Determinants of sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in Adaklu district, Volta region, Ghana: A multinomial logistic regression analysis

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1327241/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Determinants of sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in Adaklu district, Volta region, Ghana: A multinomial logistic regression analysis

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1327241/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Poor sexual communication between adolescents and their parents results in high rates of negative sexual practices such as teenage pregnancy. Contributing factors to this poor sexual communication between adolescent and their parents in a high teenage pregnancy setting have not been adequately explored. We sought to fill this gap by examining the factors that predict sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in the Adaklu district of the Volta region of Ghana.

Methods: A baseline cross-sectional household survey of 221 adolescents aged 10-19 years in 30 randomly selected communities was used. A well-structured questionnaire was developed. A multinomial logistics regression analysis was used to examine factors that significantly influenced communication between adolescents and their parents regarding sex.

Results: Only 11.3% and 27.6% of adolescents had discussions on sex with both parents and only one parent respectively in Adaklu district. Adolescent males (AOR=0.21, CI=0.06-0.75), aged 10-14 years (AOR=0.41,CI=0.04-0.57), non-members of adolescent health clubs (AOR=0.46, CI=0.21-1.00), and living with only a father (AOR=0.19,CI= 0.06-0.61) have the lower odds of communicating with their parents on sexual issues.

Conclusions: Adolescent-parental sexual communication in Adaklu district is very low. This situation requires more empowerment of adolescents to enable them to discuss sexual issues with their parents through increased engagement with adolescent health club activities and capacity building capacity of parents with the right information on sexual and reproductive health by health staff within the district. Additionally, parents need to be equipped with communication skills to enable them to communicate effectively with their children.

Adolescents

Parents

Sex communication

Reproductive health

Adaklu district

Ghana

Parent-Adolescent and older sibling adolescent communication on issues about sex is considered an important aspect of adolescent development and well-being, as it ensures informed decision making and good behavior and a protective factor for adolescent sexual health. However, poor sexual communication between adolescents and their parents results in high rates of negative sexual practices such as teenage pregnancy. Contributing factors to this poor sexual communication between adolescent and their parents in a high teenage pregnancy setting have not been adequately explored. This paper, therefore, examines the factors that predict sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in the Adaklu district of the Volta region of Ghana. It highlights individual, household, societal and sexual related factors that predict sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in an area with a high rate of teenage pregnancy among adolescent girls.

The data on adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Adaklu district shows poor sexual communication between adolescents (aged 10 -19 years) and their parents. Improving sexual communication between adolescent and their parents in rural settings requires capacity building of parents (especially mothers) with the right information and communication skills for discussing sexual and reproductive health issues with their children.

Adolescents aged 10-19 years are largely exposed to sexual and reproductive health risks due to the negative and risky sexual behaviours they often engage in, [1] coupled with a high level of poor and misinformed knowledge on sexual and reproductive matters [2–4].

Parent-Adolescent and older sibling Adolescent communication on issues about sex is considered an important aspect of adolescent development and well-being, as it ensures informed decision making and good behavior and a protective factor for adolescent sexual health. It can result in the transmission of family values, curbing of negative sexual health outcomes and promoting of healthy sexual attitudes and behaviors among adolescents [1]. Studies have identified that family-oriented communication, especially from parents play a principal role in conveying knowledge and moral values to adolescents, including sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information [5, 6].

There is evidence that adolescents rely mostly on their colleagues and social media as the main source of information on sexual and reproductive health. Unfortunately, knowledge acquired from these sources are either inaccurate or inadequate and puts them at risk of negative sexual practices [5, 7, 8]. Parental sexual communication with adolescents has been associated with better sexual health outcomes, low negative sexual practices and improved SRH [8–11]. Parental sexual communication therefore empowers adolescents to manage the several challenges associated with sexual and reproductive health [12]. Studies have noted that while most adolescents preferred their parents as a reliable and main source of information on sex [13], hitherto, only a few obtain such information from them [14, 15].

In Ghana, Parent-adolescent sexual communication has not been adequately explored to the best of our knowledge. Literature has shown that a limited number of studies have been carried out on the subject, especially in settings where there are high rates of negative sexual outcomes such as teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, abortion and multiple sexual partnership. These studies, however, were selective in assessment, scope and coverage [16–19]. For instance, Manu and colleagues [16] examined the kinds of SRH topics parents discussed with their children and the predictors of such SRH communication while Baku and colleagues [17] explored the opinions of parents in relation to discussions on adolescent sexuality.

This paper examines the factors that predict sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in the Adaklu district of the Volta region of Ghana. It highlights individual, household, societal and sexual related factors that predict sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in an area with a high rate of teenage pregnancy among adolescent girls. Data for this study is taken from a larger study on adolescent sexual reproductive health and rights (ASRHR) and perspective of their parents on the subject in the Adaklu district of the Volta Region of Ghana.

Study design and setup

The study was a baseline cross-sectional study of adolescents (10-19 years) and their parents/caregivers residing in Adaklu district of the Volta Region of Ghana. The Adaklu district comprises a total of 91 communities and the inhabitants are predominantly farmers. Farming forms about 78% of economic activities in the district and the inhabitants are mainly into crop production, bee keeping and livestock rearing. The district has a projected population of about 44,942 made up of 22,022 males and 22, 920 females, with females representing 51.0 percent of the population [20]. The estimated adolescent population in the district is 9, 887 and Women in Fertile Age account for 10, 394 out of the total population [20]. There are adolescent health clubs established in all the communities in the study area.

Study Population

The participants of this study were adolescents between the ages of 10-19 years, from 30 selected communities in the district who had lived in the area for a minimum of 6 months.

Sample size and Sampling Technique

A total of 30 communities (clusters) with a minimum population of 500 people were randomly selected from the district. The modified Expanded Program on Immunisation (EPI) cluster sampling technique was used to select seven households in each community. to which questionnaires were administered to adolescents (10-19 years) in each household. A conscious effort was made to include equal numbers of male and female respondents. Similarly, both adolescents who were members of adolescent health clubs and those who were not members had an equal chance of being recruited for the baseline study. The sample size was calculated using the single population proportion formulation under the following axioms: 17.6% proportion; confidence level was taken to be 95% with α=0.05 value, 3% margin of error and design effect of 2. Five percent was added for the expected non- response rate, constituting the final sample size of 221 adolescents aged 10-19.

Data collection tools and procedure

Data was collected electronically using RedCap software. The questionnaire was adapted from adolescent survey tools used in previous adolescents sexual and reproductive health studies of international standards and several literatures reviewed to achieve the study objectives [21]. The tools were pre-tested and all the necessary corrections and changes were made.

The tool designed in English but administered in the Ewe language was used to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics, sexual and reproductive health knowledge and services, sexuality, sexual communication between adolescents and their parents, risky sexual behaviour, sexual harassment and coercion (See supplementary file A). Data was collected by 12 well trained research assistants selected based on their proficiency in English and Ewe language commonly spoken in the study area.

Outcome and Predictor variables

The outcome variables of this study, were sexual communication with parents, comprised of three categories; sexual communication with (i) both parents, (ii) only one parent (iii) no parents, similar to the measurement used in previous studies by Manu and colleagues which explored the extent and patterns of parent-child sexual communication [16].

Predictor variables included sex[ male or female], age [10-14 and 15-19], level of education,[ no education, primary and secondary/higher] current school attendance[currently in school or out of school], adolescent club membership, household living arrangement[living with both parents, only father, only mother, only brother(s), only sister(s) or not], frequency and ease of communication with parents, sexual history[never had sex and ever had sex], history of contraceptive use[never used contraceptives and ever used contraceptives], sexual harassment experiences[kissed, breast fondled, touched) or not. The respondents were also asked about their participation in Adolescent health clubs which are common in the study district. The measurement of the predictor variables was guided by previous studies [36,37-43]

Data processing and analysis

Both descriptive (frequency distribution tables) and inferential statistics (bivariate and multivariate analysis) was used in the analysis. The bivariate analysis examined the association between the outcome and predictor variables. Multinomial logistics regression analysis was then used to examine which factors significantly influenced sexual communication between adolescents and their parents. All the variables in the multinomial logistic regression model were entered in one step. Our reference category in the regression analysis was sexual communication with no parents. SPSS was used to run all analysis, and the results of the multinomial logistic regression analysis were presented as odd ratios.

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

Background characteristics of adolescents are presented in Table 1. Of the 221 adolescents, (59.7%) were females and 40.3% were males. A higher proportion of adolescents (54.8%) were within the 15-19 years age bracket, and 43.4% had completed primary level of education. Majority (90%) of adolescents are currently in school and about 65% are members of adolescent health clubs. Out of the 221 respondents, 92 (41.6%) live with their mothers, 43 (19.5%) live with their fathers, while 86 (38.9%) live with both parents. Overall, 44% of adolescents find it easy to communicate with their fathers while 65.2% easily communicate with their mothers probably because most adolescents live with their mothers relative to their fathers. Seven out of ten adolescents had never had sexual intercourse, whereas 22.2% had had sexual intercourse. With regards to contraceptive use, majority (81.0%) of adolescents had never used contraceptives relative to 19% who had used contraceptives. About 20.4% of all adolescents had been sexually harassed in the past.

Table 1

Background Characteristics of Adolescents
Characteristics	Number	Percent
Sex
Male	89	40.3
Female	132	59.7
Age Group
10-14	100	45.2
15-19	121	54.8
Educational Level Attained
No Education	32	14.5
Primary	96	43.4
Secondary	93	42.1
Current School Attendance
Schooling	199	90.0
Not Schooling	22	10.0
Adolescent Club Membership
Not a member	77	34.8
Member	144	65.2
Living Arrangements
Living with both Parents	86	38.9
Living with father only	43	19.5
Living with mother only	92	41.6
Living with older brother(s)	54	24.4
Living with older sister(s)	50	22.6
Frequency of communicating with father
Easy	97	43.9
Average	32	14.5
Difficult	92	41.6
Frequency of communicating with mother
Easy	144	65.2
Average	29	13.1
Difficult	48	21.7
Sexual History
Never had sex	172	77.8
Ever had sex	49	22.2
History of Contraception
Never use contraceptives	179	81.0
Ever use contraceptives	42	19.0
Sexual Harassment
Not Sexually Harassed	176	79.6
Sexually Harassed	45	20.4
Sexual Communication with Parents
Both Parents	25	11.3
Only one Parent	61	27.6
No Parent	135	61.1

About 61% of adolescents admitted to not communicating with any of their parents on sexual issues, 27.6% said they discussed sexual issues with only one parent while only 11.3% indicated that they communicate with both parents.

Association between adolescent characteristics and sexual communication with their parents

Table 2 presents the association between characteristics of adolescents aged 10-19 and sexual communication with their parents. There was a positive correlation between adolescent communication with parents and sex of adolescents, adolescent club membership, living arrangement, frequency of communication with either father and mother and history of contraceptive use (p<0.05). A higher proportion (14.4%) of female adolescents had sexual communication with both parents as compared with 6.7% of their male counterparts who do so.

Table 2

Association between adolescent characteristics and sexual communication with their parents
	Adolescent Sexual Communication
Factors	With both Parents		With Only One Parent		With No Parents		P-value
Sex	N	%	N	%	N	%
Male	6	6.7	15	16.9	68	76.4	0.001**
Female	19	14.4	46	34.8	67	50.8	0.001**
Age Group
10-14	7	7.0	30	30.0	63	63.0	0.174
15-19	18	14.9	31	25.6	72	59.5	0.174
Educational Level Attained
No Education	4	12.5	10	31.3	18	56.3	0.977
Primary	10	10.4	26	27.1	60	62.5
Secondary	11	11.8	25	26.9	57	61.3
Current School Attendance
Schooling	22	11.1	55	27.6	122	61.3	0.935
Not Schooling	3	13.6	6	27.3	13	59.1	0.935
Adolescent Club Membership
Not a member	7	9.1	14	18.2	56	72.7	0.031*
Member	18	12.5	47	32.6	79	54.9	0.031*
Living Arrangements
Living with both Parents	15	17.4	16	30.2	45	52.3	0.041*
Living with father only	3	7.0	7	16.3	33	76.7
Living with mother only	7	7.6	28	30.4	57	62.0
Living with older brother(s)	10	18.5	14	25.9	30	55.6	0.156
Living with older sister(s)	6	12.0	13	26.0	31	62.0	0.953
Frequency of communicating with father
Easy	17	17.5	22	22.7	58	59.8	0.023*
Average	5	15.6	8	25.0	19	59.4
Difficult	3	3.3	31	33.7	58	63.0
Frequency of communicating with mother
Easy	22	15.3	43	29.9	79	54.9	0.023*
Average	2	6.9	9	31.0	18	62.1
Difficult	1	2.1	9	18.8	38	79.2
Sexual History
Never had sex	17	9.9	43	25.0	112	65.1	0.068
Ever had sex	8	16.3	18	36.7	23	46.9	0.068
History of Contraception
Never use contraceptives	17	9.5	45	25.1	117	65.4	0.022*
Ever use contraceptives	8	19.0	16	38.1	18	42.9	0.022*
Sexual Harassment
Not Sexually Harassed	22	12.5	48	27.3	106	60.2	0.544
Sexually Harassed	3	6.7	13	28.9	29	64.4	0.544
*p=0.001; p<0.05

More adolescents who are members of Adolescent health clubs in the district communicate with their parents on sexual issues compared to adolescents who are not members of the clubs. Furthermore, adolescents who lived with both parents had better communication (17.4%) with their parents concerning sexual issues, as compared to the adolescents who lived with either their mother (7.6%) or their father (7%). However, a higher percentage (30.4%) of adolescents living with their mothers indicated having conversation with only one of their parents on sexual issues. Adolescents who easily communicate with both parents on non-sexual issues also easily communicate with them on sexual issues. With regards to their contraceptive history, a higher proportion of adolescents who had ever used contraceptives had communicated with both parents concerning sexual issues relative to those who had never used contraceptives.

Predictors Of Sexual Communication Between Adolescents And Their Parents/caregivers

Table 3 shows the results of the multinomial logistic regression analysis. The model explained 35% of the changes in sexual communication between adolescents and their parents, suggesting it is a good fit with the data. Gender was a significant determinant of sexual communication between adolescents and both parents as well as adolescents and only one of their parents. Compared to adolescent females, adolescent males are less likely to talk to both parents as well as one of their parents.

Table 3

Odds ratios and confidence intervals for factors affecting sexual communication between adolescent and their parents (No parents, Only one parent, and Both parents): Results from a multinomial logistic regression model
Factors	Adolescent Sexual Communication
	With Both Parents		With Only One Parent
	Exp β	95% C. I	Exp β	95 C.I
Sex
Male	0.21**	0.06-0.75	0.37***	0.16-0.72
Female (RC)	0.00		0.00
Age Group
10-14	0.14***	0.04-0.57	1.04	0.47-2.33
15-19 (RC)	0.00		0.00
Educational Level Attained
No Education	4.29	0.71-25.84	1.08	0.35-3.32
Primary	0.97	0.28-3.32	0.84	0.37-1.89
Secondary (RC)	0.00		0.00
Current School Attendance
Schooling	1.48	0.24-9.17	1.22	0.36-4.07
Not Schooling (RC)	0.00		0.00	0.00
Adolescent Club Membership
Not a member	0.84	0.25-2.82	0.46**	0.21-1.00
Member (RC)	0.00		0.00
Living Arrangements
Living with both Parents (RC)	0.00		0.00
Living with father only	0.37	0.07-2.11	0.19***	0.06-0.61
Living with mother only	0.27**	0.08-0.96	0.57	0.27-1.21
Living with older brother(s)
No	0.38	0.11-1.30	1.30	0.55-3.08
Yes (RC)	0.00		0.00
Living with older sister(s)
No	1.60	0.41-6.24	1.21	0.52-2.85
Yes (RC)	0.00		0.00
Frequency of communicating with father
Easy	7.58**	1.53-37.63	0.53	0.25-1.16
Average	4.70	0.75-29.34	0.61	0.22-1.71
Difficult (RC)	0.00		0.00
Frequency of communicating with mother
Easy	11.71**	1.23-111.80	1.84	0.73-4.65
Average	13.56	0.84-217.10	2.16	0.64-7.34
Difficult (RC)	0.00		0.00
Sexual History
Never had sex	4.80***	9.68-20.18	0.46	0.06-3.37
Ever had sex (RC)	0.00		0.00
History of Contraception
Never use contraceptives	3.87	8.76-35.58	0.53	0.07-4.08
Ever use contraceptives (RC)	0.00		0.00
Sexual Harassment
Not Sexually Harassed	7.31**	1.41-37.71	2.33	0.87-6.27
Sexually Harassed (RC)	0.00		0.00
RC=Reference Category; *p=0.000; p=0.001; *p<0.05

The results indicate that adolescents aged 10-14 have lower odds (86% less) of engaging in sexual discussions with both parents compared to adolescents aged 15-19. Age, however, did not significantly differentiate adolescents who had sexual communication with only one parent and those who had no sexual communication with their parents. Furthermore, the relevance of adolescent health club membership is evident in it being a significant predictor of adolescent-parent sexual communication. Compared to adolescents who are members of health clubs, those who are not health club members are 54% less likely to engage only one parent in sexual conversation. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant relationship between adolescent club membership and adolescent sexual communication with both parents.

The household living arrangement of adolescents negatively predicted sexual communication between adolescents and their parents. Compared to adolescents living with both parents, those living with only their fathers and only their mothers were 81% and 73% less likely to communicate with both parents and only one parent on sexual issues respectively. There is a positive statistical relationship between the frequency of adolescent-parent communication (non-sexual issues) and adolescent-parent sexual communication. Adolescents who easily communicate with their fathers were 7.58 times more likely to have communication on sexual issues with both parents compared to adolescents who find it difficult communicating with their parents on non-sexual related issues. Similarly, adolescents who easily communicate with their mothers were found to be 11.71 times more likely to discuss sexual issues with both parents compared to those who find it difficult to communicate with their mothers.

Adolescent sexual history and experience of sexual harassment both positively predicted sexual communication between adolescents and their parents. Adolescents who never had sexual intercourse were about five times more likely to discuss sexual issues with both parents relative to adolescents who had ever had sexual intercourse. Similarly, adolescents who indicated that they had never been sexually harassed had higher likelihood (more than six times) of communicating about sex with both parents compared to those who had experienced sexual harassment.

The study examined the factors affecting poor sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in Adaklu district of the Volta Region. It was clear from our findings that majority of rural adolescents (10-19 years) do not communicate with their parents/caregivers with regards to sexual issues. This finding concurs with previous studies [17, 22–25], where cultural and religious norms prohibit adolescent-parent sexual communication. These studies found that in rural areas, where cultural norms are deeply rooted in the belief system of people, sexuality is considered sacred and not to be discussed with adolescents. It is culturally believed that discussing sexual issues with children and adolescents leads them to engage in early sex and risky sexual behaviour that can result in teenage pregnancy and STDs [26]. Further, the socio-cultural orientation given to adolescents, especially girls, makes them too timid to ask their parents questions bordering on sexuality [27]. However, within the Ghanaian context, there is evidence of high adolescent-parent sexual communication. Kumi-Kyereme et al.,[28] using nationally representative data from Ghana found most adolescents communicating with their parents and other family members on sexual matters.

More adolescent females compared to males were likely to discuss sexual matters with both parents and only one parent (mother or father). This finding supports other studies where parents give more priority to their daughters with regards to educating them about sexual issues [16,29- 30]. Parents consider their daughters to be more susceptible to risky sexual behaviours and sexual health issues including sexual harassment, coercion, teenage pregnancy, and abortion. This understanding makes parents very protective of their daughters and as such give them the needed audience when they are approached by them to discuss sexual issues. The sons are less available or open to such discussion with their sons [28, 30–32]. The poor sexual communication between rural adolescent males and their parents relative to females as found in this study also exposes adolescent boys to risky sexual behaviours including early sexual debut, multiple sexual partnership, risk of sexually transmitted infections and perpetration of violent sexual acts. Studies have found that due to adventurous and curious nature of boys, they exposed to sexually explicit content on television and the internet which they blindly put into practice [33–34].

Formation and existence of adolescent health clubs in rural communities is to increase knowledge and understanding of adolescents on SRH issues, including contraception, teenage pregnancy, abortion, risky sexual behaviour and promote behavioural change among adolescents [24, 35–36]. Findings from our study indicate that rural adolescents who are not members of health clubs in the community are less likely to discuss sexual issues with their parent. In other words, belonging to a health club increases an adolescent’s likelihood of communicating with their parents regarding sexual matters [35].

Family living arrangements and household structure are both known to have significant influences on communication between adolescent and their parents [37–39]. Our study finding shows that adolescents living with only a mother or father have a lower probability of discussing sexual matters with their parents compared to those living with both parents. Living with both parents ensures strict and effective monitoring, supervision and interaction between adolescents and their parents which may subsequently influence adolescents’ sexual behaviours [38].

Good communication and relationship between adolescents and their parents on non-sexual matters increases the chance of frequent discussion on sexual issues amongst them [16, 40]. Our findings clearly showed that rural adolescents who easily communicate with their mothers and fathers are more likely to engage their parents in sexual conversations compared to those who find it difficult to talk to their parents. Findings of previous studies conducted in Ghana and United States of America [16, 41] corroborates our research findings.

Sexual abstinence among adolescents is highly associated with good sexual communication between adolescents and their parents [42–43]. In our study, rural adolescents who had never had sexual intercourse had higher odds of discussing sexual matters with their parents relative to adolescents who had ever had sex. Sexual communication between adolescents and their parents results in the adolescents being well-informed and knowledgeable about the risks and negative consequences of early sexual initiation to make better sexual decision. This finding is similar to the result of previous studies [42, 44]. Parents usually have intolerant attitudes towards premarital sexual intercourse. Thus, sexual communication with parents provides adolescents the needed information that encourages sexual abstinence.

Finally, our study also found that adolescents who had never experienced sexual harassment were more likely to have discussed issues related to sex with their parents relative to those who were victims of sexual harassment. Studies have revealed that during adolescent-parental sexual communication, the scope of topics parents discuss with their children are often limited to issues related to protection from sexual abuse and harassment and pubertal development [45, 46]. Parents genuine desire to prepare and protect their children from sexual abuse and to protect the family honour motivates them to discuss sexual issues with them [46].

The findings from our study indicate that adolescent-parent sexual communication in Adaklu district is low and when it occurs, is more common among female adolescents and only one parent (mostly mothers). Male adolescents, adolescents aged 10-14 years, not being a member of adolescents’ health club and adolescents living with only one parent were predictors of low sexual communication between adolescents and their parents. However, it is worth noting that, some level of sexual communication takes place between parents and female adolescents, adolescents aged 15-19 years, adolescents who are members of health clubs, who easily have general communication with their fathers and mothers, who practice sexual abstinence and adolescent and who have never been sexually harassed. This implies that, to increase the frequency of adolescent-parent sexual communication in rural settings, adolescent males should be encouraged and empowered to talk to their parents on sexual matters often. Adolescent health clubs must be made more attractive to non-members to encourage them to attend regular club meetings, gain knowledge and understanding of SRH issues that will minimise the risk of early sexual debut, teenage pregnancy, multiple sexual partners, STDs, and HIV/AIDS. Other intervention programmes to improve sexual communication between adolescents and their parents should include strategies to build capacity of parents (especially mothers) with the right information, communicative skills and confidence in discussing sex and reproductive health issues with their children to ensure positive sexual and reproductive health behaviours among rural adolescents.

ASRHR

Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights

EPI

Expanded Program on Immunisation

HIV/AIDS

Human Immunodeficiency virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

REC

Research Ethics Committee

SRH

Sexual and reproductive health

STDs

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

UHAS

University of Health and Allied Sciences

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study received ethical clearance from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS). The study was approved with the reference number ‘UHAS-REC A.8 [3] 18-19’. All respondents were provided informed consents.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

The data and all materials analysed/used for this study will be made available and accessed upon request to the corresponding author

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests

Funding

This work has been supported by grants from the International Development Research Centre [108936] (IDRC), Canada.

Authors’ Contribution

DK conceptualised, designed the study, and obtained the data. D.K analysed and interpreted the data. The entire manuscript was drafted by D.K. It was critically reviewed and revised by P.A, M.G, C.A, E.K.A, E.A, P.D and A.O All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This project is a collaboration between Centre for Health Policy and Implementation Research, Institute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences (Ghana), Adaklu District Health Directorate and the Ghana Health Service. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review or approval of the article and decision to submit the article for publication. The authors are grateful to the people of Adaklu district, the team of interviewers from University of Health and Allied Science and staff of the Institute of Health Research.

Wamoyi J, Fenwick A, Urassa M, Zaba B, Stones W. Parent-child communication about sexual and reproductive health in rural Tanzania: Implications for young people's sexual health interventions. Reproductive health. 2010 Dec;7(1):1–8.
Kajula LJ, Sheon N, De Vries H, Kaaya SF, Aarø LE. Dynamics of parent–adolescent communication on sexual health and HIV/AIDS in Tanzania. AIDS Behav. 2014 Jan;18(1):69–74.
Flores D, Barroso J. 21st century parent–child sex communication in the United States: A process review. The Journal of Sex Research. 2017 Jun 13;54(4-5):532–48.
Titiloye MA, Ajuwon AJ. Knowledge and quality of adolescents reproductive health communication between parents and their adolescents children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2017 Jun 23;8(1).
L'Engle KL, Jackson C. Socialization influences on early adolescents' cognitive susceptibility and transition to sexual intercourse. J Res adolescence. 2008 Jun;18(2):353–78.
Mekonen MT, Dagnew HA, Yimam TA, Yimam HN, Reta MA. Adolescent-parent communication on sexual and reproductive health issues and associated factors among high school students in Woldia town, Northeastern Ethiopia. Pan African Medical Journal. 2018 Sep 18;31(1).
Motsomi K, Makanjee C, Basera T, Nyasulu P. Factors affecting effective communication about sexual and reproductive health issues between parents and adolescents in zandspruit informal settlement, Johannesburg, South Africa. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2016;25.
Wilson EK, Dalberth BT, Koo HP, Gard JC. Parents' perspectives on talking to preteenage children about sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive health. 2010 Mar;42(1):56–63.
Biddlecom A, Awusabo-Asare K, Bankole A. Role of parents in adolescent sexual activity and contraceptive use in four African countries. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2009 Jun 1:72-81.
Jerman P, Constantine NA. Demographic and psychological predictors of parent–adolescent communication about sex: A representative statewide analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Oct;39(10):1164–74.
Eisenberg ME, Sieving RE, Bearinger LH, Swain C, Resnick MD. Parents’ communication with adolescents about sexual behavior: A missed opportunity for prevention? J Youth Adolesc. 2006 Dec;35(6):893–902.
Undie CC, Crichton J, Zulu E. Metaphors we love by: Conceptualizations of sex among young people in Malawi. African journal of reproductive health. 2007 Dec 1;11(3):221-35.
Clawson CL, Reese-Weber M. The amount and timing of parent‐adolescent sexual communication as predictors of late adolescent sexual risk‐taking behaviors. Journal of Sex Research. 2003 Aug 1;40(3):256-65.
Babalola S, Tambashe BO, Vondrasek C. Parental factors and sexual risk-taking among young people in Cote d'Ivoire. Afr J Reprod Health. 2005 Apr;1:49–65.
Somers CL, Paulson SE. Students' perceptions of parent–adolescent closeness and communication about sexuality: Relations with sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of adolescence. 2000 Oct 1;23(5):629-44.
Manu AA, Mba CJ, Asare GQ, Odoi-Agyarko K, Asante RK. Parent–child communication about sexual and reproductive health: evidence from the Brong Ahafo region, Ghana. Reproductive Health. 2015 Dec;12(1):1–3.
Baku EA, Agbemafle I, Kotoh AM, Adanu RM. Parents’ experiences and sexual topics discussed with adolescents in the Accra Metropolis, Ghana: a qualitative study. Advances in Public Health. 2018 Oct;2018.
Adu-Mireku S. Family communication about HIV/AIDS and sexual behaviour among senior secondary school students in Accra, Ghana. Afr Health Sci. 2003;3(1):7–14.
Wamoyi J, Fenwick A, Urassa M, Zaba B, Stones W. Parental control and monitoring of young people's sexual behaviour in rural North-Western Tanzania: implications for sexual and reproductive health interventions. BMC public health. 2011 Dec;11(1):1–2.
Ghana. Statistical Service. 2010 Population & Housing Census Report: Urbanisation in Ghana. Ghana Statistical Service; 2014.
Awusabo-Asare K, Biddlecom A, Kumi-Kyereme A, Patterson K. Adolescent sexual and reproductive health in Ghana: results from the 2004 National Survey of Adolescents. Occasional Report. 2006 Jun;22.
Motsomi K, Makanjee C, Basera T, Nyasulu P. Factors affecting effective communication about sexual and reproductive health issues between parents and adolescents in zandspruit informal settlement, Johannesburg, South Africa. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2016;25.
Asampong E, Osafo J, Bingenheimer JB, Ahiadeke C. Adolescents and parents’ perceptions of best time for sex and sexual communications from two communities in the Eastern and Volta Regions of Ghana: implications for HIV and AIDS education. BMC Int health Hum rights. 2013 Dec;13(1):1–1.
Awusabo-Asare K, Stillman M, Keogh S, Doku DT, Kumi-Kyereme A, Esia-Donkoh K, Leong E, Amo-Adjei J, Bankole A. From paper to practice: Sexuality education policies and their implementation in Ghana.
Mbugua N. Factors inhibiting educated mothers in Kenya from giving meaningful sex-education to their daughters. Social Science & Medicine. 2007 Mar 1;64(5):1079-89.
Owusu SA. Cultural and religious impediments against sex education. Accra: GNA; 2012.
Izugbara CO. Home-based sexuality education: Nigerian parents discussing sex with their children. Youth & Society. 2008 Jun;39(4):575–600.
Kumi-Kyereme A, Awusabo-Asare K, Tanle A, Biddlecom A. Influence of social connectedness, communication and monitoring on adolescent sexual activity in Ghana. African journal of reproductive health. 2007 Dec 1;11(3):133-47.
Mbugua N. Factors inhibiting educated mothers in Kenya from giving meaningful sex-education to their daughters. Social Science & Medicine. 2007 Mar 1;64(5):1079-89.
Bastien S, Kajula LJ, Muhwezi WW. A review of studies of parent-child communication about sexuality and HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Reproductive health. 2011 Dec;8(1):1–7.
Raffaelli M, Ontai LL. 'She's 16 years old and there's boys calling over to the house': An exploratory study of sexual socialization in Latino families. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2001 Jan 1;3(3):295-310.
Wilson EK, Dalberth BT, Koo HP, Gard JC. Parents' perspectives on talking to preteenage children about sex. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive health. 2010 Mar;42(1):56–63.
Lin WH, Liu CH, Yi CC. Exposure to sexually explicit media in early adolescence is related to risky sexual behavior in emerging adulthood. PloS one. 2020 Apr 10;15(4):e0230242.
Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex roles. 2007 Mar;56(5):381–95.
Mulubwa C, Hurtig AK, Zulu JM, Michelo C, Sandøy IF, Goicolea I. Can sexual health interventions make community-based health systems more responsive to adolescents? A realist informed study in rural Zambia. Reproductive health. 2020 Dec;17(1):1–5.
Awusabo-Asare K, Bankole A, Kumi-Kyereme A. Views of adults on adolescent sexual and reproductive health: qualitative evidence from Ghana. Occasional report. 2008 Jun 13;34.
Dessie Y, Berhane Y, Worku A. Parent-adolescent sexual and reproductive health communication is very limited and associated with adolescent poor behavioral beliefs and subjective norms: evidence from a community based cross-sectional study in eastern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2015 Jul;13(7):e0129941. 10(.
Tenkorang EY, Adjei JK. Household living arrangements and transition to sexual debut among young people in Ghana. Sex Education. 2015 Jan 2;15(1):1-8.
Okigbo CC, Kabiru CW, Mumah JN, Mojola SA, Beguy D. Influence of parental factors on adolescents’ transition to first sexual intercourse in Nairobi, Kenya: a longitudinal study. Reproductive health. 2015 Dec;12(1):1–2.
Kamaruddin N, Omar SZ, Hassan S, Hassan MA, Mee AA, D'Silva JL. Impact of time spent in parents-children communication on children misconduct. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2012.
Lefkowitz ES. Beyond the yes-no question: Measuring parent‐adolescent communication about sex. New directions for child and adolescent development. 2002 Sep;2002(97):43-56.
Alhassan N, Dodoo F. Predictors of primary and secondary sexual abstinence among never-married youth in urban poor Accra, Ghana. Reproductive health. 2020 Dec;17(1):1–3.
Kabiru CW, Ezeh A. Factors associated with sexual abstinence among adolescents in four sub-Saharan African countries. African journal of reproductive health. 2007 Dec 1;11(3):99-110.
Holman A, Kellas JK. High school adolescents' perceptions of the parent–child sex talk: How communication, relational, and family factors relate to sexual health. South Communication J. 2015 Oct;20(5):388–403. 80(.
Othman A, Shaheen A, Otoum M, Aldiqs M, Hamad I, Dabobe M, Langer A, Gausman J. Parent–child communication about sexual and reproductive health: perspectives of Jordanian and Syrian parents. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 2020 Jan 1;28(1):1758444.
Beckett MK, Elliott MN, Martino S, Kanouse DE, Corona R, Klein DJ, Schuster MA. Timing of parent and child communication about sexuality relative to children's sexual behaviors. Pediatrics. 2010 Jan 1;125(1):34-42.

Download PDF

Reviews received at journal
11 Feb, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
11 Feb, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
07 Feb, 2022
First submitted to journal
04 Feb, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Determinants of sexual communication between adolescents and their parents in Adaklu district, Volta region, Ghana: A multinomial logistic regression analysis

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Plain Language Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

Predictors Of Sexual Communication Between Adolescents And Their Parents/caregivers

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1