2.1. N, P and K of Mango
Effects of treatments was significant on nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentration of mango. Treatments T8 and T9 were significant for improvement in N of mango from control. Significant increase in N was also noted in T5 and T6 from control for N in mango. Application of T7, T3, T2 and T4 also remained significant for N improvement over control (Fig. 1). In case of phosphorus, a significant decrease was observed by the application of different levels of Zn. No significant change was observed in T3, T6 and T9 where highest level of Zn was applied. It was noted that phosphorus concentration was also significantly higher in T1, T4 and T7 over T2, T5 and T8 (Zn applied) (Fig. 2). Treatments T6, T8 and T9 remained significantly better than T1 for K concentration. Application of T3, T7 and T5 were also significantly different over T1 for K concentration (Fig. 3). Furthermore, for K concentration, T2 and T4 different significantly better from T1. Maximum increase in N, P and K was noted in T9, T1 and T9 as compared to T1, T9 and T1 respectively. Pearson correlation showed that N was positive and significant in correlation with K. However, negative significant correlation was noted between N and P. Principal component analysis showed that N and K were closely associated with T8 and T9. However, P was more closely associated with T1 and T4.
2.2. Na, Ca and Fe of Mango
Effects of treatments was significant on sodium (Na), calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe) concentration of mango. Treatments T1 and T4 were significant for improvement in Na of mango from control. Significant increase in Na was also noted in T2, T3 and T5 from control for Na in mango (Fig. 4). Application of T6, T7, T8 and T9was non-significant for Na improvement with each other. In case of calcium, a significant decrease was also observed by the application of different levels of Zn. No significant change was observed among T6 and T8, however, minimum Ca was noted in T9 where highest level of Zn was applied (Fig. 5). Application of T2, T3, T4 and T5 were also significantly decrease Ca over T1. Furthermore, for Fe concentration, all the treatments showed significant decline as compared to T1 (Fig. 6). Maximum decrease in Zn, Ca and Fe was noted in T9 as compared to T1. Pearson correlation showed that Ca was positive and significant in correlation with Fe and Na. Similarly, positive significant correlation was noted between Na and Fe. Principal component analysis showed that Na, Fe and Ca were closely associated with T2.
2.3. Protein, Fats, Ash and Fiber contents of Mango
Effects of treatments was significant on protein, fats, ash and fiber contents of mango. Treatments T9 were significant for improvement in protein contents of mango from T1 control. Significant increase in protein was also observed in T7 and T8 from control for protein contents in mango. Application of T2 to T5 was significant as well for protein contents improvement with T1 (Fig. 7). In case of ash content, a significant increase was noted in T9 and T8 over T1. No significant change was observed among T8 and T7, for ash contents with each other. However, T5 and T6 also differed significantly for ash contents over T1 control. Statistical analyses also confirmed that T2 and T4 were non-significant over control T1 for ash contents in mango (Fig. 8). Treatments T6 and T9 remained significantly better than T1 for fat contents. Application of T6, T5 and T8 were also significantly increase fat contents over T1. It was observed that T2 did not differ significantly for fat contents in mango over T1 (Fig. 9). For fiber contents of mango, T5, T7, T8 and T9 were statistically alike with each other but were significantly different over control T1. Application of T3, T4 and T6 also remained significant for improvement in fiber contents over T1. However, T2 remained non-significant for fiber contents over T1 control (Fig. 10). Maximum increase in protein, fats, ash and fiber contents was noted in T9 as compared to T1. Pearson correlation showed that protein, fats, ash and fiber contents were positive and significant in correlation with each other. Principal component analysis showed that protein, fats, ash and fiber contents were closely associated with T8.
2.4. Moisture, TSS, TPC and antioxidant activity in Mango
Effects of treatments was significant on moisture, TSS, TPC and antioxidant activity in mango. Treatments T9, T8, T6 were significant for improvement in moisture contents of mango from T1 control. Significant increase in protein was also observed in T7 and T8 from control for protein contents in mango. Application of T3, T4and T5 was significant as well for moisture contents improvement from T1. Application of T2 and T7 were statistically alike with each other but differed significantly from T6 control for moisture contents (Fig. 11). In case of total soluble solids (TSS), a significant increase was noted in T6 and T9 over T1. No significant change was observed among T2 and T1, for TSS with each other (Fig. 12). However, T3, T4 and T5 also differed significantly for TSS over T1 control. Statistical analyses also confirmed that T8 and T9 were non-significant with each other but significant over control T1 for total phenolic contents (TPC) in mango (Fig. 13). Treatments T6 and T7 cause significant decrease in TPC than T1. Application of T4 and T5 were also significantly decrease TPC over T1. No significant change in TPC among T1, T2 and T3. Furthermore, for antioxidants activity, all the treatments showed significant decline as compared to T1, T4 and T7 (Fig. 14). Maximum increase in moisture, TSS, TPC and antioxidant activity was noted in T9 as compared to T1. Pearson correlation showed that moisture and TSS were positive and significant in correlation with each other. However, antioxidant activity and TPC showed negative significant correlation with moisture, TSS. Principal component analysis showed that moisture, TSS and antioxidant activity were closely associated with T6, T8 and T9, T8 and T1 and T7respectively.
2.5. Acidity, SC and Vitamin C in Mango
Effects of treatments was significant on acidity, sugar content (SC) and vitamin C in mango. All the treatments significantly decreased acidity of mango from T1 control except T4 and T7 (Fig. 15). In case of SC a significant increase was noted in T9 over T1. No significant change was observed among T5, T6 and T8 but differed significantly from T1, for SC. In addition, T2, T3 and T4 also differed significantly for SC over T1 control (Fig. 16). Statistical analyses also confirmed that T2, T4 and T7 were non-significant with each other and T1 control for vitamin C in mango (Fig. 17). Treatments T3, T5, T6, T8 and T9 significantly decreased vitamin C than T1. Maximum increase in sugar content (SC) was noted in T9 as compared to T1. However, T9 gave maximum decrease in acidity and vitamin C in mango as compared to T1. Pearson correlation showed that sugar content showed negative significant correlation with acidity and vitamin C (Fig. 18). Principal component analysis showed that acidity, sugar content (SC) and vitamin C were closely associated with T4, T6 and T7 respectively (Fig. 19).