
4-FC6H4
|
CO2Et
|
15
|
94
|
209-210
|
209-211
|
14
|
4-NO2C6H4
|
CO2Et
|
25
|
91
|
198-200
|
197-199
|
15
|
4-CH3C6H4
|
CO2Et
|
30
|
90
|
207-209
|
207-210
|
16
|
4-OCH3C6H4
|
CO2Et
|
25
|
92
|
222-225
|
224-226
|
17
|
3-NO2C6H4
|
CO2Et
|
28
|
93
|
196-199
|
198-200
|
3.6. Uniqueness of our protocol
In order to demonstrate the exclusivity of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 as a heterogeneous catalyst in the synthesis of 4H-benzo[g]chromene derivatives, our results in the optimized model reaction conditions was compared with the reported ones, being displayed in Table 3. Evidently, as depicted there, Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 is the most efficient catalyst among them in terms of reaction time and yield. Significantly, most of the reported methods toil from the absence of commonness for the condensation reactions of the deactivated aldehydes. In addition, the reported synthetic paths have some limitations, such as requires extreme temperature or long duration, large amounts of the catalyst and, most importantly, the use of hazardous solvents.
Table 3
Comparison of the catalytic activity of Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4 with reported results in the literature.
Entry
|
Catalyst
|
Time (min)
|
Yield (%)
|
Ref
|
1
|
Fe3O4/(PEG)
|
20
|
85
|
[67]
|
2
|
Imidazole
|
30
|
93
|
[68]
|
3
|
Piperidine
|
15
|
85
|
[69]
|
4
|
[PySO3H]BF4
|
25
|
89
|
[70]
|
5
|
FeCl3
|
40
|
65
|
[70]
|
6
|
Dy@Hal-BS-g-C3N4
|
14
|
97
|
This work
|