1. Rapport F, Storey M, Porter A, Snooks H, Jones K, Peconi J, Sánchez A, Siebert S, Thorne K, Clement C: Qualitative research within trials: developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit. Trials 2013, 14(1):54.
2. O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J: What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ open 2013, 3(6).
3. O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Goode J, Hewison J: Maximising the value of combining qualitative research and randomised controlled trials in health research: the QUAlitative Research in Trials (QUART) study--a mixed methods study. Health Technology Assessment 2014, 18(38).
4. Murtagh MJ, Thomson RG, May CR, Rapley T, Heaven BR, Graham RH, Kaner EF, Stobbart L, Eccles MP: Qualitative methods in a randomised controlled trial: the role of an integrated qualitative process evaluation in providing evidence to discontinue the intervention in one arm of a trial of a decision support tool. Quality & safety in health care 2007, 16(3):224-229.
5. Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD: Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2009, 339:b3496.
6. Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative research: reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 1995, 311(6996):42-45.
7. Jansen YJ, Foets MM, de Bont AA: The contribution of qualitative research to the development of tailor-made community-based interventions in primary care: a review. European journal of public health 2009, 20(2):220-226.
8. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T et al: Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. Journal of epidemiology and community health 2014, 68(2):101-102.
9. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2000, 321(7262):694-696.
10. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. International journal of nursing studies 2013, 50(5):587-592.
11. Power R, Langhaug L, Nyamurera T, Wilson D, Bassett M, Cowan F: Developing complex interventions for rigorous evaluation—a case study from rural Zimbabwe. Health education research 2004, 19(5):570-575.
12. Petticrew M: When are complex interventions ‘complex’? When are simple interventions ‘simple’? In.: Oxford University Press; 2011.
13. Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C: Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC medicine 2018, 16.
14. Drabble SJ, O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J: Describing qualitative research undertaken with randomised controlled trials in grant proposals: a documentary analysis. BMC medical research methodology 2014, 14(1):24.
15. Ravallion M: Should the randomistas rule? The Economists' Voice 2009, 6(2).
16. Mowat R, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I: Randomized controlled trials and evidence-based policy: A multidisciplinary dialogue. Social science & medicine (1982) 2018, 210:1.
17. Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L: Peer education has no significant impact on HIV risk behaviours among gay men in London. AIDS (London, England) 2001, 15(4):535-538.
18. Kinsman J, Nakiyingi J, Kamali A, Carpenter L, Quigley M, Pool R, Whitworth J: Evaluation of a comprehensive school-based AIDS education programme in rural Masaka, Uganda. Health education research 2001, 16(1):85-100.
19. Wight D, Raab GM, Henderson M, Abraham C, Buston K, Hart G, Scott S: Limits of teacher delivered sex education: interim behavioural outcomes from randomised trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2002, 324(7351):1430.
20. Craig P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. . London: Medical Research Council 2019:1-39.
21. Schwartz D, Lellouch J: Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2009, 62(5):499-505.
22. Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T: Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ: British Medical Journal 2004, 328(7455):1561.
23. Hotopf M: The pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2002, 8(5):326-333.
24. Montgomery C: From standardization to adaptation: Clinical trials and the moral economy of anticipation. Science as Culture 2016, 26(2):232-254.
25. Pallmann P, Bedding AW, Choodari-Oskooei B, Dimairo M, Flight L, Hampson LV, Holmes J, Mander AP, Odondi Lo, Sydes MR et al: Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC medicine 2018, 16(1):29.
26. Chalmers I, Glasziou P: Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet 2009, 374(9683):86-89.
27. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, Michie S, Moher D, Wager E: Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. The Lancet 2014, 383(9913):267-276.
28. Yordanov Y, Dechartres A, Porcher R, Boutron I, Altman DG, Ravaud P: Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2015, 350:h809.
29. Sandelowski M: Using qualitative methods in intervention studies. Research in nursing & health 1996, 19(4):359-364.
30. Flemming K, Adamson J, Atkin K: Improving the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care: the potential role of qualitative research in enhancing evidence from randomized controlled trials. Palliative medicine 2008, 22(2):123-131.
31. Bradley F, Wiles R, Kinmonth A-L, Mant D, Gantley M: Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ (Clinical research ed) 1999, 318(7185):711-715.
32. Mannell J, Davis K: Evaluating Complex Health Interventions With Randomized Controlled Trials: How Do We Improve the Use of Qualitative Methods? . In: Qualitative health research. UK; 2019.
33. Bogner A: The paradox of participation experiments. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2012, 37(5):506-527.
34. Wiles R, Crow G, Pain H: Innovation in qualitative research methods: A narrative review. Qualitative research 2011, 11(5):587-604.
35. Okoli C, Pawlowski SD: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management 2004, 42(1):15-29.
36. Rowe G, Wright G: The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects—Introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78(9):1487-1490.
37. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC medical research methodology 2013, 13:117.
38. Schultz KF: CONSORT statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC medicine 2010, 8:18-27.
39. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux P, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG: CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. International Journal of Surgery 2012, 10(1):28-55.
40. Puffer S, Torgerson D, Watson J: Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2003, 327(7418):785-789.
41. Datta J, Petticrew M: Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC public health 2013, 13:568.
42. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D et al: Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2015, 350:h1258.
43. Campbell MJ: Challenges of cluster randomized trials. J Comp Eff Res 2014, 3(3):271-281.
44. Ivers NM, Taljaard M, Dixon S, Bennett C, McRae A, Taleban J, Skea Z, Brehaut JC, Boruch RF, Eccles MP et al: Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-8. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2011, 343:d5886.
45. Giraudeau B, Ravaud P: Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials. PLoS medicine 2009, 6(5):e1000065.
46. Harvey SA: Observe Before You Leap: Why Observation Provides Critical Insights for Formative Research and Intervention Design That You'll Never Get From Focus Groups, Interviews, or KAP Surveys. Global health, science and practice 2018, 6(2):299-316.
47. Mays N, Pope C: Qualitative research: observational methods in health care settings. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 1995, 311(6998):182-184.
48. Bond V, F. Ngwenya, E. Murray, N. Ngwenya, L. Viljoen, D. Gumede, B. Chiti, J. Mantantana, G. Hoddinott, P. J. Dodd, H. Ayles, M. Simwinga, S. Wallman, J. Seeley Value and limitations of Broad Brush Surveys used in Community-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa. Qualitative health research 2019, In press.
49. Newman PA, Rubincam C, Slack C, Essack Z, Chakrapani V, Chuang D-M, Tepjan S, Shunmugam M, Roungprakhon S, Logie C: Towards a science of community stakeholder engagement in biomedical HIV prevention trials: an embedded four-country case study. PloS one 2015, 10(8):e0135937.
50. Heneghan C, Goldacre B, Mahtani KR: Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients. Trials 2017, 18(1):122.
51. Lewis-Beck M, Bryman AE, Liao TF: The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods: Sage Publications; 2003.
52. Latkin CA, Mai NVT, Ha TV, Sripaipan T, Zelaya C, Le Minh N, Morales G, Go VF: Social desirability response bias and other factors that may influence self-reports of substance use and HIV risk behaviors: a qualitative study of drug users in Vietnam. AIDS Education and Prevention 2016, 28(5):417-425.
53. Karnieli-Miller O, Strier R, Pessach L: Power relations in qualitative research. Qualitative health research 2009, 19(2):279-289.
54. Hyers LL: Diary Methods: Oxford University Press; 2018.
55. Lavrakas PJ: Encyclopedia of survey research methods: Sage Publications; 2008.
56. Tock L: Participatory appraisal: a brief introduction. Hull and East Yorkshire Participatory Appraisal Network 2001.
57. Ngwenya N, Gumede D, Shahmanesh M, McGrath N, Grant A, Seeley J: Community perceptions of the socio-economic structural context influencing HIV and TB risk, prevention and treatment in a high prevalence area in the era of antiretroviral therapy. African journal of AIDS research 2018, 17(1):72-81.
58. Esserman D, Allore HG, Travison TG: The Method of Randomization for Cluster-Randomized Trials: Challenges of Including Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions. Int J Stat Med Res 2016, 5(1):2-7.
59. Singh G, Manjunatha N, Rao S, Shashidhara HN, Moirangthem S, Madegowda RK, Binukumar B, Varghese M: Use of mobile phone technology to improve follow-up at a community mental health clinic: A randomized control trial. Indian journal of psychological medicine 2017, 39(3):276.
60. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual review of public health 1998, 19(1):173-202.
61. Flicker S, Guta A, Larkin J, Flynn S, Fridkin A, Travers R, Pole JD, Layne C: Survey design from the ground up: Collaboratively creating the Toronto Teen Survey. Health promotion practice 2010, 11(1):112-122.
62. Colucci E: “Focus groups can be fun”: The use of activity-oriented questions in focus group discussions. Qualitative health research 2007, 17(10):1422-1433.
63. Fernandez CV, Kodish, E. and Weijer, C.: Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2003, 25(3):12-19.
64. Gillies C, Freemantle N, Grieve R, Sekhon J, Forder J: Advancing quantitative methods for the evaluation of complex interventions. 2016.
65. Leeming D, Marshall J, Locke A: Understanding process and context in breastfeeding support interventions: The potential of qualitative research. Maternal & child nutrition 2017, 13(4):e12407.
66. Borgerson K: Valuing evidence: bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspect Biol Med 2009, 52(2):218-233.
67. Creswell JW: A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2015.
68. Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M, Brindle L, Jacoby A, Peters T, Frankel S, Neal D, Hamdy F: for the ProtecT Study Group: Improving design and conduct of randomised controlled trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2002, 325:766-770.
69. Trostle JA, & Sommerfeld, J. : Medical anthropology and epidemiology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1996, 25(1):253-274.
70. Béhague DP, Gonçalves, H., Victora, C. G. : Anthropology and epidemiology: learning epistemological lessons through a collaborative venture. Ciencia & saude coletiva 2008, 13(6):1701-1710.
71. Camlin CS, Seeley J: Qualitative research on community experiences in large HIV research trials: what have we learned? Journal of the International AIDS Society 2018, 21:e25173.
72. Greenhalgh T, Annandale E, Ashcroft R, Barlow J, Black N, Bleakley A, Boaden R, Braithwaite J, Britten N, Carnevale F: An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 2016, 352:i563.