Materials and Methods
In 2014, 18th of July, a tropical category 4 typhoon named Rammasun severely affected Wenchang city in Hainan province located in southern China. At least 14 deaths were reported as the consequence of the disaster, and it was an especially hard hit on individuals dwelling locally. In addition, in Luodou town, which is part of Wenchang city, a thousand individuals experienced being trapped by storm tide subsequent to the destructive natural event. 70 individuals affected by the typhoon in the surrounding area were recruited, and among these individuals, 36 were diagnosed with PTSD including nine males and twenty-seven females. The other group of 34 were without PTSD (TECs, 7 males and 27 females). Recruited subjects all went through screening with the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL). Diagnostic criteria specified in DSM IV was applied for diagnosing PTSD. Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) were applied to assess clinical symptoms [10, 21]. Information is obtained through the scale regarding duration, symptom onset, and impact on functioning. Presence or absence of comorbid disorders was determined by applying the Structural Clinical Review for DSM IV. Additionally, 32 healthy controls were recruited, including nine males and twenty-three females. These individuals didn’t meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD, and the subjects were recruited from Haiko, a city about 35 kilometers away from Wenchang. Assessment of depression and anxiety symptoms was conducted administering Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). The whole process lasted from November 2014 to January 2015.
The following were the applied general exclusion criteria: (a) age under eighteen or above sixty-five; (b) significant neurological and medical conditions; (c) history of head injury or loss of consciousness; (d) left handedness; (e) current comorbid or lifetime comorbid psychiatric disorders other than depression and anxiety; (f) psychotropic medication use (g) alcohol or substance abuse; (h) contraindications for MRI, such as pregnancy, claustrophobia or ferromagnetic implants [22]. Completed imaging data was unavailable for 3 female participants in PTSD group, and 6 other participants were excluded due to brain infarction (1 female), denture-related artifact (1 female, 1 male), pregnancy (1 female), excessive head movement (1 female, 1 male). Two male participants in HC group were excluded due to brain infarction and 1 female participant was excluded due to excessive head movement. Eventually, 27 PTSD subjects, 33 TEC subjects and 30 HC subjects participated in the study.
The study was conducted according to declaration of Helsinki. Approval was provided by committee of ethics in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University and Hainan General Hospital has provided approval. Signed consent was collected from all participating subjects after being informed of the study description.
Data Acquisition
The resting-state magnetic resonance imaging scans were completed with the use of 3 Tesla MRI scanner (Skyra, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany), standard 32 channel head coil [4]. Participating subjects received instructions to close their eyes, lie still and not fall asleep. High resolution T1-weighted 3D images were captured with a sagittal magnetized, single shot, rapid gradient-recalled sequence of echo to co-register and normalize subsequently. The repetition time or echo time equals 2300/1.97ms, with the flip angle equaling 9°. FOV equals 256 × 256 mm2, matrix equals 256 × 256, total 176 slices, with slice thickness equaling 1 mm. The scanning lasted 500 seconds for each MRI. Resting-state fMRI scans of the whole brain were obtained with the use of gradient-echo planar imaging (Total volumes equaled 250, TR/TE equaled 2000/30 ms, flip angle equaled 90°, FOV equaled 230 × 230 mm2, matrix equaled 64 × 64, 35 slices and no intersection gap, slice thickness = 3.6 mm). Anterior-posterior commissure was referred to for parallel alignment.
Data preprocessing
Data was processed with the use of toolbox Data Processing and Analysis of Brain Imaging (DPABI) (http://rfmri.org/dpabi), which was run in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Sherborn, MA, USA) [23]. Realignment of data to the first volume was carried out for the purpose of correcting head motions. Data was further assorted into gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid with the use of the Tissue Probability Map template. Subsequently, the normalization matrix acquired was used to smooth the functional images spatially with the convolutional effect of an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 6 mm.
Corrective measures were performed on head motion post realignment. Exclusion of subjects with head motion exceeding 1.0 mm or rotation exceeding 1.0º when scanned was performed. Group differences were evaluated with the formula: Head Motion/Rotation
L being the time series length and in current study L=240 [24]. It was indicated in the results that the two groups were not significantly different in quality of image (One-way ANOVA, F = 1.39, p = 0.255 for translational motion, and F = 0.125, p = 0.883 for rotational motion).
Group independent component analysis (ICA)
Following data preprocessing, group spatial ICA was conducted with the GIFT toolbox based on Matlab 2020a [25, 26] for data to be decomposed into functional networks.
Data reduction was conducted with application of principle component analysis. At subject-specific data level, independent components (ICs) were reduced to 120 with the application of principal components analysis. Group ICs were further decreased to 100 at group level, with the expectation-maximization algorithm [27, 28]. The ICA algorithm was repeatedly run for 20 times in ICASSO [27,29] in order to ensure the infomax ICA algorithm stability and reliability [30].
We subsequently clustered components that resulted from last step. We conducted manual confirmation of peak activation coordinates and examined if they were distributed in grey matter primarily [31]. Approximately 34 relevant components were selected based on the previous procedures for estimating reliability. Via back-reconstruction approach (GICA) we obtained subject-specific spatial maps, as well as time courses [32].
Related intrinsic connectivity networks were identified as a result of the described procedures. In addition, confirmation of high to low frequency fluctuation ratio and whether peak activation coordinates were mainly grey matter located was made to eventually narrow the ICs to 34.
Dynamic functional connectivity
Sliding window approach
There was growing application of sliding time window approach in research for investigating DFC, and we used this approach in the study to look at time-varying changes in FC [11, 27, 33, 34]. Resting state data was segmented and resulted in windows of 22 repetition times with a size of 44s. It has been demonstrated that this segment length well balanced the ability to resolve dynamics and correlation matrix estimation quality [27]. A window length of 30 to 60 seconds was identified consequently, and topological assessments of brain networks were stabilized at around 30 seconds [27]. The window length was restricted with a sigma 3-TR of Gaussian, one repetition time [33]. Above mentioned steps resulted in 218 windows that consecutively distributed across the whole scan. In order to encompass all possible pairs of the 34 ICs selected within each window, we calculated 34 x 34 pair-wise covariance matrix. In addition, the L1 norm was used in LASSO framework in order to promote sparsity in estimation with 100 repetitions [33, 35]. The resulting values were transformed into z-scores, which was achieved through Fisher’s z transformation to reduce variance effect. Eventually, the matrices that went through z-transformation were residualized with nuanced variables including gender and age [31].
Clustering analysis
The clustering method of k-means was applied for clustering the 218 window FC matrices obtained from last analysis step, with the goal to identify reoccurring FC states. The L1 distance (Manhattan distance) was employed to measure the similarity of FC matrices between windows, since it was more effective compared to L2 distance when being applied on high-dimension data [11]. According to Allen et al. [11], when performing subsampling of windows, a result of approximately 2 windows for each subject was produced. Therefore, through silhouette, the cluster number of 2 was set. The optimal cluster number was tested again through repeating the analysis with other set number, however almost identical clusters were produced and lacked significant distinction. The cluster number of 2 was also widely applied in previous literature [27, 33, 36]. All FC matrices were clustered into either state I or state II. The calculated medians of the FC matrices were computed as the centroids of two clusters. The k-means algorithm was repeated for 100 times to reduce potential random selection bias. The clustering analysis procedures were performed on all subjects as a whole group, and on the three sub-groups separately. The purpose of this step was to compare the differences among the three groups in terms of the connectivity pattern as well as connection strength of the two states. Permutation one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for state comparison among the three groups (p<0.01, FDR corrected).
State analysis
In order to explore the temporal properties of the two dFC states, we obtained the comparison of number of state transitions, fractional windows, and mean dwell time among the three groups (HC, PTSD, TEC). This analysis was based on the previous clustering analysis results, and therefore the temporal properties of the three groups were calculated separately. The temporal properties of the whole group were also calculated, however the results were not used since it was not meaningful for this study. For “fractional windows”, the measurement was number of windows in one state. For “mean dwell time”, the measurement was average amount of consecutive windows in one state before shifting into the other state. For “number of transitions”, it stood for literal meaning which was the times these three groups switched from one state to the other, indicating reliability of each state. Since there were three groups of subjects, ANOVA was applied to examine between-group differences among healthy controls, PTSD subjects and trauma-exposed subjects, with year of education, age and gender as covariates (p<0.01, FDR corrected).
Statistical comparisons and correlations analysis
We applied ANOVA for comparison of the significance of differences among demographic and clinical characteristics (p<0.001). We compared the three groups in pairs, and gained the p values for the three sets of comparison. The analysis was performed via SPSS Statistic, release version 26.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) .
In order to examine correlations between SDS and SAS scores of clinical scales and altered network temporal properties, Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed in PTSD and control group (p<0.05, uncorrected). We also performed correlational analysis in PTSD group between CAPS and IES scores and altered network temporal properties. We applied SPSS to perform all statistical analysis.