The Effects of Intravitreal Agents on Systemic Vascular Diseases in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1208757/v1

PDF

Research Article

The Effects of Intravitreal Agents on Systemic Vascular Diseases in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1208757/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted 29 Dec, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Purpose: To assess the risk for cerebrovascular desease (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients who were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and compare the rates of CVD and CAD with diabetic controls.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of diabetic patients was performed. The need for intravitreal injection and type of agent were noted. If clinically significant or center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) were determined, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were used. The CVD and/or CAD occurred within 6 months of the intravitreal injection were accepted as the main outcomes of the study. The records of diabetic patients who were followed up but not needed intravitreal injections were accepted as the control group of the study. Comparisons between these groups were performed.

Results: The number of patients enrolled in the study was 9751 (5243 female, 4508 male patients). Of these patients, 1261 patients were received various intravitreal injections. Patients who had CVD history were divided into two groups according to whether they received intravitreal injection or not. There was statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of CVD history (p<0,001). There was statistically significant difference in the hazard of CVD between different anti-VEGF treatments (p<0,001). Patients who had CAD history were divided into two groups according to whether they received intravitreal injection or not. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of CAD history (p=0,31).

Discussion: The risk for CVD was seen to increase with the intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic patients. The rate of CVD was higher in patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab treatment.

Ophthalmology

Diabetic Retinopathy

Anti Vegf

Cerebrovascular deseases

Coronary artery disease.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common complication of diabetes and is expected that 642 million people will suffer from DR by 2040 [1]. The most common cause of visual impairment due to DR is diabetic macular edema (DME)[2]. The intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) is commonly used for the treatment of center-involving DME with decreased vision [3].Two mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly injections of aflibercept and 0,3 mg monthly injection of ranibizumab were approved by US Food and Drug Administration based on VIVID-VISTA and RISE-RIDE clinical trials results, respectively [4, 5]. Off-label use of 1,25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab is also common all over the World [6]. Besides, intravitreal administrations of anti-VEGF agents have been used for proliferative DR [7].

The frequency of intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents in diabetic patients has been increased because of the expanding indications. While the increasing rates of intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, the ocular and systemic complications of such a widely performed procedure have been commonly reported [8–10]. Systemic side effects and overall mortality due to anti-VEGF agents were not found to be increased in the short and medium term when compared with either sham group or photocoagulation treatment in patients with DME [11]. Besides, adverse systemic deseases in patients with proliferative DR were not found to be different when compared with controls [8]. On the other hand, a recent meta-analysis that focused on the patients which had highest-level exposure to anti-VEGF agents, revealed a possible increased risk of death and cerebrovascular accidents. In the same meta-analysis report, no increased risk of myocardial infarction was detected [10].

The aim of the current study was to assess the risk for cerebrovascular deseases (CVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetic patients who were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and compare the rates of CVD and CAD with diabetic controls.

The present, retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary university hospital. Prior approval from the Institutional Review Board was taken (IRB number:

E-71522473-050.01.04-6071-49 and informed consent was obtained from each subject. The study was performed in adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki.

A retrospective chart review of diabetic patients at the Retinal Disease Department was performed. The chart reviews included medical records between January 2010 and December 2020. The age, sex,serum HbA1c levels, and duration of diabetes mellitus of patients were noted. The need for intravitreal injection and type of agent were also noted. The stage of diabetic retinopathy was noted as proliferative and non-proliferative DR. If clinically significant or center-involving DME were determined, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents were used.The preference of anti-VEGF agent was done according to ophthalmologist decision. The diagnosis of clinically significant DME was done due to ETDRS [12]. Center- involving DME was defined as thickening of the retina at or within 500 µ of the center of the macula [13].

The histories of CVD or CAD in patients after intravitreal injections were noted. The CVD and/or CAD occurred within 6 months of the intravitreal injection were accepted asthe main outcomes of the study. The records of diabetic patients who were followed up in Retina Department but not needed intravitreal injections were accepted as the control group of the study. The histories of CVD and CAD in these patients were also noted.

Cerebrovascular deseases were composed of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Coronary artery diseases were composed of myocardial infarction and unstable angina.

Patients with the age below 18 years old, any intraocular surgeries, chronic ocular diseases such as uveitis, glaucoma were excluded from the study. Patients with other retinal diseases such as age related macular degeneration, santral, branch retinal vein occlusion, and choroidal neovascularization.

Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS statistical software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) Descriptive analyses were performed to provide information on the general characteristics of the study population. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate whether the distributions of numerical variables were normal. The numeric variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were compared by the Chi-Square test. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

The number of patients enrolled in the study was 9751 (5243 female, 4508 male patients). The mean age was 65,2 ± 11,0 years. The mean HbA1c was 7,6 ± 1,1 mmol/l. Of these patients, 1261 patients were received various intravitreal injections because of DME with or without proliferative DR. Of these patients, 855 was diagnosed as CSME and 406 was diagnosed as center-involving DME. (Table 1).

Table 2 reveals the number of patients who had CVD.25 patients had a diagnosis of ischemic CVD and 1 patient had hemorrhagic CVD diagnosis. Patients who had CVD history were divided into two groups according to whether they received intravitreal injection or not. There was statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of CVD history (p<0,001).

Table 3 reveals the number of patients who had CAD.All patients underwent coronary angiography and coronary stend implantation was performed 28 patients, coronary by pass grefting performed 2 patients. Patients who had CAD history were divided into two groups according to whether they received intravitreal injection or not, again. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of CAD history (p=0,31).

The possible effect of different anti-VEGF treatment modalities on CVD was also assessed. There was statisitcally significant difference in the hazard of CVD between different anti-VEGF treatments (p<0,001) (Table 4).

The possible effect of different anti-VEGF treatment modalities on CAD was also assessed and no statisitcally significant difference was found in the hazard of CVD between different anti-VEGF treatments (p=0,84) (Table 5).

Table 1

Number of diabetic patients who received various intravitreal agent treatments.
	Frequency (n)	Percent (%)
No Intravitreal Agent Use	8490	87,1
Bevacizumab treatment	179	1,8
Ranibizumab treatment	455	4,7
Aflibercept treatment	364	3,7
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab Treatment	139	1,4
Bevacizumab+aflibercept treatment	44	0,5
Ranibizumab+Aflibercept Treatment	66	0,7
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab+Aflibercept treatment	14	0,1
Total	9751	100

Table 2

The number of patients who had cerebrovascular desesae history
	No CVD history (n)	CVD history(n)	Percent
No intravitravitreal treatment	8423	67	0,8
Intravitreal treatment	1235	26	2,1
CVD: cerebrovascular desease. According to Chi-square test, there was significant difference between these groups. p<0,001.

Table 3

The number of patients who had coronary artery disease history
	No CAD history (n)	CAD history(n)	Percent
No intravitravitreal treatment	8242	248	2,9
Intravitreal treatment	1228	33	2,6
CAD: coronary artery disease. According to Chi-square test, there was no significant difference between these groups. p=0,310.

Table 4

Cerebrovascular desease in patients who were received different treatment modalities
	No CVD history (n)	CVD history(n)	Percent (%)
No intravitravitreal treatment	8422	67	0,8
Bevacizumab treatment	171	8	4,5
Ranibizumab treatment	443	12	2,6
Aflibercept treatment	360	4	1,1
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab Treatment	137	2	1,4
Bevacizumab+aflibercept treatment	44	0	0
Ranibizumab+Aflibercept Treatment	66	0	0
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab+Aflibercept treatment	14	0	0
CVD: cerebrovascular desease. According to Chi-square test, there was statistically significant difference among groups (p<0,001).

Table 5

Coronary artery diseases in patients who were received different treatment modalities
	No CAD history (n)	CAD history(n)	Percent (%)
No intravitravitreal treatment	8242	247	2,9
Bevacizumab treatment	173	6	3,4
Ranibizumab treatment	441	14	3,1
Aflibercept treatment	353	11	3
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab Treatment	137	2	1,4
Bevacizumab+aflibercept treatment	44	0	0
Ranibizumab+Aflibercept Treatment	65	1	1,5
Bevacizumab+Ranibizumab+Aflibercept treatment	14	0	0
CAD: Coronary artery disease. According to Chi-square test, there was no statistically significant difference among groups (p=0,84).

In the current study, the rate of CVD was higher in diabetic patients who had treated with anti-VEGF agents than diabetic controls. The percentage of patients who had CVDs was 2,1%. Wu et al. was reported thatCVDs were seen in 0,5% percent of patients who received intravitreal Bevacizumab treatment. The diagnosis of patients were variable in this study [14].In a recent meta-analysis, possible increased risk for cerebrovascular accidents was revealed in patients with DME who were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for 2 years [10]. In our study, the control group was composed of diabetic patients. As reported previously that the risk for cerebrovascular deseases (stroke) was higher in diabetic patients, the comparison between diabetics who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment and diabetic controls gave us more accurate results [15]. Maloney et al. compared CVD between diabetic patients who received anti-VEGF agents, argon laser treatment, and steroid treatment. They did not find any increased risk of cerebrovascular diseases within 6 months after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. In this study, the cerebrovascular diseases were consisted of ischemic, hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack [2]. In our study, we investigated only ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.

In the current study, the risk of CVD was found to be higher in diabetic patients who were treated with intravitreal Bevacizumab. Maloney et al. compared the risk of cerebrovascular diseases after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept treatments in diabetic patients. They did not find any difference among different intravireal anti-VEGF agents [16]. Cerebrovascular diseases were composed of hemorrhagic, ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Wang et al. compared the incidence of systemic adverse deseases of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab in patients with age related macular degeneration. They did not find any difference [17]. The severity of diabetes mellitus, the differences in the inclusion criteria and investigation on different retinal diseases might cause variety in the results.

In this current study, the risk of coronary artery diseases after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment did not increase. In a recent meta-analysis, 24 clinical trials were included which were investigated major cardiovascular diseases in diabetic patients. They did not find any difference in diabetic patients in regards of cardiovascular diseases [18].In another meta-analysis, ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments were found to not affect the risk for myocardial infarction and arteriotrombotic deseases [10].Maloney et al. also did not find any increased risk for CAD in diabetic patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents [2]. All these studies and our study revealed no increased risk for CAD in diabetic patients treated with anti-VEGF agents.

In this study, different types of anti-VEGF agents were also investigated whether they affect the risk for CAD. There was no significant difference between ranibizumab, bevacizumab and aflibercept treatments. Maloney et al. also did not find any increased risk for acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular diseases with all these treatments [16].

The limitation of this current study was the numeric differences between groups. the retrospective design did not allow us to reach more information about the treatment of diabetic controls. On the other hand, to investigate only one disease (Diabetes Mellitus) treated with intravitreal agents gave us more accurate and reliable results.

In conclusion, the risk for cerebrovascular deseases was increased with the intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic patients. The rate of CVD was higher in diabetic patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab treatment. On the other hand, the risk for coronary artery disease did not affect from intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic patients.

Statements and Declarations:

Funding : This study was not funded by any company.

Compliance with ethical standards: Conflict of interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard: Prior approval from the Sakarya University Institutional Review Board IRB: 71522473-050.01.04-6071-49was taken. The study was performed in adherence to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent:Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each subject in the study

Simó-Servat O, Hernández C, Simó R:(2019) Diabetic Retinopathy in the Context of Patients with Diabetes. Ophthalmic Res;62:211–217. https://doi.org/ 10.1159/000499541
Maloney MH, Schilz SR, Herrin J, Sangaralingham LR, Shah ND, Barkmeier AJ.(2019) Risk of Systemic Adverse Deseases Associated with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema in Routine Clinical Practice. Ophthalmology;126(7):1007–1015.https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.09.040
Porta M, Striglia E. Intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and cardiovascular risk.(2020) Intern Emerg Med.;15(2):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-019-02253-7
Heier JS, Korobelnik JF, Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, Midena E, Boyer DS, Terasaki H, Kaiser PK, Marcus DM, Nguyen QD, Jaffe GJ, Slakter JS, Simader C, Soo Y, Schmelter T, Vitti R, Berliner AJ, Zeitz O, Metzig C, Holz FG. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 148-Week Results from the VISTA and VIVID Studies.(2016) Ophthalmology;123(11):2376-2385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.032
Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L, Gibson A, Sy J, Rundle AC, Hopkins JJ, Rubio RG, Ehrlich JS; RISE and RIDE Research Group.(2012) Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE.Ophthalmology.;119(4):789–801.https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039
Wells JA, Glassman AR, Ayala AR et al (2016) Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology 123(6):1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.022
Sun JK, Jampol LM.(2019) The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) and Its Contributions to the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmic Res;62(4):225–230. https://doi.org/ 10.1159/000502779
Simunovic MP, MBBChir, PhD FRANZCO, Maberley DAL, MSc MD (2015)Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor theraphy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Retina: Volume 35 - Issue 10 - p 1931–1942 https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000723
Shikari H, Silva PS, Sun JK. (2014)Complications of intravitreal injections in patients with diabetes. Semin Ophthalmol 29(5-6):276–289. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/08820538.2014.962167
Avery RL, Gordon GM (2016) Systemic Safety of Prolonged Monthly Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 134(1):21–29. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4070
Virgili G, Parravano M, Menchini F, Evans JR.(2014) Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.;(10):CD007419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007419.pub4
Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study report number 1. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study group.(1985)Archives of Ophthalmology.;103(12):1796–1806. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120030015
Kodjikian L, Bellocq D, Bandello F, Loewenstein A, Chakravarthy U, Koh A, Augustin A, de Smet MD, Chhablani J, Tufail A, García-Layana A, Sudhalkar A, Mathis T.(2019) First-line treatment algorithm and guidelines in center-involving diabetic macular edema. Eur J Ophthalmol;29(6):573–584.https:// doi.org/ 10.1177/1120672119857511
Wu L, Martínez-Castellanos MA, Quiroz-Mercado H, Arevalo JF, Berrocal MH, Farah ME, Maia M, Roca JA, Rodriguez FJ (2008) Pan American Collaborative Retina Group (PACORES). Twelve-month safety of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin): results of the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246(1):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0660-z
Hill MD (2014) Stroke and diabetes mellitus. Handb Clin Neurol 126:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53480-4.00012-6
Maloney MH, Payne SR, Herrin J, Sangaralingham LR, Shah ND, Barkmeier AJ.(2021) Risk of Systemic Adverse Deseases after Intravitreal Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Routine Clinical Practice. Ophthalmology;128(3):417-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.062
Wang W, Zhang X.(2014) Systemic adverse deseases after intravitreal bevacizumab versus ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis. PLoS One16;9(10):e109744.https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109744
Ngo Ntjam N, Thulliez M, Paintaud G, Salvo F, Angoulvant D, Pisella PJ, Bejan-Angoulvant T (2021)Cardiovascular Adverse Deseases With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Ophthalmol.15;139(6):1–11.https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021

PDF

Version 1

posted 29 Dec, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

The Effects of Intravitreal Agents on Systemic Vascular Diseases in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Introduction

Materials-methods

Results

Discussion

Statements and Declarations:

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1