3.1 Temperature trends.
The results of the global analysis of temperature in California (Table 1) show that positive trend exist in the whole State. The highest value is found in November (+0.04 ºC year1) and it is statistically significant, the same arises with July, August, summer and autumn where the trend reaches +0.03 ºC per year. It is noteworthy that January has shown the same trend (+1.6 ºC) over the period studied such as November but is not statistically significant. This results show similarities with other researchers conducted in the State. They have shown that regionally positive temperature trends exist in California but for the northeast region that was proved to be negative 12,28.
Table 1
Mean temperature trends (ºC/year) in the State of California. *Statistical significance (pvalue) at α = 0.05.
|
January
|
February
|
March
|
April
|
May
|
June
|
July
|
August
|
September
|
Slope
|
0.04
|
0
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.01
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
pvalue
|
0.06
|
0.87
|
0.37
|
0.53
|
0.44
|
0.07
|
0.03*
|
0.01*
|
0.23
|
|
October
|
November
|
December
|
Winter
|
Spring
|
Summer
|
Autumn
|
Annual
|
|
Slope
|
0.01
|
0.04
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.01
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
|
pvalue
|
0.58
|
0.02*
|
0.25
|
0.25
|
0.38
|
0.02*
|
0.02*
|
0.13
|
|
The results of analysing temperature trends (positive and negative) at monthly, seasonal and annual average temperature from 1980 to 2019 in the State of California as well as its statistical significance at a confidence level of 95% are shown in figure 2.
Positive trends were found each month in more than 60% of the stations. The exception to this is February where 57% of the stations show negative trends. No statistical significance was found for negative trends (Fig. 2). Figure 2 revealed that January, June, July, August and November are the months that have shown the highest values of positive statistical significance. Although several stations have shown no statistical significance, it is notable that when it is positive, there are significant trends in nearly half of the stations studied (40%).
According to the monthly results in January the spatial distribution of positive trends was found all over the State, close to 80% of the stations as can be seen in figure 2. This is especially high (+2.25 ºC increase over the period studied) in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley (30% of the stations are statistically significant).
Autumn is the season that shows the highest percentage of weather stations with positive average temperature trends (90%) and there are 35% of weather stations with statistically significant positive trends in contrast to the lowest percentage that is shown in spring (72%) and only 4% show statistical significance. November shows the highest percentage of stations with positive trends (96%), as well as the highest value (38%) of statistically significant stations.
This result agrees with other research 67 that said that a significant rise in annual mean temperatures in this area is up to +0.07 ºC per decade1. This rapid warming valley seems to be caused by the development of irrigated agriculture 68 in contrast to the slight increase they had found in Sierra Nevada. Irrigated agriculture increases the minimum temperature (Tmin) values in these areas, and seems not to have an effect on maximum temperatures (Tmax), which explains the increase in mean temperatures. These findings in Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley have been proved in this research to be similar in June, August, November and December up to an increase of +0.05 ºC year1. The San Joaquin and Sacramento rivers originate in the Sierra Nevada and the mountainous regions in the north run through this region. The confluence of the rivers occurs in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Most of the water from these rivers comes from snowmelt, and the increase in temperature trends in the winter season (DJF) would mean acceleration in the snow melting season. This results agree with other research conducted in other mountain systems 69. In those three months, over the period studied, high positive trends (+0.8-1.2 ºC) have been found all over California, nearly 90% of the stations. That rapid melt can cause difficulties in the maintenance of fresh water in agriculture and for human consumption as suggested by some researchers 5,70−72. The Central Valley can be more vulnerable to warming-driven drought if reductions in water supply cause reductions in irrigation 73. The prediction map for February revealed a lack of clear trends due to the fact that there is no distinct direction in positive or negative temperature trends. These findings support the results shown on the NOAA website (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/us-trends/), that said, strong trends are not shown, this is because the period studied is defined by warm Februarys in the 90’s and cold ones in 00’s in California State.
We can see great similarities in both March and April temperature trends. During these months, the Northeast of California tends to show slightly negative temperature trends in 30% of the stations (-0.4 ºC from 1980 to 2019), while in South Sierra Nevada, the Mojave Desert, Los Angeles, Imperial Valley, San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountain, the average temperature had gone up +1.6 ºC during the period studied. The results in May for California are different from the rest of the year, because in the southern coastal region and in San Francisco Bay a negative trend appears (-0.01 ºC year−1), and this could be related to the penetration of coastal marine fog 74 because on the coast of California, coastal marine fog varies seasonally. 75. That is important due to the moisture content of air near the surface making this a regional phenomenon with strong local patterns 76. This cooling effect that we have mentioned before has been explained by previous investigation 74, but in this research it seems to have a lesser effect, instead of being negative, trends are close to zero, similar to what has been mentioned in other research 77.
During June, July and August, the temperature has risen all over the State (+0.065 ºC year1), being more statistically significant in July and August (30% of the stations analysed). Map prediction confirmed that these months show a high statistical significance in the North of the State, Mt. Shasta, part of the Cascade Ranges and Lake Tahoe, and a huge area of Death Valley and the Mojave Desert. These results are related to those which confirm increases in trends of heat waves in south California 78, becoming more and more frequent in urban environments than in more rural surroundings, the result being a higher risk of heat-related births 79 and deaths as well as an increase in wildfires. September has great similarities to those months but with less statistical significance.
Nevertheless, in October there is a negative trend (-0.01 ºC year1) without statistical significance in the north with more coastal areas, covering Eureka city up to Shelter Cove. This result is in line with other research 12. In the case of November, the western coastal zone is cloudy and mild, northern areas are rather cooler than the southern, reaching an average temperature of 17 ºC in some years. The results for this month show both positive trends (+0.05 ºC year1) and statistical significance in Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley, Sierra Nevada, Los Angeles, San Francisco Bay, Yosemite and Southern Lake Tahoe, as was pointed out by Cordero et al. (2011). They reported that from 1970-2006 the largest warming in Tmax (from +0.06 ºC decade1 to +0.26 ºC decade1) occurred in these locations. Last but not least, December shows a positive temperature trend in most of California with the exception of the northwest, where it has been noted that there has been a negative trend with a decrease of 0.62 ºC during the period studied, although it is not statistically significant. In addition, the territories of Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley show the highest value of positive trends (+0.032 ºC year1) and it is statistically significant. As we have previously pointed out, this is a rising concern, due to the fact that snowmelt increases in mountain areas probably causing shortage in water supply in the months to come.
If we focus on seasonal trends, it is possible to observe a different seasonal pattern between results. It is especially striking that both summer (+0.03 ºC year1) and autumn (+0.02 ºC year1) have shown statistically significant positive trends. The area with statistical significance spread over the Mojave Desert and Death Valley, supports the idea mentioned before that the south of California is warming more than the north of the State. In summer it has been observed that the values of the trend increase towards the interior of the State as we move away from the coast, this is in places where the values in the trend are very low and do not present statistical significance. These results agree with those presented by previous investigations that claim there is a cooling trend over coastal Californian regions in summer. This drop in average temperatures is due to a wide range of factors such as, irrigation, coastal upwelling or cloud cover. The increase in temperatures over inland areas increases sea-breeze flow activity 28,74 lowering the temperatures in coastal zones of the State. The spatial distribution of winter trends permits us to discriminate between two distinct areas: one formed by the territories of the Klamath Mountains and the other by the north of the Cascade Range, where we find a negative trend in temperatures that are not statistically significant during the period studied. The rest of the territory in this season presents a positive temperature trend of +0.02 ºC year1, it is noteworthy that this value is statistically significant in Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin Valley and in the south of Sierra Nevada. It was observed that in spring the value of the trend shows clear warming throughout the territory but with slight statistical significance.
Finally, the spatial distribution of annual trends represented in figure 3 reflects clear warming in the territory, +0.6 ºC from 1980 to 2019, except for the northern area, in the Klamath Mountains where there is no clear trend in the average temperature, which has been indicated previously by He and Gautam (2016). It can also be observed that this positive trend in the territory is especially important in the south of the State, there is statistical significance in the southeast of Sierra Nevada, coinciding with the Valley of Death and much of the Mojave Desert. These results coincide with those proposed by Cordero et al. (2011) during 1918-2006 for the maximum and minimum temperature trends since both parameters show a significant rising in the southern part of the State. The whole State getting warmer has concerning implications, such as the snow on the mountainous systems of California melting earlier in winter-spring, which is likely to decrease the water supply even further next season 71,80. In addition, more heat produces more evaporation and so irrigation farmland would need more water, increasing the lack of fresh water even more. All in all, over the period of study as can be seen in figure 2, no negative statistical significance was found in California. According to some studies, the increase in temperature is greater in areas of higher agricultural activity, such as the east of the Rocky Mountains, due to the fact that it helps to increase the surface heat capacity and therefore the temperature 81. Several investigations suggest that these differences in the increase in temperature are affected by several factors; some of them are anthropic activity, land uses and the emission of greenhouse gases 10,82. Greenhouse gases appear to be related to the increase in average temperatures and the impact derived from this increase 71. Research on the possible causes of the increase in temperature in the State of California, shows that the existing changes in atmospheric teleconnection patterns have significantly altered the extreme temperature events that take place in said region 29. There is a concrete example in the North Pacific Ocean where surface temperatures correlate highly with Californian temperatures 83. Finally, a great deal of climatological research suggests that temperature variability can be related to variability within the atmospheric flow 31.
3.2 Teleconnection patterns.
This section shows the results of the spatial and statistical analysis between temperatures and up to nine teleconnection patterns. Table 2 shows the percentage of the stations with positive, negative or no statistical correlation (pvalue< 0.05) between the teleconnection patterns and the mean temperature in California. The results of the correlations of atmospheric teleconnection patterns and temperatures are presented in the same way as previous investigations have done with another pattern or variable 13,14,51,84,85.
Table 2
Percentages of weather stations with statistically significant positive (+) or negative (-) correlations, between teleconnection patterns and average temperatures (α = 0.05).
|
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
PDO
|
+
|
9.3
|
52.2
|
72.1
|
8.1
|
19.2
|
30.2
|
15.2
|
9.3
|
33.1
|
37.2
|
18.6
|
27.3
|
-
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.6
|
PNA
|
+
|
20.3
|
82.0
|
7.0
|
|
|
1.2
|
4.7
|
1.2
|
|
37.2
|
18.0
|
15.1
|
-
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
29.1
|
|
27.3
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
WPO
|
+
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
-
|
42.4
|
90.7
|
95.9
|
92.4
|
35.5
|
8.1
|
5.8
|
4.1
|
8.1
|
|
14.5
|
55.2
|
EPO
|
+
|
52.3
|
7.6
|
2.9
|
77.3
|
12.2
|
0.6
|
1.2
|
|
1.7
|
30.2
|
57.0
|
No data
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
No data
|
NAO
|
+
|
2.3
|
11.0
|
40.7
|
88.4
|
56.4
|
8.7
|
48.3
|
8.7
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
1.2
|
ENSO
|
+
|
1.2
|
14.0
|
15.1
|
1.2
|
2.9
|
0
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
4.7
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
4.7
|
AO
|
+
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
26.7
|
41.3
|
20.9
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
6.4
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
1.7
|
63.4
|
AAO
|
+
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
0
|
9.9
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
1.7
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
RMM1
|
+
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
2.3
|
|
4.7
|
0.6
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
9.3
|
0.6
|
1.2
|
0.6
|
1.2
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
RMM2
|
+
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
-
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
Temperatures in February, March, April and May are those that correlate most with the majority of the teleconnection patterns studied in the State of California.
Firstly, PDO in figure 4 shows that this pattern has a constant positive correlation throughout the year. This pattern, as this figure reveals, might have more influence on the average temperature on California's coastal areas such as San Francisco, Monterey Bay, Los Angeles and San Diego. We can observe in the maps that the stations with the strongest correlation are found along the coast as previous studies have brought to the fore 12,28. The results of this are remarkable, particularly in May when 19.2% of stations were statistically significant, then June (30%), September (33%) and October (38%). In March, when this teleconnection pattern had the highest percentage (72%) of statistically significant stations, there was no difference between coastal and interior locations in the State. What it is remarkable about PDO is that the majority of the stations have shown significant positive correlation as can be seen in Table 2. This allows us to say that PDO is probably related to increases in average temperatures all over California in the period studied.
According to our results of the PNA pattern in figure 5, appears to be a strong correlation between average temperatures in February. In this month 82% of the stations all over California show the highest statistically significant correlation. During the months of June and October this pattern has some influence throughout the territory studied (30-36% of meteorological stations).
In contrast, WPO has the highest percentage of the stations with statistically significant negative correlation with average temperatures. From December to April, negative correlation is observed in the area studied. These values are especially high throughout the territory, influencing 95.9% of the meteorological stations studied during the month of March and 42.4% during January. Although in this pattern, as we have previously commented, a spatial area of influence is not observed. We have to take into account that WPO is a temporary pattern and this could explain why it mainly affects the temperatures of winter 38 and spring months in the State of California (Fig. 6, Table 2).
In addition, PDO and PNA are the two teleconnection patterns that present a high percentage of significant positive correlation while WPO has the highest negative correlation. These results bear striking similarities with previous investigations undertaken in California in other years 28,31,86.
If we consider the results regarding the EPO teleconnection pattern (Fig. 7), we can state that it is the one that shows a significant positive correlation in November (57.0%) along with PNA and PDO, however, the latter to a lesser extent. In December, the EPO pattern had no data because there were no values available for the period studied on the data sheet of the Climate Prediction Centre (CPC, NOAA). Searching for alternative values for this pattern in December was not considered in order not to mix diverse information sources. This pattern shows especially high values of positive correlation in April, where 77.9% of the temperature in the stations studied seem to be affected by EPO.
Moving on to NAO correlation results (Fig. 8), there are, in both March (40.7%) and April (88.4%), average temperatures that have significant positive correlations to this teleconnection pattern. In addition, the result for May is remarkable as this pattern affects the average temperature in up to 56.4% of the California stations studied. This is supported by another recent investigation where a substantial link between NAO and surface air temperatures over California during the March–June period was found 87. Lastly, we can point out that NAO might have an effect on temperatures for five months, from March to July, throughout California. On the contrary, low significant correlation has been found for ENSO 3.4, and when there is some correlation (February and March), it is linked to the coastal stations (Fig. 9). These results were expected due to the fact that other research highlights the slight correlation with temperature 12,88.
Contrary to what previous researchers have mentioned, AO (Fig. A1) shows a positive correlation and it is statistically significant in the months of March (18.6%), May (26.7%), June (41.3%), July (20.9%), and December (63.4%) (Table 2). It is important to note that AAO is the pattern that seems to affect average temperatures the least in California (Fig. A2).
The Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) is both a global-scale complex teleconnection pattern of the tropical atmosphere and the dominant mode of interseasonal tropical variability 89. One commonly used index for defining MJO is the real-time multivariate index RMM. The two principal components RMM1, RMM2 have been shown to be useful indices of the MJO and related variability 90. Firstly, MJO is a two-dimensional phase space defined by RMM1 and RMM2. The union of these two gives as a result 8 equatorial phases of this teleconnection pattern. In the light of the results of the correlation of these indexes with average temperature in California, January and November are the months that show the highest positive correlation. To be more precisely, RMM1 (Fig. 10) seems to haven´t got any relation with temperatures over the period studied in California. In contrast, RMM2 (Fig. 11) shows highest value of correlation in November 41.3% and January 19.8% of the meteorological stations. One of the reasons of this results that are consistent with other research, could be that RMM1 describes the situation when a MJO produces an enhanced convection at the Maritime Continent while RMM2 has enhanced convection over the Pacific Ocean 90,91 closer to California State. In addition it is remarkable that the correlated stations with temperatures, in June, are located mainly both in coastal areas of San Francisco, Santa Barbara and Los Angeles and mountainous areas of Auburn, Oroville and Susanville. Dasgupta et al. (2020) found that the occurrences of MJO activity at RMM phase locations 4, 5 and 6 during boreal winter are related to the PDO index, particularly in the negative phases. The phases 6-7 of MJO are related to the convective anomaly in western Pacific that affects the weather in the United States, where warm anomalies were found particularly in mid latitude temperature and probably related to PNA 89.