In this case, SIAD due to pNET ectopically producing ADH was clinically suspected and confirmed by pathology, highlighting the adoption of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT and vasopressin immunohistochemical staining in the evaluation of etiology of SIAD.
Hyponatremia is mainly an abnormality of water balance with a relative excess of body water compared to the total sodium content in the body[14]. Sodium ions are the main component of osmotic pressure in the extracellular fluid. The main physiological mechanism of regulating serum osmotic pressure are thirst, as well as ADH released by the pituitary[14]. ADH is a polypeptide synthesized by the supraventricular nucleus and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and secreted by the posterior pituitary gland. The main reaction of the kidney to vasopressin is the increase in the water permeability of the kidney’s collecting tubules. Hyponatremia is usually related to a disorder of ADH that governs water balance[14].
SIAD is one of the important causes of hyponatremia, especially in the elderly. SIAD was firstly described by William B. Schwartz when he found that two patients with bronchogenic carcinoma had severe, unexplained hyponatremia and increased renal sodium excretion[8]. Dr. Schwartz believed that this was due to inappropriate secretion of ADH, which should have been completely stopped in the presence of obvious hyponatremia and decrease in plasma osmotic pressure, so the disease was first named SIADH[8]. Further studies showed inappropriate ADH secretion may occur as follows: 1) ADH synthesized by the supraventricular nucleus and paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and released by the posterior pituitary gland; 2) ectopic ADH secretion; 3) missense mutation in V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) causing constitutive activation of V2R and the patient’s SIAD-like clinical manifestation[15].
The essential features for SIAD diagnosis are as stated below[16]: 1) decreased effective serum osmolarity (< 275 mOsm/kg·H2O); 2) urine osmolarity > 100 mOsm/kg·H2O during hypotonicity; 3) no clinical signs of hypovolemia (no orthostasis, tachycardia, decreased skin turgor, or dry mucous membranes) or hypervolemia (no edema or ascites); 4) urine sodium > 40 mmol/L with normal diet; 5) normal thyroid and adrenal function; 6) no recent use of diuretics. In our patient, the diagnosis of SIAD was based on the results of laboratory findings combined with clinical signs and symptoms. The patient had normal head MRI findings, thyroid function test results, and glomerular filtration rate. Thus, central nervous system disorders, hypothyroidism, and renal diseases were ruled out from the possible causes of hyponatremia.
As shown above, the 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT and immunohistochemistry of vasopressin provided key information in our case. Therefore, it is essential to conduct the vasopressin immunohistochemical staining for patients who could have ADH-producing NETs. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT is a functional imaging modality used to assess well-differentiated NETs[17], which is an effective tool for locating primary tumors in NETs patients with unknown primary tumors[18]. Ga-DOTATATE has the highest affinity for SSTR2, which tends to be most overexpressed in NETs[19]. It has become the preferred imaging method for initial diagnosis, patients inclined to receive peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and localization of unknown primary tumors[17]. Moreover, a prospective study showed that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT changed the treatment of 33 patients (66%) among 50 patients who underwent this imaging procedure[20]. Thus, for staging and monitoring of NETs, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT should be considered as it is usually related to changes in treatment[20].
As far as we know, there is only one case of the ADH-producing pNET reported so far. Omalkhaire M. Alshaikh et al.[13] reported on a 52-year-old man presenting with intermittent abdominal pain. Initial findings showed a suspicious mass in the hilum of the spleen. Further, CT of the abdomen showed that the pancreas/spleen mass had increased to 7.6 cm. At that point, the blood glucose level was 6.5 mmol/L and serum sodium level was 132 mmol/L. Core biopsy confirmed a NET originating from the pancreas. The pathology of the NET was positive for pancreatic polypeptide and insulin. Four years later he developed hypoglycemia accompanied by inappropriately elevated proinsulin and insulin levels. Laboratory findings showed that serum osmolality was 250 mOsm/kg and urine osmolality was 140 mOsm/kg, which were consistent with SIAD. The autopsy was diffusely positive for vasopressin which was not observed in the original biopsy. In this patient, the ADH-producing feature of the pNET was confirmed by the autopsy, when he died of the disease nearly 9 years after the initial diagnosis. This suggests that early diagnosis of the cause resulting in hyponatremia is difficult in clinical practice.
Under most circumstances, the monism theory could help us to more accurately diagnose disease. However, hyponatremia is complicated, especially in elderly patients. In this patient, the ectopic production of ADH by the pNET, relative adrenal insufficiency, and the lack of aldosterone together resulted in hyponatremia.
The key factors that determine the management of SIAD are the severity, duration, and symptoms of hyponatremia[16]. Rapid treatment is suggested for patients with severe hyponatremia, as they can develop symptoms within 48 h[21]. The goal of the treatment, which includes 3% saline and furosemide, is to increase the serum sodium level by 1–2 mmol/L per hour. However, chronic hyponatremia should not be corrected by more than 12 mmol/L over a period of 24 h; otherwise, it may lead to osmotic demyelination syndrome[16]. Fluid restriction is essential, regardless of whether hyponatremia is severe or chronic. A vasopressin-receptor antagonist, such as tolvaptan and conivaptan, is more recently used for the treatment of SIAD[22, 23]. For the elderly, low-dose tolvaptan (7.5 mg/day) for the treatment of SIAD was effective and safe[24]. If necessary, the dosage of tolvaptan can be increased to 15–30 mg/d.
There are several limitations to our case report. First, we did not measure the ADH level due to the lack of routine ADH serum analysis in clinical practice. Second, the assessment of adrenal function was insufficient before surgery, not involving tests such as the circadian adrenocortical rhythm and the ACTH stimulation. Third, we did not receive data on the patient’s detailed serum sodium levels after discharge. Due to the influence of COVID-19 on the hospital environments as well as his advanced age, he was unable to visit our department, making follow-up visits difficult. However, we have learned that he is in good condition through telephone reports.
In conclusion, we reported a case with SIAD related to pNETs. The pNET was suggested by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-CT and confirmed by immunohistochemistry of vasopressin. This is a pNET ectopically producing ADH and leading to SIAD. Early diagnosis of the cause of hyponatremia is difficult, so the ADH-producing features of pNETs may go undetected in clinical practice. Our case highlights pNETs are possibly etiology of the hyponatremia. A systematic prospective study of SIAD should be conducted to clarify the true prevalence of this phenomenon.