Short Version of The Depression Anxiety Stress Scal-21: Is It Valid For Jordanian Adults


 Background: Given the potential utility of depression anxiety stress scale-21 and the availability of a reliable Arabic version, the current study aimed to collect information about the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the Jordanian version by administering it to adult members of the community. Thus, the depression-anxiety-stress scale was used in examining mental disorders in Jordanian adults. Methods: The study included adults of both sexes aged 18 to 72 years. The reliability of the overall DASS-21 scores and the three DASS-21 subscales were calculated. Exploratory factor analysis was used to test construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed for the two models (one-factor and three-factor models) for DASS-21 to determine the best factor structure for DASS-21 in the adult sample.Results: The findings revealed that the DASS-21 has high reliability and validity indicators, with Cronbach's alpha values exceeding 0.80. Pearson's correlation between DASS-21 and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were strongly positive, indicating that DASS-21 has sufficient convergent and divergent validity. The exploratory factor analysis showed that the three-factor model had the best indicators, and the confirmatory factor analysis results confirmed that the three-factor model was the fittest and most appropriate. Conclusion: The current study's findings suggest that the Jordanian version of the DASS-21 can be used as a reliable and valid scale for measuring depression, anxiety, and stress in adults.

check depression, despair, low self-esteem and low positive mood; (2) anxiety assessment of subjective arousal of anxiety and physical and subjective symptoms of anxiety; (3) stress measures stress, arousal, and side effects [17].
There are two versions of DASS: the full version (42 items) and the abridged version (21 items).
With the intent of developing concise forms that can be used for research and time-limited situations, Lovibond and Lovibond [17] selected seven representative items for each subscale of the questionnaire from the original DASS. The selected items should have good loading factors in the original scale and each score, and a short scale should be very close to the corresponding half of the total score. The internal consistency results for all three parameters (depression = 0.81, anxiety = 0.73, stress = 0.81) were published in a non-clinical sample. Despite the potential relevance of DASS-21, the factor analysis and psychometric characteristics of the aforementioned short scale are not documented [15]. Several studies have examined the psychometric properties of the scale in clinical [19][20] and nonclinical [21][22][23][24] adult samples. These surveys show that the three subscales have greater internal consistency, with scores ranging from 0.80 to 0.91. The signi cant convergent validity ranges from 0.50 to 0.80. The correlation between the three aspects of DASS-21 is moderate to signi cant, ranging from 0.46 to 0.75.
The psychometric properties of DASS-21, tested in clinical samples from various adult groups with different cultural backgrounds, generally gave positive results [15,21,[25][26]. These studies showed that all three subscales have strong internal consistency, with Alpha coe cient ranging from 0.83 to 0.94 for depression, 0.70 to 0.87 for anxiety, and 0.82 to 0.91 for stress. Internal consistency for the scale, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96., as a whole was not often reported but has been published in studies [21,[26][27].
The validity of DASS-21 as a standard measure of clinical outcome was also examined, and it was found that the scale responded to improvements in clinical status after treatment [28][29]. Many studies use exploratory and con rmatory methods to evaluate the factor structure of DASS-21, but the results are usually uncertain. Multiple studies have con rmed the three-factor structure of DASS-21 [20,24]. Although some perform well, they are less adaptable [35]. It was also found that the 21-items form has a clearer factor structure and lower factor correlation than the longer version [21]. However, some studies have shown that the four-factors structure, including depression, anxiety and stress, and general psychological distress factors, provide a better indicator [15,[21][22]30].
Other studies have reported three-factor designs, in which one or more items are loaded on an unde ned scale [26]. In terms of the convergence and discriminative signi cance of "The Depression and Anxiety Scale-21 items (DASS-21)" shows an acceptable correlation with other anxiety and depression scales. It was found that there was a signi cant correlation between the BAI and DASS-21 anxiety scales and the BDI and DASS-21 depression scales (r = 0.74) (r = 0.81), respectively. However, clinical samples showed similar patterns of association [20]. Lovibond & Lovibond [17] found that the reliability assessed by Cronbach's alpha is satisfactory for depression, anxiety, and stress (0.91, 0.84, 0.90) and is equivalent to the value obtained by [20,31]. It is problematic to extend their results to a wider population because the original criteria were mainly based on only students [17]. The in uence of demographics on DASS scores has not been extensively studied during the development of DASS. The analysis was limited to gender and age, although the author of the test did not specify whether age or gender had a signi cant effect [18].
Several studies have shown that DASS-42 has su cient convergent validity and discriminate validity in data collected from the normal population [16,18]. Cronbach's alpha reliability is also acceptable in all three subscales of clinical and non-clinical samples [16,18,20,31]. In the current study, the shortened version of DASS was chosen, as a meta-analysis study that directly checked the two scales in the clinical group showed that DASS-21 was associated with a cleaner factor structure relative to DASS-42 [20,25]. In addition, there is no Arab study investigating the applicability of DASS-21 validity to general adults. It was observed that DASS-21 had a signi cantly lower intraconstruct association in two independent psychological samples [20], and DASS-21 corresponds to a very high reliability score. However, these are the only studies that investigated the psychometric properties of DASS-21, and no normative data are available. The lack of normative data can be explained by his statement [16] that the DASS-21 score doubled can be directly compared with the DASS-42 score because DASS-21 covers the entire range of symptoms recorded in the longer version of DASS.
DASS-21 has been translated and veri ed in many languages, including Chinese [32], Malay [33], Italian [34], and Spanish [35]. It was also translated into Arabic and tested on Arab immigrants in Australia [36]. Its effectiveness and reliability have not been tested in the Arab world. DASS-21 is considered a valuable testing scale because it assesses multiple areas and is psychologically effective in both English and non-English contexts [5], but its understanding and the psychometric properties are still to be determined in low-income countries [31]. Therefore, one of the issues currently being investigated is to determine the understanding of characteristics, psychological indicators, including internal reliability, and the effectiveness of the anxiety and depression stress scale as a standard for the study of depression, anxiety, and stress in Jordanian adults. DASS-21 proposes a modern understanding of the nature of negative emotions and its built-in psychological characteristics and assesses depression, anxiety, and stress. DASS-21 is often used in Australian and international research and clinical trials and evaluation of the results [36].
Generally, it is an effective instrument for dealing with clients who do not understand English. It is particularly important to evaluate the psychometric properties of solutions such as DASS-21 in the Arabic context because the psychometric properties recorded in previous studies are culturally different from those in Arab culture.
Some Arab studies of the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 were available within the researcher's knowledge, the rst of which was on a sample of Arab immigrants in Australia [36]. The studies were on the following: (a) a sample of nursing workers in Saudi Arabia [37], (b) a group of mentally ill and quarantined patients in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic [38], (c) the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 on a sample of Egyptian drug users [39], (d) a Syrian sample during the COVID-19 pandemic [40], and (e) the con rmatory factor analysis of the DASS-21 on a sample of Algerian secondary school students [41]. Several Arab studies have highlighted that they studied speci c clinical and non-clinical samples from the community. Their ndings typically concluded that they support the triple structure of DASS-21, comparable to the original version in Australia. These studies identi ed a strong correlation between each item, the subscale to which it belongs, and the overall DASS-21 score, as well as a high Cronbach's alpha stability value ranging from 0.91 to 0.94. Ali and Green [39] showed that the single factor structure was best suited in a sample of drug users; hence, four items were deleted from the DASS-21. Its ndings revealed that the modi ed version of 17 items demonstrated that DASS-17 was appropriate for measuring total pressure, and the results of close validation demonstrated that DASS-17 was superior to DASS-21. Several of these studies reported that the DASS-8 and DASS-20 had comparable psychometric characteristics and reliability to the DASS-21. The rst Arabic version [36], which issued the rst Arabic version of DASS-21, revealed that the Arabic version of DASS-21 discriminated between negative emotional syndromes of depression, anxiety, and tension, and its internal consistency was high. The Arabic DASS-21 was thought to be particularly suitable for regular evaluation and treatment outcome evaluation.
Studies have shown that DASS-21 provides a reliable and accurate assessment of depression, anxiety, and stress in clinical and non-clinical populations from different cultures [30]. Additionally, DASS-21 is an easy-to-use instrument that can be used for clinical and research purposes. Thus, it is necessary to study its psychological measurement and application characteristics on Jordanian samples. Consider the potential use of DASS-21 and its inaccessibility to the adult population of Jordan and the entire Arab region. The main purpose of this study is to collect information about factor structure and psychometric characteristics by distributing the Jordanian version of the questionnaire to key members of adult communities in non-clinical settings. Earlier studies in English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries found signi cant associations between the scales [17,35]. However, the current study aimed to investigate especially the structure of the Jordanian DASS-21 factor by performing con rmatory, exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency assessment and checking the construct validity of the scale, using several mental health and well-being scales, such as Beck's depression scale and Beck's anxiety scale.

Participants
Nine hundred and thirty-ve individuals (51% males) from the general adult population, residing in various cities across Jordan's three regions (North, Central, and South), responded to the study and completed all study elements.
All participants are Jordanians, except for 120 participants of other nationalities. One hundred and twenty-seven students from Al-Balqa Applied University (57% male, mean age = 21, SD = 6.7) completed the DASS-21 questionnaire twice, separated by two weeks, to collect data on the temporal stability of DASS-21. All participants were from a nonclinical sample and had no mental or psychiatric illnesses.

Procedure
Participants were recruited from many sources in the public and private sectors. Each participant received an introduction letter and a DASS-21 form; a subset of participants received and completed two additional self-report scales (Beck for depression, Beck for anxiety). The information was gathered through an anonymous online questionnaire sent across Jordanian WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter groups between March 20, 2021, and April 28, 2021. The participants attest that they are over 18 years old and exclusively of Jordanian nationality. Non-Jordanian nationals made up 120 of the competitors. Data were collected from participants who clicked on the questionnaire link on the rst page, which included an explanation of the study and its aims in basic English. Data registration of participants has been veri ed, an anonymous name was provided, and a statement stating that they have the choice to withdraw from the survey at any time was added. Participants indicated their informed permission digitally by opting to participate in the study.

Measurements Depression, Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21)
The Arabic translation phrase was obtained from the DASS o cial website [http://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/dass/Arabic/Arabic percent 20DASS -21] .pdf] (accessed on January 25, 2021). It was validated [36] from the original DASS-21 scale [17], which is a 21-item self-report instrument in three sub domains that assesses depressive symptoms (items 3, 5, 10, 13, 16, 17, 21), anxiety (items 2,4,7,9,15,19,20), and stress (items 1, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, 18) on a scale of 0 to 3 and shows participants' level of support for symptoms during the previous week's session. The researcher went over the common Arabic version of DASS-21 to ensure that no slang is restricted to a speci c category. The scale's translation from English to Arabic was also double-checked by experts to ensure its accuracy. An Arabic language expert proofread and edited it. It turns out that items 1 and 12 were translated from English to Arabic with the same translation and the same meaning, resulting in the item being repeated in the common version. An English language and psychology experts translated the two items into English.
A new translation that precisely matches the intended meaning has been approved. Expert assessments of the original version of the DASS-21 revealed excellent clarity for all three subscale items: depression, anxiety, and stress.

The Beck Depression Inventory-ii (Bdi-ii)
The Jordanian version of the Single Beck Depression Scale developed by Al-Da'asin [42] was used in this study. It is a 21-item self-report scale used to assess the severity of depression's emotional, cognitive, motivational, vegetative, and psychomotor components. For each question, participants were asked to select the statement that best described their feelings and condition over the previous week from a graduated series of four alternatives representing the severity of depression, ranked from 0 to 3. The higher the degree, the greater the level of depression. Al-Da'asin found that the BDI-II had excellent psychometric properties and the internal consistency coe cients were good to excellent.
In the current study, Cronbach's alpha was 0.85 for the scale's internal consistency.

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (Bai)
It is a self-report inventory of 21 items that assess the severity of anxiety. Research [43] on non-clinical samples found that the Arabic version of the BAI has a good psychological scale. For each question, four alternatives representing anxiety symptoms were presented in descending order of severity from 0 to 3, and participants were asked to select the phrase that best described their symptoms of discomfort symptoms over the previous week; the highest score indicates a high level of anxiety. Cronbach's alpha ranged from good to excellent (0.88-0.92), the coe cient of stability was 0.79, and the value of Cronbach = 0.87 in the current study.

Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, skewness, and kurtosis) were calculated for the DASS-21 items to examine the distribution indicators. Cohen, Cohen, West, and Aiken (2003) proposed cutoff scores of less than 2 for skewness and less than 7 for kurtosis to test the normality of each DASS-21 item. Internal correlations between the three subscales, depression, anxiety, and stress, and the overall DASS-21 score were used to assess test-retest repeatability. Values ranging from 0.40 to 0.74 were considered to indicate good reliability [44]. Product moment correlations were calculated to investigate the correlations and temporal stability of the DASS-21 results. In addition to calculating the different correlations between the DASS-21 scores and other measures of similar constructs such as the BDI-II and BAI (convergent/divergent validity), differences in correlations within the sample were tested. In the adult sample, Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to compare the scores of the DASS-21 scales based on demographic variables such as age, gender, educational level, place of residence, marital status, and employment status. Furthermore, using linear regression analyses, the impact of demographic factors on adults' responses to the three subscales was investigated. Varimax rotation, an exploratory factor analysis of the principal axis components, was used to assess construct validity. Factor loading values greater than 0.40 were regarded as robust [22]. A series of CFAs were performed on a sample of study participants to test the different internal structures of DASS-21. Several indicators were used to assess each CFA's suitability. As the chi-square X 2 is very sensitive to sample size, two relative t indices, non-normal t index (NNFI) and comparative t index (CFI), were considered, as both work well with different sample sizes. Acceptable values for these indices are greater than 0.95 and less than 0.97, respectively [45].
The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was used, with an RMSEA value of less than 0.05 indicating a good t. ∆CFI, a qualitative assessment of appropriate indicators, was used to compare models [46]. If the difference in CFIs between two overlapping models is less than 0.01, then the hypothesis that there is no t difference between the two models should not be rejected. SPSS Version 22.0 was used for all of these analyses.

Internal Consistency
For DASS-21 items, distribution indices were computed. Table 1 shows the mean (0.77 to 1.47) for items, means, and standard deviations for the three subscales of depression, anxiety, stress, and the overall DASS-21 score. All DASS-21 items had skewness and kurtosis values less than 2, which are good indicators of normality [47]. Table 2 displays Cronbach's alpha and the correlations between the three subscales of the sample of adults in the population as a whole. Cronbach's alpha coe cients exceeded 0.80, indicating good internal consistency for the subscales and the scale as a whole. Correlations between the three subscales were strong, ranging from 0.69 to 0.80, P = 0.01. The correlation between each DASS-21 subscale and the overall score was very signi cant, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94, and all DASS-21 subscales had two-week test-retest reliability (depression r = 0.76, anxiety r = 0.67, stress r=0.69, total r = 0.80). Table 1 + Table 2 to feature here.

Convergent and divergent validity
Pearson's correlation with the Beck depression scale and the beck anxiety scale was used to determine the DASS-21's convergent and divergent validity. According to Table 2, the depression score in the DASS-21 was more strongly correlated with the contralateral scale BDI-II than with the other non-contrast scales, and the anxiety score in the DASS-21 was more strongly correlated with the contralateral scale BAI than with the other scales. Overall, the results indicated that the DASS-21 had su cient convergent and divergent validity, and the overall DASS-21 score was similarly correlated with measures of depression, anxiety, and stress.

Data Distribution
The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy scale (KMO = 0.957) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (X 2 = 10173.778, Comp = 0.000, DF = 210) results con rmed that the data were suitable for factor analysis and that the model's adequacy was excellent [55-56].

Exploratory factor analysis
Various EFAs were performed, and two models (the one-factor model and the three-factor model) were tested. In the single-factor model, it was discovered that all DASS-21 items were loaded on one factor, with a loading factor ranging from 0.472 to 0.778, except for item no. 1, which was loaded on another factor of 0.421 and explained 43% of the total variance. Examination of the three-factor model discovered that items 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, and 19 were loaded on two factors, namely depression and anxiety, with a loading factor greater than 0.30 [44]. Item 8 had a loading factor of 0.389 on the depression subscale and 0.422 on the stress subscale. With a loading factor of 0.343 and 0.419, respectively, item 12 loaded on the anxiety and stress factors. Due to deleting 8 DASS-21 items, we obtained a 13item DASS-13 scale, as shown in Table 3. Table 3 to feature here.

Con rmatory factor analysis
Three different CFAs were performed to determine the best factor structure for DASS-21 in a sample of Jordanian adults, per the recommendations [48]. The following three models were tested for DASS-21: (a). one-factor, (b). threefactor DASS-21, and (c). three-factor DASS-13. The one-factor model for DASS-21 provided the worst t (Table   4). Table 4 to feature here.
The three-factor DASS-21 model produced appropriate indicators, whereas the three-factor DASS-13 model produced the best indicators. The ∆CFI between the three-factor DASS-21 and DASS-13 models was = 0.023 (see Fig. 1, Fig. 2 for models). This supports the hypothesis that there is no difference in t between the two models. The CFI between the one-factor model and the three-factor DASS model was = 0.009, and this value indicates a difference in t between the two models, supporting the hypothesis that the three-factor model is the most appropriate. This lends credence to the hypothesis that the three-factor is the best and most suitable. Fig. 1+ Fig. 2 to feature here.

DASS-21 association with demographic variables
The results of the MANOVA to examine the signi cance of the means differences of the participants' responses to the DASS-21 sub-scales revealed that there are differences between males and females in the scores of the subscales and the total score of the DASS-21, in favor of females. While the analysis revealed no differences in the degrees of the sub-scales or the overall DASS-21 score as a result of other demographic variables (age, educational level, place of residence, marital status, and employment status). This result was con rmed by using linear regression to examine the effect of demographic factors on adults' responses to the three subscales Table 5. Table 5 to feature here.

Discussion
The current study sought to determine the validity of developing a short version of the Jordanian Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 on a non-clinical sample of adults despite its utility in differentiating between depressed and anxious patients, concerning the internal structure of the scale. The current study employed methods to assess the internal reliability of the depression, anxiety, and stress subscales and the internal reliability of the scale as a whole. It is essential to assure that the scale is reliable across all population groups. However, there has only been one published assessment of the repeatability of the DASS-21 test and retest, and appropriate statistical tests were used for this purpose. Bottesi et al [15] reported values r = 0.75 for depression, r = 0.64 for anxiety, and r = 0.64 for stress, indicating a moderate positive correlation. The current study calculated Pearson's correlation between the three subscales and the overall DASS-21 score because the Pearson correlation coe cient effectively measures the relationship between the data test-retest rather than the agreement between them. The DASS-21 formulations were correlated with an acceptable positive correlation in this study. The relationship between anxiety, depression, and stress was at its peak, which supports previous research [24,[49][50]. Positive correlations between the three subscales indicate that there are similarities between items associated with the different scales, which may pose di culties in detecting signs of depression, anxiety, and stress. This does not fully explain the ndings of the construction analysis based on three factors, as suggested by the original scale [17]. These ndings demonstrated excellent test and retest validity, indicating that the DASS-21 is appropriate for use with the general adult population in the community. Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each DASS-21 subscale separately and for the overall scale. The scale was found to be reliable in this study, with excellent internal consistency values when compared to those reported in other recent studies [15,22,49,51]. Cronbach's alpha values for the scale as a whole were reported in four studies [15,37,49,51], and these values, along with the values observed in this study, indicated that the DASS-21 had good and acceptable internal consistency and was composed of independent items. The current ndings may imply that using the overall DASS-21 score is just as appropriate as calculating the scores of the three subscales individually. This score represents the idea that the DASS-21 is a common overall measure of distress, and the DASS-21 appears to be equally appropriate for research purposes because it measures general distress in a very e cient and economical manner.
In light of the current ndings, I believe that DASS-21 may enable the purposeful and effective measurement of depression-anxiety traits and general distress traits, per the ndings of a study [22], and this nding is consistent with Clark and Watson's [13] model, which suggests that negative in uence can be a common feature of depression and anxiety syndromes, each of which is distinguished by its items. For all DASS-21 scores, the two-week temporal stability was acceptable. In particular, the correlations between the measures were positive and good in the current study's sample of participants, which is consistent with previous ndings [15,19,24,33]. Furthermore, the results of the associations between the three subscales and measures of the same different constructs are generally satisfactory, which is consistent with previous research [21,24,52].
The research examined the convergent and discriminatory validity of measures of anxiety and depression but did not include a measure of stress. Indeed, the stress scale was positively correlated with both the BDI-II scale and the BAI scale with high reliability, and this result is consistent with previous ndings [22]. The analyses revealed only minor associations between age and DASS-21 scores, indicating that the questionnaire is largely insensitive to age, as well as educational level, place of residence, marital status, and employment status. Because the analyses revealed no signi cant relationship between these demographic variables and any of the DASS-21 scale scores, the current ndings regarding age, educational level, place of residence, marital and occupational status, and marital and occupational status provide evidence that the previous demographic characteristics do not affect the results of the Jordanian version of DASS-21, allowing it to be administered to a large population. The analyses revealed strong and positive correlations between gender and total DASS-21 scores on the one hand, and gender and DASS-21 sub-scales scores on the other, indicating the scale's gender sensitivity. Females scored higher on the overall scale and on the DASS-21 subscales, which is consistent with previous ndings that show higher levels for women than men of depression [53], anxiety [23], stress [23], and total score for DASS-21 [53]. These ndings con rm that the three constructs have high, concordant, and motivating validity, and they are consistent with previous research that has looked at associations between the DASS-21 and other measures. While other studies have found no gender differences in any of the three DASS-21 subscale scores [15], Wang et al [26] found that males scored signi cantly higher on the depression scale than females in their validation study in China, which could be due to cultural differences.
The structural analysis of DASS-21 reveals some issues, such as forcing some items to be loaded on more than one structure or forcing them to be loaded on nominally unrelated structures. The scale's 20 items were loaded onto a single factor, which is thought to be the general distress factor, except for item 1, which was loaded to a factor other than the general distress factor in the one-factor model. In the three-factor model, items 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 19 were carried on the depression and anxiety factors, item 8 was carried on the depression and stress factors, and item 12 was carried on the anxiety and stress factors. After removing the eight items, the three-factor model achieved better item adjustment. According to the three-factor model of DASS-21, it was necessary to delete eight items from DASS-21 to achieve an acceptable model t. Consequently, we obtained a new version, DASS-13, in the current study. A variety of appropriate indicators were used to evaluate the original three-factor model's suitability. The results showed a high level of model agreement, con rming that the Jordanian version measures three distinct structures as suggested by Lovibond and Lovibond [16]. The current result is consistent with previous research [24][25]27]; this validated the original three-factor model as the best factorial structure. The current study's ndings indicate that the representation of DASS-21 sub-scales remains questionable with its various models; however, the current study's ndings do not differ from previous studies [24,[51][52], with DASS-21 presenting a clear contrast.
Other exploratory factor analyses of DASS-21 in the adult population sample and previous studies [19,22,49] noted the structural problems encountered by the current study's three-factor model. These issues are the primary reason for further investigation, which should include alternative testing models that might t better. The three-factor model was found to be the most appropriate for adults in most studies [5,15,36,51,54]. Some of the limitations of the current study included the temporal stability that was made in one group of participants, so the temporal stability results were based on data from a sample of university students. Members of the Jordanian community were sought in the north, center, and south of the country. The characteristics of the participants revealed that the Southern Jordanian regions were more representative than the Northern and Central Jordanian regions. As a result, the population distribution of the participants in the study sample is uneven. Because the participants were from a non-clinical sample of community adults, it is unclear how their ndings can be applied to clinical samples; therefore, the current study recommends that future studies on the psychometric properties of the DASS-21 include larger multicenter samples. Based on the current results of the exploratory factor analysis of the DASS-21 in the adult sample, additional studies to extract normative data for DASS-21 are required, as well as a review of some items and further analyses to determine the scale's reliability in other populations.

Conclusions
We conclude that the Jordanian version of the DASS-13 can be used as a reliable and valid tool for measuring depression, anxiety, and stress in an adult population in Jordan, and providing the psychometric properties of DASS-21 will assist Jordanian clinicians and researchers in quickly examining common mental disorders in the community. Furthermore, the current study's ndings contribute to determining the potential bene t of using the scale's overall score as a measure of general distress, because CFA modeling revealed that DASS-21 is a signi cant common factor of general mental disorder. Procedures followed in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration. Authors' con rmed that the experimental protocols were approved by the deanship of the scienti c research at Al-Balqa Applied University and the department of planning and follow-up in the Ministry of Health. Informed consent obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material The datasets analyzed during this study is not publicly available because of ethical restrictions. Contact the corresponding author.

Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interest.

Funding
This research did not receive any speci c grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-pro t sectors.

Author contribution
The corresponding author is the one who has done all the work related to the manuscript such as:

Supplementary Files
This is a list of supplementary les associated with this preprint. Click to download. Dass21.pdf