2.1 Screening of target circadian rhythm genes PER1-3, CRY1-2, CLOCK and BMAL1
Selection of target genes: Among the many genes obtained from the ONCOMINE database according to the screening conditions that we set, we selected the genes according to the median rank order from front to back. After excluding genes that have already been reported in detail, we finally selected the genes PER1, PER2, PER3, CRY1, CRY2, CLOCK, and BMAL1.
2.2 Results of circadian gene expression in common tumor types
A total of 2,946 datasets were included in the ONCOMINE database regarding the expression levels of PER1 (423), PER2 (392), PER3 (385), CRY1 (452), CRY2 (415), CLOCK (433), and BMAL1 (446) in different tumor tissues (Figure 1). Among them, 46 studies showed statistically significant results regarding PER1 expression, 40 of which showed lower expressions of PER1 in tumor tissues, and we recorded it as PER1 (40/46). For the other genes, the result was PER2 (45/48), PER3 (33/37), CRY1 (17/35), CRY2 (37/39), CLOCK (11/16), and BMAL1 (18/36).
2.3 Results of circadian gene expression in lung cancer
Using the ONCOMINE database, we investigated the transcript levels of PER1-3, CRY1-2, CLOCK, and BMAL1 in lung cancer and normal samples. The results showed that the mRNA levels of the above circadian genes were lower in lung cancer tissues (Table 1). Specifically, genes PER1-3 and CRY2 showed significantly lower expression in lung squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Expression of CRY1 was significantly lower in lung adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer. BMAL1 showed significantly lower expression mainly in lung squamous carcinoma, and CLOCK showed significantly lower expression in lung carcinoid tumors (Figure 2).
Table 1
Expression levels of circadian genes in lung cancer
Gene Type
|
Cancer Subtype
|
P-value
|
Fold Change
|
Rank(10%)
|
Sample
|
PER1
|
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
7.49E-6
|
-8.101
|
3%
|
203
|
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
3.35E-5
|
-5.555
|
5%
|
203
|
|
Lung Carcinoma Tumor
|
3.68E-4
|
-3.922
|
28%
|
203
|
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
8.29E-19
|
-2.125
|
3%
|
107
|
PER2
|
Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
4.35E-14
|
-2.430
|
6%
|
156
|
|
Large Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
6.44E-7
|
-2.691
|
11%
|
156
|
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
0.005
|
-2.213
|
24%
|
203
|
|
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
0.001
|
-3.007
|
27%
|
203
|
PER3
|
Large Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
0.009
|
-2.006
|
8%
|
73
|
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
1.05E-9
|
-2.024
|
9%
|
156
|
|
Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
2.74E-6
|
-2.204
|
19%
|
156
|
|
Large Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
3.60E-4
|
-2.061
|
20%
|
156
|
CRY1
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
1.39E-6
|
-2.058
|
6%
|
66
|
|
Lung Carcinoma Tumor
|
0.001
|
-2.984
|
34%
|
203
|
|
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
0.007
|
-2.047
|
39%
|
203
|
CRY2
|
Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
3.80E-18
|
-2.335
|
3%
|
156
|
|
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
2.47E-5
|
-3.450
|
9%
|
66
|
CLOCK
|
Lung Carcinoma Tumor
|
0.004
|
- 2.382
|
43%
|
203
|
BMAL1
|
Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma
|
5.67E-5
|
-2.526
|
4%
|
73
|
2.4 Relationship between circadian gene expression and prognosis in lung cancer
We analyzed the correlation between the expression level of each circadian gene and OS in lung cancer patients using the Kaplan-Meier-Plotter online database. The results showed that OS was shortened in lung cancer patients in the low-expression group of each circadian gene (PER1-3, CRY1-2, CLOCK, and BMAL1) compared with the high-expression group (p<0.05) (Figure 3). The PrognoScan database was further used to explore the relationship between the transcript level of each circadian gene and cancer prognosis. The result showed that patients with low-expressions of PER1-3, CRY2 and CLOCK had worse OS than high-expression patients(p<0.05) (Figure 4). The above data predicted a poor prognosis for lung cancer patients with low expression of circadian rhythm genes and a better prognosis for lung cancer patients with high expression.
2.5 Co-expression analysis of circadian gene-related proteins
SRTING is a database that can be used to predict protein-protein interactions. Co-expression analysis showed that PER2 gene was co-expressed with BMAL1 (ARNTL), BHLHE41, CLOCK, CRY1, CRY2, CSNK1D, CSNK1E, NFIL3, NPAS2, and PER1 genes (Figure 5), indicating that there was a coordinated interaction between circadian genes in the body. These circadian genes together regulated the biological clock changes in the body. In addition, the KEGG pathway analysis revealed that PER2 protein was involved in the regulation of multiple signaling pathways, especially the circadian signaling pathway (Table 2).
Table 2
Analysis of the KEGG pathway of the PER2 protein
KEGG Pathways
|
Pathway
|
Description
|
count in gene set
|
false discovery rate
|
hsa04710
|
Circadian rhythm
|
10 of 30
|
4.91e-26
|
hsa05168
|
Herpes simplex infection
|
4 of 181
|
1.45e-05
|
hsa04340
|
Hedgehog signaling pathway
|
2 of 46
|
0.0013
|
hsa04713
|
Circadian entertainment
|
2 of 93
|
0.0037
|
hsa04728
|
Dopamine synapse
|
2 of 128
|
0.0056
|
hsa04390
|
Hippo signaling pathway
|
2 of 152
|
0.0065
|
2.6 Circadian gene signature in human lung cancer
The expression levels of circadian rhythm genes have been demonstrated to affect OS and the prognostic status of lung cancer patients through Kaplan-Meier and PrognoScan databases. Further, using the cBioPortal database, a total of 6509 samples were investigated in 22 datasets to explore the genetic alterations of circadian genes such as PER1-3, CRY1-2, CLOCK, and BMAL1 (ARNTL) in various lung cancer subtypes. The results showed that the types of genetic alterations in these 22 datasets included mutations, amplifications, deletions, fusions, and multiplex alterations (Figure 6). The OncoPrint interface was used to provide statistics on the percentage of alterations of each gene, which ranged from 2.5–19.1% from each dataset. Among them, mutation was found to be the most common alteration.