Crapemyrtle Bark Scale (Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae; CMBS) is an invasive pest species that primarily infest crapemyrtles (Lagerstroemia spp.) in the United States. Recent reports have revealed the dire threat of CMBS to attack not only crapemrytles but also the U.S. native species with expanded host plants such as American beautyberry (Callicarpa spp.) and Hypericum kalmianum L. (St. Johnswort). A better understanding of plant-insect interaction will provide better and environmental-friendly pest management strategies. In this study, we constructed the first comprehensive life table for CMBS to characterize its biological parameters, including developmental stages, reproductive behavior, and fecundity. The indirect effect of three plant nutrient conditions (water, 0.01MS, and 0.1MS) on CMBS populations was examined using the age-stage, two-sex life table. The demographic analyses revealed that the plant nutrient conditions had significantly altered CMBS development in terms of the intrinsic rate of increase (r), the finite rate of increase (λ), the net reproductive rate (R0), and mean generation time (T). Higher r, λ, and R0 were recorded under nutrient-deficient conditions (water), while CMBS reared on plants with healthier growing conditions (0.1MS) had the most prolonged T. Overall, CMBS shows better insect performance when reared on plants under nutrient-deficient conditions.
Research Article
Life Table Construction for Crapemyrtle Bark Scale (Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae): The Effect of Different Plant Nutrient Conditions on Insect Performance
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1230882/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
You are reading this latest preprint version
Crapemyrtle (Lagerstroemia spp.), which generates an increasing market value of up to $70 million per year 1,2 , is a versatile ornamental plant widely used in landscape applications. Crapemytle is relatively easy to maintain in the landscape without severe disease and insect complications 3 . However, the infestation of crapemyrtle bark scale (CMBS; Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae) is spreading among southeastern United States 4 , which dramatically affects the aesthetic and economic value of crapemyrtle 5 .
Crapemyrtle bark scale is a hemipterous insect under the superfamily of Coccoidea (scale insects), which is closely related to other piercing-sucking insects such as mealybugs (Pseudococcidae), aphids (Aphididae), whiteflies (Aleyrodidae), and psyllids (Psyllidae) 6. According to previous studies and observations, the number of CMBS generations within one-year ranges from two to four depending on the climate zones 5,7,8. In the Southeastern United States, CMBS-infested plants can be found in the field year-round, with up to four generations of CMBS being observed in Dallas, TX in one year 5. However, lack of in-depth characterization of CMBS biological parameters, such as developmental stages, reproductive behavior, and fecundity, might limit the research capacity to investigate controlling strategies based on insect biology and physiology. The construction of life tables could be contributing fundamental knowledge as well as providing insight into the population dynamics of a specific arthropod of interest. Hence, life table study and analysis would be essential tools to generate a holistic view of the basic biological properties in a CMBS population.
Initially used for human demographic studies, the life table has been adapted as a record-keeping system and mathematical approach to collect and interpret insect population dynamics 9. Traditionally, methods proposed by Leslie 10 or Birch 11 have been widely used to construct age-specific life tables that focus on female individuals in a population 12–14. For example, female age- or stage-specific life tables were constructed for phloem-feeding insects such as aphids 15–17, armor scale insects 18–20, soft scale 21,22, mealybug 23, and psyllid 24. However, the life table construction solely based on females may lead to errors in calculating the population parameters, especially when bisexual arthropods are involved 14. The traditional female life table also fails to distinguish developmental stages and accurately present the stage overlapping 12,25. To address these issues, Chi and Liu 13 developed the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis, which accounts for both sexes and developmental stages to achieve a comprehensive understanding of insect biology and ecology. In recent years, age-stage, two-sex life tables have been increasingly used for evaluating the performance of phloem-feeding insects such as aphids 26–29 and armor scale insects 30. However, a comprehensive life table study for CMBS has not been reported yet. Previous studies on CMBS tend to ignore the developmental stages due to the small size of the nymphs (0.3 mm to 3 mm depending on the age and sex) 31. The technical difficulties in distinguishing immature nymphal stages remains challenging for constructing comprehensive life tables for CMBS.
A comprehensive life study promotes a better understanding of the plant-insect interactions under various conditions. Insects are ectothermic organisms, therefore, environmental factors such as temperature and humidity greatly affect insect performance 32–34. On the other hand, these abiotic factors combining plant nutrient conditions could indirectly affect insect herbivores by changing the host plants’ metabolic state. The study of abiotic factors by tracking individual CMBS in the field has been proven difficult, partially due to the relatively small size and the lifestyle of CMBS (feeding at cracks and crevices of stem or trunk). Therefore, a controlled laboratory condition with the aid of a microscope is necessary to conduct a comprehensive life study and investigate plant-CMBS interactions by excluding certain environmental variables.
Abiotic factors such as climate, light, and edaphic affect plant growth by altering plant metabolism, indirectly affecting insect herbivores. Hence, abiotic factors’ direct or indirect effects on insects are often important subjects of insect ecology. For example, as a major source for providing plant nutrients, edaphic environments alter plant physiology in terms of phenology and chemical property in plant tissues, which further affect the plant-insect interactions 35,36. Plant malnutrition was known to disturb plant metabolism, which leads to nutrient-deficiency symptoms, including stunted growth, chlorosis, and necrosis of leaves 37. Moreover, host plants show varied susceptibility towards the same pest species grown under different edaphic conditions 38. Such plant-insect interactions associated with plant nutrition for CMBS are currently less understood. Therefore, we have investigated the CMBS life table by artificially altering the nutrients available to the host plants in this study.
Developing effective integrated pest management (IPM) programs is essential for predicting and preventing damages from CMBS in the United States. To reach this goal, we have conducted this study with two main objectives: (1) To construct the first comprehensive life table and gain a thorough understanding of CMBS biology in terms of its developmental stages, survival, and fecundity on Lagerstroemia; (2) To expand the current knowledge on the effects of plant nutrient conditions on the interaction between CMBS and its host plants, through the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis.
Crapemyrtle bark scale life history. The CMBS rearing experiments were conducted using small, rooted plants grown inside small petri dishes (feeding chambers). Daily monitoring was conducted under a dissecting microscope (see ‘Methods’ section for details). According to our observation, the life cycle of CMBS reared on the seedling (cuttings) of L. fauriei ‘Fantasy’ under laboratory conditions varied between 102 to 158 days. The egg incubation time for males and females was 10.84 ± 0.05 (mean ± SEM, n = 396) days under 25 oC. The life history, including all developmental stages and significant events in the life cycle of CMBS, has been summarized in Figure 1. Out of the three nutrient conditions evaluated, the ‘water’ or nutrient deficient treatment group show utmost insect performance. Hence, the life history of CMBS males and females under ‘water’ condition, has been characterized as below.
The life history of CMBS males started from egg, followed by 1st instar (17.9 days) and then 2nd instar (63.9 days). The development of the male pupa was characterized as a three-step process (P1, P2, and P3 stages). Firstly, a P1 stage (4.6 days) has been identified, as a 2nd instar forms the elongated ‘cocoon’ structure typically identified as a male sac in the field (Figure 1 and 2). Before P1, a 2nd instar nymph might retract and detach its stylets from the plant and become mobile. Within a short period (24h), the male 2nd instar might relocate and start excreting wax to form the white male sac. After P1, the 2nd instar would pupate and push out the exuviates through the rear opening of the male sac. The duration of P1 is around 4.6 days, followed by prepupa (P2) and then pupa (P3), which takes around 5.7 and 7.2 days, respectively. Hence, a total of three exuviates would be pushed out from the male sac before adult male emergence. After the molting of the pupa, the adult male usually stays in pupa sac for several days before emergence. Once exiting the pupa sac, the adult male immediately roams the surrounding environment, presumably searching for the adult female’s presence. The development of CMBS males is complete metamorphosis, as pupa and adult male stages can be identified (Figure 2).
Compared to males, the female scale development undergoes incomplete metamorphosis, in which four major stages (egg, 1st instar, 2nd instar, and adult female) without pupation were recorded (Figure 1 and 2). The duration for 1st and 2nd instar females is 18.2 days and 61.4 days, respectively. The adult (or the 3rd instar) female could be distinguished from the 2nd instar morphologically. The adult female gains size quickly and has a significant amount of wax secretion/development than the 2nd instar. The longest developmental stage for both males and females are the ‘2nd instar’ stage. The sex of CMBS could only be identified morphologically under live monitoring conditions after the 2nd instar due to the lack of significant difference among the 1st and 2nd instar regarding sex development.
Mating behavior. Mating behavior was observed between adult males and adult females, which is an essential process required for reproduction. No parthenogenesis was observed under the experimental conditions in this study. Newly emerged adult females typically remain mobile for a short period before settling down at a suitable location to feed on the plants. Thus, most adult females become sessile for the rest of the life cycle, while the alate adult male (once located the female) would be initiating the mating process by taping the dorsal side of the female. Upon stimulation, the female reacts by lifting and retracting the rear end of her abdomen to accept copulation. The male then proceeds to curve its abdomen down and direct its genitalia to contact the ventral side of the female abdomen, where sperm transfer could be occurring (Figure 2).
After the mating process is completed, a reproductive female can be confirmed as the female develops its typical white ovisac structure (Figure 2). As a newly emerged adult female gaining its size, it might be undergoing development for sexual maturity as various adult preproduction periods were recorded. Therefore, depending on the female ages, it would take from 2 to 11 days before the development of ovisac could be observed. Shortly after the ovisac is developed (2-3 days), a female would start laying eggs, and the reproduction period can last up to 10 days.
Developmental duration and longevity. Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt, as a well-balanced nutrient source, is widely used in plant propagation applications such as tissue culture. Hence, the different levels of MS supplementation in media have led to apparent differentiation of plant development in terms of physical characteristics and potentially plant metabolism. Plants grown in nutrient-deficient medium (the ‘water’ treatment) demonstrated the characteristics of plant malnutrition development, including stunted growth and yellowish leaves, compared to the plants under sufficient nutrient treatment (Figure S1), which indirectly affects the development of CMBS.
| Biological Parameters | Stage | Water | 0.01MS | 0.1MS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | ||||
| Developmental times (Days) | 1st instar | 18.31 ± 0.41a | 17.23 ± 0.56 a | 18.03 ± 0.48 a |
| 2nd instar + Pupa (Male) | 83.18 ± 6.59 a | 91.13 ± 6.34 a | 56.00 ± 0.00 b | |
| 2nd instar (Female) | 62.09 ± 4.37 a | 70.22 ± 6.50 a | 69.5 ± 4.00 a | |
| Preadult stage | 102.45 ± 4.56 a | 107.24 ± 5.16 a | 95.33 ± 3.59 a | |
| Adult longevity (Days) | Male | 3.18 ± 0.30 ab | 2.38 ± 0.32 b | 3.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Female | 33.64 ± 4.58 a | 21.67 ± 4.56 a | 22.00 ± 10.14 a | |
| Total longevity (Days) | 88.22 ± 5.23 a | 89.69 ± 5.90 a | 51.47 ± 3.77 b | |
Developmental duration, adult longevity, and total longevity of CMBS reared on Lagerstroemia host plants (with the same genetic background) under different nutrient conditions are listed in Table 1. The durations of immature nymphs (1st and 2nd instars) and the preadult duration were by large not affected by plant nutrient conditions, especially between ‘water’ and ‘0.01 MS’, where the comparison is more meaningful as the survival rate of individuals under ‘0.1 MS’ treatment was significantly low. Only one male and two females in the ‘0.1 MS’ group reached the respective adult stages. The adult longevity for all males was two to three days, while all adult females lived around one month, with no significant difference (P > 0.05) under three nutrient conditions (Table 1).
Despite the lack of difference in the developmental times and longevity of the individuals that completed all life stages, the total longevity of all individuals (including nymphs who died immaturely) was vastly different between deficient and sufficient nutrient conditions. The total longevity of CMBS under ‘water’ (88.22 ± 5.23 days) and ‘0.01MS’ (89.69 ± 5.90 days) was almost double of the ones under ‘0.1MS’ (51.47 ± 3.77 days) (Pwater&0.01MS = 0.85; Pwater&0.1MS < 0.001; P0.01MS&0.1MS < 0.001) (Table 1).
Fecundity and oviposition days. Crapemyrtle bark scale females had similar fecundity in terms of adult preoviposition period (APOP), total preoviposition period (TPOP) fecundity, and oviposition days in the ‘water’ and ‘0.01MS’ groups (P > 0.05; Table 2). Compared to ‘0.01MS’, female CMBS under ‘0.1MS’ had longer APOP and TPOP (P < 0.05). The highest fecundity observed was 102 eggs from one female in the ‘water’ group, while the lowest fecundity was 48 eggs from one female in the ‘0.1MS’ group.
| Water | 0.01MS | 0.1MS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | |||
| APOP (Days) | 30.14 ± 5.19 ab | 22.80 ± 2.31 b | 35 .00 ± 0.00 a |
| TPOP (Days) | 125.47 ± 7.15 b | 118.80 ± 7.73 b | 140.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Fecundity (eggs) | 49.18 ± 12.40 a | 34.22 ± 10.69 a | 24.00 ± 13.51 a |
| Oviposition days | 8.86 ± 0.41 a | 8.4 ± 0.25 a | 5.00 ± 0.00 b |
Life table analysis of CMBS. For life table/population parameters, no significant difference was detected between ‘water’ and ‘0.01MS’ (P > 0.05). However, CMBS population under both ‘water’ and ‘0.01MS’ had higher growth rate in terms of intrinsic rate of increase (r) (Pwater&0.01MS = 0.71; Pwater&0.1MS = 0.0014; P0.01MS&0.1MS = 0.0048) and finite rate of increase (λ) (Pwater&0.01MS = 0.72; Pwater&0.1MS = 0.0016; P0.01MS&0.1MS = 0.0073) compared to CMBS reared under ‘0.1MS’ (Table 3). The highest r and λ among three treatments were 0.018 ± 0.003 days −1 and 1.018 ± 0.023 days −1, respectively, on ‘water’. Meanwhile, r and λ were -0.0018 ± 0.002 days −1 and 0.998 ± 0.0482 days −1, respectively, from ‘0.1MS’ (Table 3). According to life table theory, a r value of less than 0 or λ less than 1 would lead to negative value in the doubling time, suggesting the decline of population size 39. The longest mean generation time (T) was 142.86 ± 1.92 days on plants under ‘0.1MS’ condition, compared to the shortest of 121.37 ± 7.53 days on ‘0.01MS’ (Table 3).
| Conditions | r (days−1) | λ | Ro | T (days) | GRR (offspring/individual) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | 0.018 ± 0.003 a | 1.018 ± 0.023 a | 9.84 ± 3.57 a | 127.35 ± 7.51 b | 95.51 ± 31.55 a |
| 0.01MS | 0.017 ± 0.004 a | 1.017 ± 0.075 a | 7.33 ± 3.10 a | 121.37 ± 7.53 b | 61.95 ± 27.35 a |
| 0.1MS | -0.0018 ± 0.002 b | 0.998 ± 0.482 b | 0.77 ± 0.77 b | 142.86 ± 1.92 a | 48.00 ± 0.00 a |
The age-stage specific survival rate (sxj) of CMBS reared under different host conditions provides various probabilities that a newborn within a particular cohort (treatment group) would survive to age x and stage j (Figure 3). The overlaps of survival curves resulted from the variable developmental rate of individuals at different life stages, which were observed under all three nutrient conditions. The development of CMBS under three nutrient conditions resemble each other at the beginning of the rearing experiment, as the survival curves of egg and 1st instar followed a similar pattern. The emergence of the 2nd instar started 20 days after the rearing experiment and reached peaks at around 30 to 40 days, where a significant difference in survivor rates was recorded. The survival rate of CMBS under ‘water’ and ‘0.1MS’ was almost double compared to that of the ‘0.1 MS’ group (Figure 3). This phenomenon resulted from the higher mortality of 1st and 2nd instar under ‘0.1 MS’ in the first 60 days, leading to fewer individuals reaching adult stages.
The age-stage specific fecundity (fx,4), representing the mean number of eggs produced by females at age x, were reported in Figure 4. The maximum daily fecundity was 16, 15, and 20 eggs for ‘water’, ‘0.01MS’, and ‘0.1MS’, respectively. Interestingly, when maximum daily fecundity was achieved, the female age varied significantly. It was between 60 to 80 days for ‘water’ while it took over 100 days for individuals under ‘0.1MS’ to reach maximum fx. The curves for the age-stage survival rate (lx) and age-specific maternity (lxmx) were also provided in Figure 4. The lxmx under ‘0.1MS’ is lower compared to ‘water’ and ‘0.01MS’. This is due to the lx, which gives the probability that an egg will survive to age x, which was very low for individuals under ‘0.1MS’ (Figure 4).
The age-stage specific life expectancy (exj) reports the duration that an individual of age x and stage j would be expected to live 40. The maximum life expectancy was observed under ‘water’ while the lowest was recorded for individuals living under ‘0.1MS’ (Figure 5).
As a newly emerged non-native pest species, many aspects of CMBS biology and its potential adaptive development in the United States remained unknown. This study characterized the CMBS developmental stages and life cycle in great detail through a comprehensive life table study since no such report was available, especially under controlled laboratory conditions. Most previous research on CMBS relied on observation or experiments in the field, such as monitoring programs of crawler activity 41, and tests on chemical efficacy 42.
Field study provides valuable experience in controlling the CMBS infestation. Several chemical trials have been conducted in recent years to test the efficacy of different chemical treatments to control CMBS. Bifenthrin, buprofezin, flupyradifurone, and pyriproxyfen were able to reduce CMBS infestation when applied on bark surface, and drench of systemic insecticide such as cyantraniliprole, chlorantraniliprole, imidacloprid and dinotefuran has been proven effective in providing long-term suppression 42–44. However, the application of pesticides exposes humans and beneficial insects to potential hazards which may lead to unbalanced biodiversity 45. Furthermore, the development of insecticide-resistant scale populations has been reported as the direct consequence of long-term overuse of insecticide 46.
To avoid or reduce the use of pesticides, environmental-friendly pest management programs with ecological-oriented strategies should be developed and utilized to control non-native scale insects. For example, highly specific natural enemy such as parasitoid can be introduced to control invasive scale insects. The introduction of the parasitoid, Comperiella calauanica, in regions of the Philippines since 2014 has brought down or eliminated the devastating infestation of Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne to Coconut tree plantations by 2020 47. Alternatively, the development and utilization of pheromone traps are among the common approaches to control or monitor the infestation of red scale, Aonidiella aurantia (Maskell) 48, yellow scale, Aonidiella citrina (Coquillett) 49, Matsucoccus feytaudi 50, M. josephi 51, and citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri 52, in agricultural or horticultural operations. The development of these environmental-friendly strategies requires a deeper understanding of insect biology.
A better understanding of the CMBS biology and developmental process has been achieved, for the first time, through the age-stage, two-sex life table construction in this study. According to our observation in the CMBS rearing experiment, the life history of a male involves six major stages: egg, 1st instar, 2nd instar, P1 (2nd instar male after forming pupa covering), P2 (prepupa), P3 (pupa), and an adult alate stage. Four developmental stages were recorded in females: egg, 1st instar, 2nd instar, and an adult stage (Figure 1). Previously, incongruent reports on CMBS life history were found in the literature. For example, Zhang and Shi (1986) reported two instars before females become sexually mature 53, while Jiang and Xu (1998) reported both a 3rd instar and an adult stage in female development 7. Our results were consistent with Zhang and Shi (1986), and Wang et al. 2015, who reported five stages for males and three for females (excluding the egg stage) under greenhouse conditions.
The second objective of this study is to identify the effects of plant nutrient conditions as a factor that can influence plant physiological conditions and the plant-insect interactions. Both abiotic and biotic factors are integrated elements that regulate the population dynamics and distribution of insect herbivores 54,55. Abiotic factors refer to non-living components such as temperature, humidity, light, and minerals 54, while biotic factors are elements related to living organisms such as natural enemies 56 in an ecosystem. The plant-herbivore interactions are crucial in understanding insect biology and developing an effective and eco-friendly integrated pest management program 57.
Hence, we have investigated the effects of different host conditions, under three different nutrient conditions, on the biological parameters of CMBS in this study. We utilized the supplementation of Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt without vitamins to create different plant nutrient conditions, potentially altering the host plants' metabolic status. As a universal standard medium formulation, the MS basal salt provides a complete and well-balanced list of required micro-and macro-nutrients for plant growth 58. As a result, the rooted clones grown in three different media started to show different growth conditions after one month. Stem cuttings grown in nutrient deficient water agar medium had a noticeable slower shoot and leaf growth and yellowish leaf compared to the healthiest plant growth in the ‘0.1MS’ agar medium (Figure S1). However, better plant growth conditions did not promote CMBS infestation. Instead, R0 was less than 1 when under ‘0.1MS’, suggesting that the CMBS population could not increase and would eventually die out under this condition.
With an initial intention to optimize CMBS colonies using healthy host plants, this result was somehow unexpected and contradictory to some reports on other hemipteran species. Previous studies have shown that applying nitrogen fertilizers to soil leads to the increased severity of mealybugs infestation in terms of enhanced fecundity and shortened insect generation time 59. Phosphorus did not affect the mealybugs population, whereas increased potassium level in the medium results in decreased infestation 60. The elongate hemlock scale (Fiorina externa Ferris) showed better performance with lower mortality and higher fecundity on healthy plants than plants under adverse growing conditions 61. Interestingly, different species of scale insects might respond differently to the availability of macro- or micro-nutrients in soil. Salama et al. reported in 1972 that the supplementation of nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous reduced the susceptibility of citrus seedlings to the infestation of the red scale, Aonidiella aurantii 62. The effect of plant nutrition on crapemyrtle metabolic pathway and its association with plant-CMBS interactions are currently less understood, and further research is needed.
The relationship between plant hosts and insects could be complicated, counter-intuitive, and subject to the ever-changing abiotic factors such as climate change 63. For example, well-regulated abiotic factors in cropping systems, such as fertilization, are often desirable and have shown a positive influence on plant growth 64,65 by optimizing nutrient uptakes 66 and the synthesis of essential compounds 67. However, better plant performance may or may not lead to increased plant defense against herbivore attacks. The insect fitness is determined by a combination of factors, including the nutritional quality and defensive property of host plants and the physiological conditions of insects 68. For example, Sauge et al. (2010) showed that the infestation of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) had a positive correlation with nitrogen fertilization up to a certain level then became negative 69. Chen et al. (2019) reported that the elevated carbon dioxide had negatively affected the performance of aphids feed on Barley 70.
In the case of scale insects, differentiated infestations on the same host plant species grown nearby 71 are not uncommon. Similar phenomena have been observed with CMBS on the same plant species in the field 5 and across different plant species in host range tests 31. The interaction between scale insects and their host plants had been studied extensively, and complicated research questions were proposed. For example, some scale insects show a certain level of specialty and feeding preference in infesting specific host plants, whereas some species were reported to be polyphagous 72. As a significant source for providing plant nutrients, edaphic environments alter plant physiology in terms of phenology and chemical property in plant tissues, affecting plant-insect interactions 35,36.
The underlying plant-insect interactions for CMBS have not been studied extensively, and hence related research is needed to develop effective and low-cost strategies for pest management. Therefore, the life table study is an effective tool that has been used extensively to investigate the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on insect development and plant-insect interactions. 73–75. The CMBS rearing systems developed in this study were proven successful in supporting the CMBS life cycle to better document and characterize the developmental stages of CMBS, including the defining differentiation and the duration of each developmental stage, which is essential for investigating the factors that affect insect mortality.
In conclusion, we have constructed the first age-stage, two-sex life table for CMBS to better understand its biology and ecology. Crapemyrtle bark scale showed the poorer performance to establish a population on plants in healthier conditions. However, our current data should not conclude that a healthy crapemyrtle plant is entirely immune to CMBS attack. The underlying plant defense mechanism, such as secondary metabolites under different nutrient conditions, is unknown and should be investigated in the future. Field experiments should further validate this phenomenon, in which more factors such as natural enemies might come into play. Therefore, future studies on other abiotic factors, such as temperature, humidity, and pesticides, should be investigated to optimize the understanding and insect management strategies.
Development of insect colony. Branches/twigs infested with crapemyrtle bark scale were collected from crapemyrtle trees on campus (Texas A&M University, College Station, TX) and stored in zip-lock bags under constant temperature (25 oC). Colonies of CMBS were developed by tying infested branches to healthy crapemyrtle plants. Plants inoculated with CMBS were then placed in plant/insect growth chambers. The plant/insect growth chambers were constructed with supporting frame material and mesh fabric. The plant/insect chambers containing the CMBS colony were placed in a greenhouse or Conviron growth chamber (25 oC and 250 µmol m-2 s-1; 12:12 light : dark), which provides stable environmental conditions to allow long-term maintenance CMBS population. The gravid females used in this study were collected from laboratory-maintained insect colonies.
Plant material and insect rearing chamber. Cuttings collected from one seedling of Lagerstroemia fauriei ‘Fantasy’ were used as host/food sources for the CMBS rearing experiment. Stem cuttings were cleaned and soaked in 10% bleach solution for 10 min for sterilization. Cleaned cuttings were stuck in agar media for rooting. Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt (PhytoTech Labs, Lenexa, KS, USA) was utilized as a ‘complete’ supplementation of plant nutrients. Three different agar media were prepared and considered as three different treatments: water (nutrient-deficient condition), 0.01 MS (intermediate nutrient condition; 0.043 g MS salt per 1 L media), 0.1 MS (nutrient sufficient condition; 0.43 g MS salt per 1 L media). The rooted cuttings (clones) were used in the following rearing experiments. The rooted clones grown in three different media showed similar initial plant growth (initial sprouting and root development), but as time progress plants in nutrient deficient medium showed noticeable plant malnutrition development (stunted growth and yellowish leaf), compared to the plants in nutrient sufficient medium (Figure S1).
Rearing chambers were constructed with small petri dishes (Falcon® Disposable Petri Dishes, 60 mm x 15 mm) and clear plastic food wrap. Around half of petri dish was wrapped by clear plastic food wrap to create space for medium. Agar medium (1%) with different nutrient conditions was poured into the bottom of the petri dish, using an electronic pipette, to fill around one-third portion of the petri dish. Rooted stem cuttings with bud nodes were transferred from rooting containers to the insect rearing chambers before the experiments. Depending on the condition of the medium, rooted cuttings were carefully removed from the old medium and transferred to fresh medium regularly throughout the rearing experiment. The rearing chambers were placed in Conviron growth chambers set at 25 oC and 250 µmol m-2 s-1 light with a photoperiod of 12:12 (light : dark).
Insect rearing experiment. White coverings of the female scales were carefully lifted using a fine pin/needle. All existing eggs inside the ovisacs were removed, and the gravid females were transferred, using a fine brush, onto a moist filter paper placed in a petri dish. All newly laid eggs were collected the next day (after 24 hours) and kept under 25 oC for incubation until hatched.
Egg incubation times were recorded, defined as the duration from the day when gravid females first laid the eggs to the day 1st instars were hatched. Five to ten newly hatched crawlers/nymphs per rearing chamber were transferred onto stem cuttings using a fine brush. Daily observations were made to record the settling status of nymphs. Rearing chambers with nymphs that failed to settle on the plants were discarded when the mortality or escaping were confirmed.
Insect rearing experiments on Lagerstroemia different nutrient conditions were conducted from July to December 2019 and repeated from May to November 2020. Daily observations were conducted using stereomicroscope as nymphs started feeding, and the duration of each developmental stage (including nymphal stages, pupa, and adult stages) was recorded. When a male reaches the adult stage, it will be transferred to a pair with a female for mating to complete the female's life cycle. Fecundity data (the number of eggs that an adult female produces) and longevity (the number of days a female lives) were recorded as the gravid females complete their life cycle. The life history data collected from all individual CMBS were pooled together for the life table analysis.
The entire developmental process of CMBS has been photographed using a stereomicroscope system (Olympus SZX7, Waltham MA, United States) coupled with a color camera (Olympus LC30, Waltham MA, United States). All photos were generated by manual focusing along a z-axis and then focus stacking were performed using Helicon Focus (Helicon Soft Ltd. Kharkiv, Ukraine).
Data analysis. The developmental stages of both male and female CMBS were determined by the number of times the nymphs molt, which can be obtained most simply by keeping track of the exuviates. According to age-stage, two-sex life table theory 12,13, the fecundity data (number of eggs each adult female produced) and longevity data (the number of days each CMBS nymph lives) can be obtained to calculate population (life table) parameters of CMBS.
The life history data of CMBS were analyzed using TWOSEX-MS Chart, a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis 76, to obtain population (life table) parameters. According to the method described in Chi and Su 76, the raw data were used to calculate the age-stage specific survival rate {sxj, where x = age in days and j = stage; the first stage is egg, the second stage is 1st instar, the third stage is 2nd instar, the fourth stage is male pupa 1 (2nd instar with cocoon), the fifth stage is male pupa 2 (prepupa), the sixth stage is pupa 3 (pupa), the seventh and eighth stages are female and male}, age-specific survival rate (Sxj), and population (life table) parameters, including mean generation time (T), net reproduction rate (Ro), the intrinsic rate of increase (r), and the finite rate of natural increase (λ), to construct the age-stage, two-sex life table. In the age-stage, two-sex life table, the lx and mx will be calculated as:
where k is the number of stages. Ro, or the net reproduction rate, represents the mean number of eggs an individual CMBS produced during its entire life cycle, which will be calculated as:
r, or the intrinsic rate of increase, is calculated using iterative bisection method with age indexed from 0 78, and the formula is shown as followed:
λ, or the finite rate of increase, will be calculated as: λ =er (5). T, or the mean generation time, represents the length of time (days) a population used to increase to Ro-fold of its size, and is calculated as: T = (lnRo) / r (6).
All data calculated for the biological parameters of CMBS were subjected to the bootstrap resampling with 100,000 replications to estimate the standard errors. Differences in the duration of each developmental stage and the population parameters of CMBS reared at different nutrient conditions were compared using the paired bootstrap test 79.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the technical supports from Jingru Lai and Qiansheng Li on maintaining plant materials and giving advises on plant propagation. We would like to thank Dr. Gary Knox for providing the original plant material (Lagerstroemia fauriei ‘Fantasy’). Funding supports were from Crop Protection and Pest Management project ‘Integrated pest management strategies for crape myrtle bark scale, a new exotic pest’ [grant no. 2014-70006-22632/project accession no. 10004888] and Specialty Crop Research Initiative project ‘Systematic Strategies to Manage Crapemyrtle Bark Scale, An Emerging Exotic Pest’ [grant no. 2017-51181-26831/project accession no. 1013059] from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Additional financial supports were from AmericanHort Horticultural Research Institute and Center for Applied Nursery Research.
Author contributions statement
H.Q, M.G, and R.X. conceived the experiments, R.X. conducted the experiments and wrote the main manuscript text, R.X. and B.W. analyzed the data and prepared tables and figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
- USDA, N. Census of Horticultural Specialties. 2014. USDA: Washington, DC (2014).
- USDA, N. Census of Horticultural Specialties. 2019. USDA: Washington, DC (2019).
- Soliman, A. S. & Shanan, N. T. The role of natural exogenous foliar applications in alleviating salinity stress in Lagerstroemia indica L. seedlings. J. Appl. Hortic. 19, 35–45 (2017).
- Chappell, M. R., Braman, S. K., Williams-Woodward, J. & Knox, G. J. J. o. E. H. Optimizing plant health and pest management of Lagerstroemia spp. in commercial production and landscape situations in the southeastern United States: a review. 30, 161–172 (2012).
- Gu, M., Merchant, M., Robbins, J. & Hopkins, J. Crape Myrtle Bark Scale: A New Exotic Pest. Texas A&M AgriLife Ext. Service. EHT 49 (2014).
- Kondo, T., Gullan, P. J. & Williams, D. J. Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea). Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 9, 55–61 (2008).
- Jiang, N. & Xu, H. Observertion on Eriococcus lagerostroemiae Kuwana. J. of Anhui Agri. Coll. 25, 142–144 (1998).
- He, D., Cheng, J., Zhao, H. & Chen, S. Biological characteristic and control efficacy of Eriococcus lagerstroemiae. Chinese Bull. of Entomol. 45, 812–814 (2008).
- Harcourt, D. The development and use of life tables in the study of natural insect populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14, 175–196 (1969).
- Leslie, P. H. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33, 183–212 (1945).
- Birch, L. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J. Anim. Ecol., 15–26 (1948).
- Chi, H. Life-table analysis incorporating both sexes and variable development rates among individuals. Environ. Entomol. 17, 26–34 (1988).
- Chi, H. & Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Bull. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sin 24, 225–240 (1985).
- Fathipour, Y. & Maleknia, B. in Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security (ed Omkar) 329-366 (Academic Press, 2016).
- Auad, A. et al. The impact of temperature on biological aspects and life table of Rhopalosiphum padi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) fed with signal grass. Fla. Entomol., 569–577 (2009).
- Qu, Y. et al. Sublethal and hormesis effects of beta-cypermethrin on the biology, life table parameters and reproductive potential of soybean aphid Aphis glycines. Ecotoxicology 26, 1002–1009 (2017).
- Araujo, E. S., Benatto, A., Mogor, A. F., Penteado, S. C. & Zawadneak, M. A. Biological parameters and fertility life table of Aphis forbesi Weed, 1889 (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on strawberry. Braz. J. Biol. 76, 937–941, doi:10.1590/1519-6984.04715 (2016).
- Krishnamoorthy, S. V. & Mahadevan, N. R. Life table studies of sugarcane scale, Melanaspis glomerata G. J. Entomol. Res. 27, 203–212 (2003).
- Uematsu, H. Studies on life table for an armored scale insect, Aonidiella taxus Leonardi (Homoptera: Diaspididae). J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. (1979).
- Hill, M. G., Mauchline, N. A., Hall, A. J. & Stannard, K. A. Life table parameters of two armoured scale insect (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) species on resistant and susceptible kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) germplasm. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 37, 335–343 (2009).
- Yong, C. X. W. Z. C. & Shaoyun, Z. J. Y. S. W. Age-specific life table of chinese white wax scale (Ericerus pela) Natural Population and Analysis of Death key Factors [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinica 9 (2008).
- Rosado, J. F. et al. Natural biological control of green scale (Hemiptera: Coccidae): a field life-table study. Biocontrol Sci. and Technol. 24, 190–202 (2014).
- Fand, B. B., Gautam, R. D., Chander, S. & Suroshe, S. S. Life table analysis of the mealybug, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) under laboratory conditions. J. Entomol. Res. 34, 175–179 (2010).
- Vargas-Madríz, H. et al. Life and fertility table of Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae), under different fertilization treatments in the 7705 tomato hybrid. Rev. chil. entomol. 39 (2014).
- Huang, Y. B. & Chi, H. Age-stage, two‐sex life tables of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)(Diptera: Tephritidae) with a discussion on the problem of applying female age‐specific life tables to insect populations. Insect Sci. 19, 263–273 (2012).
- Saska, P. et al. Leaf structural traits rather than drought resistance determine aphid performance on spring wheat. J. Pest. Sci. 94, 423–434 (2021).
- Ma, K., Tang, Q., Xia, J., Lv, N. & Gao, X. Fitness costs of sulfoxaflor resistance in the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 158, 40–46 (2019).
- Ullah, F. et al. Fitness costs in clothianidin-resistant population of the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii. Plos one 15, e0238707 (2020).
- Güncan, A. & Gümüş, E. Influence of different hazelnut cultivars on some demographic characteristics of the filbert aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 110, 1856–1862 (2017).
- Bailey, R., Chang, N.-T., Lai, P.-Y. & Hsu, T.-C. Life table of cycad scale, Aulacaspis yasumatsui (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), reared on Cycas in Taiwan. J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 13, 183–187 (2010).
- Wang, Z., Chen, Y. & Diaz, R. Temperature-dependent development and host range of crapemyrtle bark scale, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae (Kuwana)(Hemiptera: Eriococcidae). Fla. Entomol. 102, 181–186 (2019).
- Zhang, Z.-J. et al. A determining factor for insect feeding preference in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000162 (2019).
- Wang, Z., Chen, Y., Diaz, R. & Laine, R. A. Physiology of crapemyrtle bark scale, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae (Kuwana), associated with seasonally altered cold tolerance. J. Insect Physiol. 112, 1–8 (2019).
- Suh, S.-J. Notes on some parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) associated with Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae (Kuwana)(Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in the Republic of Korea. Insecta mundi 0690: 1–5 (2019).
- Meindl, G. A., Bain, D. J. & Ashman, T.-L. Edaphic factors and plant–insect interactions: direct and indirect effects of serpentine soil on florivores and pollinators. Oecologia 173, 1355–1366 (2013).
- Wielgolaski, F. E. Phenological modifications in plants by various edaphic factors. Int. J. Biometeorol. 45, 196–202 (2001).
- Uchida, R. in Plant nutrient management in Hawaii’s soils (ed Raymond S. Uchida James A. Silva) 31-55 (University of Hawaii at Manoa, College of Agriculture & Tropical Resources, 2000).
- Flanders, S. E. Observations on host plant induced behavior of scale insects and their endoparasites. Can. Entomol. 102, 913–926 (1970).
- Yang, T.-C. & Chi, H. Life tables and development of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) at different temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 99, 691–698 (2006).
- Tuan, S. J., Lee, C. C. & Chi, H. Population and damage projection of Spodoptera litura (F.) on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) under different conditions using the age-stage, two‐sex life table. Pest Manag. Sci. 70, 805–813 (2014).
- Vafaie, E. et al. Seasonal Population Patterns of a New Scale Pest, Acanthococcus lagerstroemiae Kuwana (Hemiptera: Sternorrhynca: Eriococcidae), of Crapemyrtles in Texas, Louisiana, and Arkansas. J. Environ. Hortic. 38, 8–14 (2020).
- Vafaie, E. K. Bark and systemic insecticidal control of Acanthococcus (= Eriococcus) lagerstroemiae (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) on Potted Crapemyrtles, 2017. Arthropod manag. tests 44, tsy109 (2019).
- Vafaie, E. K. & Knight, C. M. J. A. M. T. Bark and systemic insecticidal control of Acanthococcus (= Eriococcus) lagerstroemiae (Crapemyrtle Bark Scale) on Landscape Crapemyrtles, 2016. 42, tsx130 (2017).
- Vafaie, E. & Gu, M. Insecticidal control of crapemyrtle bark scale on potted crapemyrtles, Fall 2018. Arthropod Manag. Tests 44, tsz061 (2019).
- Aktar, M. W., Sengupta, D. & Chowdhury, A. J. I. t. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. 2, 1 (2009).
- Grafton-Cardwell, E. & Vehrs, S. Monitoring for organophosphate-and carbamate-resistant armored scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in San Joaquin valley citrus. J. Econ. Entomol. 88, 495–504 (1995).
- Almarinez, B. J. M. et al. Biological control: a major component of the pest management program for the invasive coconut scale insect, Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne, in the Philippines. Insects 11, 745 (2020).
- Grout, T. & Richards, G. Value of pheromone traps for predicting infestations of red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell)(Hom., Diaspididae), limited by natural enemy activity and insecticides used to control citrus thrips, Scirtothrips aurantii Faure (Thys., Thripidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 111, 20–27 (1991).
- Grafton-Cardwell, E., Millar, J., O'Connell, N. & Hanks, L. Sex pheromone of yellow scale, Aonidiella citrina (Homoptera: Diaspididae): evaluation as an IPM tactic. J. Agric. Urban. Entomol. 17, 75–88 (2000).
- Jactel, H., Menassieu, P., Lettere, M., Mori, K. & Einhorn, J. Field response of maritime pine scale, Matsucoccus feytaudi Duc.(Homoptera: Margarodidae), to synthetic sex pheromone stereoisomers. J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 2159–2170 (1994).
- Mendel, Z. et al. Outdoor attractancy of males of Matsucoccus josephi (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) and Elatophilus hebraicus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to synthetic female sex pheromone of Matsucoccus josephi. J. Chem. Ecol. 21, 331–341 (1995).
- Zada, A. et al. Sex pheromone of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri: synthesis and optimization of trap parameters. J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 361–368 (2004).
- Zhang, Z. & Shi, Y. Studies on the Morphology and Biology of Eriococcus Lagerstroemiae Kuwana. J. Shandong Agri. Univ. 2 (1986).
- Savopoulou-Soultani, M., Papadopoulos, N. T., Milonas, P. & Moyal, P. Abiotic factors and insect abundance. PSYCHE 2012 (2012).
- Vandegehuchte, M. L., de la Pena, E. & Bonte, D. Relative importance of biotic and abiotic soil components to plant growth and insect herbivore population dynamics. PLoS One 5, e12937 (2010).
- Clavijo McCormick, A. Can plant–natural enemy communication withstand disruption by biotic and abiotic factors? Ecol. Evol. 6, 8569–8582 (2016).
- Nebapure, S. M. & Sagar, D. Insect-plant interaction: A road map from knowledge to novel technology. Karnataka J. Agri. Sci. 28, 1–7 (2015).
- Murashige, T. & Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473–497 (1962).
- Hogendorp, B. k., Cloyd, R. A. & Swiader, J. M. Effect of nitrogen fertility on reproduction and development of citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri Risso (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), feeding on two colors of coleus, Solenostemon scutellarioides L. Codd. Environ. Entomol. 35, 201–211 (2006).
- Lema, K. & Mahungu, N. in Tropical root crops: production and uses in Africa: proceedings of the Second Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops-Africa Branch held in Douala, Cameroon, 14-19 Aug. 1983. (IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA).
- McClure, M. S. Dispersal of the scale Fiorinia externa (Homoptera: Diaspididae) and effects of edaphic factors on its establishment on hemlock. Environ. Entomol. 6, 539–544 (1977).
- Salama, H., Amin, A. & Hawash, M. Effect of nutrients supplied to citrus seedlings on their susceptibility to infestation with the scale insects Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) and Lepidosaphes beckii (Newman)(Coccoidea). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 71, 395–405 (1972).
- Rasmann, S. & Pellissier, L. in Climate Change and Insect Pests Vol. 8 (ed P. Niemelä C. Björkman) 38–53 (Wallingford, UK: CAB Int., 2015).
- Wang, Z. & Li, S. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on plant growth and nitrate accumulation in vegetables. J. Plant Nutr. 27, 539–556 (2004).
- Da Costa, P. B. et al. The effects of different fertilization conditions on bacterial plant growth promoting traits: guidelines for directed bacterial prospection and testing. Plant Soil. 368, 267–280 (2013).
- Dong, H., Kong, X., Li, W., Tang, W. & Zhang, D. Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility. Field Crops Res. 119, 106–113 (2010).
- Aulakh, M., Dev, G. & Arora, B. Effect of sulphur fertilization on the nitrogen-sulphur relationships in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. Pers.). Plant Soil. 45, 75–80 (1976).
- Powell, G., Tosh, C. R. & Hardie, J. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, and applied perspectives. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 309–330 (2006).
- Sauge, M. H., Grechi, I. & Poëssel, J. L. Nitrogen fertilization effects on Myzus persicae aphid dynamics on peach: vegetative growth allocation or chemical defence? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 136, 123–133 (2010).
- Chen, Y., Serteyn, L., Wang, Z., He, K. & Francis, F. Reduction of Plant Suitability for Corn Leaf Aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide Condition. Environ. Entomol. (2019).
- Miller, D. R. & Kosztarab, M. Recent advances in the study of scale insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24, 1–27 (1979).
- Hardy, N. B., Peterson, D. A. & Normark, B. B. Scale insect host ranges are broader in the tropics. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150924 (2015).
- Chen, Q. et al. Age-stage, two-sex life table of Parapoynx crisonalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) at different temperatures. PloS one 12, e0173380 (2017).
- Li, X. et al. Density-dependent demography and mass-rearing of Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) incorporating life table variability. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 255–265 (2019).
- Ning, S., Zhang, W., Sun, Y. & Feng, J. Development of insect life tables: comparison of two demographic methods of Delia antiqua (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on different hosts. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).
- TWOSEX-MSChart: a computer program for the age-stage, two-sex life table analysis (2020).
- Chi, H. & Su, H.-Y. Age-stage, two-sex life tables of Aphidius gifuensis (Ashmead)(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its host Myzus persicae (Sulzer)(Homoptera: Aphididae) with mathematical proof of the relationship between female fecundity and the net reproductive rate. Environ. Entomol. 35, 10–21 (2006).
- Goodman, D. Optimal life histories, optimal notation, and the value of reproductive value. Am. Nat. 119, 803–823 (1982).
- Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. An introduction to the bootstrap. (CRC press, 1994).
No competing interests reported.