3.1 Photocatalysts Characterization
Generally, the anatase has more oxygen vacancies than rutile, it is easier to capture electrons and effectively suppress the recombination of electron-hole pairs, thus the photocatalytic activity of anatase is higher than that of rutile (Spanu et al. 2017). Therefore, the calcined temperatures were controlled in the range of 300-600°C to obtain the samples with good photocatalytic performance. XRD patterns of Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites under different calcined temperatures are presented in Fig. 1(a). Peaks at 2θ of 25.38°, 37.88°, 48.10°, 54.10°, 55.28°, and 62.75° would be the characteristics for (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), and (204) of anatase, respectively ( PDF NO.65-5714 ), indicating that no rutile phase diffraction was detected for all of the composites under different calcined temperatures. On the basis of XRD patterns, the crystallite size of different samples was calculated by Scherrer's equation, as listed in Table 1. The increasing of calcined temperatures resulted in an enhancement of the crystallite size. Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composite calcined at 500°C was with a crystallite size of 11.5 nm, less than that of undoped TiO2 calcined at 500°C (12.7 nm). It suggested that Tb and S co-doping could inhibit grain growth of TiO2, owing to the deformation of lattice and oxygen vacancies left by the substitution of O atoms for Tb or S atoms. Correspondingly, specific surface area of Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composite calcined at 500°C was larger than that of undoped TiO2. Fig. 1(b) shows the SEM images of Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites calcined at 500°C. Regularly shaped agglomerate spherical particles with diameters of about 17 nm were clearly observed.
Table 1
Physical properties of different samples.
Samples
|
Crystallinity (%) a
|
Crystallite size (nm) b
|
BET (m2/g)
|
Tb, S co-doped TiO2-300°C
|
93.44
|
9.9
|
94
|
Tb, S co-doped TiO2-400°C
|
95.07
|
10.8
|
89
|
Tb, S co-doped TiO2-500°C
|
98.97
|
11.5
|
82
|
Tb, S co-doped TiO2-600°C
|
99.56
|
13.9
|
73
|
Undoped TiO2-500°C
|
99.68
|
12.7
|
76
|
a Evaluated by Jade 5.0 software. |
b Caculated by Scherrer's equation |
XPS analysis was performed to analyze the surface elements and chemical valence. Fig. 2 presents the O 1s, Ti 2p, Tb 3d, and S 2p spectra of the Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composite. Two peaks located at 528.63 and 530.3 eV could be observed in O 1s spectra (Fig. 2a), which were ascribed to Ti-O and superficial oxygen of chemically adsorbed hydroxyl species (Liu et al. 2019). The results of the XPS spectra for Ti 2p are displayed in Fig. 2(b). It could be fitted into four peaks, which were assigned to the characteristic peaks of Ti3+ and Ti4+ state (Wang et al. 2018). Note that the presence of Ti3+ might be caused by the reduction of Ti4+ in the preparation process. This interesting phenomenon could induce defects in the TiO2 lattice, and further resulted in the formation of oxygen vacancies. As seen from Fig. 2(c), two broad spin-orbit doublet peaks at 1226.84 and 1242.7 eV belong to Tb3+ 2p5/2 and Tb3+ 2p3/2, respectively, which was indicative of the formation of Tb2O3 and shallow traps on the surface of photocatalysts (Wang et al. 2019). Accordingly, the carriers could be quickly captured, facilitating the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes. For S 2p spectra (Fig. 2d), the peaks at 168.0 eV and 167.3 eV were ascribed to S4+ 2p3/2 and S4+ 2p1/2. Generally, the substitution of Ti4+ by cationic S is energetically more favorable than replacing O2−with S2−(Vorontsov et al. 2019). It could result in a charge imbalance in the lattice, and the excess positive charge might be neutralized by hydroxide ions, thus the recombination of electrons and holes was effectively suppressed. Besides, the binding energy related to S6+ 2p1/2 and S6+ 2p3/2 levels has confirmed the formation of SO42− on the surface of TiO2, which could effectively capture the photo-generated electrons and holes. All of these results demonstrated that Tb, S co-doping was favorable for the improvement of photocatalytic performance.
3.2 Factors influencing the photocatalytic efficiency
Calcined temperature and doping amount of the elements are two important factors affecting the photocatalytic performance. It has been reported that calcined temperature profoundly influenced the structural characteristics, including crystallinity, crystallite size and specific surface. Owing to the change in structural characteristics, the surface defects and active sites of the photocatalyst were further changed (Liu et al. 2018). Fig. 3 reveals the result of photocatalytic experiments. As illustrated in Fig. 3(a), Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites calcined at 500°C exhibited the highest photocatalytic performance with a degradation rate of 72.4% in 3 h. The reduced performance of photocatalyst with high calcined temperature should be due to the destruction of the structured morphology and decrease of the specific surface area (Table 1). On the contrary, low-temperature calcined catalysts with weak purification, more defects and low active sites also led to poor photocatalytic performance. Therefore, 500°C was chosen as the optimal calcined temperature for further studies. In addition to calcined temperature, the effect of S doping amount on the photocatalytic performance was also investigated. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the increment of S doping amount from 1–2% resulted in an enhancement of the photocatalytic activity. However, a decrease of the degradation rate was obviously observed in the range of 2%-4%. The decrease in photocatalytic activity was attributed to the presence of excess sulfur ions, which acted as recombination centers for electrons and holes pairs (Gyorgy et al. 2018). Moreover, it could absorb incident photons and reduce the light exposed to the catalyst, subsequently the photocatalytic activity decreased. Therefore, 2% was chosen as the optimal doping amount for further studies.
3.3 Synergistic effect discussion
In order to investigate the synergistic effect of co-dopants in a photocatalytic process, TiO2, S-, Tb- and Tb, S co-doped TiO2 were used as catalysts for comparative experiments. The photocatalytic performance of MB degraded by different catalysts is displayed in Fig. 4(a). It worth emphasizing that the photocatalytic performance of doped catalysts was better than undoped catalysts. Notably, Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composite presented a remarkable increment in the photocatalytic performance with a degradation rate of 72.4%. As revealed in Fig. 4(b), good linear relationship between -ln(Ct/C0) and irradiation time were observed in all cases, indicating that MB degradation was followed a pseudo-first-order pattern. Reaction rate constant(k) was determined by the slope of graph plotted between −ln(Ct/C0) and irradiation time. The value of k was 0.11529, 0.26025, 0.35038, and 0.41462 h−1 for TiO2, Tb-, S- and Tb, S co-doped TiO2, respectively. The reaction rate of Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites was approximately 3.6 times compared with pure TiO2, which might be attributed to the synergistic effect of terbium and sulfur dopants. The UV-vis diffraction reflectance spectra of photocatalysts are illustrated in Fig. 4(c). Pure TiO2 was chosen as a reference. It is clearly observed that the absorption edge of S-doped and Tb, S co-doped samples exhibited an slight red-shift, whereas Tb-doped sample showed no obvious change into the visible region. The order of the redshift for different samples is listed as follows: Tb-S-TiO2≈S-TiO2>Tb-TiO2≈TiO2, which arose from the contribution of S dopant. In addition, doping of mono- or double- ions would cause difference between light absorption capacity in ultraviolet region. The intensity of the absorption peaks can be arranged in the following order, Tb-S-TiO2>S-TiO2>Tb-TiO2>TiO2, suggesting that Tb and S dopants have an obvious synergistic effect on improving the photocatalytic efficiency. Fig. 4(d) presents the UV-vis spectra of MB in a degradation process. The absorbance was decreased with the enhancement of irradiation time, which was indicative of the gradually degradation of MB by Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites. Taking advantage of the synergistic effect of terbium and sulfur dopants, Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites exhibited obvious enhancement in the photocatalytic activity. Tb, S co-doping could strengthen the response to light irradiation and facilitate the separation of electron-holes. On the other hand, Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites with smaller average crystallite size could provide larger specific surface area and more active centers, which was favorable for the adsorption between dye molecules and catalysts. Besides, the smaller crystallite size was beneficial for the rapid transfer of photogenerated electrons and holes to the surface of the TiO2 (Gyorgy et al. 2018).
Formation process of •OH was confirmed by a PL spectroscopy. Terephthalic acid was applied as a scavenger, and the experimental details were the same as previously reported (Wang et al. 2019; Amer al. 2019). Fluorescence spectra of •OH tracking process is illustrated in Fig. 4(e). A positive relationship between the photocatalytic degradation and the amount of •OH radicals was observed, which demonstrated that •OH radicals have been one of the primary reactive species responsible for the degradation of dye contaminants. Electrons(e−) and holes(h+) were generated by photons under light irradiation, and electrons transferred from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB). However, these charge carriers were easily recombined, resulting in low photocatalytic performance (Santacruz et al. 2020; Cheng et al. 2016). After doping of terbium ion, it could be served as trapping centers for the photogenerated electrons to reduce the recombination rate, which allowed the catalyst to produce more active species and improve the photoactivity.
3.4 Photoatalysts re-usability
Reusability is one of the major concerns for the practical applications of photoatalysts[28]. Therefore, four successive recycling tests for the degradation of MB were conducted to investigate the photocatalyst reusability. In a typical experiment, the catalysts were collected by a centrifugal process after each run. The separated photocatalysts were washed thoroughly with deionized water and ethanol, and dried at 105°C for 3 h before the beginning of next cycle. Note that the photocatalysts should be calcined at 500°C before use of the fourth cycle. It can be observed from Fig. 5 that the degradation rate was 72.4%, 68.2% and 63.7% for the first to the third runs, respectively. Slight decrease in the degradation rate was mainly due to the absorbed intermediates on the surface or interface of the catalyst as well as to the loss of a small amount of photocatalyst during the recovery process. It worth emphasizing that the degradation rate of the fourth cycle was only 2.2% less than that of the fresh cycle, demonstrating that a calcined process was favorable for the regeneration of the photocatalysts. In conclusion, re-usability tests have confirmed that the resulting Tb, S co-doped TiO2 composites owned good stability and could be potentially employable for continuous photocatalytic processes.
3.5 Acute toxicity of photocatalysts
Biological safety of photocatalysts is of great significance for their potential applications in wastewater treatment. Herein, we evaluated the effects of Tb, S co-doped TiO2 on the aquatic ecosystem via acute toxicity experiments. As presented in Fig. 6, mortality of zebrafish was increased with the increasing of catalyst concentrations. Tb, S co-doped TiO2 showed low toxicity on zebrafishes with a half lethal concentration of 20.3 mg·L−1 (96 h-LC50༞10 mg·L-1).