Rural versus Urban Residence. We evaluated placental malaria (PM) in 317 singleton births to 249 mothers who participated in a longitudinal cohort in a rural community on the Bandiagara Escarpment in Central Mali. Eight-four percent of the births were to women who continued to live in the rural community where they were followed from enrollment (1998 to 2000) to the time they gave birth (2011 to 2019). Fifteen percent of the births were to women in the cohort who had migrated to Bamako. The odds of a placenta being infected with malaria (including both active and past infections) were 67% lower (p = 0.015) for Bamako compared to the villages--after adjusting for other covariates such as the number of SP doses the woman received during pregnancy. Similarly, the prevalence of P. falciparum in children aged 6 to 59 months was far higher in the Mopti Region than in Bamako in the Demographic and Health Surveys in the years 2010 to 2018 [9]. Prevalence of malaria is generally higher in rural compared to urban areas [14, 15], although a few studies reported no difference between rural and urban locations [16, 17]. We did not investigate differences in infrastructure, or social, and environmental factors that might contribute to the lower prevalence of placental malaria in Bamako. However, one advantage of our study is that the women at both locations came from the same ethnicity (Dogon), reducing genetic or cultural differences that may influence malaria susceptibility. Moreover, as they came from the same cohort, they were similar in age and shared similar childhood and adolescent environments prior to the migration, at a mean (SD) age of 17.9 (3.1) years, of some of the women to Bamako who then provided 16% of placentas analyzed.
PM Prevalence. The overall prevalence of PM in our study was 71%, similar to other regions in Sub-Saharan Africa where malaria is endemic (for example, 75% in southeastern Tanzania [18], 59% in Sudan [19]). The prevalence of past infections, at 48% in our study, was higher than for acute (5%), chronic (18%), and no (29%) infection. Malaria parasites were not detected in most placentas (77%), and when they were detected, the infections were mostly mild as opposed to moderate or severe, similar to a study in Kenya [20] that also used scoring criteria based on Bulmer et al. (1993) and Muehlenbachs (2010). We are not aware of any other studies conducted in Mali that examined PM prevalence using placental tissue histology, although several have used placental blood smears [21–23].
Risk Factors for PM. Several variables were strongly associated with PM. In particular, the odds of placental malaria infection were much higher for births to women in the earlier years of the study compared with the later years, which may have reflected increased anti-malaria efforts over time. For example in 2015, the odds for malaria infection (active and past combined) in our study were eight-fold higher (p = 0.001) than in 2018. In 2015, the Mopti Region had twice the malaria prevalence, compared to the national average, for children under five years, prompting an indoor residual spraying program which took place in 2017 and included the Bandiagara district [24]. From 2016 to 2017, peak malaria incidence decreased by 42%, on average, in sprayed health facility catchment areas compared to non-sprayed communities in the Mopti Region [24]. Spraying campaigns also took place in 2018 [25] and 2019 [26]. Our data provide further evidence for the success of malaria control campaigns on the Bandiagara escarpment.
[27].
Maternal Age and Year of Offspring Birth. Maternal age has sometimes been reported to be associated with PM [28] and a study in the District of Bandiagara in 1993 and 1994 reported that women under the age of 27 years had more malaria parasites in blood smears [29]. However, we found that after adjusting for year of study in an attempt to control for changes in yearly exposure to malaria, maternal age was no longer associated with PM (Table 2 and 3). Although maternal age and the year in which a woman gave birth are correlated, our analysis indicates that birth year was the more important predictor of PM in our study. As it was important to adjust for offspring’s birth year, we will focus our discussion on the model for maternal risk factors for PM that did so (Model 1). We also note that since we identified far more past infections than active ones (acute and chronic), we had more statistical power to detect risk factors for active and past infections combined than for active infections alone.
Gravidity. Previous studies reported greater PM risk among women who were primigravida [19, 30–32]. We replicated this finding for active and past PM infections only if maternal age and year of birth, which are associated with gravidity (SI Figure 2), were not included in the model (SI Table 1). It has been reported that the timing of malaria infection during pregnancy differentially impacts primigravid and multigravid women [33], but we cannot assess this possibility in our study as we did not collect data on the timing of infection.
Maternal BMI. In our study, a one unit increase in maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was associated with a 13% decrease in the odds of active and past PM (Table 2: Model 1). This result is unlikely to be due to confounding with gravidity because, although the multigravida had a mean BMI that was 0.7 kg/m2 greater than for the primigravida (SI Figure 2), we adjusted for gravidity. In Tanzania, underweight women had decreased risk of sub-microscopic placental malaria infection, while overweight or obese women had higher odds of placental malaria by blood smear compared to normal weight women [34]. The authors speculated that iron deficiency in the underweight mothers may have protected them against PM. Anemia was common in our study, but most of the placentas were from women who had normal BMI (84.5% normal (N = 268), 4.1% underweight (N = 13), 11.4% overweight/obese (N = 36). One possibility is that women of higher BMI in our study were more sedentary and engaged in less outdoor manual labor and thus had less exposure to mosquitoes.
Maternal Education. Mothers in our study who had some education beyond secondary school had decreased risk of both active and past PM infections combined. Similarly, education has been reported to be associated with decreased risk of malaria in pregnancy [35, 36]. However, associations between education and PM were not found in Uganda [35] and Sudan [19]. Education has been associated with health-seeking behaviors such as prenatal visits and optimal SP dosing [37]. As our models adjust for SP dosing, it is also possible that the better educated mothers performed less manual outdoor labor and had less exposure to mosquitoes.
Season of Birth. The odds of PM (active and past infections combined) were 77% lower for births in the rainy season (June through October) compared to the hot dry season (March through May) (Table 2: Model 1). Similarly, in The Gambia and Burkina Faso, risk for active and past PM was lower for births in the rainy season compared to the dry season [38]. In our study, the odds of active PM infections (excluding past infections) were eleven-fold greater for births during the rainy and seven-fold greater for births during the cool dry season compared to births in the hot dry season (Table 3: Model 3). This result may reflect increased transmission of malaria during the rainy season, instigating active infections. Similarly, using thick blood smears, increased PM was found in the rainy season in univariate analyses for Koro and Bandiagara in Mali [23].
SP Doses. The 2018-2022 National Strategy for Malaria Control in Mali calls for at least 80% of pregnant women to receive ≥ 3 doses three doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) during their pregnancies [39]. At least 3 SP doses have been recommended to support and protect the period of rapid fetal weight gain during the third trimester [23] and have been associated with full term births and normal birth weights [40]. However, in our study, only 25% of women received ≥ 3 doses of SP, 36% received two doses, 32% received one dose, and 7% received no doses of SP. Thus dosing of SP fell far short of national guidelines.
Across several regions of Mali in 2015, 66% of women reported taking SP during pregnancy. Of those who took SP, 63% reported < 2 and 37% reported taking ≥ 3 doses [41]. Compared with that study, our cohort had a lower prevalence of women who received no doses or who received ≥ 3 doses of SP. Moreover, in our study, the first SP dose occurred late in pregnancy at a mean (SD) gestational age of about 26 (10) weeks, which is at the end (week 26) rather than the beginning (week 13) of the second trimester when dosing can begin. Late first SP doses (after 21 weeks) may provide suboptimal protection against infection as was seen in Benin [42]. In rural northern Ghana, women who had a second dose of SP during the 2nd trimester were more likely to receive ≥ 3 doses compared to women whose first dose was delayed to the third trimester [40]. We did not detect a difference in dosing in Bamako compared to the villages; thus it would be a useful precaution for dosing at both sites to start earlier in the second trimester of pregnancy.
We tested for differences in the number of SP doses women received and the odds that a placenta was infected by malaria. Compared with mothers who received ≥ 3 doses of SP, placentas from mothers who received no doses had fourteen-fold higher (p = 0.001) odds of active and past PM. This was a stark difference. The odds for active (excluding past) infections were ten-fold higher (p = 0.001) for women who had no doses and more than two-fold higher for women who had one dose (p = 0.036) compared to ≥ 3 doses. However, regardless of whether we lumped active and past infections together or considered only active infections, we did not detect a difference in the odds of PM between receipt of 2 versus ≥ 3 SP doses. This finding contrasts with an earlier study in 2006-2008 in the Segou Region of Mali which demonstrated two-fold lower prevalence of PM by placental blood smear with 3 SP doses compared to 2 doses after adjustment for gravidity, season of birth, maternal age, and malaria at enrollment [22]. A meta-analysis of 6 sub-Saharan countries found a 49% reduced risk of PM with ≥ 3 compared to 2 SP doses [43], but this finding was restricted to primigravid and secundigravid women and did not pertain to multigravid women. In a Tanzanian low malaria transmission setting, no difference in PM was found for women who had ≥ 3 doses compared to 2 doses [44]. The Tanzanian study also found a 36% increased risk of maternal anemia in women with 2 SP doses compared to ≥ 3, highlighting the drug’s role in combating malaria in the peripheral blood.
Birth Outcomes and SP Doses. We also examined birth outcomes in relation to the number of SP doses a pregnant woman received (Table 4). Compared with women who received ≥ 3 doses, birth weight was lower by 285 g (p = 0.03) in women who received no doses of SP. It was lower by 75 and 68 g in women who received one or two doses, respectively, but these latter two differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.17) compared with ≥ 3 doses. When we dichotomized birth weight as low versus normal, the risk of low birth weight (LBW) was 14% higher with one and two SP doses compared to ≥ 3 doses (p = 0.02) and 22% higher with no doses versus ≥ 3 but the p-value was 0.1 for this last comparison.
In South West Cameroon, ≥ 3 doses were associated with lower odds of LBW compared to ≤ 1 dose, but unlike our study, no difference was detected between ≥ 3 doses and 2 doses [45]. In Southeast Tanzania, higher birth weight was seen with ≥ 3 doses compared to two doses, as well as lower risk of LBW [46]. Lower risk of LBW was also seen in Nigeria with 3 doses compared to 2 doses [47]. A meta-analysis showed a stronger association between mean birth weight and 3 doses than mean birth weight and 2 doses [43]. Our study did not detect higher birth weights when women received ≥ 3 compared to 2 doses, but did show increased risk of LBW with 2 compared to ≥ 3 doses. A topical review of LBW in Eastern Africa [48] found ≥ 3 doses SP was associated with a decreased risk of LBW and increased birth weight compared to 2 doses. This review also addressed evidence that SP may not protect against risk of LBW in areas of high-level SP resistance. Parasite molecular markers demonstrating SP resistance were associated with decreased effectiveness of SP in preventing malaria infections and LBW in a meta-analysis of 57 studies in sub-Saharan Africa [49]. SP resistance in Mali increased 7% from 2000-2020 [50], a rate lower than some East African countries such as Mozambique (64%) and Tanzania (55%) but higher than other West African countries such as Nigeria (-14%) and Burkina Faso (0.13%).
In our study, birth length was 2 cm shorter (p = 0.004) when no SP doses were received compared to ≥ 3 doses. We observed a trend toward shorter birth length by half a centimeter for one instead ≥ 3 doses SP (B = -0.49, p = 0.064), but no evidence for a difference at two doses instead of ≥ 3 doses (B = -0.07, p = 0.770). In Ghana doses even in excess of 5 were not associated with a dichotomous variable for birth length [40]. In Malawi, the child’s length at 4 weeks of age was greater if the mother received SP doses on a monthly as opposed to an intermittent basis [51].
Placental Weight. The mean (SD) placental weight in our study was 483 g (91). We found that placentas were 75 g lighter (p = 0.002) from women who received no SP doses compared to ≥ 3 doses. Placentas from women who received one or two doses were 32 g lighter (p = 0.021) and 36 g lighter (p = 0.005), respectively, compared to placentas from women who received ≥ 3 doses. Thus, placental weight was higher at any level of dosing, compared to no dosing, and we could distinguish one or two doses from three doses but not one dose from two doses. In southern Mozambique, placental weight was 49 g heavier and the duration of pregnancy was 6.1 days longer in women who had two SP doses compared to no doses [52]. Elsewhere, the impact of SP dosing on placental weight is largely unreported, although malaria infections in peripheral blood early in pregnancy were associated with decreased placental weight compared to uninfected controls in Tanzania [53].
SP Uptake. We attempted to discover why some women in our study received no doses of SP (Table 6: Model 5), which put their offspring at high risk for poor birth outcomes. We detected that these women were younger and they were more likely to have no education instead of having gone to primary school. These results underscore the importance of primary school education for women. This finding was similar to results from survey data from twelve sub-Saharan African countries including Mali in the years 2015-2019, showing maternal education and maternal age positively associated with SP doses [28]. We also identified a trend toward 5 times increased odds of receiving no SP doses (p = 0.06) if the birth was in the cool dry season instead of the hot dry season. Further research would be needed to understand whether this seasonal difference is real and, if applicable, any underlying causes. One possibility is that this finding might reflect seasonal differences in women’s workload impinging on their time and energy to seek ante-natal care. Women who gave birth in 2018 as opposed to 2016 were more likely to get no doses of SP, which is surprising and bears further investigation.
In our study, socio-economic status was the only variable that predicted getting ≥ 3 doses of SP. Specifically, for each additional increase in the wealth z-score of a woman’s family, the woman was 40% more likely to receive ≥ 3 doses of SP (Table 6: Model 6). A study conducted on the Bandiagara escarpment in Mali in 2015 [41] reported that women under age 20 years were less likely to receive ≥ 3 doses of SP. That study [41] was consistent with ours in not finding an association between SP and urban/rural residence, but it differed in that it did not find an association between maternal education or wealth and SP doses. Similar to our findings, wealth was associated with ≥3 doses of SP in Uganda [54] and Nigeria [55].
Study limitations
An important limitation of this study is its observational, non-randomized design. Therefore, to improve the comparison of PM in Bamako versus the villages, it was helpful that the participants in both places came from the same longitudinal cohort and the same ethnicity. Unlike most studies that entail an urban – rural comparison, our study was restricted to women who belonged to a specific cohort that we established in 1998 to 2000 in a rural community on the Bandiagara Escarpment. No placentas came from women who were not part of this cohort. Although the cohort study as a whole had unusually strong retention of participants who migrated to Bamako, losing only 6% of these urban migrants to follow-up, participation in the placental collections in Bamako was lower than in the villages. Placental collection in Bamako was logistically challenging as the women in the cohort gave birth at a variety of hospitals and clinics, whereas in the rural community only one hospital was involved.
Another limitation of our study is that we did not evaluate maternal anemia, which is known to be associated with malaria in pregnancy, and we did not measure peripheral blood parasitemia levels. Lastly, we assessed PM through the histological examination of the intervillous space of placental samples, which is an established method for assessment of PM. However, it is likely to miss early or low density (sub-microscopic) infections that would require molecular analysis for detection. We also lacked data on the onset of malarial infection, which would have been useful for shedding light on associations between placental malaria and season of birth.