Changes in FBG of rats during the 8-week intervention
At wk0, the FBG levels of the diabetic rats were not significantly different (P > 0.05) but were significantly higher than those in the CON group (P < 0.01), indicating that the diabetes model was successfully established. At wk1, the FBG levels of rats in the DH, DL, and DLE groups were significantly lower than those in the DCM group (P < 0.05). The FBG of the rats in the DH group decreased the most compared to the DL and DLE groups but the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). In wk2, the FBG levels of the rats in the DH and DL groups increased slightly but those in the DLE group continued to decrease. After wk2, FBG was monitored once every two weeks. FBG decreased to varying degrees in the groups. The FBG of rats in the DH and DL groups altered to a certain extent but those in the DLE group decreased steadily. The FBG levels in each of the intervention groups were significantly lower than those in the DCM group (P < 0.05). The FBG levels of rats in the CON group remained stable throughout the 8 weeks.(in Fig. 2)
Comparison of related indices of the serum metabolites across the experimental groups
After 8 weeks of intervention, the levels of FBG, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c increased and HOMA-β decreased significantly in the DCM group compared to the CON group (P < 0.01). However, the levels of FINs were not significantly different across the groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the DCM group, the DH, DL, and DLE groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the levels of FBG, HOMA-IR, and HbA1c (P < 0.01) and an increase in the HOMA-β (P < 0.01). The levels of FINs in the DH group were higher than those in the DCM group (P < 0.05). Although the levels of FINs in other groups were higher than the DCM group, the differences were not significant (P > 0.05).(in Table2)
Table 2
Establishment of diabetic cardiomyopathy models
|
CON
|
DCM
|
DH
|
DL
|
DLE
|
FBG(mmol/L)
|
5.82±0.87
|
19.19±2.02**
|
10.37±2.62##
|
11.89±2.19##
|
10.72±2.24##
|
FINs(IU/L)
|
13.38±2.90
|
16.64±3.83
|
22.85±3.59#
|
20.00±4.17
|
20.62±2.16
|
HOMA-IR
|
3.42±0.75
|
14.29±4.37**
|
10.44±2.81
|
10.40±1.95
|
9.74±1.84
|
HOMA-β
|
138.30±80.00
|
21.39±4.92**
|
80.53±49.78
|
53.52±30.86
|
64.15±27.70
|
HbA1c (mmol/L)
|
6.35±0.52
|
17.27±2.75**
|
10.65±1.00##
|
11.77±1.35##
|
10.97±1.55##
|
Note 2: One-way analysis of variance was performed; **, P < 0.01 compared to the CON group. #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01 compared to the DCM group. |
Comparison of the heart function of rats across the groups
After 8 weeks of intervention, the results of echocardiography showed that compared to the control group, the EF, FS, and CO of the rats decreased significantly (P < 0.01), the E/A ratio increased significantly (P < 0.01), and IVRT increased but not significantly (P > 0.05) in the DCM group. Compared to the DCM group, the DH, DL, and DLE groups showed a significant decrease in the E/A ratio (P < 0.05), and a significant increase in EF (P < 0.05). The FS of the DLE group was higher than that of the DCM group (P > 0.05), and the EF was significantly higher than that of the DH and DL groups (P > 0.05). No significant changes were observed in LVEDD, LVESD, and IVRT (P > 0.05) across the groups.(in Table3)
Table 3
Comparison of cardiac function across the experimental groups
|
CON
|
DCM
|
DH
|
DL
|
DLE
|
LVEDD(mm)
|
6.70±0.41
|
7.26±0.96
|
6.83±0.89
|
6.70±0.64
|
6.30±0.95
|
LVESD(mm)
|
3.86±0.58
|
4.42±1.20
|
4.32±0.85
|
4.09±0.50
|
3.56±1.15
|
EF(%)
|
78.45±2.39
|
57.34±8.06**
|
67.67±4.39#&
|
69.06±3.87#&
|
83.05±3.67##
|
FS(%)
|
42.86±5.48
|
30.25±3.46**
|
37.23±4.36
|
38.31±4.91
|
47.73±8.39#
|
CO(%)
|
62.81±6.17
|
45.29±15.33
|
54.18±11.47
|
53.27±13.23
|
58.50±14.31
|
E/A ratio
|
1.11±0.09
|
1.85±0.40**
|
1.10±0.12##
|
1.14±0.11##
|
1.25±0.17##
|
IVRT(ms)
|
29.19±5.71
|
32.89±7.53
|
33.12±1.00
|
32.41±3.35
|
31.15±2.55
|
Note 3: One-way analysis of variance was performed; **, P < 0.01 compared to the CON group. #, P < 0.05; ##, P < 0.01 compared to the DCM group. &, P < 0.05 compared to the DLE group. |
Comparison of the morphology of the rat myocardial tissue across the experimental groups
The myocardial tissues from each experimental group were stained with H&E and the tissue morphology was observed using a light microscope. In the control group, the myocardial cells were arranged neatly and densely, the myocardial fibers were tightly connected, the staining was uniform, and there was no muscle fiber dissolution. In the DCM group, the myocardium of rats showed damage and fractured myocardial fibers, the myocardial fibers were disordered, the muscle fiber gap was significantly widened, and there was blood cell accumulation in the interstitial space. In the DH, DL, and DLE groups, the myocardial fibers were neatly arranged without any breaks, the myocardial congestion was reduced, and the cell morphology was generally intact. The myocardial fibers in the DLE group were thicker and the arrangement was tighter than that in the DH and DL groups.(in Fig. 3)
Compared to the CON group, the total collagen in the myocardial tissue increased, the collagen arrangement was disordered, and a large number of collagen type I and III collagen fibers were dispersed around the cardiomyocytes in the DCM group. In the DLE group, the total collagen decreased significantly (P < 0.05). The total collagen content in the DL group was lower than that in the DH group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences across the DLE, DL, and DH groups (P > 0.05).(in Fig. 4)
Comparison of the levels of myocardial AGEs across the experimental groups
After 8 weeks, the level of AGEs in the myocardium of the rats in the DCM group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (P < 0.01). Compared to the DCM group, the DH, DL, and DLE groups demonstrated significantly lower levels of AGEs (P < 0.05) and those in the DL group were slightly higher than those in the DH and DLE groups ,but there were no significant differences(P > 0.05).(in Fig. 5)
Comparison of the expression of genes related to central ventricular remodeling in the myocardial tissue
The expression of ventricular remodeling genes BNP, GSK3β, α-MHC, and β-MHC in myocardial tissues was detected using RT-PCR (in Fig. 6).
After 8 weeks, the relative expression of BNP mRNA in the myocardium of the DCM group increased significantly compared to that in the CON group (P < 0.01). The DH, DL, and DLE groups showed a significant decrease in the relative expression of BNP mRNA (P < 0.01) compared to the DCM group but there were no significant differences across the DH, DL, and DLE groups (P > 0.05).
After 8 weeks, compared to the CON group, the relative expression of GSK3β mRNA in the myocardium of the DCM group increased significantly (P < 0.01). The DH, DL, and DLE groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the relative expression of GSK3β mRNA (P < 0.01) compared to the DCM group but there were no significant differences across the DH, DL, and DLE groups (P > 0.05).
After 8 weeks, compared to the CON group, the relative expression of α-MHC mRNA was significantly lower in the DCM group (P < 0.05). The relative expression of α-MHC mRNA was significantly increased in the DH, DL, and DLE groups compared to the DCM group (P < 0.01). The relative expression of α-MHC mRNA in the DLE group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (P < 0.05) but there were no significant differences across the DH, DL, and DLE groups (P > 0.05).
After 8 weeks, the DCM group demonstrated a significant increase in the relative expression of β-MHC mRNA compared to the CON group (P < 0.01). The relative expression of β-MHC mRNA decreased in the DH, DL, and DLE groups compared to the DCM group (P < 0.01) but there were no significant differences across the three groups (P > 0.05).
Comparison of GLP-1/GLP-1R protein expression in the myocardium across the experimental groups
After 8 weeks, the relative expression of GLP-1 protein in the myocardial tissue in the DCM group was significantly lower than that in the CON group (P < 0.05). The expression of GLP-1 significantly increased in the DH, DL, and DLE groups compared to the DCM group (P < 0.01). The expression of GLP-1 in the DH group was higher than that in the DL and DLE groups but the differences were not significant (P > 0.05).(in Fig. 7)
After 8 weeks, the expression of GLP-1R in myocardial tissue in the DCM group was lower than that in the CON group but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The expression of GLP-1R increased significantly in the DH, DL, and DLE groups compared to that in the DCM (P < 0.01) and the CON groups. The DLE group showed significantly higher GLP-1R expression than the DH and DL groups but the differences across the DH, DL, and DLE groups were not significant (P > 0.05).