The essential parameters to design a rectangular patch antenna are the resonance frequency (fr), FR4 dielectric substrate with the dielectric constant of 4.4 and the dielectric thickness of 1.6 mm. The selection of a suitable substrate is the first step in the design of microstrip patch antenna for the required applications. The selection of the substrate material depends on its dielectric constant ∈_r, loss tangent tanδ and material thickness. Various types of materials such as polyphenylene, alumina, polyolefin, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polystyrene, sapphire, quartz, ferromagnetic and semiconductor substrates have considerable flexibility in the selection of substrates for a particular application. From the above-specified substrate materials, quartz and PTFE result in excellent radiation efficiency at microwave frequencies, but they are expensive. Hence the FR4 substrate material is widely selected for the microwave applications since it is cost effective and readily available. The mathematical modeling of the proposed rectangular microstrip patch antenna is summarized below from Equations (1) to (7)
a) The width of the patch (Wp)
$${W}_{p}=\frac{{v}_{0}}{2{f}_{r}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{{\epsilon }_{r}+1}}$$
1
b) The effective dielectric constant (εreff) of the substrate
$${\epsilon }_{reff}=\frac{{\epsilon }_{r}+1}{2}+\frac{{\epsilon }_{r}-1}{2}{\left[1+12\frac{h}{W}\right]}^{\frac{-1}{2}}$$
2
c) The extension length (ΔL) is calculated as
$$\frac{\varDelta L}{h}=0.412{\left[\frac{{\epsilon }_{reff}+0.2\left(\frac{w}{h}+0.264\right)}{{\epsilon }_{reff}-0.258\left(\frac{w}{h}-0.8\right)}\right]}^{\frac{-1}{2}}$$
3
d) The effective length (\({ L}_{eff}\)) is calculated as
$$L{e}_{ff}=\frac{{v}_{0}}{2{f}_{r}\sqrt{{\epsilon }_{eff}}}$$
4
e) The actual length of the patch (\({L}_{p})\) can be determined from
$$\left({L}_{p}\right)= {L}_{eff}-2\varDelta L$$
5
f) The ground plane length (\({L}_{g}\)) and width (\({W}_{g}\)) are determined from
where is the free space velocity and \({\text{f}}_{\text{r}}\) is the frequency of resonance.
Initially, a rectangular patch radiator is designed and simulated with the calculated dimensions of proposed antenna results in a narrowband resonance. A human body is made up of several layers with different thickness and dielectric constant. Hence, an UWB antenna with wide bandwidth is suitable to examine the defects at different layers at various frequencies.
The staircase steps at the patch edges and Defective Ground Structure (DGS) improve the impedance bandwidth and increase the directivity of the antenna. Varying the gap between the bottom of the patch edge and the ground plane varies the fringing fields. Hence there is an increase in the electrical length of the antenna, and the proposed antenna resonates towards the low frequency. Figure 1 depicts the development of the proposed UWB in different stages. The optimal dimensions of the proposed UWB antenna are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Dimensions of the proposed UWB Staircase monopole antenna
Antenna Parameters
|
Antenna dimensions
(in mm )
|
Antenna Parameters
|
Antenna dimensions
(in mm)
|
Lp
|
34
|
L4
|
17
|
Wp
|
36
|
W4
|
7
|
L1
|
4
|
L5
|
4
|
W1
|
2
|
W5
|
7.5
|
L2
|
4
|
Lg
|
25.7
|
W2
|
5
|
Wg
|
58.5
|
L3
|
5
|
Ls
|
72
|
W3
|
4
|
Ws
|
63
|
2.1 UWB Monopole Antenna with Various Staircase Steps of Stage 2
In Stage 2, the geometry with multiple staircase steps at both the edges is shown in Figure 1(b). [12] proposed that the optimization of planar antenna width, feed line height and feed line width results in an improved impedance bandwidth. The rectangular patch antenna is excited by the 50Ω transmission line via various staircase steps. The implementation of three staircase steps of dimensions L1xW1, L2xW2 and L3xW3 of the patch antenna results a perfect impedance matching. Figure 2 shows the effect of staircase steps on the impedance bandwidth of Stage 2. The proposed UWB antenna resonates on both the lower edge frequency at 1.88 GHz and the upper edge frequency of 8.3 GHz. From the return loss plot, it is found that the antenna with staircase steps makes a shift in the upper edge resonant frequency from 8.3 GHz to 7.4 GHz compared to the simple rectangular patch antenna. In addition, the lower edge frequency of stage 1 and stage 2 antenna layouts remains unchanged.
2.2 UWB Monopole Antenna with DGS Ground Plane of Stage 3
The patch radiator with varaitions at the edges resonates only at the lower frequency of 1.88 GHz with narrow bandwidth. The return loss |S11| less than -10 dB is found at the higher frequencies of 5.4 GHz to 9 GHz with banwidth improvement of 3.6 GHz. To improve the resonance at the mid-band from 3 GHz to 6.5 GHz, a rectangular slit of width 10 mm and length of 1mm is etched in the ground plane at the bottom of the feed line. Figure 3 depicts that the defective ground structure introduces the multi-resonance with the value of |S11| which is well below -10 dB at the frequencies of 1.88 GHz, 3.7 GHz, 5.7 GHz and 8 GHz. There is also an improvement in the bandwidth of 5 GHz from 1.6 GHz to 6.7 GHz.
2.3 UWB Monopole Antenna with Top Loaded Staircase Steps of Stage 4
Figure 4 depicts that the addition of a staircase steps on the top of the radiator results in a significant shift of the return loss curve towards the higher frequency. Since the resonance frequency is directly proportional to the length of the antenna, the decrease in the patch length shifts the resonant frequency from 1.8 to 2.2 GHz. Hence there is an improvement in the return loss curve at the higher frequency with an increase in bandwidth.
2.4 UWB Monopole Antenna with Ground Plane Slot of Stage 5
In microwave imaging applications, the maximum depth of penetration in UWB signals is required to identify the location of a tumor inside a dense breast tissue. A rectangular slot etched at edges of the ground plane varies the surface wave distribution between the ground plane and the patch radiator. The variation in the fringing field at the edges of the patch makes the antenna to resonate at 1.9 GHz with the |S11| of -37.32 dB and achieves a wide bandwidth of 7.1 GHz as shown in Figure 5.
2.5 UWB Monopole Antenna with Curved Edges of Stage 6
From Figure 5, it is obvious that the Stage 5 with staircase steps at the edges and at the top regions of the patch antenna results in a improved reflection coefficient only at the low frequency. [13] have done a study on the rectangular and circular patch antennas. They have reported that the circular patch antenna results in an improved bandwidth and proper impedance matching compared to rectangular patch antenna. Hence the increase in the surface area of the flat edges into curved surface introduces resonances at the higher frequencies with improvement in bandwidth. Figure 6 depicts that the reflection coefficient at the higher frequencies is well below -10 dB than the antenna with flat edges in Stage 5. It implies that there is an increase in the impedance bandwidth of the antenna after creating curved edges when comparing with flat edges.
2.6 Current Distribution of the Proposed UWB Antenna
The current distribution in the proposed antenna is shown in Figure 7. From the general principle of antenna design, at a lower frequency of operation, the length of the antenna is significantly large and the current distribution is found at the edges of the patch.
As the frequency of resonance increases, the current distribution approaches the sharp edges of the antenna. Besides this, the optimization of surface wave current in the ground plane by introducing the slots varies the fringing fields the implementation of slots at both ends of the ground plane varies the fringing fields obtains an improved impedance matching. The slot below the feed line improves the impedance bandwidth.
2.7 Simulated and Measured Results of the Proposed UWB Antenna
The Staircase UWB antenna resonates from 1.6 GHz to 9.4 GHz which has a broad bandwidth. The layout of the proposed antenna fabricated antenna is shown in Figure 8. As it provides a wide bandwidth of 7.8 GHz, the antenna can able to transmit and receive the reflected signals from various layer of the object under test. Hence, the proposed antenna is suitable for microwave imaging applications. The introduction of staircase steps at the top and bottom edges provides an improved impedance matching at higher lower and lower frequencies. The proposed UWB antenna results in a return loss |S11| of –40 dB at 1.9 GHz as shown in Figure 9.
The fabricated staircase monopole antenna is tested with the Vector Network Analyser (VNA) for parameter measurements. Figure 10 depicts that the proposed UWB patch antenna has proper impedance matching with the feed line over the frequency range of 1.6 GHz to 9.4 GHz with a value of VSWR<2. The shift in the lower frequency resonance is because of the soldering RF connector with the feed line. Since the antenna resonates for wide bandwidth, it is used in microwave imaging applications.
2.8 Radiation Pattern of the Staircase Monopole UWB Antenna
The radiation characteristics of antenna at various resonance frequencies at 2 GHz, 4GHz, 5.8GHz and 7.4 GHz is shown in Figure 11. It is observed that from the figure that the E plane of antenna has omnidirectional radiation pattern at low frequencies and bidirectional pattern at high frequency. The monopole UWB antenna results a high gain of 5.87 dBi. At the higher frequencies, the antenna has a decrease in the broadside radiation. The performance of the proposed radiator is compared with the existing microstrip patch antennas as shown in Table 2. The proposed staircase monopole antenna is of optimum size and resonantes at multiple frequencies at 2 GHz, 4 GHz, 5.8GHz and 7.4GHz. The proposed staircase patch antenna achieved a wide bandwidth of 7.8 GHz, fractional bandwidth of 141% and the gain of 5.87 dBi over the frequency range of 1.6GHz to 9.4GHz which is better than the existing antenna design.
Table 2
Comparison of the proposed Staircase UWB antenna with the existing UWB antennas
Ref
|
Antenna parameters
|
Dimensions in mm
|
Resonant frequency, GHz
|
Bandwidth in GHz
|
Fractional Bandwidth %
|
Gain dBi
|
[14]
|
78 x 70.4
|
0.5-5.5
|
5
|
163.6
|
-
|
[1]
|
80 x 50
|
4.6, 7.5
|
6.8
|
124
|
3.25
|
[7]
|
55 x 40
|
4.6, 7.5, 9.4
|
7
|
108
|
6
|
[8]
|
17x22
|
3.4, 6.5, 9.5
|
9
|
122
|
2
|
[15]
|
51x42
|
3, 4.77, 5.78
|
3.2
|
85.74
|
<5
|
[10]
|
43 x 43
|
2, 4, 6, 8
|
6.52
|
127.6
|
5.27
|
Proposed
UWB patch
antenna
|
72 x 63
|
2, 4, 5.8, 7.4
|
7.8
|
141
|
5.87
|