To highlight the importance of the use of Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles in the SPR sensor, we compared its plasmon response with that of two SPR sensors. One is based on gold nanoparticles embedded in a host medium, the other is based on a massive Ag-Au bimetallic layer. The responses are simulated for a sensor with a sensitive length of 20 mm, a fiber core diameter of 600 µm, a metal layer of thickness equal to 55 nm, and the fraction volume of silver \(y=0.75\). The sensitive medium refractive index (RI) is equal to 1.34. Fig. 2 presents the variation in transmission with wavelength for the three sensors respectively. It is clearly remarkable that the depth, transmission (94.7; 91.2; 95.9), Full Width at Half Maximum FWHM (55nm; 39nm; 58nm) and resonant wavelength (555nm; 571nm; 602nm) vary with the variation of the configuration involved. It appears that the proposed configuration has the narrowest curve also offering better resolution (curve in red). We can conclude that the best compromise between the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), amplitude and position of the resonance can be obtained for this configuration.
The curve obtained in this work coincides well with that found by Sharma et al.[41] for a configuration based on the alloy of metallic nanoparticles. The appearance and general shape of the curves are comparable especially at the level of the minimum absorption (\({\lambda }_{res}=555 nm\)). A slight difference can be explained by the difference between the parameters used. This justifies the validity of our numerical work.
Thanks to its interesting optical properties and especially its good absorption of molecules, a layer of graphene was added to the alloy film of Ag-Au nanoparticles in this work. This allows us to improve the performance of the SPR biosensor in terms of sensitivity and resolution.
The sensitivity shows the displacement of the plasmon resonance peak (augular or spectral) per unit of refractive index (RIU). it is defined by the following expression :[31]
$$S=\frac{\delta {\lambda }_{res}}{\delta n} \left(nm/RIU\right)$$
19
To better assess the sensitivity of detection, it is necessary to consider another parameter; the full width at half maximum of the SPR signal denotes FWHM. This increases with the value of the refractive index of the dielectric, inducing a larger SPR signal. By dividing the value of S by the FWHM, we introduce the notion of « Figure of Merit (FOM) »
$$FOM=\frac{S}{FWHM}$$
20
The SPR sensor resolution can be described as the smallest change in refractive index that can be detected by a visible shift in the plasmon signal resonance wavelength. This parameter can be determined by measurement of the limit of detection (LOD) or via the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The latter is strongly dependent on the resonance peak width. It is defined in the following form [31]:

(21)
Figure 3 presents a comparison of the sensitivity obtained for each configuration. The R.I of sensitive medium covers the range of indices between 1.32 and 1.40. The thickness of a graphene layer is 0.34 nm. It is noted from this fig. that the sensitivity rises according to the R.I of the medium to be detected for the three configurations but it is not in the same way. In fact, the sensitivity obtained with an SPR biosensor based on an Ag-Au / graphene nanoparticle alloy is higher than the other two. It went from 1900 nm / RIU to 7100 nm / RIU while the sensitivity of the massive bimetallic configuration reaches a maximum equal to 6700 nm / RIU and the maximum sensitivity obtained by the configuration based on nanoparticles incorporated in a host medium is equal to 3300 nm / RIU. This improvement in the sensitivity of the proposed sensor is due to the improvement in molecular adsorption to the surface of the sensor and to the alloy, which makes it possible to take advantage of the sensitivity of silver, while maintaining the sensor chemical stability of in the field using a gold surface layer.
Such a sensor represents the combination of the advantages of metallic nanoparticles and graphene could only be the basis for the birth of an effective early detection system. therefore Fig. 4 illustrates the FOM variation with the sensitive medium refractive index. This parameter is used to analyze the overall SPR sensor performance. Thus, for the same variation of index, if the FOM is high it indicates a large spectral shift of the signal or a narrower plasmonic signal i.e less error in the determination of the resonance wavelength. In both cases this translates into better sensor performance. According to the Fig. 4, the configuration based on an alloy film of the Ag-Au NPs has the highest FOM values when compared with the other two configurations. The maximum value of FOM reached by this configuration is equal to \(38.88 {RIU}^{-1}\).
Figure 5 illustrates the evolution of SNR according to the RI of the medium to be detected for the three sensors. SNR increases with increasing refractive index. The best SNR is obtained with the proposed configuration based on an alloy of Ag-Au nanoparticles /graphene. The curve increases until it reaches a maximum value equal to 0.388, while the maximum SNR obtained with the sensor based on gold nanoparticles incorporated in a host medium and the sensor based on a bimetallic layer are 0.369 and 0.385 respectively. Therefore the studied sensor offers the best resolution, in fact the greater the SNR value is, the more precise the detection will be.
Table 2
Comparison of the proposed sensor sensitivity with other research study
References
|
SPR Sensor
|
Sensitivity (nm\RIU)
|
Detection range (RIU)
|
Shukla et al.[54 ] (2016)
|
ITO/ZnO/Analyte
|
2202
|
1.30-1.37
|
Nayak and Jha [55] (2017)
|
Ag/Graphene/Analyte
|
6800
|
1.33-1.37
|
Sharma and Gupta [56] (2005)
|
NPs Au/analyte
|
1900
|
1.342
|
Hongyan et al.[46] (2015)
|
Au/graphene/analyte
|
3400
|
1.33-1.37
|
Shukla et al. [57](2015)
|
Au/ZnO/Analyte
|
3161
|
1.30-1.37
|
Kapoor et al. [58] (2019)
|
ITO/Ag/Analyte
|
1830
|
1.33-1.37
|
Sharma et al.[ 59] (2017)
|
Au/Pt/Analyte
|
3571
|
1.30-1.35
|
Proposed work
|
Ag–Au alloy NPs/graphene/Analyte
|
7100
|
1.30-1.40
|
By comparing it with other works in the literature as shown in Table 2, we found that the obtained value of the sensitivity (7100 nm\RIU) is greater than those obtained with the previous configurations of the SPR sensors. It is evident that the proposed configuration could be used in a wide range of great sensitivity applications such as biological and biochemical detection.
The control of the graphene layers number transferred to the metallic interface makes it possible to control the SPR response and the sensitivity of the SPR measurements. This should lead to improve performance and sensitivity of the SPR sensors.
Figure 6 shows the plasmonic response variation as a function of the number of graphene layers. This graph shows that the increase of the graphene layers number L leads to a modification and a change of the width of the resonance peaks, which respectively becomes broader, a variation of its amplitude, and a displacement of the resonance peak. For six layers of graphene, the resonance wavelengths go from 536 nm to 551 nm for a refractive index equal to 1.33. This is justified by Fig. 7 which reflects the variation of the resonance wavelength ranging from 1 to 6 layers of graphene. It is clearly noticeable from this fig. that the resonance wavelength \({\lambda }_{res}\) changes with the number of added graphene layers and with the sensitive medium refractive index following an increasing curve. Therefore, sensor sensitivity rises with increasing graphene layers number. But on the other hand, the resonance peak becomes less selective and the resolution of the biosensor decreases due to the broadening of the resonance peak.
Note that the increase in the width at mid-height of the resonance peak as a function of the graphene layers number can be explained by the damping by absorption of the surface plasmons at the interface of the Au-Ag alloy nanoparticle films /graphene, thanks to the optical properties of graphene, especially to the imaginary large part of its refractive index.
Thus, It is necessary to make the best choice for the maximum graphene layers number, which must be set for the good performance of the biosensor. This fixed number should be chosen in order to provide a significant improvement in sensitivity and high detection accuracy. From the two figures, the best performance is obtained for a single layer of graphene, which can be extended up to three layers.
Our findings results are similar to those found by Hongyan et al. [37] for a configuration based on a metallic layer of gold. They are in good agreement with the same evolution of the resonance wavelength and the plasmonic response as a function of the graphene layers number for the same detection range (RIU).
Figure 8 shows the effect of the radius of Ag-Au spherical nanoparticles on the plasmon response of the sensor. The curves presented in this fig. are obtained by varying the radius of the nanoparticles from 5 nm to 25 nm and keeping the other parameters constant. According to the fig., the variation in the radius of the nanoparticles leads to a variation in the transmission, the shape of the resonance peak, the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) and the resonance wavelength which decreases from 540 nm to 536 nm passing from a radius of 5 nm to 25 nm. It can be observed that from a radius of 15 nm \({\lambda }_{res}\) stabilizes at 536 nm and the resonance peaks follow the same evolution. In addition, an increase in the nanoparticles size leads to a decrease in the broadening of the SPR curve (FWHM). This is illustrated by Fig. 9 which shows a decreasing curve. This can be explained by eq. 6 since the damping frequency \({\omega }_{d}\) and the radius of nanoparticles are inversely proportional. In fact, when the nanoparticles size increases, \({\omega }_{d}\) decreases. Thus, the imaginary part which is responsible for the absorption of the metallic dielectric function decreases. Therefore, this causes a decrease in the transmitted power and the SPR curve should shift downward, when the size of the nanoparticles decreases, which leads to a widening of the curve.
Consequently, the size of the nanoparticles (R) must be taken into account, which is an important parameter acting on the sensor performance. The two figures 8 and 9 guide us towards an optimal choice of radius. It must be greater than 10 nm. We have chosen 15 nm as the optimal value for this studied configuration.
Let us now move on to study the SPR response of our construct for SARS-COV-2 detection. We employ thiol-attached DNA as a ligand layer because it has been shown to be a good receptor for SARS-COV-2. We gather SARS-COV-2 related data from the literature [13, 14, 49]. Fig. 10 presents the transmission variation as a function of the incident wavelength which varies from 400 nm to 800 nm. The curves are obtained following the numerical simulation without and with SARS-CoV-2 i.e. before and after bonding. it is clearly observed a change of resonance peak (wider) with a displacement towards a higher resonance wavelength which passes from 517 nm to 543 nm.
The resulting curves reflect the surface plasmons excitation of the metal layer. This can be interpreted by the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Indeed, In the suggested sensing setup, samples taken from human nasopharyngeal swabs are piped in a liquid solution across the sensing channel. When hybridization occurs between SARS-CoV-2 RNA (RdRp-COVID sequence) from a sample with the thiol-attached DNA of receptor molecules, it leads to an important resonance wavelength shift (up to 26 nm). Moreover, the transmission dip is accompanied by a small change in FWHM. This proves the prowess of our conception as a potential plasmonic sensor for the highly sensitive detection of SARS-COV-2.
Figure 11 presents the variation of the resonance wavelength for a series of SARS-CoV-2 solutions having different refractive indices corresponding to the different concentrations. In fact the refractive index of the sample increases with the increase of the concentration or the surface density [14] of SARS-CoV-2 according to eq. (13). The curve reveals that, the increase in the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 leads to an increase in the resonance wavelength, due to the successful recognition and identification of the virus.