A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 23 to March 23 /2020 at Bahir Dar city governmental hospitals. The city has three governmental hospitals namely: Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (FHCSH), Addis-Alem General Hospital, and Tibebe Gihon Specialized Teaching Hospital (TGSTH). These hospitals are opened for 24 hours for emergency service. They provide promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services. Around 2700 people with hypertension were registered for follow-up in the previous year in Bahir Dar governmental hospitals. Those people with hypertension were used to collect their medication on every two to three-month basis. In the outpatient chronic follow up department, approximately 790 adult people with hypertension (450 in FHCSH, 240 in Addis Alem, and 100 in TGSH) were seen monthly.
All people with hypertension aged 18 years and older, and who had been regular follow up appointments regardless of ethnicity and religions were participating in the study. Hearing and/or verbalize impairment, and severe illness and recently diagnosed during data collection were excluded from the study. Participants who are comprised hearing and/or verbalizing impairment; those who did not provide consistent answers to the demographic questions. The participant; that serious illness to difficult participate who had a severe medical or psychiatric illness to complete the study questionnaire in one sitting, that did request to stop the interview for medical reasons, or the data collectors perceived that the participant was too sick to participate. Participants were newly diagnosed means that they diagnosed before six months of the actual data collection periods. This was by considering those participants could be perceived as a lack of experience of the disease to obtain complete information.
Sample size determination and Sampling procedure
The sample size was determined by using a single population proportion formula by considering the following assumptions: 95% (1.96) confidence interval (CI), 64.70% for adherence to recommended diet (20), and 5% (0.05) of marginal error (\(n=\frac{\left({\frac{z\alpha }{2})}^{2 }p*q\right)}{{d}^{2}}\)). This yields an initial sample size of 351. By considering adjustment for expected non-response rate (10%), the final sample size was 386 people with hypertension. The samples were proportionally allocated to each hospital. A systematic sampling technique was used to select study participants. After the first respondent drawn by the lottery method then every two intervals were interviewed until the sample size reached.
Data were collected by using face to face interviews with structured questionnaires to acquire demographic information, behavioral factors, hypertension knowledge, Body Mass Index (BMI), social support, and adherence to the recommended diet. To assess clinical related data: co-morbidity, duration of HTN since diagnosis and blood pressure measurement was collected from the clients’ chart by using checklists.
Body weight was measured with the participant wearing light clothing without shoes using a Seca weight scale to the nearest 0.1 kilogram (kg) and height was measured in centimeters (cm) using a stadiometer while the participant was standing in an upright position without wearing shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kg divided by height in meters squared. The BMI classification as follows: underweight (BMI ≤18.49 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI = 18.50–24.99 kg/m2), overweight (BMI = 25.00–29.99 kg/m2), or obese (BMI ≥30.00 kg/m2
Adherence to recommended diet questionnaire was developed based on existing literature (14, 19–21, 23, 30–33). This questionnaire had six components of diets (1) fruits, (2) vegetables, (3) grains, (4) low-fat dairy products, (5) saturated fat and oil, and (6) sodium salts. Each items was a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from none =1, rarely =2, sometimes =3, most times =4, all times =5). In the case of saturated fat and sodium salt intake were given as reverse scoring (none =5, rarely =4, sometimes =3, most times =2, all times =1).
The dietary fruits, vegetables, whole grain, and low-fat dairy consumption were evaluated by asking how many times in the previous 7 days did the respondents eat the above-listed items. Those who responded “all times” and “most times” were adherent while those who responded “sometimes”, “rarely” or “none” were non-adherent
Dietary saturated fat and oil consumption was inquired how many times in the previous 7 days did the respondents eat. Those participants who responded “sometimes”, “rarely”, and “none” were considered adherent while those who responded “all times” and “most time” were non-adherent.
Salt consumption also was evaluated in the previous 7 days by inquiring about the addition of raw table salt in addition to the one who used to prepare the food item during meal times. Those who responded “rarely” and “none” were considered adherent to recommended salt, whereas “all times”, “most times” and “sometimes” were considered non-adherent to recommended dietary salt (33). As a result, the lowest and highest total scores were 6 and 30, respectively.
Knowledge of hypertension was assessed by hypertension knowledge-level scale (HK-LS) questionnaires (34). This scale has 22 items that were used to assess respondents’ knowledge. The tool contains parts of the definition, treatment, drug adherence, diet, lifestyle, and complications. The definition, lifestyle, diet, and complication part of the questioner was used to assess the knowledge of hypertensive individuals. The tool contains selected-response items with yes and no response; the right answer coded as “1” and wrong answer as “0”.
People with hypertension who have supported by their families or friends or neighbors scored was assessed by the “Oslo 3-items social support scale (OSSS-3)”. The score ranged from 3-14 (35). Participant who scored OSSS-3, (1) from 3-8 were considered poor socials support, (2) from 9-11 were considered moderate support, and (3) from 12-14 were considered strong support.
Three BSc degree holders nurses for the data collection (one for each hospital) and three BSc degree holders supervision (one for each hospital) were recruited during the data collection period (both the data collectors and the supervisors were not from the same hospitals). At each hospital the aim of the study was clearly explained to the study participants before they interviewed. The data collectors and supervisors were trained in one day on how to facilitate the data collection process and prevent errors. Questionnaires were reviewed and checked for completeness, accuracy, and consistency by supervisors and the research team every day during the data collection period.
All the questions were prepared in English and translated into the Amharic language by an expert who was fluent by both languages and back-translated to English to see its consistency. Two weeks before the actual data collection, the questionnaires were pre-tested on 5% of the total sample among people wiyh hypertension who had follow-up at Debre Tabor hospital to evaluate the consistency and applicability of the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha test (α = 0.76). Data collection was preserved in a secure environment to avoid loss and breach of confidentiality. The supervisor and principal investigator closely followed the data collection process. Appropriate times to complete the questionnaire were allocated for the participants and the completed questionnaires were collected timely.