This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Identification of appropriate varieties adapted to the global warming and enhanced drought changes is imperative. In this study two sets of thirty elite genotypes of Desi and Kabuli chickpea types were used to investigate the effects of water scarcity at the phenotypic level in reproductive stages and surveying different drought-induced responses for them.
Results: Alterations in GY and its components, FT, PT, MT, FM, and SDM as well as number of drought tolerance indices were measured in field conditions. The estimated genotypic effects were detected significant at both limited and full irrigation conditions for GY, GN, GW, and SDM; however, these effects had smaller values for environmental effects except in GW. The SDM and GW in water-limited conditions showed significant positive relationship with those of full irrigated for both chickpea types. GMP index provided the most positive correlations with GY for both type either of two conditions. The highest direct effect on GY was represented by SDM for Kabuli at both conditions as well as Desi chickpeas in limited water condition, while GN was the most one in full-irrigated Desi chickpeas. The ideal genotypes, 25 and 321, as Kabuli and Desi chickpeas, respectively, were detected with high stable and high GY.
Conclusions: Results of this study showed that tested chickpea genotypes responded differently under different water treatments, suggesting the importance of assessment of genotypes under these conditions in order to identify the best genotype make up for each particular condition. As water stress severity was applied equally, therefore it was thought to be more serious in genotypes with a greater life cycle. However, it seems that chickpea plants have been adapted to the terminal drought stress, which could be due to the same time of vegetative growth with filling pods and transfer capability of photosynthesis assimilates towards more grain yield in tolerant genotypes. It seems to change in plant phenology due to the terminal drought stress more affected GN and GW in Desi and Kabuli chickpeas, respectively. These differences could be clear points for the leadership of breeding programs towards more adaptation of both Desi and Kabuli chickpea types to terminal water stress, respectively. Moderate to a high proportion of G × E effects were observed in combined analysis for GY, GN, and SDM compared to genotypic effects, suggesting that G × E effects played a greater role than genotypic effects. The ideal genotype of Kabuli type i.e. genotype 25 had greater GY as well as SDM in water-limited condition, while genotype 321 as ideal Desi genotype showed acceptable GY and SDM, but could compensate with higher GN.
Keywords
path analysis, yield potential, variance components, genotypic effects, yield stability
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 22 Jan, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 22 Jan, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Identification of appropriate varieties adapted to the global warming and enhanced drought changes is imperative. In this study two sets of thirty elite genotypes of Desi and Kabuli chickpea types were used to investigate the effects of water scarcity at the phenotypic level in reproductive stages and surveying different drought-induced responses for them.
Results: Alterations in GY and its components, FT, PT, MT, FM, and SDM as well as number of drought tolerance indices were measured in field conditions. The estimated genotypic effects were detected significant at both limited and full irrigation conditions for GY, GN, GW, and SDM; however, these effects had smaller values for environmental effects except in GW. The SDM and GW in water-limited conditions showed significant positive relationship with those of full irrigated for both chickpea types. GMP index provided the most positive correlations with GY for both type either of two conditions. The highest direct effect on GY was represented by SDM for Kabuli at both conditions as well as Desi chickpeas in limited water condition, while GN was the most one in full-irrigated Desi chickpeas. The ideal genotypes, 25 and 321, as Kabuli and Desi chickpeas, respectively, were detected with high stable and high GY.
Conclusions: Results of this study showed that tested chickpea genotypes responded differently under different water treatments, suggesting the importance of assessment of genotypes under these conditions in order to identify the best genotype make up for each particular condition. As water stress severity was applied equally, therefore it was thought to be more serious in genotypes with a greater life cycle. However, it seems that chickpea plants have been adapted to the terminal drought stress, which could be due to the same time of vegetative growth with filling pods and transfer capability of photosynthesis assimilates towards more grain yield in tolerant genotypes. It seems to change in plant phenology due to the terminal drought stress more affected GN and GW in Desi and Kabuli chickpeas, respectively. These differences could be clear points for the leadership of breeding programs towards more adaptation of both Desi and Kabuli chickpea types to terminal water stress, respectively. Moderate to a high proportion of G × E effects were observed in combined analysis for GY, GN, and SDM compared to genotypic effects, suggesting that G × E effects played a greater role than genotypic effects. The ideal genotype of Kabuli type i.e. genotype 25 had greater GY as well as SDM in water-limited condition, while genotype 321 as ideal Desi genotype showed acceptable GY and SDM, but could compensate with higher GN.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...