Knowledge of obstetric fistula and its associated factors among women of reproductive age in Northwestern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1346413/v1

Abstract

Background: Obstetric fistula is one of the major maternal health challenges in low and middle-income countries, especially in Ethiopia where child marriage and access to a health facility are main challenges. Obstetric fistula is common among teenage mothers that results in a vast social, economic and cultural sequel. In Ethiopia, particularly in the study area, there is a paucity of research evidence on women's knowledge about obstetric fistula. Therefore, this study aimed to assess women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula and its associated factors at Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia.

Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted at Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia. Systematic sampling method was used to recruit 784 women in the reproductive age from six rural and one urban kebeles. Data were collected using pre-tested structured questionnaires through face-to-face interview method. Descriptive statistics, binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed by using SPSS version 24.

Results: Of the study participants who had good knowledge about obstetric fistula was found to be 36.4% (95%CI: 32.9%-39.7%). Women who had completed primary education (AOR:3.47, 95%CI:2.01-5.98), secondary and above education (AOR:3.30, 95%CI:1.88-5.80), being a student (AOR: 6.78, 95%CI:3.88-11.86), get counseling about obstetric fistula (AOR:6.22, 95%CI: 3.78-10.24), participated in pregnant women’s conference (AOR:3.36, 95%CI: 1.99-5.66), had antenatal care follow-up (AOR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.39-4.13), being an urban resident (AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.33-7.66), and having access to TV/Radio (AOR:1.68, 95%CI:1.10-2.60) were significantly associated with women's good knowledge about obstetric fistula.

Conclusions: One-third of women have good knowledge about obstetric fistula. Therefore, empowering women in education, promoting antenatal care, and reinforcing pregnant women's counselling conference platforms could substantially optimize women's knowledge of obstetric fistula

Background

Obstetric fistula is a hole between the vagina and bladder, and/or between the vagina and rectum, which results in continuous leakage of urine or stool into the vaginal vault [1]. It is predominantly caused by injury during childbirth, resulting in an abnormal opening between the vagina and the bladder which is vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) or rectum (rectovaginal fistula (RVF) [2]. Obstetric fistula which is largely caused by prolonged and obstructed labor, is an indicator of the health system failing to provide accessible, timely, and appropriate intrapartum care [1, 3], especially in developing countries where access to and use of obstetric care is limited [4]. Among all maternal morbidities, obstetric fistula is considered the most devastating adversely affects both the Physical and Mental health of the women [5]. The constant leakage of urine, faces, or both cause women who have a fistula to be frequently abandoned, and is a highly debilitating condition, with women often ostracized [6, 7]. Physical and psychological sufferings adversely affect the quality of women’s lives in such a catastrophic way that they are sometimes described as dead women walking [8].

Globally for every maternal death, an additional 20–30 women develop a serious pregnancy-related complication, of these severe maternal morbidities, obstetric fistula is one of the most common devastating conditions [2], occurring with an estimated incidence of 50,000–100,000 each year [1, 9]. Currently, at least 2 million women in developing countries are living with untreated obstetrical fistulas [10, 11]. An estimated incidence of 30,000–130,000 obstetric fistula incidence in sub-Saharan Africa every year, which accounts more than 60% of overall burden. [11, 12].

In Ethiopia, more than 110, 000 women have suffered from obstetric fistula, yielding the lifetime risk of experiencing obstetric fistula to be 1060 per 100,000 women [13]. Of these, only 2000 (2%) women get treatment in the last 3 years. These data imply that if no new cases occur, and with the current rate, it will take at least 55 years to treat the existing patients in Ethiopia [6]. Ending obstetric fistula is one of the critical measures to achieve the third Sustainable Development goal (SDGs) by 2030[14]. As result, the Ethiopian government devised and implemented several strategies such as reducing teenage pregnancies, improving access to obstetric care, creating awareness in the community about obstetric fistula complications, and instituting treatment modalities to prevent and control obstetric fistula [15, 16]. Yet, there have been between 3,300 and 3,750 new cases of obstetric fistula each year [15].

The burden of untreated obstetric fistula also varies among the regions with 1.2% in the Oromia region, 1.5% in Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Region (SNNPR), and 1.6% in Tigray [13]. The highest prevalence of untreated obstetric fistula in 2016 was found in the Amhara region with 230 cases per 100,000 women of childbearing age [17]. Thus, lack of awareness among communities, especially the vulnerable groups about the risk factors, prevention methods, and treatable of obstetric fistula is desperately needed to prevent the cases and also minimize further complications and to improve timely treatment-seeking behavior [13].

Despite this effect, the knowledge level of the childbearing women on obstetric fistula and factors affecting understanding about the disease entity remains a challenge in Ethiopia, especially in the Amhara region where the burden is unacceptably high [17]. This deters efforts to integrate women with fistula in their communities before and after surgery for the condition. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to assess women’s knowledge level about obstetric fistula and its associated factors at Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia.

Methods

Study design, and setting

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in July 2021 at Banja District, Awi Zone, Amhara Regional State, Northwestern Ethiopia. Banja District is one of the Districts which is located 447 Kilometers away from Addis Ababa and 120 kilometers away from Bahir Dar in Northwestern Ethiopia. According to the Zonal Health Department report (2020), Banja District has a total of 100,836 population, and women (15-49years) account for 23,777 (23.6%). The district, comprised of 25 rural and 2 urban sub-districts or kebeles (smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia). The district has 6 functional health centers, 25 functional satellite health posts, 3 private medium clinics, and 2 private drug stores and one general hospital [18].

Eligibility for participation and sampling size 

Women of the reproductive age group (15-49 years) who had been living in Banja District for at least six months at their respective sub-districts and registered by health extension program (had family folders) were eligible and included in this study. Nevertheless, women who were severely ill and unable to give a response during the data collection period were excluded from the study. A single population proportion formula was used to determine the sample size using parameters; the knowledge of obstetric fistula among women 36.4% [19], 5% margin of error,  95% significance level and considering a design effect of two and 10% potential non-response compensation. The final sample size for this study was 784 women in the reproductive age. 

Sampling methods

One urban and six rural sub-districts were randomly selected out of 27 total sub-districts in Banja District. A total of 7759 women in the reproductive age at households level were identified as eligible from registered family folder from respective satellite health posts of selected sub-districts.    A sampling frame was constructed using the women’s list from family folder which was regularly updated through collaborative effort of the sub-districts administrative bodies and health extension workers. The family folder comprised of household number (unique ID), sociodemographic characteristics of each household member, and also vital events. Hereafter, the calculated sample size was proportionally allocated to the identified eligible households at each sub-distrits. The sampling frame was constructed based on identified eligible women for each kebeles. Eventually, systematic sampling was used to select participants based on a sampling interval of (k=10). The sampling procedure is schematically presented using flow diagram (Figure 1).

 Data collection procedure   

Data were collected using an face-to-face interviewer-administered pretested structured questionnaire containing socio-demographic characteristics, obstetrics-related characteristics, and knowledge-related characteristics which were adapted from reviewing relevant literature [19-26]. Fifteen data collectors and three supervisors who can speak and write both Amharic and “Awigna” language were used as data collectors. The English language questionnaire was translated into two local dialects (Amharic and “Awigna” by language experts and back-translated to English to check its consistency. Fifteen data collectors and three supervisors who can speak and understand both local dialects were deployed to collect data. To ensure data quality, each data collector went through a three-day study training workshop about the objectives of the study and the data collection techniques. Each day, supervisors checked the completeness of the observational data collected. A pre-test was done outside of the study area on 5% of the sample size to check the consistency of the tool. Then, correction and modification of the instrument were undertaken accordingly. Moreover, double data entry had done for its validity and comparison with the original data.

Outcome variable measurement

Obstetrical fistula  is an abnormal opening between a woman’s vagina and bladder and/or rectum, that results in the continuous involuntary leakage of either urine or faeces into the vaginal vault [26, 27]. Regarding knowledge of obstetric fistula: women's comprehensive knowledge about obstetric fistula was measured using ten questions with 30 items that mainly comprised of ever heard of obstetric fistula, know the type of obstetric fistula, cause/risk factors, sign and symptom, treatment and prevention of obstetric fistula. The responses for each of the items was scored as “1= correct answer” and “0=wrong answers.” Each item was then summed up and the mean score was computed. Finally, women’s knowledge above mean score were categorized as ‘good knowledge about obstetric fistula’, and those women who scored below the mean were categorized as ‘poor knowledge of obstetric fistula’.

Data processing and statistical analysis

Collected data were entered into EpiData version 4.2 and exported into SPSS Version 25 for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive statistics were applied to compute frequency, proportion, mean, and standard deviation. Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to check which variables have association with the outcome variable (i.e., women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula). To control for possible confounding factors, variables with a P-value of ≤0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in in the final model of multiple logistic regression analysis. The goodness of fit was tested by Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic and Omnibus tests [29]. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) at 95% CI and a p-value <0.05 was used to declare significant association with women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants

In this study, a total of 784 women of reproductive age were participated, yielding an overall response rate of 98.6% (773). The mean age of the women was 33.03 (±9.61) years. Two-third (66.4%) of women and 79.3% of husbands were farmers. The majority (94.7%) of women were Orthodox Christianity religion followers, and 69.3% of women were married (Table 1).

Obstetrics related characteristics

The median age at first marriage was 16 with IQR 5 with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 26 years. The median age at first pregnancy was 18 with IQR 4 with a minimum of 13 and a maximum of 30 years. The median age at first childbirth was 19 with IQR 4 with a minimum of 14 and a maximum of 31 years. Of 773 participants, 327(42.3%) and 564(73.0%) women were grand multigravidas and multiparous respectively. Women who had history of abortion and stillbirths were 16.7% and 9.2% respectively. More than three-fourth (78.1%) of women gave birth at health institutions, and two-third of the participants described that lack of transportation was the main reason for giving birth at home. The majority (94.7%) of women delivered their baby. Only 23.5%, n=260) of women got counseling about obstetric fistula once upon a time. In addition, 41.4% of women participated in a monthly regular pregnant women’s conference led by health extension workers (Table 2).

Women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula

The overall women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula in the study area was 36.4% (95% CI: 32.9%-39.7%) (Figure 2).

The most frequently cited sign and symptoms of obstetric fistula were urinary incontinency (33.0%) and faecal incontinence (32.7%). Regarding risk factors, prolonged labor (26.9%) and child marriage (26.8%) were frequently mentioned risk factors for obstetric fistula. Delaying the age of first pregnancy (34.4%) cessation of harmful traditional practices like female genital mutilation (30.4%) were frequently mentioned prevention methods of obstetric fistula by the study participants (Table 3). 

Factors Associated with Knowledge of Women of Reproductive Age about Obstetrics Fistula

Ten variables (women's level of education, women's occupation, getting counselling about obstetric fistula, history of abortion, history of stillbirth, postnatal follow-up, participated in pregnant women conference, ANC follow-up, residence and having TV/radio) were variables showing significant association at a p-value of ≤0.25. After controlling the confounding variables, this study identified six independent factors affecting the women’s’ knowledge level of the obstetric fistula. These were women's level of education, women's occupation, getting counseling about obstetric fistula, participating in pregnant women conferences, ANC follow-up, residence, and having TV/radio. Women who had completed primary education (AOR: 3.47, 95%CI: 2.01-5.98) and secondary education and above (AOR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.88-5.80) were 3 times more likely to have good knowledge about obstetric fistula than women who unable to read and write. The odds of knowledge about obstetric fistula were about 6.78 times higher among those study participants who were a student as compared to farmers (AOR: 6.78, 95%CI: 3.88-11.86). Similarly, the odds of knowledge about obstetric fistula were higher among participants who get counseling about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterparts (AOR: 6.22, 95%CI: 3.78-10.24). Women who participated in pregnant women’s conferences were 3.36 times more likely to be knowledgeable about obstetric fistula than those who have not participated at pregnant women conferences (AOR:  3.36, 95%CI: 1.99-5.66). Women who had ANC follow-up history at time of pregnancy so far were 2.40 times more likely to be knowledgeable about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterparts (AOR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.39-4.13). Those women who were urban dwellers were 3.19 times more likely knowledgeable than rural dwellers (AOR: 3.19, 95% CI: 1.33-7.66). Women who have access to mass media (TV/radio program) had also a higher odds of knowledge level about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterpart (AOR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.10-2.60) (Table 4).  

Discussion

The present study determined the level of women’s knowledge on obstetric fistula and its associated factors in northwestern Ethiopia. Only one-in-three women, 36.4% %;95% CI: 32.9%-39.7%) were found to be knowledgeable about obstetric fistula in the study area. Women's level of education, women's occupation, counseling about obstetric fistula, participation in pregnant women’s conferences, ANC follow-up, residence, and having access to mass media remained as predictors of women’s’ knowledge about obstetric fistula. 

This prevalence of knowledge level of obstetric fistula is in line with the study conducted in Burkina Faso (36%) [19]. However, the present study finding  is higher than studies reported from Ghana (29%) [22] and Cameroon (23.2 %) [30]. This difference might be attributed to variation in the study nature, sociodemographic characteristics of participants of the study, and differences in sample size, for instance, small study participants were enrolled in the study reported from Ghana. In contrary, the finding of this study is lower than the studies done in Nigeria (57.8%) [31], and in Ethiopia: Benchesheka zone (40.8%) [16], and the Southeastern zone of the Tigray (41.2%) [32]. 

In this study, the educational level of the women was significantly associated with the odds of having knowledge about obstetric fistula. Accordingly, women who attended primary education, and secondary education and above were 3.47 and 3.30 times more likely knowledgeable about obstetric fistula as compared to women who cannot read and write. This finding is consistent with previous studies reported from Ghana [22] Burkina Faso [19], and the Benchesheka zone, Ethiopia [16], and the Southeastern zone of the Tigray region [32] It is now widely accepted that keeping girls in schools, especially, ensuring that they complete at least primary education, contributes to women empowerment, curtails harmful traditional practices such as child marriage, promotes gender equality and reduces incidences of maternal morbidity and mortality, including obstetric fistula [33, 34]. Education, even at the basic level, provides an opportunity to realize obstetric fistula and reduces gaps in knowledge about fistula, and prevents its occurrence. Furthermore, schooling even basic primary education has long been noted as an important medium for propagating health information, especially sexual health education [35]. 

Consistent with the previous study [36], the occupation of the women is significantly associated with the women's knowledge level about obstetric fistula. In doing so, the odds of being knowledgeable about obstetric fistula were 6.78 times more common among participants who are students by their occupation compared to those who are farmers. This might be due to students might take information from their teachers, school relatives and courses about obstetric fistula or, students can easily understand the concept through reading.

The finding of this study noted that women who had ever participated in pregnant women conferences were 3.36 times more likely knowledgeable about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterparts. The finding of this study bears similarity with a study conducted in the Benchesheka zone, Ethiopia [37]. This is due to the fact that the pregnant women's conference is one of the widely recognized platforms, where health personnel provide health information about the broad spectrum of maternal heath in the form of health education. 

According to this study, the knowledge level of obstetric fistula is significantly associated with counseling about obstetric fistula. Women who get counseling about obstetric fistula were about six times more likely knowledgeable about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterparts. This is explained by receiving counseling services about obstetric fistula increase in women’s knowledge about obstetric fistula and fistula prevention, speaks to the benefit of having one-on-one counseling with a trained individual during which perceptions and misconceptions can be addressed. In addition, counseling creates a conducive environment for clients to develop goals for health preservation and dissemination of information about fistula within their communities that they did not have before counseling [38].   

According to this study, the knowledge level of obstetric fistula is higher in urban areas (75.9% in urban vs 33.4% in rural). This finding is in line with the study conducted in Burkina Faso [19]. This might be due to being an urban resident would offer a chance to access information about health and health-related issues including awareness about obstetric fistula, as most of the health facilities are confined to urban areas. On the other hand, women living in rural areas could have lower access and exposure to mass media which might further reduce their level of awareness and knowledge on health-related issues [39]. 

It is important to note that mass media such as TV, radio, and newsletters have become a significant source for raising awareness of the community about health and health-related issues including obstetric fistula. Exposure to media communication also increases the uptake of maternal health services these services directly create an opportunity for promoting health education in various regards [40]. Similarly, this study found out that, women who have access to TV/radio were 1.68 times more likely knowledgeable about obstetric fistula as compared to their counterparts. 

Having antenatal care follow-up is another determinant factor for knowledge of obstetric fistula among women of reproductive age. Accordingly, the odds of knowledge about obstetric fistula were 2.4 times more common among women who have antenatal care follow-up as compared to those who haven’t antenatal care follow-up. This finding is in congruent with the study conducted in India [41], Ghana [22], Benchesheka zone, Ethiopia [37, 42]. This is due to the fact that utilization of maternal health care services such as ANC is an entry point for women to have a greater opportunity to be exposed to health education and to dissemination structured and targeted messages on the health of women and utilization of ANC services that also targets information about obstetric fistula. 

Strength and limitation of the study

This study was conducted at the community-based house-to-house level, comprised of both urban and rural resident participants, applied probability sampling method with a scientifically sound approach for sample size determination for generalization can be taken as strength of the study. Despite this strength, the cause-and-effect relationship may be affected by temporality issues due to the nature of the cross-sectional study design and the response of participants might be affected by recall bias. 

Conclusion

In this study, the overall knowledge of obstetric fistula among reproductive-age women was low. Women's level of education, women's occupation, getting counseling about obstetric fistula, participated in pregnant women conferences, having antenatal care follow-up, being from an urban resident, and having TV/radio were variables that have a significant association with knowledge of women's about obstetric fistula. Therefore, empowering women in education, promoting antenatal care, and reinforcing pregnant women's counseling conference platforms could substantially optimize women's knowledge of obstetric fistula.

Abbreviations

ANC: Antenatal Care; IHRERC: Institutional Health Research Ethics Review Committee; RVF: Recto Vaginal Fistula; SDGs: Sustainable Development Goals; SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences; VVF: Vesico Vaginal Fistula; SNNPR:Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Region .

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Health Research Ethical Review Committee (IHRERC: 065/2021), College of Health and Medical Science, Haramaya University. The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki’s. Informed verbal and written consent were obtained from each study participant (women) for their willingness to be included in the study. Consent from parents/legal gardian and assent from them were obtained from study participants whose age younger than 18 years old, and also not attended formal education. Permission was obtained from Awi zone Health Department and then Banja District and respective kebeles administration accordingly before conducting participant recruitment for interview. Participant’s information is kept confidential anonymously.  

Consent for publication:

Not applicable  

Availability of data and materials

The participants de-identified data used for current study will be available upon submitting reasonable request from the corresponding author (MT) in either SPSS or Stata format and as per the permission obtained from senior project principals (AS, TA). 

Computing interests: 

All authors have declared no computing interest. 

Funding: 

This study was supported by the government of Ethiopia tenable at Haramaya University.   

Author’s contributions 

MT, AS & TA involved since inception of the study and design methodological approaches. MT, TA, GG, AD involved in the data management and analysis. MT and AS, GT drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the paper critically for important intellectual contents. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. 

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Haramaya University for the overall support. We would like to also thank data collectors and supervisors for their invaluable effort to make this study real. The author’s deep gratitude also goes to our study subjects who were willing and took their time to give us all the relevant information for the study.  

Authors information

(TA, GT, AS)1School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia; (MT)2Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia; (GG)3School of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia; and (AD)4School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.

References

  1. Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH: Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. International urogynecology journal2012, 23(4):387-394.
  2. Ahmed S, Tunçalp Ö: Burden of obstetric fistula: from measurement to action. The Lancet Global Health2015, 3(5):e243-e244.
  3. Andargie AA, Debu A: Determinants of obstetric fistula in Ethiopia. Afr Health Sci2017, 17(3):671-680.
  4. Pope R, Bangser M, Requejo JH: Restoring dignity: social reintegration after obstetric fistula repair in Ukerewe, Tanzania. Global public health2011, 6(8):859-873.
  5. Rundasa DN, Wolde TF, Ayana KB, Worke AF: Awareness of obstetric fistula and associated factors among women in reproductive age group attending public hospitals in southwest Ethiopia, 2021. Reproductive health2021, 18(1):183.
  6. Maheu-Giroux M, Filippi V, Samadoulougou S, Castro MC, Maulet N, Meda N, Kirakoya-Samadoulougou F: Prevalence of symptoms of vaginal fistula in 19 sub-Saharan Africa countries: a meta-analysis of national household survey data. The Lancet Global Health2015, 3(5):e271-e278.
  7. Karateke A, Cam C, Ozdemir A, Guney B, Vatansever D, Celik C: Characteristics of obstetric fistulas and the need for a prognostic classification system. Archives of medical science: AMS2010, 6(2):253.
  8. Ahmed S, Genadry R, Stanton C, Lalonde A: Dead women walking: neglected millions with obstetric fistula. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics2007, 99:S1-S3.
  9. Jokhio AH, Rizvi RM, Rizvi J, MacArthur C: Prevalence of obstetric fistula: a population-based study in rural Pakistan. BJOG2014, 121(8):1039-1046.
  10. Treuthart MP: No Woman, No Cry-Ending the War on Women Worldwide and the International VIolence against Women Act (I-VAWA). BU Int'l LJ2015, 33:73.
  11. Animut M, Mamo A, Abebe L, Berhe MA, Asfaw S, Birhanu Z: "The sun keeps rising but darkness surrounds us": a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of women with obstetric fistula in Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health2019, 19(1):37.
  12. UNFPA E: Obstetric fistula needs assessment report: Findings from nine African countries. New York: UNFPA EngenderHealth2003.
  13. Biadgilign S, Lakew Y, Reda AA, Deribe K: A population based survey in Ethiopia using questionnaire as proxy to estimate obstetric fistula prevalence: results from demographic and health survey. Reproductive health2013, 10(1):1-8.
  14. Trautvetter GSL: Addressing the fistula treatment gap and rising to the 2030 challenge. Int J Gynecol Obstet2020, 148(suppl.1):9-15.
  15. Organisation WH: Obstetric fistula. In. Geneva, Switerland 2018.
  16. Asefa Z, Amenu D, Berhe A: Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors among Reproductive-age Group Women in Bench Sheko Zone, Southwest, Ethiopia. Community based Cross-Sectional Study. J Women’s Health Care2020, 9(509):2167-0420.2120.
  17. Demographic E: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville. Maryland, MA, USA: CSA and ICF2016.
  18. Awi zone health office: Awi zone administration health department office annual report, 2020. unpublished document. 2020.
  19. Banke-Thomas AO, Kouraogo SF, Siribie A, Taddese HB, Mueller JE: Knowledge of obstetric fistula prevention amongst young women in urban and rural Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One2013, 8(12):e85921.
  20. Tseunwo C, Mail SHW, Antaon JSS, Obama CM, Tebeu PM, Rochat CH: Obstetric Fistula Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among the Professionals of Communication in Yaounde. HEALTH SCIENCES AND DISEASE2020, 21(6).
  21. Lucy I, Kingsley C, Japari M, Aaron M, Ayobami A, Steve T: Assessment of the Knowledge and Obstetric Features of Women Affected By Obstetric Fistula at Obstetric Fistula Centre in Bingham University Teaching Hospital, Jos. Nigeria. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology2020, 1(1):1-9.
  22. Azanu WK, Dassah ET, Agbeno EK, Ofori AA, Opare-Addo HS: Knowledge of obstetric fistula among prenatal clinic attendees and midwives in Mfantsiman municipality, Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2020, 148 Suppl 1:16-21.
  23. Bello OO, Morhason-Bello IO, Lawal OO, Abdussalam RA, Ojengbede OA: Knowledge of front-line health workers on the role of urethral catheterization for primary prevention of obstetric fistula in Ibadan, Nigeria. Transl Androl Urol2019, 8(4):379-386.
  24. Martin SS, Adogaye SB, Rodrigue MB, Maurice D, Vivaldi TT, Amede SF, Marie OE, Meriam AS, Colizzi V, Gianluca R: [Study of knowledge, attitudes and practices in social reintegration of women victims of obstetric fistula: region of the far-North, Cameroon]. Pan Afr Med J2015, 20:172.
  25. Tebeu PM, de Bernis L, Boisrond L, Le Duc A, Mbassi AA, Rochat CH: [Knowledge, attitude and perception about obstetric fistula by Cameroonian women]. Prog Urol2008, 18(6):379-389.
  26. Wegner MN, Ruminjo J, Sinclair E, Pesso L, Mehta M: Improving community knowledge of obstetric fistula prevention and treatment. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2007, 99 Suppl 1:S108-111.
  27. WHO: World Health Organization; Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development/editors: Gwyneth Lewis, Luc de Bernis. In: Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development/editors: Gwyneth Lewis, Luc de Bernis. edn.; 2006.
  28. WHO: World Health Organization; Obstetric fistula: Available at:https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/10-facts-on-obstetric-fistula. In: Obstetric fistula: guiding principles for clinical management and programme development/editors: Gwyneth Lewis, Luc de Bernis. edn.; 2018.
  29. Bartlett J: The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test for logistic regression. Retrieved from The Stats Geek:http://thestatsgeekcom/2014/02/16/the-hosmer-lemeshow-goodness-offit-test-for-logistic= regression2014.
  30. Tunçalp Ö, Tripathi V, Landry E, Stanton CK, Ahmed S: Measuring the incidence and prevalence of obstetric fistula: approaches, needs and recommendations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization2014, 93:60-62.
  31. Ezeonu PO, Ekwedigwe K.C., Isikhuemen,M.E.,. Eliboh,M.O., Onoh,R.C., L. O. Lawani,L.O., .Ajah,L.O., Dimejesi,E.L.,: Awareness of Obstetric Vesicovaginal Fistula among Pregnant Women in a Rural Hospital. Advances in Reproductive Science2017, 5:39-46.
  32. Teklay BA, Gebru HB, Belay DS, Gebremeskel TG: Awareness on Risk Factor for Obstetric Fistula and Associated Factors Among Reproductive Age Women in South Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia, 2020. Cross Sectional Study. 2021.
  33. Shefren JM: The tragedy of obstetric fistula and strategies for prevention. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology2009, 200(6):668-671.
  34. Capes T, Ascher‐Walsh C, Abdoulaye I, Brodman M: Obstetric fistula in low and middle income countries. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine2011, 78(3):352-361.
  35. Cutler DM, Lleras-Muney A: Education and health: evaluating theories and evidence. In.: National bureau of economic research Cambridge, Mass., USA; 2006.
  36. Anest T: US medical students' knowledge of obstetric fistula in developing countries. The University of Texas School of Public Health; 2009.
  37. Asefa Z ADaB, A.;: Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors among Reproductive-age Group Women in Bench Sheko Zone, Southwest, Ethiopia. W om ens H e a lt h Ca re2020, 9:509.
  38. Johnson KA, Turan JM, Hailemariam L, Mengsteab E, Jena D, Polan ML: The role of counseling for obstetric fistula patients: lessons learned from Eritrea. Patient education and counseling2010, 80(2):262-265.
  39. Masresha SA, Kassaw MW, Alen GD: Adolescent Marriage in Northeast Ethiopia: The Case of Delanta District. Global Social Welfare2021, 8(2):171-179.
  40. Agegnehu CD, Tesema GA: Effect of mass media on comprehensive knowledge of HIV/AIDS and its spatial distribution among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia: a spatial and multilevel analysis. BMC public health2020, 20(1):1-12.
  41. Swain D, Parida SP, Jena SK, Das M, Das H: Prevalence and risk factors of obstetric fistula: implementation of a need-based preventive action plan in a South-eastern rural community of India. BMC Womens Health2020, 20(1):40.
  42. Beyene FY, FeyisaW.,Azezu Nigusie,A., and Tesfa A.: Awareness and its Associated Factors of Obstetrics Fistula among antenatal care attendees in Injibara Town Health Institutions, Awi Zone, North West, Ethiopia. Maternal & Fetal Medicin2019, 10.21203/rs.2.14146/v1.

Tables

Table 1

 Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants in Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia, 2021(n=773).

Variables         

Category         

Women’s age (Years)

15-19

107

13.8

20-24

66

8.5

25-29

109

14.1

30-34

118

15.3

35-39

145

18.8

40-44

120

15.5

45-49

108

14.0

Current marital status

Married

536

69.3

Divorced

54

7.0

Widowed 

39

5.1

Single 

144

18.6

Religion

Orthodox

732

94.7

Muslim

19

2.5

Protestant 

22

2.8

Womens education status

No formal education

405

52.4

Read and write

111

14.4

Primary education

123

15.9

Secondary education

111

14.3

College and above

23

3.0

Women’s occupation status

Housewife 

51

6.6

Government employee

22

2.8

Private employee

48

6.2

Farmer

513

66.4

Student

139

18.0

Husband educational status (n=536)

No formal education

284

53.0

Read and write

121

22.6

Primary education

66

12.3

Secondary education

35

6.5

College and above

30

5.6

Husbands occupation  (n=536)

Farmer

425

79.3

Government employee

28

5.2

Private employee

52

9.7

Daily labourer

19

3.6

Student

12

2.2

Residence

 

Urban

58

7.5

Rural

715

92.5

Wealth index

Poorest

158

20.4

Poor

152

19.7

Medium

70

9.1

Rich

279

36.1

Richest

114

14.7

 

Table 2

 Obstetrics characteristics of women of reproductive age in Banja District, Awi zone, Northwestern Ethiopia, 2021(n=773).

Variables        

Category        

%

Number of pregnancy 

Nulligravida

145

18.8

Primigravida

57

7.3

Multigravida

244

31.6

Grand multigravida 

327

42.3

Number of delivery 

Nulliparous 

148

19.1

Primiparous 

61

7.9

Multiparous 

564

73.0

History of abortion 

Yes 

129

16.7

No 

644

83.3

History of stillbirth 

Yes 

71

9.2

No 

702

90.8

ANC follow-up (n=628)

Yes 

316

50.3

No 

312

49.7

Number of antenatal care visit(n=316)

1 visit

16

5.1

2-3 visit

190

60.1

≥4 visit

110

34.8

Place of delivery (n=625)

Health institution 

488

78.1

Home 

137

21.9

Reason to delivery at home

Lack of transport

95

66.4

No nearby facility 

37

25.9

Others*

11

7.7

Mode of delivery (n=625)

SVD

592

94.7

Instrumental delivery

15

2.4

Cesarean section delivery

18

2.9

Postnatal follow-up (n=625)

Yes 

354

56.6

No 

271

43.4

Ever used family planning

Yes 

336

43.47

No 

437

56.53

Get counseling about obstetric fistula

Yes 

182

23.5

No 

591

76.5

When do you get the counseling?

Prenatal

93

45.4

Antenatal

100

48.7

Postnatal 

12

5.9

Ever participated in a pregnant women conference?

Yes

260

33.63

No

513

66.37

Time take in a minute to reach a health facility

≤ 30 minutes

248

32.1

>30 minutes 

525

67.9

Others*; poor road condition and poor maternal decision-making power, SVD: spontaneous vaginal delivery.

 

Table 3

 Knowledge about obstetric fistula among women in Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia, 2021(n=773).

Variables

Category

n

%

Ever heard of obstetric fistula?

Yes

299

38.7

No 

474

61.3

Source of information

Health professional

198

25.6

School

132

17.1

Mass media (radio, TV)

43

5.6

Family/friend

37

4.8

Others*

12

1.6

Know the type of fistula?

Yes

105

13.6

No 

668

86.4

Type of obstetric fistula

Recto-Vaginal Fistula (RVF)

4

3.8

Vesico-Vaginal Fistula (VVF)

6

5.7

Both

95

90.5

Know the sign/symptoms of obstetric fistula?

Yes

256

33.1

No

517

66.9

 

Know sign/symptoms of obstetric fistula

 

Urinary incontinency

 

255

 

33.0

Faecal incontinency

253

32.7

Vulvar irritation

86

11.1

Foul-smelling vaginal discharge

172

22.3

Leakage of gas/faeces into the vagina

79

10.2

Pain while having sex

17

2.2

Know the causes/risk factors of obstetric fistula?

Yes

228

29.5

No

545

70.5

Causes/risk factors of obstetric fistula

Prolonged labor

208

26.9

Obstructed labor

151

19.5

Childhood malnutrition

30

3.9

Operative delivery

17

2.2

Early marriage

207

26.8

Younger age

9

1.2

Home delivery

163

21.1

Unspaced childbirth

32

4.1

Lack of obstetrics care

80

10.3

Is obstetric fistula preventable?

Yes

291

37.6

No

482

62.4

Prevention methods of obstetric fistula

Delaying the age of first pregnancy

266

34.4

Cessation of harmful traditional practices

235

30.4

Timely visit/seeking of skilled obstetric care

223

28.8

Avoiding poverty

149

19.3

Empowering women and female education

191

24.7

Skilled care at birth

188

24.3

Family planning use

119

15.4

Is obstetric fistula a treatable condition?

Yes

325

42.0

No

448

58.0

Type of treatment mentioned

Medical treatment

317

39.5

Overall knowledge about obstetric fistula

Good knowledge                      

281

36.4

Poor knowledge            

492

63.6

Others*: fistula victim, community meeting, TV (television). 

Table 4

 Factors associated with knowledge of obstetric fistula among women in Banja District, Northwestern Ethiopia, 2021(n=773).

Variables 

Knowledge of obstetric fistula

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

Good (%)

Poor (%)

Women's level of education

Can’t read and write

94(23.2)

311(76.8)

1

1

Can read and write

35(31.5)

76(68.5)

1.52(0.96-2.42)

0.97(0.54-1.75)

Primary education

67(54.5)

56(45.5)

3.96(2.59-6.04)

3.47(2.01-5.98)*

Secondary education and above

85(63.4)

49(36.6)

5.74(3.77-8.74)

3.30(1.88-5.80)*

Women's occupation

    Government employee 

17(77.3)

5(22.7)

8.46(3.07-23.36)

1.78(0.47-6.73)

    Student 

85(61.2)

54(38.8)

3.92(2.65-5.79)

6.78(3.88-11.86)*

    Private employee

12(25.0)

36(75.0)

0.83(0.42-1.64)

0.33(0.13-1.82)

    Housewife

20(39.2)

31(60.8)

1.61(0.89-2.91)

0.51(0.19-1.37)

    Farmer

147(28.7)

366(71.3)

1

1

Getting counselling about obstetric fistula

Yes 

133(73.1)

49(26.9)

8.12(5.57-11.84)

6.22(3.78-10.24)*

No 

148(25.0)

443(75.0)

1

1

History of abortion

 

 

 

 

Yes 

43(33.9)

84(66.1)

0.87(0.59-1.31)

1.47(0.85-2.54)

No 

238(36.8)

408(63.2)

1

1

History of stillbirth

 

 

 

 

Yes 

18(25.4)

53(74.6)

0.56(0.32-0.99)

0.54(0.24-1.22)

No 

263(37.5)

439(62.5)

1

1

Postnatal follow-up

Yes 

157(44.4)

197(55.6)

1.89(1.41-2.55)

0.63(0.34-1.16)

No 

124(29.6)

295(70.4)

1

1

Participated in pregnant women conference

Yes 

146(56.2)

114(43.8)

3.58(2.62-4.91)

3.36(1.99-5.66)*

No 

135(26.3)

378(73.7)

1

1

ANC follow-up

Yes 

163(51.6)

153(48.4)

3.06(2.26-4.15)

2.40(1.39-4.13)*

No 

118(25.8)

339(74.2)

1

1

Residence 

Urban 

44(75.9)

14(24.1)

6.34(3.41-11.80)

3.19(1.33-7.66)*

Rural 

237(33.1)

478(66.9)

1

1

Having TV/radio

Yes 

120(51.3)

114(48.7)

2.47(1.80-3.39)

1.68(1.10-2.60)*

No 

161(29.9)

378(70.1)

1

1

* Statistically significant at a p-value of less than 0.05.