Experimental Animals:
Total 48 healthy male Wister albino rats (200–250 g) were used for the experimentations which were obtained from the Central Animal House of the institution, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhopal, India. All the animals were adapted to the new environment minimum of two weeks before initiating the experiments using six animals in each group. The animal house temperature was maintained at 25°C ± 2°C with 12 hours of light and 12 hours day cycle and they were allowed to have free access to standard pellet diet and water. The present experimental study was carried out as per the Committee for the purpose of control and supervision of experiments on animals(CPCSEA) guidelines after the approval by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), AIIMS Bhopal, India (AIIMS/BHOPAL/IAEC/2017/03 Date: 10th August 2017).
Chemicals and drugs:
Chemicals Carrageenan and Formalin were obtained from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd (Mumbai, India). The Test compound Zaltoprofen was obtained from the JB Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Mumbai, India) and the standard agent Piroxicam from the Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd. (New Delhi, India).
Experimental Dosing:
All the 24 experimental rats were randomly divided into four different groups (n=6 in each group) in each model[ Figure 2].
Group I (Negative Control) were treated orally with normal saline (NS) 10 ml/kg body weight.
Group II (Positive Control) were treated orally with piroxicam 10 mg/kg body weight (PRC10).
Group III (Test-I) were treated orally with Zaltoprofen 10 mg/kg body weight (ZLT10).
Group IV (Test-II) were treated orally with Zaltoprofen 20 mg/kg body weight (ZLT20).
Experimental induction of acute and chronic inflammation:
Carrageenan-Induced Acute Inflammation:
Carrageenan induced paw oedema is the unique model of acute inflammation having large reproducibility. Inflammation was induced in rats according to previous standard research protocols [15]. Six animals of either sex in each group were used in the total four groups. Rats were administered orally 0.9% NaCl (10ml/kg), zaltoprofen (10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg), and piroxicam (10 mg/kg) dissolved in 0.9% normal saline, 1 h before carrageenan administration. After that 0.1 ml of 1% carrageenan dissolved in normal saline was injected subcutaneously into the right hind paw for the induction of acute inflammation. The average volume of the left hind paw of each mouse was measured before injecting carrageenan, and at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours after injection of carrageenan, using a digital plethysmometer (ORCHID Scientific & Innovative India, Pvt. Ltd. India)[15]. By using the following formula we have calculated the percentage of inhibition in comparison with the control group.
% Inhibition = [(Volume of oedema (control) −Volume of oedema (test)] / Volume of oedema (control) × 100.
Formalin-induced arthritis:
In the formalin-induced chronic inflammation model, paw oedema was induced by subaponeurotic administration of 0.1 ml of 2% formaldehyde 30 minutes after the oral administration of standard /test/vehicle compounds on day 1 and day 3 respectively. Experimental animals were administered daily, with test drug Zaltoprofen (10mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) and standard piroxicam (10 mg/kg) orally for 10 days. The daily changes in paw oedema or linear cross-section (LCS) of each rat, below the ankle joint, was measured daily with a digital vernier calliper (1). The difference in the paw volume on day 1 and day 10 was considered as inflammatory oedema. Volume changes in Test I, Test II and standard groups were compared with that of control and percentage inhibition was calculated.
The percentage inhibition of the inflammation was determined by the formula;
% Inhibition = 1– (dt/dc) × 100.
Statistical procedure: Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Results were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). The percentage inhibition of the inflammation was calculated for each model. Comparison between all the four different groups was done by using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test to compare the difference between groups at different time intervals. P-value less than 0.005 was considered statistically significant when compared with control (*p <0.005).