This preprint is under consideration at World Journal of Surgical Oncology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Clinical Comparative Study of Lower Limb PICC and Deep Venous Catheterization
peng Su
Beijing Shijingshan Hospital
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective: To compare the clinical application effects of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and deep venous catheters placed through the lower limbs in adults, and to explore the advantages of ultrasound-guided PICC through the lower limbs in adults.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 27 bedridden patients with advanced malignant tumor between February 2017 and February 2019. The success rate of one-time catheterization, the length of catheterization puncture time, the number of catheterizations, and the occurrence of catheter-related complications of the two methods were compared.
Results: Results of the study showed that ultrasound-guided PICC through the lower limbs has a higher success rate than deep venous catheterization. The average length of puncture time in adults with PICC through the lower limbs under ultrasound guidance was shorter than that in the femoral vein group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of catheter-related complications between the two groups.
Conclusion: The indications for PICC through the lower limbs in adults include patients with advanced malignant tumor after bilateral breast cancer lymphadenectomy or superior vena cava obstruction syndrome, and mainly bedridden patients. This technique has certain advantages over deep venous catheterization and is an effective choice for venous access.
Keywords
Lower limb PICC, Deep venous catheterization, Advanced malignant tumor, Bedridden
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 16 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 23 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 09 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 09 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 06 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at World Journal of Surgical Oncology. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Clinical Comparative Study of Lower Limb PICC and Deep Venous Catheterization
peng Su
Beijing Shijingshan Hospital
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 16 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 18 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 23 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 09 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 09 Dec, 2020
First submitted
On 06 Dec, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Objective: To compare the clinical application effects of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and deep venous catheters placed through the lower limbs in adults, and to explore the advantages of ultrasound-guided PICC through the lower limbs in adults.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 27 bedridden patients with advanced malignant tumor between February 2017 and February 2019. The success rate of one-time catheterization, the length of catheterization puncture time, the number of catheterizations, and the occurrence of catheter-related complications of the two methods were compared.
Results: Results of the study showed that ultrasound-guided PICC through the lower limbs has a higher success rate than deep venous catheterization. The average length of puncture time in adults with PICC through the lower limbs under ultrasound guidance was shorter than that in the femoral vein group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of catheter-related complications between the two groups.
Conclusion: The indications for PICC through the lower limbs in adults include patients with advanced malignant tumor after bilateral breast cancer lymphadenectomy or superior vena cava obstruction syndrome, and mainly bedridden patients. This technique has certain advantages over deep venous catheterization and is an effective choice for venous access.