This preprint is under consideration at Systematic Reviews. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Top 100 Cited Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in The Major Journals of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis
Essam Al-Moraissi
Thamar University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences: Dhamar University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-9662
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background : The aim of this bibliometric research was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited systematic reviews in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Methods : Using the Web of Science-database without restrictions on publication year or language, a bibliometric analysis was performed for the five major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Surgery Oral medicine Oral pathology Oral radiology.
Discussion : The most top-cited systematic review was published in 2015 with a total of 200 citations on survival and success rates of dental implants, consistent with the finding that “pre- and peri-implant surgery and dental implantology”, and “craniomaxillofacial deformities and cosmetic surgery” were the most frequently-cited topics (22% each).
The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery displayed both most citations in total and in average per publication. The outcome of this article can be used as a source of information not just for researchers but also for clinicians and students, and of which areas have a large impact on the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery but cannot reflect the quality of the included systematic reviews.
Systematic review registration: not applicable
Keywords
Bibliometrics, Citation Analysis, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Systemic Reviews, Meta-Analysis
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 16 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Submission checks complete
On 13 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 08 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Head & Neck Surgery
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Systematic Reviews. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Top 100 Cited Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in The Major Journals of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis
Essam Al-Moraissi
Thamar University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences: Dhamar University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-9662
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 16 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Submission checks complete
On 13 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 08 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Head & Neck Surgery
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background : The aim of this bibliometric research was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited systematic reviews in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Methods : Using the Web of Science-database without restrictions on publication year or language, a bibliometric analysis was performed for the five major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Surgery Oral medicine Oral pathology Oral radiology.
Discussion : The most top-cited systematic review was published in 2015 with a total of 200 citations on survival and success rates of dental implants, consistent with the finding that “pre- and peri-implant surgery and dental implantology”, and “craniomaxillofacial deformities and cosmetic surgery” were the most frequently-cited topics (22% each).
The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery displayed both most citations in total and in average per publication. The outcome of this article can be used as a source of information not just for researchers but also for clinicians and students, and of which areas have a large impact on the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery but cannot reflect the quality of the included systematic reviews.
Systematic review registration: not applicable
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5
Figure 5