Plasma Neurofilament Light and Phosphorylated Tau 181 as Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology and Clinical Disease Progression
Background: To assess the performance of plasma neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) to inform about cerebral Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and predict clinical progression in a memory clinic setting.
Methods: Plasma NfL and p-tau181, along with established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD pathology (CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42), Aβ1-42 /Aβ1-40, total-tau (tau), and p-tau181) were measured in participants with normal cognition (CN, n=91) and memory clinic patients with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and dementia, CI, n=127). Clinical and neuropsychological evaluations were performed at inclusion and follow-up visits at 18 and 36 months, to measure decline in global cognition and progression of disease severity. Multivariate analysis assessed associations of plasma NfL and p-tau181 levels with the presence of cerebral AD pathology (a priori defined by a CSF p-tau181/Aβ1-42 > 0.0779), single CSF biomarkers, and clinical measures of disease progression.
Results: Plasma NfL levels were higher in CN participants with an AD CSF profile, and in CI participants when compared to CN non-AD participants, while p-tau181 plasma levels were higher in CI patients with AD when compared to the other participants. Plasma NfL levels correlated with CSF tau and p-tau181 in CN, and with CSF tau in CI patients. Plasma p-tau181 correlated with CSF p-tau181 in CN and with CSF biomarkers in CI participants. Compared to a reference model, adding plasma p-tau181 improved the prediction of AD in CI patients (AUC 0.861, p-value = 0.048) while adding NfL did not. Adding p-tau181, but not NfL levels, to a reference model improved prediction of cognitive decline in CI participants (AUC 0.838, p-value = 0.032). Using a plasma p-tau181 cutoff of 9.68 pg/ml the models reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.79 for AD prediction, and of 0.88 and 0.69 for the prediction of cognitive decline.
Conclusion: Plasma NfL may be useful as a marker of neuronal injury, although it is not specific for AD. P-tau181 can serve, in a memory clinic setting, as a blood-based biomarker of both cerebral AD pathology and cognitive decline. The predictive performance of both markers depends on the presence of cognitive impairment.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Posted 30 Dec, 2020
Received 21 Jan, 2021
Received 19 Jan, 2021
On 11 Jan, 2021
On 10 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 09 Jan, 2021
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 21 Dec, 2020
Plasma Neurofilament Light and Phosphorylated Tau 181 as Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology and Clinical Disease Progression
Posted 30 Dec, 2020
Received 21 Jan, 2021
Received 19 Jan, 2021
On 11 Jan, 2021
On 10 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 09 Jan, 2021
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 23 Dec, 2020
On 21 Dec, 2020
Background: To assess the performance of plasma neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181) to inform about cerebral Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and predict clinical progression in a memory clinic setting.
Methods: Plasma NfL and p-tau181, along with established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD pathology (CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42), Aβ1-42 /Aβ1-40, total-tau (tau), and p-tau181) were measured in participants with normal cognition (CN, n=91) and memory clinic patients with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and dementia, CI, n=127). Clinical and neuropsychological evaluations were performed at inclusion and follow-up visits at 18 and 36 months, to measure decline in global cognition and progression of disease severity. Multivariate analysis assessed associations of plasma NfL and p-tau181 levels with the presence of cerebral AD pathology (a priori defined by a CSF p-tau181/Aβ1-42 > 0.0779), single CSF biomarkers, and clinical measures of disease progression.
Results: Plasma NfL levels were higher in CN participants with an AD CSF profile, and in CI participants when compared to CN non-AD participants, while p-tau181 plasma levels were higher in CI patients with AD when compared to the other participants. Plasma NfL levels correlated with CSF tau and p-tau181 in CN, and with CSF tau in CI patients. Plasma p-tau181 correlated with CSF p-tau181 in CN and with CSF biomarkers in CI participants. Compared to a reference model, adding plasma p-tau181 improved the prediction of AD in CI patients (AUC 0.861, p-value = 0.048) while adding NfL did not. Adding p-tau181, but not NfL levels, to a reference model improved prediction of cognitive decline in CI participants (AUC 0.838, p-value = 0.032). Using a plasma p-tau181 cutoff of 9.68 pg/ml the models reached a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.79 for AD prediction, and of 0.88 and 0.69 for the prediction of cognitive decline.
Conclusion: Plasma NfL may be useful as a marker of neuronal injury, although it is not specific for AD. P-tau181 can serve, in a memory clinic setting, as a blood-based biomarker of both cerebral AD pathology and cognitive decline. The predictive performance of both markers depends on the presence of cognitive impairment.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3