Ludangshen Oral Liquid for Treatment of Convalescent COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1313112/v1

Abstract

Objective

To explore the effect of Ludangshen Oral Liquid for treatment of convalescent patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter method.

Methods

200 convalescent COVID-19 patients who had symptoms related to decreased digestive and respiratory function were randomly divided to either receive Ludangshen Oral Liquid or placebo for 2 weeks. The severity of clinical symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, abdominal distension, loose stools, and shortness of breath were assessed by visual analogue scale and observed at before and after treatment. The improvement and resolution rates of clinical symptoms were evaluated. Full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS) were used for statistical analyses. Adverse events were recorded during the study.

Results

8 patients did not complete the study. After 2 weeks of treatment, both FAS and PPS results showed that patients in Ludangshen group had significantly lower score of fatigue, anorexia, loose stools, and shortness of breath than placebo group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in distention (P > 0.05). The improvement rate of fatigue, anorexia, distension, loose stools and shortness of breath were significantly higher in Ludangshen group (P < 0.05), as well as the resolution rates (P < 0.05) except for shortness of breath (P > 0.05). There were two cases of adverse events, with one nose bleeding in Ludangshen group and one headache in placebo group.

Conclusion

The study suggested that two weeks of Ludangshen Oral Liquid treatment may have certain effects for convalescent COVID-19 patients on improving digestive and respiratory symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, loose stools and shortness of breath, which may be one of the choices for management of convalescent COVID-19 patients with digestive and respiratory symptoms.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is still severe all around the world, with over 318 million cases and 5 million deaths cumulatively reported by World Health Organization till January 15, 2022 [1]. In China, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) together with Western medicine has been highly recommended in prevention, and treatment of COVID-19[2, 3]. TCM has played an important role in relieving symptoms of COVID-19 patients as well as delaying or reducing the progression from mild to severe condition[4]. As a result, the epidemic has almost been controlled in China[5].

Till January 17, 2022, almost 123,169 COVID-19 patients have been cured and discharged from hospitals in China[6]. For convalescent patients, who had met the discharge criteria (absence of clinical symptoms and radiological abnormalities, as well as two consecutive negative test results of real time reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR))[2], about 10% patients may still experience mild clinical discomforts such as cough and fatigue, especially those who were severe or critical cases [4, 7, 8]. As the number of patients who are discharged from hospitals or discontinued of quarantine has increased rapidly, the management of convalescent COVID-19 patients has gradually become a new urgency[4]. In TCM theory, COVID-19 belongs to “cold-damp pestilence” category[9]. The pathogenic cold-damp together with epidemic pathogen firstly invaded the exterior and block the lung-wei; as the lung meridian originate from middle-jiao, the function of spleen and stomach were then affected[4, 10]. Therefore, the patients during recovery period would mainly present clinical symptoms related to decreased digestive and respiratory function, such as fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, loose stools, and shortness of breath, which should be highly managed [4, 10]. TCM has been highly recognized for their remarkable effects in fighting infectious diseases. Acted as "preventive treatment of diseases", it has advantages in preventing disease recurrence after recovery[11]. TCM can provide comprehensive rehabilitation therapies including herbal medicine as well as non-pharmacological therapies (acupuncture, taichi) to improve clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients during recovery period. In this study, we investigated the effect of Ludangshen Oral Liquid, a Chinese patent medicine, for treatment of digestive and respiratory symptoms in convalescent COVID-19 patients, in order to provide clinical evidence for the treatment of COVID-19.

Method

Study Design

The study was designed as a multi-center randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients during recovery period of COVID-19 treated with Ludangshen Oral Liquid. The trial was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (No. ChiCTR200003291). The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee (No. KY2020-050). The written informed consent was signed by all patients. 

The study included two weeks of treatment, and all patients underwent physical examinations, clinical symptoms assessment (including fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, loose stools, shortness of breath and other symptoms of decreased digestive function), and adverse events recording before and after treatment.

Patients 

The convalescent COVID-19 patients with lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome in presence of digestive and respiratory symptoms, were enrolled from Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ezhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, and Xiaogan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital. 

The convalescent patients were defined as those who have met the criteria of medical isolation and discharge[3]. The criteria was: (1) body temperature returned to normal for more than three days; (2)respiratory symptoms improved significantly; (3)lung imaging showed obvious absorption; (4) two consecutive negative test results of nucleic acid (the sampling interval was at least one day)[2].

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) meeting the criteria of medical isolation and discharge mentioned above; (2) meeting the criteria of lung-spleen qi deficiency syndrome (Clinical manifestations: shortness of breath, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, fullness, loose stool, and uneasiness. The tongue is pale and greasy.); (3) at least two or three TCM symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, loose stools, shortness of breath, or a single symptom score greater than 4 points when measured by a visual analogue scale of 0-10 points; (4) discharged from hospital for two to four weeks; (5) aged 18 to 70 years; (6) provision of written informed consent. 

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) presence of symptoms related to decreased digestive function caused by other reasons or other digestive system diseases; (2) having difficulty in oral medication due to underlying diseases or other reasons; (3) having severe basic diseases, such as uncontrolled heart, lung, kidney, digestive diseases, hematological diseases, neuropsychiatric diseases, immune diseases, metabolic diseases, malignant tumors, and severe malnutrition; (4) allergy to the examined treatments, or with allergic constitution; (5) women in pregnancy or lactation; (6) having mental diseases; (7) participating in other clinical trials. 

Treatment

Patients in intervention group were treated with Ludangshen Oral Liquid (Shanxi Zhenglai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanxi, China, production batch No. 2003305), 10ml twice daily for two weeks. The composition of Ludangshen Oral Liquid is ludangshen. Patients in control group were treated with placebo of Ludangshen Oral Liquid (Shanxi Zhenglai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanxi, China), 10ml twice daily for two weeks. The Ludangshen Oral Liquid and placebo solution were indistinguishable regarding flavor, taste, and appearance including color and packaging. Patients who have basic diseases were allowed to take corresponding treatments. 

Outcomes 

The changes in digestive and respiratory symptoms, including fatigue, anorexia, abdominal distension, loose stools and shortness of breath, were observed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 to 10 score was used to evaluate the severity of symptoms; “0” represents asymptomatic symptoms, while “10” represents the most severe symptoms. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms. Based on the VAS score, the improvement and resolution rates of symptoms were assessed. Adverse events were recorded during the study period.

Randomization and blinding 

Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either Ludangshen Oral Liquid or placebo. The randomization was performed using the clinical research central randomization system (online version). The doctors, patients, outcome investigators and statistics were blinded to the treatment assignments of patients, only if emergency happened. 

Statistical analysis 

Data were analyzed by SPSS 26.0 software. Continuous variables were presented as mean + standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as median with interquartile range (IQR) if not normally distributed. Categorical variables were presented as the number and percentage (%). The t-test was used to compare continuous data between groups if data were normally distributed, otherwise two independent sample rank sum test (Mann-Whitney U test) was used. The X2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical data between groups. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 

Two analysis sets including full analysis set (FAS) and per protocol set (PPS) were analyzed for effectiveness in this study. FAS was used to analyze the data of patients who went through randomization and received treatments; for missing data, last time measurement was carried forward and filled. PPS was used to analyze the data of patients who fully completed the study with good compliance. 

Results

Baseline characteristics 

A total of 200 convalescent COVID-19 patients from three centers were enrolled and assessed for eligibility, with 100 patients in each group after randomization. Three patients dropped out of the study because of poor compliance, violation of the treatment protocol, or adverse events; four patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, one patient repeatedly recorded. Totally, 192 patients fully completed the study. (Figure 1)

The demographic and baseline characteristics were shown in Table1. There was no significant difference in gender, age, smoking, drinking, drug allergy history, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, breathing, CT imaging, hospitalization length, discharge length, comorbidities and concomitant medication between groups (> 0.05). The body mass index value was significantly lower in Ludangshen group than control group (P = 0.021). 

Comparison of symptom scores 

At week 1, fatigue score was significantly lower in Ludangshen group compared to that in placebo group (FAS: P < 0.001; PPS: P < 0.001). Ludangshen group had significantly lower symptom score in anorexia, distension, loose stools and shortness of breath compared to placebo group for FAS analysis, but the PPS analysis showed not significantly difference between groups (FAS: P < 0.001, P = 0.024, P = 0.001, P = 0.016; PPS: P = 0.535, P = 0.619, P = 0.749, P = 0.996) (Table 2). 

At week 2, patients in Ludangshen group had significantly lower score of fatigue, anorexia, loose stools, and shortness of breath (FAS: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, < 0.001; PPS: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in distension score between the two groups (FAS: P = 0.987; PPS: P = 0.341) (Table 2).

Comparison of symptom improvement rate 

At week 1, the improvement rates of fatigue and anorexia were significantly higher in Ludangshen group than placebo group (FAS: P = 0.002, P < 0.001; PPS: P = 0.003, P < 0.001). Patients in Ludangshen group also had obviously higher improvement rate in distension and loose stools by FAS analysis, but the differences were not significant by PPS analysis (FAS: P = 0.036, = 0.039; PPS: P = 0.059, P = 0.062). For shortness of breath, there was no significant difference between groups (FAS: P = 0.23; PPS: P = 0.312). (Table 3)

At week 2, the improvement rate of fatigue, anorexia, distension, loose stools, and shortness of breath were all significantly higher in Ludangshen group compared to placebo group (FAS: P < 0.001, P = 0.013, P = 0.007, P < 0.001, P < 0.001; PPS: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.01, P = 0.005, P = 0.001). (Table 3)

Comparison of symptom disappearance rate 

At week 1, the symptom disappearance rate of fatigue and anorexia were significantly higher in Ludangshen group than placebo group (FAS: P = 0.027, P = 0.036; PPS: P = 0.026, P < 0.001). For distension, loose stools, and shortness of breath, there were no statistically significant difference in symptom disappearance rate between groups (FAS: P = 0.194, P = 0.07, P = 1; PPS: P = 0.197, P = 0.058, P = 1). (Table 4)

At week 2, the symptom disappearance rate of fatigue, anorexia, distension and loose stools were significantly higher in Ludangshen group than placebo group (FAS: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.005, P = 0.005; PPS: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom disappearance rate of shortness of breath between groups (FAS: P = 0.11; PPS: P = 0.11). (Table 4)

Safety evaluation 

The adverse events were recorded during the study. There were two cases of adverse events. One case in Ludangshen group had nose bleeding, and one case in placebo group had headache. The rate of adverse events was 1% in both groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and resting heart rate at the end of treatment between Ludangshen and placebo group (> 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, Ludangshen Oral Liquid could significantly improve certain symptoms related to decreased digestive and respiratory functions. The FAS results showed that symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, loose stools and shortness of breath were improved after treatment of Ludangshen Oral Liquid compared to placebo at week 1 and week 2. The results were consistent with PPS analysis at week 2. However, for results at week 1, there was difference between FAS analysis and PPS analysis. In PPS analysis, only fatigue was shown to be significantly improved. It seems that week 2 result was more stable, and that compared to one-week treatment of Ludangshen Oral Liquid, two weeks treatment indicated better effect. In terms of symptom improvement rate and is appearance rate at week 2, the results from FAS analysis and PPS analysis were consistent. Improvement rate of fatigue, anorexia, abdominal distension, loose stools and shortness of breath in COVID-19 patients were all significantly increased after treated by Ludangshen Oral Liquid. In addition, symptom disappearance rate of fatigue, anorexia, abdominal distention and loose stools were also significantly increased.

The main component of Ludangshen Oral Liquid is Dangshen (Radix Codonopsis), which is the dried root of Campanulaceae plants. As recorded in Pharmacopoeia of people's Republic of China, Dangshen is sweet and neutral, and can supplement the center to boost qi, and fortify the spleen to boost the lung; therefore, it is often used when there is spleen-lung qi deficiency, shortness of breath, palpitations, loss of appetite, loose stools, cough with empty breath, and wasting-thirst with internal heat. Besides, the Thoroughly Revised Materia Medica and Orthodox Interpretation of the Materia Medica of Qing Dynasty also clearly stated the function of Dangshen in regulating digestive symptoms and improving lung ventilation. Therefore, Ludangshen Oral Liquid can be used for convalescent COVID-19 patients who were of lung and spleen qi deficiency[4].

Previous laboratory studies have showed that Dangshen could adjust gastrointestinal motility, promote digestion and absorption, protect gastric mucosa, and have anti-ulcer function[1214]. It was also found that Dangshen can improve resistance ability, and have anti-fatigue and anti-anoxia function[15, 16]. A systematic review of Dangshen indicated that Dangshen formulate can improve lung function and quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[17]. Besides, Ludangshen Oral Liquid can help enhance the immune activity[18, 19]. All these studies proved that Ludangshen Oral Liquid and its major components can help improve digestive and respiratory function and relieve related symptoms. Previous studies about recovery of COVID-19 patients more focused on description of basic characteristics and re-test RT-PCR positive risk, but very few could provide treatment information of COVID-19 during recovery period [6, 2022]. This study used a randomized placebo-controlled design to explore the effects of Ludangshen Oral Liquid in convalescent COVID-19 patients, which is considered as one of the most powerful tools for interventional study[23]. During data analyses, we performed sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of the results by comparing FAS and PPS results. The study had some limitations. The present study only included patients of Wuhan city, and therefore the conclusion may only be relevant to Chinese people. A larger sample size and longer follow-up for further verification is required.

In conclusion, the study suggested that two weeks of Ludangshen Oral Liquid may have certain effects on improving digestive and respiratory symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, loose stools and shortness of breath, and Ludangshen Oral Liquid can be one of the choices for management of convalescent COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion

The study suggested that two weeks of Ludangshen Oral Liquid treatment may have certain effects for convalescent COVID-19 patients on improving digestive and respiratory symptoms including fatigue, anorexia, loose stools and shortness of breath, which may be one of the choices for management of convalescent COVID-19 patients with digestive and respiratory symptoms.

Abbreviations

COVID-19

coronavirus disease 2019

FAS

Full analysis set

PPS

per-protocol set

TCM

traditional Chinese medicine

RT-PCR

reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction

VAS

visual analogue scale

SD

standard deviation

IQR

interquartile range.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan Third Hospital (No. KY2020-050).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable

Availability of data and materials

Not Applicable

Competing interests

None

Funding

This study was supported by the This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program (2020YFC0845000) and the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Special Project of Chinese Medicine Emergency Response to New Coronavirus Pneumonia (2020ZYLCYJ04-1).

Authors' Contributions

FL, YB and XT designed the protocols; BP, XH, HJ, ZX and HZ were responsible for patient enrollment and follow-up, and XA and BP were responsible for data organization, chart production, and article drafting. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Not Applicable

References

  1. Weekly. Operational Update on COVID-19 ttps://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-operational-update-on-covid-19---6-november-2020.
  2. Commission NH: Translation: Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (Trial Version 7). Infectious Microbes and Diseases 2020, 2(2):48-54.
  3. Notice on issuing rehabilitation guidance for traditional Chinese medicine during the recovery period of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (Trial) http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/24/content_5482544.htm.
  4. Zai F, Mu L, Li P, Chang L, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang Q, Guo L, Li H. Intepretation of the rehabilitation guidance for traditional Chinese medicine during the recovery period of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (Trial). J Changzhi Med Coll (Chang Zhi Yi Xue Yuan Xue Bao). 2020;34(2):111–3.
  5. Transcript of the Press Conference on February 17, 2020 http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/fkdt/202002/f12a62d10c2a48c6895cedf2faea6e1f.shtml.
  6. Xu X, Shi Y-N, Wang R-Y, Liu T, Xu J, Mao W, Sun Q-H. Home-based traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions for discharged patients with COVID-19: A rapid review of Chinese Guidelines. Integrative medicine research 2020:100479.
  7. Li Q, Wang H, Li X, Zheng Y, Wei Y, Zhang P, Ding Q, Lin J, Tang S, Zhao Y, et al. The role played by traditional Chinese medicine in preventing and treating COVID-19 in China. Front Med. 2020;14(5):681–8.
  8. Zhao S, Liu Y, Fan F, Wang Z, Jin C, Wang W, Li D, Chen X. Traditional Chinese medicine treatment strategy for convalescent patients with severe or critical cases of COVID-19. J Traditional Chin Med Univ Hunan (Hu Nan Zhong Yi Yao Da Xue Xue Bao). 2020;40(4):387–91.
  9. Wang W-Y, Xie Y, Zhou H, Liu L: Contribution of traditional Chinese medicine to the treatment of COVID-19. Phytomedicine 2020.
  10. Fan Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang Y. Analysis on the treatment of New Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19) from the cold epidemic treatment. J Traditional Chin Med (Zhong Yi Za Zhi). 2020;61(05):369–74.
  11. Zemin HE, Yongqiang HE. Connotation and Guiding Significance of the Theory of Chinese Medicine Preventive Treatment of Disease. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2015.
  12. Cheng J, Deng W, Huang p, Li J, Wu J. Experimental study on antiulcer effect and acute toxicity of Codonopsis pilosula. Northwest Pharm J (Xi Bei Yao Xue Za Zhi). 2011;26(02):120–2.
  13. Liu L, Wang J, Hu Y, Hou N, Chen J. Study on the anti-gastric mucosal damage effect and mechanism of Codonopsis and its active ingredients III. Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica (Zhong Yao Yao Li Yu Lin Chuang) 1990(05):20–23.
  14. Zheng T, Li W, Zhang Y, Qu S, Ding Y, Wei Y. Experimental study of Dangshen on small intestinal propulsion in mice. J Gansu Coll Traditional Chin Med (Gan Su Zhong Yi Xue Yuan Xue Bao). 2001;18(01):19–20.
  15. Zhang C, Wang J, Li C, Li L. Dynamic study on the contents of lobetyolin contained in Gansu DangShen. Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Xi Bu Zhong Yi Yao) 2014(9):7–9.
  16. Liu L, Cao L, Peng L, Zhang Z, Wang X. Effect of Dangshen fermentation broth on anti-fatigue ability and hypoxia tolerance of rats. Hunan J Traditional Chin Med (Hu Nan Zhong Yi Za Zhi). 2015;31(03):148–50.
  17. Demeco A, Marotta N, Barletta M, Pino I, Marinaro C, Petraroli A, Moggio L, Ammendolia A. Rehabilitation of patients post-COVID-19 infection: a literature review. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(8):0300060520948382.
  18. Hu T, Lin C, Xiang Y, Gu W. Immunoregulatory effects of Ludangshen oral liquid on immunosuppressed mice. Pharm Clin Res (Yao Xue Yu Lin Chuang Yan Jiu). 2019;27(3):171–4,186.
  19. He L-X, Zhang Z-F, Sun B, Chen Q-H, Liu R, Ren J-W, Wang J-B, Li Y. Sea cucumber (Codonopsis pilosula) oligopeptides: immunomodulatory effects based on stimulating Th cells, cytokine secretion and antibody production. Food Funct. 2016;7(2):1208–16.
  20. He S, Tian J, Li X, Zhou Y, Xiao M, Zhang Y, Min X, Li X, Jin D, Zhang Q, et al: Positive RT-PCR Test Results in 420 Patients Recovered From COVID-19 in Wuhan: An Observational Study. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2020, 11.
  21. Lan L, Xu D, Ye G, Xia C, Wang S, Li Y, Xu H. Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered From COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1502–3.
  22. Xiao M, Tian J, Zhou Y, Xu X, Min X, Lv Y, Peng M, Zhang Y, Yan D, Lang S, et al: Efficacy of Huoxiang Zhengqi dropping pills and Lianhua Qingwen granules in treatment of COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial. Pharmacological Research 2020, 161.
  23. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KCJP. surgery r: The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. 2011, 128(1):305.

Tables

Table 1

Demographic and baseline characteristics of patients between Ludangshen and placebo group

Characteristics

Ludangshen (n=99)

Placebo (n=98)

t/χ2/Z

P value

Male (n, %)

28 (28.3)

33 (33.7)

0.747

0.387

Age (n, %)

   

-0.191

0.848

≤30

9 (9.1)

5 (5.1)

   

31-40

16 (16.2)

23 (23.5)

   

41-50

23 (23.2)

21 (21.4)

   

51-60

25 (25.3)

18 (18.4)

   

≥61

26 (26.3)

31 (31.6)

   

BMI (Mean ± SD)

22.7±2.86

23.7±2.97

-2.236

0.021

Smoking (n, %)

5 (5.0)

9 (9.2)

1.138

0.251

Drinking (n, %)

4 (4.0)

9 (9.2)

2.168

0.141

Temperature (Median, IQR)

36.5 (36.3-36.5)

36.5 (36.3-36.5)

-0.048

0.962

SBP (Mean ± SD)

123.4±11.2

124.2±11.7

-0.512

0.609

DBP (Median, IQR)

79 (73-81)

76 (70-80.25)

-0.799

0.424

Breathing (Median, IQR)

18 (18-19)

18 (18-19)

-0.434

0.664

Resting heart rate (Median, IQR)

80 (75-86)

79.5 (75-86)

-0.498

0.625

Clinical classification (n, %)

   

-0.296

0.767

Mild cases

10 (10.1)

7 (7.1)

   

Moderate cases

77 (77.8)

80 (81.6)

   

Severe cases

11 (11.1)

11 (11.2)

   

Critical cases

1 (1.0)

0 (0.0)

   

CT imaging (n, %)

   

0.359

0.549

Normal

19 (19.2)

22 (22.5)

   

Abnormal

80 (80.8)

76 (77.6)

   

Blood routine (n, %)

   

1.221

0.269

Normal

99 (100.0)

94 (95.9)

   

Abnormal

0 (0.0)

1 (1.0)

   

Allergy history (n, %)

16 (16.3)

14 (14.3)

0.133

0.737

Comorbidities (n, %)

25 (25.3)

27 (27.6)

0.166

0.683

Initial symptoms (n, %)

       

Fatigue

94 (94.9)

90 (91.8)

-

-

Anorexia

68 (68.7)

70 (71.4)

-

-

Distention

43 (43.4)

34 (34.7)

-

-

Loose stools

48 (48.5)

52 (53.1)

-

-

Shortness of breath

50 (50.5)

50 (51.0)

-

-

Concomitant medication (n, %)

13 (13.1)

15 (15.3)

0.217

0.641

Hospitalization length (Median, IQR)

19 (11-28)

18 (10.75-26.5)

-0.23

0.818

Discharge length (Median, IQR)

71 (59-81)

69.5 (50-80)

-0.61

0.542

Notes: BMI: body mass index; SD: standard derivation; IQR: interquartile range; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure

Table 2

Comparison of symptom scores between Ludangshen and placebo group

Variables

FAS analysis

 

PPS analysis

 

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

 

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

Fatigue (n)

94

90

   

92

92

 

Week 1

2.88±1.44

3.64±1.43

<0.001

 

2.87±1.45

3.51±1.55

<0.001

Week 2

1.31±1.42

3.21±1.85

<0.001

 

1.35±1.46

3.11±1.92

<0.001

Anorexia (n)

68

70

   

67

68

 

Week 1

1.66±1.17

2.61±1. 53

<0.001

 

1.66±1.74

2.62±1.55

0.535

Week 2

0.78±1.22

2.09±1.74

<0.001

 

0.78±1.23

2.09±1.76

<0.001

Distention (n)

43

34

   

42

43

 

Week 1

2.02±1.88

2.32±2.10

0.024

 

2.00±1. 90

2.27±2.11

0.619

Week 2

0.74±1.62

1.53±1.89

0.987

 

0.74±1.64

1.58±1.90

0.341

Loose stools (n)

48

52

   

48

50

 

Week 1

2.02±1.77

2.65±1.94

0.001

 

2.02±1.77

2.70±1.96

0.749

Week 2

1.04±1.91

2.12±2.37

0.001

 

1.04±1.91

2.20±2.37

0.001

Shortness of breath (n)

50

50

   

49

49

 

Week 1

3.40±1.36

4.02±1.65

0.016

 

3.43±1.35

4.02±1.66

0.996

Week 2

1.76±1.38

3.26±2.07

<0.001

 

1.78±1.396

3.27±2.09

<0.001

Notes: FAS: full analysis set; PPS: per protocol set

Table 3

Comparison of clinical symptom improvement rate between Ludangshen and placebo group

Variables

FAS analysis

 

PPS analysis

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

 

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

Fatigue (n)

94

90

   

92

89

 

Week 1

52 (55.3)

29 (32.2)

0.002

 

50 (54.3)

29 (32.6)

0.003

Week 2

81 (86.2)

38 (42.2)

<0.001

 

78 (84.8)

37 (41.6)

<0.001

Anorexia (n)

68

70

   

67

68

 

Week 1

 

49 (72.1)

25 (35.7)

<0.001

 

48 (71.6)

25 (36.8)

<0.001

Week 2

61 (89.7)

38 (54.3)

<0.001

 

60 (89.6)

36 (52.9)

<0.001

Distension (n)

43

34

   

42

33

 

Week 1

28 (65.1)

14 (41.2)

0.036

 

27 (64.3)

14 (42.4)

0.059

Week 2

38 (88.4)

22 (64.7)

0.013

 

38 (90.5)

21 (63.6)

0.01

Loose stools (n)

48

52

   

48

50

 

Week 1

32 (66.7)

24 (46.2)

0.039

 

32 (66.7)

24 (48.0)

0.062

Week 2

41 (85.4)

32 (61.5)

0.007

 

41 (85.4)

30 (60.0)

0.005

Shortness of breath (n)

50

50

   

49

49

 

Week 1

27 (54.0)

21 (42.0)

0.23

 

26 (53.1)

21 (42.9)

0.312

Week 2

44 (88.0)

28 (56.0)

<0.001

 

43 (87.8)

28 (57.1)

0.001

Notes: FAS: full analysis set; PPS: per protocol set

Table 4

Comparison of clinical symptom disappearance rate between Ludangshen and placebo group

Variables

FAS analysis

 

PPS analysis

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

 

Ludangshen

Placebo

P value

Fatigue (n)

94

90

   

92

89

 

Week 1

5 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

0.027

 

5 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

0.026

Week 2

35 (5.3)

8 (8.9)

<0.001

 

34 (36.7)

8 (9.0)

<0.001

Anorexia (n)

68

70

   

67

68

 

Week 1

10 (14.7)

3 (4.3)

0.036

 

10 (14.9)

3 (4.4)

0.038

Week 2

39 (57.4)

15 (21.4)

<0.001

 

39 (58.2)

14 (20.6)

<0.001

Distention (n)

43

34

   

42

33

 

Week 1

10 (23.3)

4 (11.8)

0.194

 

10 (23.8)

4 (12.1)

0.197

Week 2

29 (67.4)

12 (35.3)

0.005

 

29 (69.1)

11 (33.3)

0.002

Loose stools (n)

48

52

   

48

50

 

Week 1

11 (22.9)

5 (9.6)

0.07

 

11 (22.9)

5 (10.0)

0.058

Week 2

32 (66.7)

20 (38.5)

0.005

 

32 (66.7)

18 (36.0)

0.002

Shortness of breath (n)

50

50

   

49

49

 

Week 1

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1.000

 

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1.000

Week 2

8 (16.0)

3 (6.0)

0.110

 

8 (16.3)

3 (6.1)

0.110

Notes: FAS: full analysis set; PPS: per protocol set