2.1. Preparation of ZZCD extract
The Gardeniae Fructus and Semen sojae praeparatum, identified by Prof. Lu-Ping Qin (Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), were purchased from Tong Han Chun Tang Chinese Herbal Factory (Shanghai, China) and were prepared as powder. A total of 800 g of powder was weighed according to the ratio of 2:1. The mixture was extracted twice by reflux with 50% ethanol (1:8, w/v) for 4 h and filtered through gauze. The filtrate was concentrated to 0.1 g/mL with rotary evaporator. The sample was loaded in a ratio of 1:1 of medicinal materials (mL)/D101 macroporous adsorption resins (mL), and then the static adsorption was performed for 2 h. The resin was washed with 1BV pure water and ethanol eluent at different concentrations in a range of 10, 20 and 30 (v/v) in turn. 6 BV 40% ethanol eluent was collected and dried by rotary evaporator combined with water bath to obtain the powder of ZZCD extracts.
2.2. Animals
Fifty-six male Sprague-Dawley rats, weighing 200 ± 20 g, were obtained from Experimental Animal Center of Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China, SCXK2013-0016) and were housed in plastic cages with a 12-h light/dark cycle under controlled temperature (22 ± 2℃) and humidity (55 ± 5%). All animals were trained to consume 1% sucrose solution for 1 week before the commencement of experiments. After a week for habituation, twenty-eight rats were randomly divided into four groups on average: the control (Ct), CUMS, FLU and ZZCD groups. The rest of rats were also evenly divided into four groups randomly: the control (Ct), CUMS, FLU and the butyrate (BA) groups for following validation experiment. All rats were individually housed except two Ct groups. All experimental procedures in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Military Medical University (Shanghai, China).
2.3. Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and treatment
The internationally recognized CUMS paradigm was used to establish a chronic depression model[33, 34]. The rats of Ct group acquired water and standard chow diet ad libitum and didn’t receive stress stimulations except behavioral tests, while rats of the rest three groups received stress stimulations lasting for 6 weeks. It was not allowed to use a same stressor for 2 consecutive days. The stressors included: wet bedding for 20 h; 45° cage tilting for 24 h; restraint for 2 h; swimming in 4℃ water for 5 min; cage shaking for 15 min; nip tail for 1 min; food or water deprivation for 24 h. Fluoxetine (2.1 mg/kg, Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) and ZZCD extract (10 g/kg, equivalent to the weight of raw medicinal materials) were gavaged to the rats of FLU and ZZCD groups from the third week to the end of experiment, respectively. Meanwhile, the equal volume of 0.5% carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) aqueous solution was gavaged to the rats of Ct and CUMS groups.
2.4. Behavioral testing
2.4.1. Sucrose preference test (SPT)
The SPT, used to assess anhedonia, was performed at 42th day as described in previous studies with slight modification. All rats were deprived of water and food before SPT. Whereafter, the SPT was conducted for 1 h (19:00-20:00). Each rat had free access to a bottle of tap water and a bottle of 1% sucrose solution to measure the consumed volumes in these two bottles, respectively. The proportion of sucrose preference was calculated as the percentage of the consumed sucrose solution against total amount of liquid intake.
2.4.2. Tail suspension test (TST)
The test rats were individually suspended by the tail (2 cm from tail tip) on a horizontal bar with sticky tape and the whole test lasted 6 min. The cumulative durations of immobility of rats within the last 4 min was recorded in seconds. Rats were considered to be immobile when they gave up struggle to keep completely motionless.
2.4.3. Forced swim test (FST)
Rats were individually placed in a cylinder (60 cm × 40 cm diameter) containing 35 cm-depth water at 25℃ and forced to swim for 6 min. The accumulated time of immobility was monitored within the last 4 min. Rats were recognized as immobility when they moved slightly to maintain floating or were stationary in the water without struggling. Water was changed between each rat to remove odors, and the test rats had been wiped dry after the procedure of FST.
2.5. Sample harvesting
After behavioral tests, one rat from each group was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with 20% urethane (0.4 mL/100 g). Cardiac perfusion was carried out with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). When lungs, eyeballs and paws displayed white color, 4% paraformaldehyde was perfused to rats until muscles of their upper limbs were stiff. Coronal sections of brain were prepared and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h as soon as possible.
Likewise, the rest rats in each group were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with 20% urethane (0.4 mL/100 g) after behavioral tests. The blood was obtained via abdominal aorta and serum was separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 20 min 4℃ after standing for 2 hours at room temperature. Plasma collected by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 20 min 4℃ immediately. The rats were sacrificed by cervical decapitation, and hippocampus and hypothalamus were carefully stripped from whole brain. The hippocampus, hypothalamus, cecal content and ileum were collected and weighed immediately. All samples were stored at -80℃ for further analysis.
2.6. Nissl staining
Coronal sections of brain, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, were embedded in paraffin and sliced into 5-μm-thick sections with a vibratome (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Sections were stained in 1% toluidine blue solution for 20 min at 56℃. The morphology of Nissl bodies was observed by microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and scanned with the NanoZoomer digital scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan).
2.7. DNA Extraction from Cecal Content and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Total bacterial DNA was extracted from cecal content of all samples using E.Z.N.A® Mag-Bind® Soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, United States) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA integrity and concentration were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The V3-V4 hypervariable region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the primers 341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 805R (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) containing specific barcode to tag each PCR product. The procedure of amplification and products’ purification had been described previously. Miseq platform (Illumina, San Diego, United States) was used for sequencing by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) to generate pair-end reads.
2.8. Bioinformatics Analysis
Usearch (version 10.0.240) was applied to obtain high-quality reads for subsequent bioinformatics analysis through merging pair-end reads, cutting primers, filtering reads and removing redundant. The acquired high-quality reads were used to generate operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using Unoise3. Whereafter, the taxonomy assignment was performed based on Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier with a confidence threshold of 80%. OTU abundance information was normalized to the number of sequences in the sample with the least sequences and then the normalized data was used for subsequent analyses of alpha and beta diversity. The index of Shannon e and Simpson was evaluated the species diversity, while the index of Chao1 and Richness was assessed to species richness in alpha diversity. Moreover, Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA), based on weighted UniFrac distances, exhibited the differences of samples.
2.9. Analysis for SCFAs in cecal content
The cecal contents were homogenized with methanol and then scrolled 30 min. Thereafter, mixtures were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant samples were standed for 2 h and then take 800 μL for freeze-drying. The residues were redissolved with 35 μL acetonitrile and vortex 3 min. Mixtures were added 5 μL 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBT), 5 μL 5-(Diisopropylamino)amylamine (DIAAA) and 5 μL O-(7-azabenzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU) for vortexing 3 min. After 14000 rpm centrifugation for 5 min, the supernatant samples were taken to analyze.
After centrifugation, a Shimadzu LC-40D XS system coupled with a Shimadzu 8045 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer was used to analyze the supernatants. The chromatographic separation was achieved at 35℃ using a Waters XSelect HSS T3 column (2.1×100 mm, 2.5 µm). The mobile phase, consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B), was used with a gradient elution: 0-8 min, 5-95% B; 8-10.9 min, 95% B; 10.9-11 min, 95-5% B, 11-14 min, 5% B. The flow rate was maintained at 0.3 mL/min. The injection volume was 3 μL.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed by electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive modes. Desolvation line (DL) temperature and heat block temperature were maintained at 250℃ and 400℃, respectively; nebulizer gas, 3 L/min; drying gas, 10 L/min; heating gas, 10 L/min; interface temperature, 300℃; interface voltage, 0 kV. Desolvation temperature was 526℃. Acetic acid: m/z 229.23→86.00, collision voltage, 32 kV; propionic acid: m/z 243.25→201.00, collision voltage, 8 kV; butyrate: m/z 257.26→86.00, collision voltage, 28 kV; valeric acid: m/z 271.30→85.90, collision voltage, 25 kV. The dwell time was 100 msec.
2.10. Biochemical analysis
The concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the serum, ileum and hypothalamus were evaluated using rat IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and BDNF ELISA kits (Mlbio, Shanghai, China) according to their instructions, respectively.
2.11. Analysis for neurotransmitters and amino acids levels
The levels of neurotransmitters and amino acids were examined using 2,6-Dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHBA) as an internal standard. Briefly, the plasma was thawed at room temperature and then was mixed with ice-cold 80% methanol containing 0.1% formic acid and internal standard solution. Meanwhile, the ileum and hippocampus were homogenized with the same solution. Thereafter, mixtures were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 15 min (4℃). The supernatant samples were centrifuged again for 10 min at the same condition. The collected supernatants were evaporated and the residues were redissolved with 50% methanol. After centrifugation, an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system coupled with an Agilent 6538 Accurate Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer (UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS) was used to analyze the supernatants.
The chromatographic separation was achieved at 25℃ using a Waters XSelect HSS T3 column (2.1×100 mm, 2.5 µm). The mobile phase, consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B), was used with a gradient elution: 0-2 min, 5% B; 2-13 min, 5-95% B; 13-19 min, 95% B. The flow rate was maintained at 0.4 mL/min. The injection volume was 3 μL.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed by electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative modes. The parameters were as follows: a capillary voltage of 4.0 kV for positive mode and that of 3.5 kV for negative mode; gas temperature of 350℃; dry gas flow of 11 L/min; nebulizer pressure of 45 psi and fragmentary voltage of 120 V.
After centrifugation, a Shimadzu LC-30AD system coupled with a Shimadzu 9030 Accurate Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer was used to analyze the supernatants. The chromatographic separation was achieved at 40℃ using a Waters XSelect HSS T3 column (2.1×100 mm, 2.5 µm). The mobile phase, consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (B), was used with a gradient elution: 0-2 min, 3% B; 2-10 min, 5-95% B; 10-11 min, 95% B, 11-15 min, 3% B. The flow rate was maintained at 0.4 mL/min. The injection volume was 3 μL.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed by electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative modes. The interface voltage was 4.5 kV for positive mode and −3.5 kV for negative mode; nebulizer gas, 3 L/min; heating gas, 10 L/min; interface temperature, 300℃; drying gas, 10 L/min; desolvation line (DL) temperature and heat block temperature were maintained at 250℃ and 400℃, respectively.
2.12 Animal experiment design of the validation study
After adaption for a week, twenty-eight rats for validation were evenly divided into four randomly: the control (Ct), CUMS, FLU and BA groups. The chronic depression model was established according to the procedure described above. Fluoxetine (2.1 mg/kg) and butyrate (30 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich) were gavaged to the rats of FLU and BA groups from the fourth week to the end of experiment, respectively. Meanwhile, the equal volume of 0.5% CMC-Na aqueous solution was gavaged to the rats of Ct and CUMS groups. After behavioral testing, samples were collected for further study. Nissl staining, biochemical analysis and detection of neurotransmitters and amino acids were conducted according to the procedure described above.
2.13. Statistical Analysis
With regard to data obtained from the experiments of behavioral testing, biochemical analysis, analysis for neurotransmitters levels and alpha diversity, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc was used to assess these data using GraphPad Prism software (version 5.02). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. As for the gut microbiota data, Welch’s t-test was used to identify taxonomic changes with significant difference between two different groups in STAMP software. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.