Human plasma and serum of PCOS patients
Fifteen PCOS patients were evaluated in this study. A control group of five healthy patients was used for comparison. The healthy patients were probands with no evident clinical acute disease or known pathological anamnesis in the medical history. The BMI of both groups was similar.
All patients were recruited at the Lubos Klinik in Munich, Germany.
Samples were obtained at 8 am under fasting conditions.
Table 1 shows the demographic data of the patients.
The whole study was performed following a protocol designed and conducted following the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with GCP and existing regulatory requirements. Institutional review board approval was obtained from the study site.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained for the investigational centre. The overall approval for the study was given on Jul 17, 2020, by the Ethical Committee of the Bayerischen Landesärztekammer; Nr. 20056.
Clinical trial registration: DRKS-ID: DRKS00022337. Date of registration: Jun 29, 2020.
Blood sample analyses.
Blood samples of plasma and serum were obtained for each patient. Each of these samples was considered a mono-replicate.
After standard preliminary treatment, samples were stored at -80 degrees Celsius until they were processed in the laboratory. They were all analysed separately.
Lipid mediator extraction and profiling (LC-MS/MS)
Lipid mediators were extracted from human plasma and serum samples following the SPE (Solid Phase Extraction) method described below. Internal labelled standards d8-5-HETE, d5-RvD2, d5-LXA4, d4-LTB4, d4-PGE2 (500 pg each, Cayman Chemical Company) in 4 mL of methanol (Methanol Optima LC/MS Grade, Fisher Chemical) were added to each sample (plasma or serum, 1 mL) previously thawed on ice. These labelled standards were used for the amount determined and the calculations of the recovery of the lipid mediators. Next, the samples were placed at -80ºC for 30 minutes to allow the precipitation of proteins. The probes were centrifugated in the following working step (2000 g, 10 min, 4ºC). The supernatants were obtained from each sample, and SPE was carried out according to optimized and reported methods [28, 29]. Samples were rapidly acidified to pH=3.5 with 9 mL of acidic water (HCl) before loading onto SPE columns (100mg, 10 mL, Biotage) and pH neutralized with 4 mL of MiliQ water, followed by 4 mL of n-hexane wash step. After, compounds were eluted with 9 mL of methyl format. Extracts from the SPE were brought to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen and immediately resuspended in methanol/water (50:50 vol/vol) (MeOH/Water Optima LC/MS Grade, Fisher Chemical, both) before injection into an LC-MS/MS system.
Targeted LC-MS/MS Acquisition Parameters
LC-MS/MS system consisting of a Qtrap 5500 (Sciex) equipped with a Shimadzu LC-20AD HPLC pump. A Kinetex Core-Shell LC-18 column (100 mm × 4.6 mm × 2.6 μm, Phenomenex) was kept in a column oven maintained at 50 °C. A binary eluent system of LC-MS/MS grade water (A) (Fisher Chemical) and LC-MS/MS grade methanol (Fisher Chemical) (B), both with 0.01 % (v/v) of acetic acid, was used as mobile phase. LMs were eluted in a gradient program respect to the composition of B is as follows: 0-2 min, 50 %; 2-14.5 min, 80 %; 14.6-25 min; 98 %. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min.
The QTRAP 5500 was operated in negative ionization mode, using scheduled Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) coupled with the information-dependent acquisition (IDA) and an Enhanced Product Ion scan (EPI). Each LM parameter (CE, target retention time (RT), and specific Q1 and Q3 mass) was optimized according to reported methods [29, 30]. To monitor and quantify LMs of interest, quantities were taken as areas under the peak. We used MRM with MS/MS matching signature ion fragments for each molecule (at least six diagnostic ions; <0.1 picograms was considered below the limit of detection) using published criteria [30]. Examples of representative MRM spectra are presented in figure 5. The laboratory analyses were performed at Solutex GC SL.
Statistical analyses
Quantitative measurements were presented as mean, standard error, minimum and maximum. When indicated, Outlier exclusion was calculated using default parameters ROUT (Q=1%) from GraphPad Prism version 9.0.2, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA. Comparisons were consequently made using an unpaired one-tailed t-test.
All tests were done with a one-tailed t-test, and statistical significance was considered at P<0.05. We did not make any adjustments for multiple testing; thus, the results are explorative and descriptive.
A ratio between pro-inflammatory and pro resolutive parameters was established to describe the physiology of both investigated axes (pro-inflammatory and pro resolutive).
The proposed ratios have the purpose of seeking the overall balance/unbalance of interconnected metabolic routes and the overall status of the resolution of the immune response.
Evaluated parameters
Fatty acids (EPA, DHA, ARA, DPA); SPM monohydroxylated-containing precursors (17-HDHA, 18-HEPE, 14-HDHA); SPM´s (Resolvins: RvE1, RvD1, RvD2, RvD3, RvD4, RvD5; Maresins: MaR1, MaR2; Protectins: PD1, PDX; Lipoxins: LXA4, LXB4). Eicosanoids: Prostaglandins (PGE2, PGD2, PGF2α.) Thromboxanes (TxB2) Leukotrienes (LTB4)