1 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care - IQWiG Germany. Benefits and risks of Screening Tests. 2019. www.informedhealth.org. Accessed 26 October 2020.
2 Nagel M, Arslanow A, Nguyen-Tat M., Wörns MA, Heil FJ, Mainz D, Zimper G, Zwerenz B, Wangler J, Jansky M, Gisch D, Jäger J, Engelmann T, Graf E, Knaus J, Stelzer D, Fichtner U, Binder H, Farin-Glattacker E, van Ewijk R, Ortner J, Velthuis L, Lammert F, Galle PR. Lebervorsorge-Progamm SEAL: Screening der Allgemeinbevölkerung zur strukturierten Früherkennung von Leberfibrose und Leberzirrhose (preventive liver programme SEAL: Screening the general population for early detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis). Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie. 2019; 57(09): 246.
3 Harris R. Overview of Screening: Where We Are and Where We May be Headed. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2011; 33: 1-6.
4 Landstra J, Deane FP, Ciarrochi J. Psychological consequences of cancer screening in HIV. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2013; 25(5): 526-531.
5 Brodersen J, McKenna SP, Doward LC, Thorsen H. Measuring the psychosocial consequences of screening. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 3.
6 Rijnsburger AJ, Essink-Bot ML, van As E, Cockburn J, de Koning HJ. Measuring psychological consequences of screening: Adaptation of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire into Dutch. Quality of Life Research. 2006; 14: 933-940.
7 Cockburn J, De Luise T, Hurley S, Clover K. Development and validation of the PCQ: A questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. Social Science and Medicine. 1992; 34: 1129-1134.
8 Ong G, Austoker J, Brett J. Breast screening: Adverse psychological consequences one month after placing women on early recall because of a diagnostic uncertainty. A multicentre study. Journal of Medical Screening. 1997; 4: 158-168.
9 Brett J, Austoker J, Ong G. Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1998; 20: 396–403.
10 Lowe JB, Balanda KP, Del Mar C, Hawes E. Psychologic distress in women with abnormal findings in mass mammography screening. Cancer. 1999; 85: 1114-1118.
11 Bowland L, Cockburn J, Cawson J, Anderson HC, Moorehead S, Kenny M. Counselling interventions to address the psychological consequences of screening mammography: A randomised trial. Patient Education and Counseling. 2003; 49: 189-198.
12 Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Essink-Bot ML, Bossuyt PM, Fockens P, Dekker E. FIT false-positives in colorectal cancer screening experience psychological distress up to 6 weeks after colonoscopy. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21: 2809-2815.
13 Tinmouth J, Raboud J, Ali M, Malloch L, Su D, Sano M, Lytwyn A, Rourke SB, Rabeneck L, Salit I. The Psychological Impact of Being Screened for Anal Cancer in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2011; 54(3): 352-359.
14 Risica PM, Matthews NH, Dionne L, Mello J, Ferris LK, Saul M, Geller AC, Solano F, Kirkwood JM, Weinstock MA. Psychological consequences of skin cancer screening. Preventive Medical Reports. 2018; 10: 310-316.
15 Brodersen J, Thorsen H. Psychosocial consequences of false positive screening mammography – an adaptation of the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) into Danish. Abstract 1265. Quality of Life Research. 2003; 12: 798.
16 WHO. WHO Research tools. 2020. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/. Accessed 27 October 2020.
17 Schupp JC, Fichtner UA, Frye BC, Heyduck-Weides K, Birring SS, Windisch W, Criée CP, Müller-Quernheim J, Farin E. Psychometric properties of the German version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in sarcoidosis. PLoSOne. 2018; 13(10): e0205308.
18 Varni JW, Seid M, Rode CA. The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory. Medical Care. 1999; 37: 126-139.
19 Lin CY, Luh, WM, Cheng CP, Yang AL, Su CT, Ma HI. Measurement equivalence across child selfreports and parent-proxy reports in the Chinese version of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0. Child Psychiatry and Human Development. 2013; 44: 583-590.
20 McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research. 1995; 4: 293-307.
21 Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999; 6: 1-55.
22 Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1937; 38: 1-10.
23 Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1992; 21: 301-306.
24 Chen FF. Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Model A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007; 14: 464-504.
25 Schotte CKW, Van Den Bossche B, De Doncker D, Claes S, Cosyns P. A biopsychosocial model as a guide for psychoeducation and treatment of depression. Depression and Anxiety. 2006; 23: 312-324.