3.1. Charaterisation of the membranes
SEM was used to investigate the surface morphology of the membranes (Figure 2). Defect free, porous and clean membrane surfaces were observed for all the membranes. The Pd nanoparticles (PdNPs) were not visible in the mixed matrix membrane SEM images. This is similar to a study by Taurozi et al. on in-situ embedded silver on a PSF/PVA matrix [25]. However, observable surface morphological changes like the increase in membrane porosity due to an increase in Pd concentrations (wt. %) was observed. The pure PSf membrane (Figure 2 (a)) showed more apparent and evenly distributed pores with similar pore geometry. With increasing Pd concentrations, the membranes were observed to show increased porosity with evenly distributed and smaller sized pores. The increase in porosity can be attributed to the effects of Pd nanoparticles as hydrophilic additive influencing the exchange rate between solvent and non-solvent during phase inversion process [26].
EDS was used to investigate the elemental composition of the membranes. It can be observed that in the pristine PSf membrane (Figure 2 (e)), the peaks observed were associated with the elemental components of the polymer which are: C, O, and S. In Figure 2 (f) additional peaks attributed to the palladium nanoparticles are observed. No other elements were detected in the membrane samples confirming the purity of the fabricated membranes.
TEM images of the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf dope solution were observed on a Tecnai G2 F2O X-Twin MAT equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) to investigate the particle size, distribution and elemental composition of the polymer dope solution (Figure 3). PdNPs were evenly dispersed in the polymer dope solution with some aggregation which was reliant on the intensity of the polymer and Pd nanoparticles [27]. The small PdNPs of average size of 5 nm formed sparsely distributed clusters as observed in Figure 3 (a). The cluster pattern can be described as ballistic cluster-cluster agglomeration. The average size of the Pd nanoparticles as observed on HR-TEM was around 5 nm (Figure 3(b)) and this concurred with a study done by [28]. The crystallinity of the PdNPs was evaluated through SAED patterns and the polycrystallinity was confirmed as some ringed patterns could be observed (Figure 3 (c)) [29]. The elemental composition of the sample confirmed the presence of peaks attributed to the polymer and the PdNPs: C, O, S and Pd (Figure 3 (d)). However, additional Al and Cu peaks can be attributed to sample holder.
The embedded PdNPs were also analysed by TEM after dissolving the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane in a solvent. Small pieces of the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane were completely dissolved in NMP (2 mL). The solution was sonicated in methanol, dropped on a copper grid, dried and observed on TEM equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The PdNPs maintained their morphology after casting and embedding in the PSf membrane. The nanoparticles were evenly distributed in the dissolved membrane solution (Figure 4(a)). Average particle size was around 5 nm (Figure 4(b)). The SAED pattern showed limited crystallinity due to coverage of the nanoparticles by the polymeric solution. Two ring patterns could be observed (Figure 4 (c)), as opposed to multi ring patterns that are observed in Figure 3 (c). The EDS spectrum confirmed the presence of elements associated with the PSf polymer (C, O and S) as well as the PdNPs (Pd). The presence of Cu can be attributed to the Cu grid used during sample analysis.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to investigate the surface morphology and roughness of the membranes (Figure 5). The bright and dark areas in the images show peaks and valleys of the membrane, respectively. The pristine PSf membrane possessed the lowest average roughness (16.56 nm) as shown by the lighter areas in Figure 5(a). In-situ embedding of PdNPs resulted in increased membrane surface area from about 12.69 nm for the pristine PSf to around 24.59 for the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane. The increase in membrane surface area due to in-situ embedded PdNPs concurred with the water permeation tests where membranes with higher roughness parameters produced high water flux. According to literature, surface roughness reduces the permeation resistance due to the increased surface area of the membrane [30][31].
The structure of pristine PSf and Pd/PSf membranes were studied by XRD analysis (Figure 6(a)). The in-situ generation of PdNPs into PSf membrane did not show any changes in the XRD patterns. The broad peak observed at 2θ = 16o can be attributed to the largely amorphous PSf polymer. No obvious PdNPs peaks were observed at higher Pd concentrations. The 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane showed a sharp peak at 2θ = 14° and 25o, which may indicate the presence of Pd though this could not be confirmed form literature or XRD databases. The XRD pattern for Pd-black should show characteristics peaks at 38.1° and 46.6°. The absence of Pd peaks can be attributed to the creation of an X-ray shield by the polymer on the in-situ nanoparticles, resulting in low intensity [32][33]. The XRD patterns of the metal nanoparticles embedded in polymeric membranes tend to show shielding of the metal peaks by the polymer phase peaks. The entrapped metal nanoparticles will be completely covered by the polymer phase. In addition, the low percentages of Pd generated in the PSf membranes may have contributed to the low intensities of the Pd peaks.
The water flux increased with increasing amount of in-situ embedded PdNPs (Figure 6(b)). This concurred with the observed increase in the porosity with increasing nanoparticle loading. The water flux also increased with increasing pressure. The 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane showed the highest water flux at 7 bar. The water flux results also corrobarated well with the water contact angle measurements and the roughness parameters calculated from the AFM.
The contact angle is a measure of surface hydrophilicity of the membrane (Figure 6(c)). Pristine PSf showed a water contact angle of 75°. In-situ loading of PdNPs reduced the water contact angle to around 68° which translates to an improvement in the hydrophilicity of the membranes [34]. Hydrophilic membranes are reported to result in higher water flux due to favourable permeation of water molecules through hydrophilic compared to hydrophobic membranes [35].
The zeta potential of membranes is an important parameter since it represents the membrane surface charge in aqueous solution due to dissociation of functional groups on the membrane surface. All the membranes showed a negative zeta potential at pH 5.6 (Figure 6 (d)). Increasing the concentration of PdNPs in the membranes resulted in more negative surface charges of the membranes. The increasing negative charges would improve the separation efficiency of negatively charged molecules due to the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged membrane surface and any negatively charged pollutants [36].
The mechanical properties of the membrane were evaluated by using the tensile strength measurements (Table 1). It can be observed that the membrane with the highest Pd concentration (1% wt.) was able to withstand more tensile stress before permanent deformation. It can be observed that with increase in PdNP concentration, the mechanical properties of the membranes were improved with an elongation at break of 14% for the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf compared to only 4% for the pristine PSf membrane. Similar observations have been reported in literature where the addition of nanoparticles to membranes resulted in improved elongation at break [37]. This is very important in membrane applications where high pressure is required.
Table 1
Mechanical properties of the membranes
Membrane type
|
Tensile strength (N/mm2)
|
Elongation at break
(%)
|
PSf
|
35
|
4
|
0.05 wt % Pd/PSf
|
37
|
9
|
0.1 wt % Pd/PSf
|
38
|
11
|
0.5 wt % Pd/PSf
|
35
|
13
|
1.0 wt % Pd/ PSf
|
41
|
14
|
Figure 7 shows thermograms of PSf membranes. The decomposition of PSf and 1.0% Pd/PSf membranes followed a similar trend. However, while the decomposition of PSf occurred at 505°C, that for 1.0% Pd/PSf was observed at 515°C. This confirmed that membranes containing PdNPs had slightly higher thermal stability than the PSf membrane. The mass losses at temperatures below 130°C were due to elimination of adsorbed water [38]. It was also important to note the residual weight at 900 oC was slightly higher for 1.0% Pd/PSf membrane compared to PSf which completely degraded and resulted in zero residue. The residual weight of 1.0% Pd/PSf membrane confirmed the presence of thermally stable PdNPs. The % residual mass corresponded to the amount of Pd embedded in the membrane (about 1.0%).
Small angle X-rays scattering (SAXs) measurements were performed at high resolution to investigate the morphological structure and size distribution of the in-situ synthesized PdNPs. The data obtained from SAXS measurements were analysed using Saxquant software program (Anton Paar, Germany) to generate two-dimensional SAXS patterns. Generalized Indirect Fourier Transformer (GIFT) software was used to convert the two-dimensional SAXS patterns into one dimensional Pair-Distance Distribution Functions (PDDF). In Figure 8, volume distribution of the particle sizes is presented. The particle size of PdNPs can be estimated using Fourier transform based on the scattering vector. The equations used by the Saxquant software to calculate the particle size are expressed in our previous work [22].
The volume distribution graphs consist of two symmetrical curves in r-space. The resultant PDDF graphs illustrates that the nanoparticles existed in different sizes (polydisperse) and different shape (polymorphous) due to nucleation and growth stages during in-situ nanoparticle formation. However, the symmetrical nature of the curves demonstrates a normal volume distribution of the nanoparticle size in the membrane. These results concur with the TEM results obtained for nanoparticles in the membrane.
From the SAXS pattern it can be deduced that that the concentration of the nanoparticles in membranes was dilute due to the absence of the q peak (Figure 9). This, therefore, suggests poor electrostatic interactions between the nanoparticles due to extensive interparticle distance. The interparticle distance is approximated by:
$$d=\frac{2\pi }{{q}_{peak}}$$
2
where d is the interparticle distance and q is the scattering vector [39].
The number distribution of nanoparticle sizes is also an important parameter as it is used to deduce the size of nanoparticles. SAXS intensity (I) of a particle at q=0 can be described by:
$$I single \left(q=0\right)=\left(\varDelta {P}^{2}\right){V}^{2 }$$
3
where, p = electron density contrast between the particle and matrix or solvent, V = particle volume.
For polydisperse system the SAXS intensity at q =0 can be written as:
$$I\left(q=0\right)=N\left({V}^{2}\right){(\varDelta P)}^{2}$$
4
where, N is the particle number and V2 is the average volume of these particles. The SAXS intensity at q=0 can be obtained by extrapolating SAXS curve to q = 0 by using Guinear formula. Therefore, the relative particle number distribution can be obtained by comparing SAXS intensities at q=0 [40]. The obtained nanoparticle radii were approximately 0.2 to 2 nm for the 0.05 wt % Pd/PSf membrane and 0.2 to 2.5 nm for the 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membranes. This signifies that at larger concentrations, the coalescence phase produced bigger nanoparticles meaning the initial concentration of the Pd precursor played a role in the size of the resultant PdNPs. The number distribution indicates that the smaller nanoparticles were more dispersive in the membrane than larger ones.
3.2. Catalytic reduction of 4-NP
The reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP was selected as a model reaction for evaluating the catalytic activity of 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane and the reaction was monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy. A control experiment was performed using pristine PSF for comparison. The reduction of 4-NP by NaBH4 is thermodynamically feasible because the difference in their standard electrode potentials (ΔE0 = E0(4−NP/4−AP) − E0(H3BO3/BH4) = −0.76 − (−1.33) = 0.67 V) is greater than zero, but it could be kinetically restricted in the absence of an efficient catalyst [41]. As soon as the NaBH4 is added, the embedded PdNPs within the membrane initiate the catalytic reduction by relaying the electrons from the donor \({BH}_{4}^{-}\) to the acceptor 4-NP following their adsorption on the catalyst surface. The role of PdNPs in the redox reactions can be explained in terms of electrochemical current potential [42]. In this case, the rate of electron transfer at the catalyst surface can be influenced by two step mechanism; firstly, adsorption of 4-nitrophenolate ion onto the catalyst surface, then secondly, the interfacial electron transfer and desorption of 4-aminophenolate away from the surface. In the presence of NaBH4, the 4-NP solution exhibits a strong absorption peak at 400 nm which diminishes with time up to 70 mins as a new peak ascribed to 4-AP appears at approximately 300 nm (Figure 10 (a)) [43].
Figure 10 Catalytic reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP using a) catalytic 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane b) Pristine PSf membrane c) 4-NP reduction profiles d) Kinetics of the 4-NP reduction. Both reactions were performed under similar conditions ([4-NP] 10 ppm; NaBH4, 0.5 M, 2 mL; 12 membrane pieces, 5 mm2 of membrane)
The pristine PSf membrane did not show any catalytic activity under the same reaction conditions, even after 100 minutes (Figure 10(b)). It can thus be concluded that, a catalyst is required for the reduction to take place and PSf can be a good support for entrapment of the catalytic PdNPs. Similar observations have been reported elsewhere [44].
Figure 10(c) shows the decrease in the concentration of the 4-NP with time using the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane. For the control membrane (pristine PSf) no reaction was observed. The kinetics of the reduction reaction was described by Langmuir Hinshelwood pseudo-first order kinetics equation;
k app C = -dC/dt ……………………………………………………………………….(5)
where C is the concentration of 4-NP at reaction time t. A linear correlation was observed between ln(C/C0) and the reaction time, confirming pseudo-first order kinetics, and the corresponding kapp values were approximately 2.1 x 10−2min−1 for the 1.0 wt % Pd/PSf membrane and 1.03 x 10−4 min−1 for the pristine membrane (Figure 9(d)).
The reaction followed pseudo-first order rate law as reported by other researchers [45][46][47]. However, the reaction is much slower than the reported rates in slurry systems. The slow reaction kinetics with embedded nanoparticles can be attributed to the mass flow limitations due to the hinderance of the PdNPs by the PSf membrane phase. Equation 6 shows the reaction between 4-NP and the reducing agent sodium borohydride to form the 4-hydroxylaminophenol (Hx) and then finally 4-AP.
.........(6)
The reduction of 4-NP to 4-AP follows a series of steps in which 4-NP is reduced to the 4-nitrosophenol and then quickly converted to 4-hydroxylaminophenol (Hx), which is the only stable intermediate. Finally, Hx is reduced to the final product, 4- AP as shown in Figure 11 [48][49][50]. The mechanistic reduction of 4-NP on the PdNPs occurs in two steps that involve (1) diffusion and adsorption of 4-NP to the catalyst surface and (2) electron transfer mediated by the catalyst surface from NaBH4 to the 4-NP. This is then followed by the desorption of products (4-AP) from the surface of catalyst [50][51].